0% found this document useful (0 votes)
40 views

Modeling and Simulation Voltage and Frequency Variations

The document discusses modeling and simulation of voltage and frequency variations in power systems. It covers several topics: - Automatic Voltage Regulator (AVR) models to regulate voltage and its simulation. - Load Frequency Controller (LFC) models to regulate frequency and its simulation for single-area and multi-area systems. - Combining AVR and LFC models to jointly control voltage and frequency. - Comparing responses of different controller parameters to optimize performance for variables like settling time and steady-state error. The key aim is to design and simulate controllers to maintain stable operation of power systems during load variations.

Uploaded by

Kashyap Mokariya
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
40 views

Modeling and Simulation Voltage and Frequency Variations

The document discusses modeling and simulation of voltage and frequency variations in power systems. It covers several topics: - Automatic Voltage Regulator (AVR) models to regulate voltage and its simulation. - Load Frequency Controller (LFC) models to regulate frequency and its simulation for single-area and multi-area systems. - Combining AVR and LFC models to jointly control voltage and frequency. - Comparing responses of different controller parameters to optimize performance for variables like settling time and steady-state error. The key aim is to design and simulate controllers to maintain stable operation of power systems during load variations.

Uploaded by

Kashyap Mokariya
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 66

Modeling and simulation Voltage

and Frequency Variations


Out line:

• Introduction.
• Automatic Voltage Regulator (AVR).
• Load Frequency Controller (LFC).
• LFC Model for Two Areas Power System.
• LFC for Three Areas Power System.
• Combining AVR with LFC system.
• Conclusion.
Introduction:

• An electrical power system consists of


many elements connected to form
complex system capable of generating,
transmitting and distributing electrical
energy over a large geographical area.
Introduction:

• Power system stability requires a well designed


controllers to regulate system
variations.

• Voltage and frequency control actions needed to


maintain system operating conditions.

• Automatic Generation Control actions take effect.


Introduction:

• Automatic Generation Control (AGC) is


the name given to a control system having
three major objectives:
1.Hold system frequency at a specified value
(50Hz in UAE).
2. To maintain the correct value of
interchange power between control areas.
3. To maintain each unit's generation at the
most economic value.
Introduction:

• Automatic Generation Control has more


advantages, such as:
• Increase Generation Ability by connecting
two or more areas together.
• Improve ability of load variation recovery.
• More efficient for detecting and fixing
power faults.
Power Generation Mechanism:

• Mechanical energy provide the needed


motion (rotational) to produce electrical
power.
• Generated using thermal energy such as
steam, natural gas and nuclear and the little
rest by hydro-mechanical such as water
falls energy or wind.
Elements Of AGC efficiency:

• Load Frequency Controller (LFC).

• The Automatic Voltage Regulator (AVR).


Aims of the project:

• Design and simulate AVR.


• Design and simulate LFC.
• Design and simulate LFC for two areas power
system.
• Design and simulate LFC for three areas power
system.
• Combining AVR with LFC.
• Control the power of different areas.
Automatic Voltage Regulator
(AVR)
Introduction for the AVR system:
• What is the AVR system?

• Why we need the AVR system?

• Where its connect in the power system?

• What elements its consist of?


The AVR system:

• Make the system efficient.

• Consist of sensor, amplifier, exciter and generator.

• Deals with the reactive power.


The AVR system:

• This is diagram for AVR system and it shows where it is


connected in the generation system
Modeling and Simulation:

Simple AVR System:


Transfer function relating the generator terminal voltage
Vt(s) to the reference voltage Vref(s) is:
What is Happening in the AVR system?

• The amplifier comes first in the AVR system to


amplify the error signal.
• Then the error signals alter the exciter and
consequently the generator.
• The sensor sense the voltage output and send it to
the transducer and the transducer send in the
signal after comparing it to the amplifier.
PID (proportional-integral-derivative):

The transfer function of a PID controller is:


:Advantages of PID

- Fast response and small error (due to the proportional gain).

.Reduced steady-state error (due to the integral gain) -

- Reduced overshoot (due to the derivative gain).

:Disadvantages of PID

.There is no formal way to determine the best PID gains -


Delta V :Simple AVR Model Simulink

Delta V

Time (s) Time (s)

Input signal (Step Function) Output response from model


.Steady State error = 1 – 0.96 = 0.04

.Overshoot = 1.09 – 1 = 0.09

.Settling Time = 4s
AVR with PID Controller:
Delta V

Delta V
Time (s)
Time (s)

Case 1( Kd=0.1,Ki=0.1,Kp=1). Case 2( Kd=0.5,Ki =0.5,Kp=0.5).


Delta V

Delta V

Time (s) Time (s)

.Case 3( Kd=0.2,Ki=0.5,Kp= 3) Case 4( Kd=1,Ki=3,Kp=4).


