Proposal of Evaluation
MEMBER:
RAFFER ENRIQUE AMARA
COD: 12524108
COURSE: 551027_11
TUTOR
EDNER SUAREZ ALOMIA
COURSE: TESTING AND EVALUATION IN ELT
The population chosen in step 4. Evaluation Proposal
was:
d. 2017 Promotion of a private country school in a very
exclusive northern area in Cali. The school has bilingual
status; the school day is 8 hours. The class is 24
students.
Hypothetical facts Characterization
a. Methods, approaches and Assessment for English specific purposes, and evaluation youth through technology
Indicator Students
1 10 15 24 Poor Need improving Satisfactory Very good
Work Does not complete the Completes the tasks only Completes the tasks The quality of the tasks
tasks assigned partially before the deadline improves the final result
Participation His/her presence in the Speaks very seldom, only if In general, he/she is His/her participation is
group is irrelevant asked by others participative frequent and of high quality
Organization Doesn’t respect the Admits what other group Participates actively in the Is organized and distributes the
organization, members propose organization, distribution work efficiently
distribution of tasks of tasks
Cohesion Interested in his/her Hard to integrate in the group Makes efforts to reach Promotes a clear definition of
own personal common agreements and objectives and the integration
objectives, not in the objectives of the group around them
group.
Communicative Doesn’t listen to others, Listens rarely, does not make Accepts opinions and Inspires qualitative
and interaction is unkind and wants to questions, does not worry presents points of view in participation among all
skills impose his/her own about others’ opinions. a constructive way members
views Interventions, lacking quality
The focus has been participative
In a teaching and learning community, assessment becomes more
effective than the basis of effective practices based on student learning
outcomes (Doherty et al., 2002, Shapiro and Levine, 1999).
Assessment of young students and evaluation through
technologies
Personality Test and get a “freakishly accurate” description of
who you are and why you do things the way you do.
https://www.16personalities.com/
Conclusion
The Direct questioning of students.
Bibliografy
Evaluating and Improving Undergraduate Teaching in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.
(2003). doi:10.17226/10024
Flateby, T. L. (2010). Improving Writing and Thinking Through Assessment. Charlotte, N.C.: Information Age
Publishing. Retrieved from
http://bibliotecavirtual.unad.edu.co/login?url=https://bibliotecavirtual.unad.edu.co:2969/login.aspx?direct
=true&db=e000xww&AN=469990&lang=es&site=ehost-live