Reserves Classification-Class-1
Reserves Classification-Class-1
Reserves Classification-Class-1
Unproved Proved
Producing Nonproducing
Reserves Classifications and
Definitions
Reserves
Unprovedof hydrocarbon
Quantities Proved
believed to be
commercially
Possible Probable Developed Undeveloped
recoverable
from known accumulations
Producing Nonproducing
Reserves Classifications and
Definitions
Reserves
Unproved Proved
Quantities
Possible Probable of petroleum
Developed Undeveloped
that can be estimated with
reasonable certainty to
Producing Nonproducing
be commercially
recoverable
Reserves Classifications and
Definitions
Reserves
Resources expected
to be recovered from
Unproved Proved
existing wells
Producing Nonproducing
Reserves Classifications and
Definitions
Reserves
Unproved
Recovery from Proved
currently open
completion
Possible Probable Developed Undeveloped
intervals
Producing Nonproducing
Reserves Classifications and
Definitions
Reserves
Reserves shut-in or
Unproved behind pipe so they
Proved
are expected to be
commercially
Possible Probable Developed Undeveloped
recoverable
Producing Nonproducing
Reserves Classifications and
Resources expected to be
Definitions
recovered from
Reserves
new wells
deepening existing wells
Unproved Proved efforts
expensive additional
Producing Nonproducing
Reserves Classifications and
Definitions
Reserves
Unproved Proved
Technical, contractual,
Possible Probable Developed Undeveloped
economic, or regulatory
uncertainties prevent
definition as proved
Producing Nonproducing
Reserves Classifications and
Definitions
Engineering data
Reserves
suggests reserves are
more likely than not
commercially
Unproved Proved
recoverable
Producing Nonproducing
Reserves Classifications and
Definitions
Reserves that may be
Reserves
commercially
recoverable depending
on Unproved
favorable geological Proved
and economic factors
Producing Nonproducing
(PRMS)
Petroleum Resources Management
System (PRMS)
• In year 2007, Society of Petroleum Engineers
(SPE), the World Petroleum Council (WPC), the
American Association of Petroleum Geologists
(AAPG) and the Society of Petroleum Evaluation
Engineers (SPEE) sponsored a project to evaluate
and suggest a unified system of reserves
categorization.
• A system called Petroleum Resources
Management System (PRMS) was proposed after
lot of deliberations among the experts
Petroleum Resources Management
System (PRMS)
• The new system builds on the previous set of
definitions and incorporates best practices
identified in other international petroleum
and mineral classification systems. These
technical definitions are offered for any
company, agency, country or other
stakeholder to use.
2007 SPE-PRMS: Major Principles
• The System is “Project–Based”.
• Classification is based on project’s chance of
commerciality.
• Categorization is based on recoverable quantity
uncertainty.
• Applies to both conventional and unconventional
resources
26
They must satisfy the following criteria:
Has project been defined?
Is timeframe reasonable?
Have economics been defined, and are they positive?
Does a market exist, or is it reasonably certain that it will exist?
Is there reasonable certainty that facilities will exist?
Is there reasonable certainty that all consents will be obtained
Has government approved the plan and have partners committed
to it?
If no to any of these, then it is Contingent Resources;
if yes to all, then Reserve.
The system defines the major recoverable
resources classes:
• Production,
• Reserves,
• Contingent Resources
• Prospective Resources
• Unrecoverable.
SPE-WPC-AAPG Classification System
SPE-WPC-AAPG Classification System
SPE-WPC-AAPG Classification System
CONTINGENT RESOURCES
PROSPECTIVE RESOURCES
petroleum estimated, as of a given date, to be
potentially recoverable by application of future
development projects and have both an associated
chance of discovery and a chance of development.
39
RECOVERY FACTOR
B
A Depends on :
B Depends on :
= ( So-Sor) / So
•Sor = C* So ???
•Sor ~ 20 % - 25 %
Simple Calculation
•The parabolic trend line peaks at 40% for a reservoir depth of 2000 m
• it is fascinating to find that the recovery factor trend line is nil for reservoirs
deeper than 7000 m
•The range is very large, but shortens for reservoirs deeper than 4000 m.)
Recovery Factor as function of
drive mechanism
DRIVE RECOVERY (%) RANGE MEDIAN
Solution Gas Drive 12 - 37 20
Gas Cap Drive 15 - 60 33
Water Drive 18 - 84 50
( Courtesy of IHRDC)