Stage Theories of Development
Stage Theories of Development
Stage Theories of Development
Stage
Theories of
Development
• Epigenetic principle
– Idea that development progresses through
a series of interrelated stages and that
each stage has a critical period of
development
• Psychosocial crisis
– Turning points; conflict between opposing
psychological qualities
• Diffusion
– No crisis; no commitment; little self-
direction, impulsive, and low self-esteem
• Foreclosure
– No crisis; commitment made; close-minded
and accepts and endorses parental
choices and values
• Moratorium
– Crisis experienced; no commitment;
anxious, changes major often, and often
dissatisfied
• Achievement
– Crisis experienced; commitment made;
introspective, planful, logical, and high self-
esteem
Crisis
No Foreclosure Diffusion
• Scheme
– Organized pattern of behavior or thought
• Organization
– Tendency to coherently systematize and
combine processes into general systems
• Adaptation
– Process of creating a good fit between
one’s conception of reality and one’s
experiences
• Equilibration
– Tendency to organize schemes to allow
better understanding of experiences
Piaget Vygotsky
Role of More strongly More strongly
Social influenced by influenced by those
Interaction peers than by more intellectually
adults advanced
Role of Formal instruction Instruction important
Instruction does not have zone of proximal
significant impact development (ZPD)
“In Europe a woman was near death from cancer. One drug
might save her, a form of radium that a druggist in the same
town had recently discovered. The druggist was charging
$2,000, ten times what the drug cost him to make. The sick
woman’s husband, Heinz, went to everyone he knew to borrow
the money, but he could only get together about half of what it
cost. He told the druggist that his wife was dying and asked him
to sell it cheaper or let him pay later, but the druggist said “No.”
The husband got desperate and broke into the man’s store to
steal the drug for his wife. Should the husband have done that?”
(Kohlberg, 1969, p. 376).