Syllable Structure
Syllable Structure
Syllable Structure
Basic of syllables
Pushpak Bhattacharyya
Syllable structure
Pushpak Bhattacharyya
Onset (O)
• Onset: the beginning sounds of the syllable; the ones preceding the
nucleus. These are always consonants in English. The nucleus is a
vowel in most cases, although the consonants [ r ], [ l ], [ m ], [ n ], and
the velar nasal (the 'ng' sound) can also be the nucleus of a syllable.
Pushpak Bhattacharyya
Rhyme (R)
Rhyme = nucleus + coda
Pushpak Bhattacharyya
Nucleus (N)
• is the core or essential part of a syllable. A nucleus must be present in order for a syllable to be
present.
• In English and most other languages, most syllable nuclei are vowels.
• The English liquids [ r l ] and the nasals [ m n ] can be the nuclei of syllables under certain
conditions. [ r ] can be a nucleus as easily as a vowel, in any position: the words 'bird', have [ r ] as
the nucleus; in other words, there is no vowel in the pronunciation of these syllables, even though
they have one in the spelling.
[brd]
• [ l ] and the nasals [ m n ] become syllable nuclei when they follow an alveolar consonant in the last
syllable of a word. This happens in the relaxed or casual rather than very formal articulation of the
word. Compare casual vs. formal pronunciations of 'button', 'bottle', 'bottom'.
Pushpak Bhattacharyya
• Linguists often use tree diagrams to illustrate syllable structure. 'Flop', for example, would look
like this (the word appears in IPA symbols, not English spelling). 's' = 'syllable'; 'O' = 'onset'; 'R'
= 'rhyme'; 'N' = 'nucleus'; 'C' = 'coda'.
• The syllable node at the top of the tree branches into Onset and Rhyme; the Onset node
branches because it contains two consonants, [ f ] and [ l ]. The Rhyme node branches
because this syllable has both a nucleus and a coda.
• σ
/ \
O R
/ \ / \
| | N C
| | | |
[ f l a p ]
Pushpak Bhattacharyya
Steps to determine the diagram:
Pushpak Bhattacharyya
Possible syllable structures
The Nucleus is
always present
Onset and Coda
may be absent
Possible structures
V
CV
VC
CVC
Pushpak Bhattacharyya
syllable theories
Prominence Theory
E.g. entertaining /entəteɪnɪŋ/
The peaks of prominence: vowels /e ə eɪ ɪ/
Number of syllables: 4
Chest Pulse Theory
Based on muscular activities
Sonority Theory
Based on relative soundness of segment within words
Pushpak Bhattacharyya
Introduction to sonority theory
Pushpak Bhattacharyya
Sonority hierarchy
Pushpak Bhattacharyya
Sonority scale
Obstruents can be
further classified
into:-
Fricatives
Affricates
Stops
Pushpak Bhattacharyya
Sonority theory & syllables
Onset Coda
Pushpak Bhattacharyya
Sonority sequencing principle
“The Sonority Profile of a syllable must rise until its Peak(Nucleus), and
then fall.”
Peak
(Nucleus)
Onset Coda
Pushpak Bhattacharyya
examples
ABHIJEET
Sonority Profile 1
A I E E
H J
B T
Sonority Profile 2
A I E E
H J
B T
Pushpak Bhattacharyya
Maximal onset principle
Pushpak Bhattacharyya
Syllable Structure: amore detailed look
S ≡ Syllable, O ≡ Onset
R ≡ Rhyme, N ≡ Nucleus
Co ≡ Coda
Pushpak Bhattacharyya
Syllable Structure: Examples
• ‘word’
• ‘sprint’
Pushpak Bhattacharyya
Syllable Structure: Examples
• ‘may’
No Coda.
• ‘opt’
No Onset.
• ‘air’
No Coda, No
Onset.
Pushpak Bhattacharyya
Syllable Structure
Pushpak Bhattacharyya
Syllabification: Determining Syllable
Boundaries
• Given a string of syllables (word), what is the coda of one
and the onset of another?
Pushpak Bhattacharyya
Draw, the syllable structure of the following
words:
apron
basic
began
begin
depend
even
hotel
Pushpak Bhattacharyya
Sonority Hierarchy
• A more plausible account, however, is offered by the “Sonority Hierarchy”:
4 Vowels Most Sonorous
3 Liquids
2 Nasals
1 Obstruents Least Sonorous
• The Syllable Sonority Profile:
i - rises
ii - reaches a peak
iii - falls
Pushpak Bhattacharyya
Sonority Hierarchy
[sli:p]
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
Sonority
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
s l i: p
Pushpak Bhattacharyya
Sonority Hierarchy
*[lsi:p]
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
Sonority
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
l s i: p
Pushpak Bhattacharyya
Sonority Sequencing
Pushpak Bhattacharyya
Gaps
Pushpak Bhattacharyya
Sonority Distance
• Sonority Distance may vary:
(stop + fricative) 1 - 1 = 0
(stop + nasal) 2 - 1 = 1
(stop + liquid) 3 - 1 = 2
• In many languages, the segments of complex subsyllabic constituents need to satisfy a minimum of
sonority distance.
• This requirement is formalized through the Minimal Sonority Distance parameter.
• For English, this parameter is set as follows:
Minimal Sonority Distance in English Onsets
The minimal sonority distance between the two elements of an English complex onset is 2.
Pushpak Bhattacharyya
Summing up
• Syllables are abstract structures which cannot themselves be pronounced.
• Children’s utterances consist principally of CV syllables.
• There are no languages where CV syllables are not attested.
• Syllable structure is richer than the core syllable.
• Syllable complexity can be measured against the optimal CV configuration.
• Syllable structure is built on the timing tier.
• The distribution of vowels and consonants within a syllable is a consequence of sonority differences
between these two classes of sounds.
• The constraints on possible branching onsets in English are also explained by the principle of
Sonority Sequencing and the Minimal Sonority Distance.
Pushpak Bhattacharyya
Discussion on the assignment