White Collar Crime: DR DRH
White Collar Crime: DR DRH
White Collar Crime: DR DRH
Dr DRH
THE EMERGENCE OF WHITE COLLAR
CRIMES
The earliest documented case of white-collar crime law dates back to 15th century is England. There
has been a case popularly known as the Carrier‘s case of 1473, where the agent was entrusted to
transport wool and he attempted to steal some of it for him. Therefore the Star Chamber and Exchequer
Chamber of the English Court of Law adopted the ‗breaking bulk‘ doctrine as it constituted the crime of
larceny. However, the growth of industrial capitalism in the eighteenth century ushered a new history of
crime and criminality. The very base of industrial capitalism is based on coercion and robbery. Now,
before we discuss the topic let us understand the meaning of capitalism The process of emergence of
these conditioned was termed by Karl Marx as primitive accumulation‘ while in the words of Adam
Smith, it was ‗previous accumulon.‘ Therefore, the Dutch Marxist, William Bonger contended that
criminal attitude develops among the working class under capitalism due to conditions of misery and at
the same time the criminal attitude develops among the bourgeoisie from the avarice fostered when
capitalism strives.It succeeded in United States of America in 1890, when Congress passed the Sherman
Antitrust Act which took the initiative to make the monopolistic trade illegal. Other industrialized
countries like Great Britain had a history of penalties involving whitecollar crime by that time, but it
was not as sweeping as the Sherman Act
COST OF FRAUD
The report answers the most relevant question relating to fraud – what is the loss caused by
fraud? The estimated figure given in the report is that globally organizations suffered 2.1%
revenue loss due to fraud. For India, the percentage is higher at 2.4%. Further analysis
available in the report says that 18% of the companies reported an earnings loss of more
than 4%. A quarter of these most affected companies suffered losses more than 10%. These
companies are reporting corruption, bribery, money laundering and regulatory breaches
frequently. However, they are doing nothing about it. The lack of fraud prevention and
investigation measures is causing huge losses in these companies. Indian companies are ill
prepared to the fight fraud menace. Just 50% companies have background screening, third-
party due diligence and other fraud prevention measures in place. In my view, India does
not have adequately trained fraud investigators as part of the risk management teams.
Overall, the focus is on financial statements audits and internal audits. These audits are not
done to detect frauds
THE INSIDE JOB
Management finds it hard to accept this fact that internal employees and related parties
conduct most frauds. The report mentions that insiders conducted 60% of the frauds
globally. That is, 28% junior employees, 21% senior employees and 11% third-party agents
conducted frauds. In India, 59% of the frauds were conducted by internal sources. The
frauds conducted by senior employees cause more damage to the company. Not only are
the financial figures larger, the reputation damage is huge. However, the companies in
India still do not have adequate focus on internal controls and management controls.
However, government has initiated some steps to address the high level of frauds in Indian
private sector. In my view, the Indian government‘s decision to give more power to the
Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) in the new Companies Bill is a step in the right
direction. SFIO will be in a position to conduct more investigations, arrests, raids and
seizures. This would put some brakes on the escalating financial fraud cases in India.
CORRUPTION & BRIBERY IN INDIA
The report has a special coverage on corruption in India. It shows that the 2010-2011 corruption
and fraud cases in India – 2G telecom scam, Adarsh Society scam, CWG fraud, various land
scams etc. – have negatively impacted India‘s reputation internationally. Last decade depicted
India‘s growth story. The government and private sector post independence never had it so good.
Huge investments were planned to improve infrastructure. With liberalization foreign investment
flows increased. The sudden spurt in economy also resulted in higher greed and corruption
soared. The cases show how senior level politicians and business heads who were much revered
and respected compromised their ethics. As per the report, 78% of the Indian organizations have
stated that they are highly/moderately vulnerable to corruption. In my view, this is an
understatement; around 90- 95% of the companies are exposed to corruption. The multinational
subsidiaries in India are also significantly affected by corruption. Though the FCPA and/or
UKBA are applicable to them, the acts do not have much teeth in Indian scenario. In my view,
the US/ UK authorities will be able to follow through only on the bigger cases, and the smaller
ones will be ignored. Hence, the effectiveness of these acts is limited
. Secondly, the developed countries have a one sided view of corruption. They prohibit
their own country‘s companies from paying bribes. However, accept the bribe money
deposits from Indian (and other countries) politicians and businesspersons in their
country‘s banks. This encourages money laundering rather than curtailing corruption.
Although, India has a Prevention Against Corruption Act, it hasn‘t reduced corruption. As
per the act, government officials cannot receive any form of bribes or grease payments.
However, receiving 2-10% bribe of total contract value assigned is quite prevalent. The
India Against Corruption moment led by Anna Hazare has forced government to issue a
strong Lokpal Bill.
FOUR SHOCKING MISCONCEPTIONS
ABOUT WHITE-COLLARED CRIME The most recent issue of Psychology Today has a
short column on four major myths that are widely when it comes to white-collared crime—
usually described as an illegal act committed for financial gain. 1. White-collared crimes are
nonviolent—since white-collared crime is usually characterized as non-violent, many are
prone to this myth. But criminals in general have a sense of entitlement and need for control.
2. White-collar criminals are highly paid—you may be thinking of famous Ponzi schemers
like Bernie Madoff or Allen Sanford here, but white-collared criminals also depend on poorly
paid underlings. IRJC International Journal of Social Science & Interdisciplinary Research
Vol.1 Issue 9, September 2012, ISSN 2277 3630 www.indianresearchjournals.com 164 3.
White-collar criminals are otherwise upstanding citizens—about 40% of white collared
criminals have a record. So, no. 4. It's all about cash—Yes, there are poorly paid white-collar
criminals, but the mastermind of the crime could be very rich. Researchers say "peer pressure,
company culture, and pure hubris" cause people to commit white-collared crimes.