Document Examination: Fourth Edition

Forensic Science
From the Crime Scene to the Crime Lab

Fourth Edition
Chapter 17
Document
Examination
Copyright © 2019, 2016, 2013, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Introduction (1 of 3)
• Any object with handwriting or print whose source or
authenticity is in doubt may be referred to as a questioned
document.
• Document examiners apply knowledge gathered through
years of training and experience to recognize and
compare the individual characteristics of questioned and
known authentic writings.
• For this purpose, the gathering of documents of known
authorship or origin is critical to the outcome of the
examination.
• The uniqueness of handwriting makes this type of physical
evidence one of the few definitive individual characteristics
available.
Character of Handwriting (1 of 6)
• Document experts continually testify to the fact that no two
individuals write exactly alike.
• Many factors comprise the total character of a person's
writing.
• The early stages of learning handwriting are characterized
by a conscious effort to copy standard letter forms.
• However, as writing skills improve, nerve and motor
responses associated with the act of writing become
subconscious.
• The unconscious handwriting of two different individuals
can never be identical.
• Variations are expected in angularity, slope, speed,
pressure, letter and word spacing, relative dimensions of
letters, connections, pen movement, writing skill, and
finger dexterity.
• Other factors to consider include the arrangement of the
writing on the paper, such as margins, spacing, crowding,
insertions, and alignment.
• Spelling, punctuation, phraseology, and grammar can be
personal and help to individualize the writer.
• Furthermore, the writing style of one individual may be
altered beyond recognition by the influence of drugs or
alcohol.
• No single handwriting characteristic can in itself be taken
as the basis for a positive comparison.
• The final conclusion must be based on a sufficient number
of common characteristics between the known and
questioned writing samples.
• There are no hard and fast rules for a sufficient number of
personal characteristics.
 It is a judgment call made by the expert examiner in the
context of each case.
Handwriting Exemplars (1 of 3)
• The collection of an adequate number of known writings
(exemplars) is most critical for determining the outcome of
a handwriting comparison.
• Known writing should contain some of the words and
combination of letters present in the questioned document
and be adequate in number to show the range of natural
variations in a suspect's writing.
• The writing implement and paper should also be alike.
• The writing of dictation and several pages may serve to
minimize attempts at deception.
Transcript Comparisons
• The two requests most often made of the examiner in
connection with the examination of photocopier, fax, and
printing devices are:
 Whether a particular suspect printing device can be
identified as having prepared the questioned document
 Whether the make and model of the printing devices
used to prepare the questioned document can be
identified
Characteristics From Use (1 of 2)
• As is true for any mechanical device, use of a printing
device will result in wear and damage to the machine's
moving parts.
• These changes will occur in a fashion that is both random
and irregular, thereby imparting individual characteristics to
the printing device.
Characteristics From Use (2 of 2)
• The document examiner has to deal with problems
involving business and personal computers, which often
produce typed copies that have only subtle defects.
Digital Technology (1 of 2)
• In the cases of photocopiers, fax machines, and computer
printers, an examiner may be called on to identify the
make and model of a machine or to compare a questioned
document with test samples from a suspect machine.
Digital Technology (2 of 2)
• A side-by-side comparison is made between the
questioned document and the printed exemplars to
compare markings produced by the machine.
• Examiners compare transitory defect marks, fax machine
headers, toner, toner application methods, and mechanical
and printing characteristics.
Alterations, Erasures, and Obliterations (1 of 4)
• Document examiners must deal with evidence that has

been changed in several ways, such as through
alterations, erasures, and obliterations.
• Erasures by rubber erasers, sandpaper, razor blade, or

knife to remove writing or typing disturb the fibers of the
paper and are readily apparent when examined with a
microscope under direct light or with side lighting.
• If an alteration is made to a document with ink differing

from the original, it can sometimes be detected due to
differences in the ability of ink to absorb infrared light.
• Obliteration of writing by overwriting or crossing out to hide

the original writing can be revealed by infrared radiation,
which may pass through the upper layer of writing while
being absorbed by the underlying area.
Other Problems (1 of 3)
• Infrared photography and reflecting light at different angles
are sometimes successfully used to reveal the contents of
a document that has been accidentally or purposely
charred in a fire.
• In certain situations, indented writings (partially visible
depressions underneath the visible writing) have proved to
be valuable evidence.
• It may be possible to determine what was written by the
impressions left on a sheet underneath the one on which
the original writing was done.
• Applying an electrostatic charge to the surface of a
polymer film placed in contact with a questioned document
will visualize indented writings.
Digital Imaging Processing (1 of 2)
• An image can be scanned by scanner or a digital camera
and converting the image by computer into an array of
digital intensity values called pixels.
• Once the image has been digitized, an image editing
program can be used to make adjustments such as
lightening, darkening, color, and contrast controls.
Digital Imaging Processing (2 of 2)
• Using a photo editor on a digitized image can reveal
information that has been obscured.
Ink and Paper Comparisons (1 of 2)
• A study of the chemical composition of the ink used on
documents may verify whether or not known and
questioned documents were prepared by the same pen;
and the paper itself may be analyzed.
Ink and Paper Comparisons (2 of 2)
• A nondestructive approach to comparing ink lines is
accomplished with a visible-light microspectrophotometer.
• Thin-layer chromatography is also suitable for ink
comparisons.
Copyright
This work is protected by United States copyright laws and is

provided solely for the use of instructors in teaching their
courses and assessing student learning. Dissemination or sale of
any part of this work (including on the World Wide Web) will
destroy the integrity of the work and is not permitted. The work
and materials from it should never be made available to students
except by instructors using the accompanying text in their
classes. All recipients of this work are expected to abide by these
restrictions and to honor the intended pedagogical purposes and
the needs of other instructors who rely on these materials.

Document Examination: Fourth Edition

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Document Examination: Fourth Edition

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Document Examination: Fourth Edition

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Forensic Science

From the Crime Scene to the Crime Lab

• Document examiners must deal with evidence that has

• Erasures by rubber erasers, sandpaper, razor blade, or

• If an alteration is made to a document with ink differing

• Obliteration of writing by overwriting or crossing out to hide

This work is protected by United States copyright laws and is

You might also like