G2 Quality Assurance
G2 Quality Assurance
G2 Quality Assurance
ASSURANCE
Group 2
Narciso, Noralyn S.
Jupiter, Stephen
Casimiro, Jasper V.
Decretales, Kristian
Echanique, Stephanie
What is Quality
■ The ability to make the same thing the same way, over
and over again
■ Customer buys today is same as what they bought last
week or will buy next week
■ Product meets customer’s expectations 100% of the
time
Customer expectations
■ Prevention of Mix-ups
■ Provide Traceability
■ Accountability of actions
■ Responsibility
■ Product Performance Guarantee
Factors Influencing Quality Assurance
■ EDUCATION
■ RECORD
■ LEADERSHIP
■ FACILITIES
■ AUTONOMY
Components of Quality Assurance
■ To maintain standards & specification for all raw material & finished product.
■ To give service to company in all areas related to product quality includes trouble
shooting, visiting, production, facilities, designing and training Quality control panel.
■ To produce information that is accurate, reliable and adequate for the intended purpose.
■ Evaluating performance, service, of the quality of a product against a system, standard
or specified requirement for customers
Installation of QA plan
■ Organization of department
– Make use of supervisors
■ Amount and quality of training affects finished product quality
– Every line employee should be trained
– Verify job is being done correctly
■ Automation of process changes types and quantities of analyses needed
– Speed of testing
– What level of accuracy is necessary
– Maintenance and calibration of lab equipment
– Training of technicians
– Verification of accuracy and variation of technicians
QA operation
■ If certain tests take several days to complete, the department must create a
record review, and a well-coordinated release procedure must be
developed so that product is not shipped prior to the completion of all the
tests.
■ Electronic, as well as actual, inventory-control procedures are necessary,
and fall under the supervision of QA.
■ This is where a great deal of pressure is brought to bear on the QA
function. The company has orders to fill and customers to keep happy, but
the test results are not available. As the industry develops new, rapid
procedures for microbiological testing, this time lag will decrease
dramatically.
QA operation
■ The question is easier to answer with food-safety issues
than with quality deviations.
– With food safety, if you don’t know or there is doubt, you don’t
ship anything.
– However, with quality deviations, the manager must ask how
bad the out-of-specification condition is.
■ Previous customer complaints about a problem can be reported along with the test
data.
■ One recommendation might entail a quality review committee established by upper
management that will make these decisions based on the data furnished by QA.
■ This should occur at a management level that understands the total ramifications of
a decision to ship or not ship the product. Usually, these are the people that
established and approved the original product specifications.
QA operation
■ Raw-material deviations are easier to deal with.
– Is the product safe to use? If the answer is no, then it is rejected.
– Can the company make a good, quality finished product from the
out-of-specification raw material?
■ If yes, then it is accepted and a deviation report is sent to the supplier.
– Can the supplier replace the raw material in time to maintain the
production schedule?
■ If not, then how badly does the company need the final product it contains?
■ If it is critical, then can manufacturing make a processing change to
accommodate the raw-material deviation?
■ If not, then it is still rejected.