Normative Ethical Theories: A Critical Survey of The Different
Normative Ethical Theories: A Critical Survey of The Different
Normative Ethical Theories: A Critical Survey of The Different
NORMS, ETHICAL
NORMS, ETHICAL
PRINCIPLES, RULES
PRINCIPLES, RULES
AMONG OTHERS
HUMAN AMONG OTHERS
HUMAN JUDGMENT
JUDGMENT
CONDUCT
CONDUCT CONFORMITY OR
NON CONFORMITY
MORAL OR IMMORAL
7.7.
8.
8 Types of
1.1.
2.2.
3.3.
Conscience
Is one which sees wrong where there
is non. It is a conscience which is
4.4.
5.5. extremely austere; it is always scared
6.6. to commit evil
7. SCRUPULOUS
CONSCIENCE
8.
8 Types of
1.1.
2.2.
3.3.
Conscience
Is the opposite of scrupulous
conscience as it fails to see wrong
4.4.
5.5. where there is wrong. This
6.6. categorically needs a right education.
7.7.
8. LAX
CONSCIENCE
NATURAL
LAW
Traditional ethics considers this as remote norm of
morality. It reflects what the thing is in accordance with
its nature.
According to traditional ethics, everything has been
made with a specific nature and purpose.
NATURAL
LAW
"
Purpose is always ”
good
-St. Thomas Aquinas
eternaL
LAW
Traditional ethics considers divine law or eternal
law as the ultimate norm of morality
Kant was one of the foremost thinkers of the Enlightenment and arguably one of the
greatest philosophers of all time. In him were subsumed new trends that had begun
with the rationalism (stressing reason) of René Descartes and the empiricism
(stressing experience) of Francis Bacon. He thus inaugurated a new era in the
development of philosophical thought.
2 KANTIAN ETHICS
(IMMANUEL KANT 1724-1804)
3.3.MORAL
MORALLAWS
LAWS 4.4.IT IS
IT IS
ARE
AREIMMUTABLE
IMMUTABLE ABSOLUTE
ABSOLUTE
2 KANTIAN ETHICS
(IMMANUEL KANT 1724-1804)
As to the question,”
WHY MUST DO WE DO GOOD?”
Kant answer by saying,
NICCOLO
NICCOLO
MACHIAVELLI
MACHIAVELLI
THE
THEPRINCE
PRINCE THE DISCOURSE
THE DISCOURSE
3 THE MACHIAVELLIN PRINCIPLE (NICCOLO
MACHIAVELLI 1469-1527)
MEANS
LEADER
LEADER MEANS END
END
DO
DO CREATION
CREATION
ABSOLUTE
ABSOLUTE ANYTHING
ANYTHING OF
OFAN
AN
MONARCH ILLEGAL
ILLEGALOR
OR
MONARCH IDEAL STATE
IDEAL STATE
MORAL
MORAL
3 THE MACHIAVELLIN PRINCIPLE (NICCOLO
MACHIAVELLI 1469-1527)
Machiavelli also espouses violence in the process of creating a strong leader in the 16th century
Italy. In the book the Prince, Machiavelli also states
3
utely." Although
THE MACHIAVELLIN PRINCIPLE (NICCOLO
e state, staying long
oday have
archy. MACHIAVELLI 1469-1527)
upreme power or
on. (Usually Kings
3
tely." Although
THE MACHIAVELLIN PRINCIPLE (NICCOLO
state, staying long
CRITIQUES ON MACHIAVELLI’S
PRINCIPLE
4) "Bonum ex integra causa, malum ex
quocumque defectu" means "an action is
good when it is good in every respect; it is
wrong when it is wrong in every respect."
4 THE MACHIAVELLIN PRINCIPLE (NICCOLO
MACHIAVELLI 1469-1527)
BUSINESS APPLICATIONS
• ON MANAGEMENT
A management style where all employees are required to work very
hard no matter what it takes just to achieve the bottom line could be a
scenario of applying the Machiavellian principle.
The means to achieve a goal of a corporation takes all measures,
even changing the lifestyle of the person.
4 THE MACHIAVELLIN PRINCIPLE (NICCOLO
MACHIAVELLI 1469-1527)
BUSINESS APPLICATIONS
• ON THE INDIVIDUAL
In meeting the demands of a job to make both ends meet or to provide for a
comfortable life for the family, people tend to prioritize their time for work over
time for family.
In effect, the good objective of providing for the family becomes the excuse for
neglecting other responsibilities. Even if they want to ensure a better life for
their family by working hard, if home-life becomes farfetched, there may be no
more family to offer the fruits of working hard.
• ON LEADERSHIP
At times, we need a strong autocratic leader to motivate people and to attain
goals of a state or organization.
2 UTILITARIANISM OF JEREMY AND JOHN
STUART MILL
From the latin words, utilie bonum” or utilis which means usefulness
A theory of morality holding that all actions should be judged for rightness and
wrongness in terms of their consequences; thus, the amount of pleasure people derive
from those consequences becomes the measure of moral goodness. Jeremy Bentham and
John Stuart Mill, were the chief proponents of this view.
FORMS OF PLEASURE
• PHYSICAL PLEASURE
The sensual indulgences to bodily gratification.
Examples: sexual intercourse, eating, drinking, and others
• MENTAL PLEASURE
Refers to the intellectual, spiritual, and moral pleasures.
Examples: Man's noble feelings, imagination, and moral sentiments
*Mill's utilitarianism refers to the mental pleasures when it defines happiness as a pleasure. Happiness pursues mental pleasures and
this is what differentiates utilitarianism from hedonism.
4 UTILITARIANISM OF
JEREMY AND JOHN STUART MILL
CRITIUES ON UTILITARIANISM
1) Utilitarianism proposes an earthly goal for man which is the temporal welfare
here on earth. The ultimate and supreme purpose of man cannot be found in this life.
2) Utilitarianism makes morality relative. What is pleasant or useful to one
individual, may be painful and harmful to another individual. Relative morality
leads to moral chaos and confusion.
3) Utilitarian theory makes morality extrinsic. Utilitarianism, like hedonism,
confuses the nature of the act with the effect of the act.
4) Utilitarianism has a bias on the majority. ("The greatest good is the greatest
pleasure or happiness of the greatest number.")
4 UTILITARIANISM OF
JEREMY AND JOHN STUART MILL
BUSINESS APPLICATIONS
a. This principle is used in Cost- Benefit
Analysis. (More benefit, less cost is s good
action.)
b. It is also used in the formulation of budgets
c. It is also used in the resolution of Labor-
Management conflict.
D. Can also be used in the calculation of opportunity costs