0% found this document useful (0 votes)
221 views9 pages

Testing and Evaluation in Elt

This document proposes an evaluation of a private bilingual school in Cali, Colombia. It describes the population as a class of 24 students in 2017. It provides a table with hypothetical student characteristics and levels of performance. The levels are poor, need improving, satisfactory, and very good for work, participation, organization, cohesion, and communication skills. The focus of the evaluation will be on participative assessment of students and evaluation through technology. It concludes that direct questioning of students will also be part of the evaluation.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
221 views9 pages

Testing and Evaluation in Elt

This document proposes an evaluation of a private bilingual school in Cali, Colombia. It describes the population as a class of 24 students in 2017. It provides a table with hypothetical student characteristics and levels of performance. The levels are poor, need improving, satisfactory, and very good for work, participation, organization, cohesion, and communication skills. The focus of the evaluation will be on participative assessment of students and evaluation through technology. It concludes that direct questioning of students will also be part of the evaluation.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

Proposal of Evaluation

MEMBER:
RAFFER ENRIQUE AMARA
COD: 12524108
COURSE: 551027_11

TUTOR
EDNER SUAREZ ALOMIA
COURSE: TESTING AND EVALUATION IN ELT
The population chosen in step 4. Evaluation Proposal
was:

d. 2017 Promotion of a private country school in a very


exclusive northern area in Cali. The school has bilingual
status; the school day is 8 hours. The class is 24
students.
Hypothetical facts Characterization
a. Methods, approaches and Assessment for English specific purposes, and evaluation youth through technology
Indicator Students        
  1 10 15 24 Poor Need improving Satisfactory Very good
Work         Does not complete the Completes the tasks only Completes the tasks The quality of the tasks
tasks assigned partially before the deadline improves the final result
   
Participation         His/her presence in the Speaks very seldom, only if In general, he/she is His/her participation is
group is irrelevant asked by others participative frequent and of high quality 
   
Organization         Doesn’t respect the Admits what other group Participates actively in the Is organized and distributes the
organization, members propose organization, distribution work efficiently
distribution of tasks   of tasks  
 
Cohesion         Interested in his/her Hard to integrate in the group Makes efforts to reach Promotes a clear definition of
own personal   common agreements and objectives and the integration
objectives, not in the objectives of the group around them
group.    
Communicative         Doesn’t listen to others, Listens rarely, does not make Accepts opinions and Inspires qualitative
and interaction is unkind and wants to questions, does not worry presents points of view in participation among all
skills impose his/her own about others’ opinions. a constructive way members
views Interventions, lacking quality    
 
The focus has been participative

In a teaching and learning community, assessment becomes more


effective than the basis of effective practices based on student learning
outcomes (Doherty et al., 2002, Shapiro and Levine, 1999).
Assessment of young students and evaluation through
technologies
Personality Test and get a “freakishly accurate” description of
who you are and why you do things the way you do.
https://www.16personalities.com/
Conclusion
The Direct questioning of students.
Bibliografy
Evaluating and Improving Undergraduate Teaching in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.
(2003). doi:10.17226/10024

Flateby, T. L. (2010). Improving Writing and Thinking Through Assessment. Charlotte, N.C.: Information Age
Publishing. Retrieved from
http://bibliotecavirtual.unad.edu.co/login?url=https://bibliotecavirtual.unad.edu.co:2969/login.aspx?direct
=true&db=e000xww&AN=469990&lang=es&site=ehost-live

You might also like