Steady State Error Settling Time (s) Overshoot Kp Ki Kd Cases

0.001 3 0.003 1 0.1 0.1 1

0.4 10 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 2

0.01 4 0.4 3 0.5 0.2 3

0.01 5 0.17 4 3 1 4

The case 1 is the best case because it has less time


.settling, less overshoot and less steady state error
Load Frequency
Control (LFC)
Load Frequency Control (LFC):

• The main problems of control in the large


power system are:
• Active Power.
• Reactive Power.
• Active power control is closely related to
frequency control.
• The frequency has an inverse relationship
with the load that is changing continually.
Load Frequency Control (LFC):

• Feedback.
• Sensor.
• Frequency fixed.
• Frequency of UAE power system = 50 Hz
Load Frequency Control (LFC):

• Analysis of LFC :
High load (Air conditions, machines)  High pressure on
system  Decreasing in frequency of the load (< 50 + 0.05Hz) 
System is unstable.

To return the value of load frequency to its normal:

1) The output will multiply with the value of K G (speed regulation) then,
multiply it with governor delay.
2) There will be a command which tells control valve to control the
pushing of fuel.
3) More mechanical power to turbine  More electrical power 
Frequency of the load will increase to its normal value  System is
stable.
Load Frequency Control (LFC):

• Model of LFC:
Load Frequency Control (LFC):
• Modeling & Simulation:

Typical LFC Model

Name TCV TT K D

Value 0.2 sec 0.5 sec 0.8 20

constant values in LFC


Load Frequency Control (LFC):

• Frequency response of LFC:


Delta f (Hz)

Time (sec)

• It is not stable.
Load Frequency Control (LFC)
• Improvement of LFC:
• Adding PID controller to the LFC.

PID Controller. PID parameters effects (Ki, Kd, Kp)


Load Frequency Control (LFC):

• Model of LFC after adding PID Controller:

Simulink diagram for LFC with PID control system


Load Frequency Control (LFC):
• LFC response with different values of PID
parameters:
Delta f (Hz)

Delta f (Hz)
Time (sec) Time (sec)

LFC response for (Kp = 1, Ki = 1, Kd = 1) LFC response for (Kp = 1, Ki = 0.3, Kd = 1)


Load Frequency Control (LFC):
• LFC response with different values of PID
parameters:
Delta f (Hz)

Delta f (Hz)

Time (sec) Time (sec)

LFC response for (Kp = 1, Ki = 0.3, Kd = 0.6) LFC response for (Kp = 2, Ki = 0.8, Kd = 1.1)
Load Frequency Control (LFC):
• The output result of undershoot, settling time and steady-
state error for different values of PID parameters:

Kp Ki Kd Undershoot Settling time Steady- state error


1 1 1 -0.012 >10 -0.002

1 0.3 1 -0.014 11 -0.0015

1 0.3 0.6 -0.015 10 -0.0011

2 0.8 1.1 -0.009 6 -0.0001

- Last value of PID controller parameter is the best


one.
LFC Model for Two Areas Power System:
∆Pd1
∆Pd2

∆Pt12

Area 1 Area 2

∆Pt21
∆f1
∆f2

∆f1 = f1 – fo ∆f2 = f2 – fo

∆f1
∆Pd1
Two areas power system ∆f2
∆Pd2
∆Pt12
LFC Model for Two Areas Power System:

LFC Model for two areas without integral controller


LFC Model for Two Areas Power System:
:Outputs figures (∆f1, ∆f2, ∆Pt12)

Delta f (Hz)
Delta f (Hz)

Time (sec) Time (sec)

f1∆ f2∆
Delta f (Hz)

Pt12∆
Time (sec)

The system is not stable.


LFC Model for Two Areas Power System :

LFC Model for two areas with Integral Controller


LFC Model for Two Areas Power System :
For (ki1 = 0.02 & ki2 = 0.01):
:Figures for outputs (∆f1, ∆f2, ∆Pt12) with Integral Controller
Delta f (Hz)

Delta f (Hz)
Time (sec)
Time (sec)

f1∆ f2∆
Delta f (Hz)

Time (sec)

∆Pt12
LFC Model
LFC Model forareas
for Two Two Areas Power System :
For (ki1 = 0.1 & ki2 = 0.02):
Delta f (Hz)

Delta f (Hz)
Time (sec) Time (sec)

f1∆ f2∆
Delta f (Hz)

Time (sec)

∆Pt12
LFC Model for Two Areas Power System :
For (ki1 = 0.42 & ki2 = 0.019):
Delta f (Hz)

Delta f (Hz)
Time (sec)
Time (sec)

f1∆ f2∆
Delta f (Hz)

Time (sec)
∆Pt12

The system is stable because output results go to the reference point.


Two Areas with Um Al Naar Substation:
Two Areas with Um Al Naar Substation :

• Studying cases of LFC system of two area:


- Case 1: Area 1 and 2 are in the normal situation. (∆P1=0 & ∆P2=0) .

- Case 2: Area 1 is overloaded to more than 10% of the normal limit, i.e. a step load
disturbance of 0.1. Area 2 is in the normal situation. (∆P1 = 0.1& ∆P2 = 0) .

- Case 3: Areas 1 and 2 are overloaded to more than 10% of the normal limit, i.e. load
disturbances of 0.1 for each area. (∆P1 = 0.1& ∆P2 = 0.1) .

- Case 4: Area 1 and 2 are overloaded to more than 10% and 20% of the normal
limit, i.e. load disturbances of 0.1 and 0.2 respectively. (∆P1 = 0.1& ∆P2 = 0.2) .
Two Areas with Um Al Naar Substation :

Case 1: Area 1 and 2 are in the normal situation. (∆P1=0 & ∆P2=0)

Two-area system ( Area 1 ) Two-area system ( Area 2 )


1 1

0.8 0.8

0.6 0.6

0.4 0.4

0.2 0.2

Delta f (Hz)
Delta f (Hz)

0 0

-0.2 -0.2

-0.4 -0.4

-0.6 -0.6

-0.8 -0.8

-1 -1
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Time (s) Time (s)

.Response for area 1 when ∆P1 = 0 and ∆P2 = 0 .Response for area 2 when ∆P1 = 0 and ∆P2 = 0
Two Areas with Um Al Naar Substation :

Case 2: (∆P1=0.1 & ∆P2=0)

-3 -3 Two areas system (Area 2)


x 10 Two areas system (Area 1) x 10
0 2

-1
0
-2

-3 -2

-4

w(t) (Hz)
w(t) (Hz)

-4
-5

-6 -6

-7
-8
-8

-9 -10
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Time (sec) Time (sec)

.Response for area 1 when ∆P1 = 0.1 and ∆P2 = 0 .Response for area 2 when ∆P1 = 0.1 and ∆P2 = 0
Two Areas with Um Al Naar Substation :

Case 3: (∆P1=0.1 & ∆P2=0.1)

Two-area system ( Area 1 ) Two-area system ( Area 2 )


0.02 0

0 -0.002

-0.02 -0.004

Delta f (Hz)
Delta f (Hz)

-0.04 -0.006

-0.06 -0.008

-0.08 -0.01

-0.1 -0.012
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Time (s) Time (s)

.Response for area 1 when ∆P1 = 0.1 and ∆P2 = 0.1 .Response for area 2 when ∆P1 = 0.1 and ∆P2 = 0.1
Two Areas with Um Al Naar Substation :

Case 4: (∆P1=0.1 & ∆P2=0.2)

Two-area system ( Area 1 ) Two-area system ( Area 2 )


0.01 0

-0.01 -0.005

-0.02

-0.03 -0.01

Delta f (Hz)
Delta f (Hz)

-0.04

-0.05 -0.015

-0.06

-0.07 -0.02

-0.08

-0.09 -0.025
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Time (s) Time (s)

.Response for area 1 when ∆P1 = 0.1 and ∆P2 = 0.2 .Response for area 2 when ∆P1 = 0.1 and ∆P2 = 0.2
LFC Three Areas
Power System
Three-Area Power System:

Area1
ΔPt13
ΔPt12
ΔPt31
ΔPt21

ΔPt23

Area2 Area3
ΔPt32
Simple Block Diagram for 3-area Power
System:

Inputs Variables Outputs


ΔPd1 Δf1

ΔPd2 Δf2

ΔPd3 Δf3
Area Power System 3 ΔPt12

ΔPt23

ΔPt13
Three Area LFC system:
Output from LFC Three Area System:

Δf1 (Hz)

Time (sec)

Output from Area-1


Output from LFC Three Area System:

Δf2 (Hz)

Time (sec)

Output from Area-2


Output from LFC Three Area System:

Δf3 (Hz)

Time (sec)

Output from Area-3


Combining AVR with
LFC System
Combining AVR with LFC System:

• The connection between the AVR and the LFC


systems only represented in some constants
K1, K2…etc.
• The main concentration in AGC system is the
LFC part more than the AVR system.
• If the LFC system wasn’t stable the AGC
system will not be stable
Simulation of the AGC system:
Simulation:
:Result by using MATLAB

Kp=0.1, Ki=0.2 and Kd=0.009

The response of the AGC the LFC part The response of the AGC the AVR part

Overshoot = 0.16 Overshoot = 0.185


Response Time = 12 s
Response Time = 3.5 s
Steady state error = 0 Steady state error = 0
The response of the AVR and LFC system
separately:

AVR LFC
From the previous example:

• If the LFC system is not stable the


AGC system is stable.
• If the AVR system wasn’t stable it not
meant to be that the AGC system isn’t
stable.
Conclusion:

• The purpose of AGC is the tracking of load


variations while maintaining system frequency, net
tie-line interchanges, and optimal generation levels
close to specified values.
• AGC has more advantages than the previous
technique such as, increasing generation ability,
improve ability of load increase recovery, more
efficient for detecting and fixing power faults,
saving time.
Conclusion:

• LFC is used to regulate the output power of each


generator at prescribed levels while keeping the
frequency fluctuations within pre-specified limits.
• The study of AVR
• show what is the important of the proportional-
integral-derivative action (PID) controller.
• The LFC system is much slower than the AVR due
to the mechanical inertia constant in LFC.
Conclusion:

• If the LFC system is not stable the AGC


system is not stable.
• If the AVR system wasn’t stable it not
mean that the AGC system isn’t stable.
Thank You For Your Listening

We Will Be Happy To Answer Your


Questions

You might also like