Concepts of Growth and Development
Concepts of Growth and Development
1. Chronological age
2. Biological age which consists of morphologic age
,skeletal age , dental age and circumpubertal age
3. Behavioral age
4. Mental age
5. Self-concept age.
Chronological Age Biological Age
it is a poor indicator of Somatotypic Age
developmental status. Ectomorph,
Mesomorph, and
Endomorph.
Height and Weight Age
Dental Age Sexual and Facial Age
Dental age does not correlate well
with the developmental age.
The dental age method involves
the recognition of clinically
present teeth with eruption charts.
The major limitation
Variation in the timing of eruption,
The influence of local and
environmental factors, and
The fact that several or no teeth may
erupt during the same time interval.
SKELETAL AGE ASSESSMENT
Hand wrist Ceph(frontal sinus and
cvm) OPG(canine nad 3rd
molar)
CVM Stages Hassel and Farman (1995)
Initiation: Inferior borders
of the second, third and
fourth cervical vertebrae
are flat at this stage.
The third vertebra is
wedge shaped and the
superior vertebral borders
are tapered from posterior
to anterior.
100% Growth.
Acceleration
Concavities on the inferior
borders of second and
third vertebrae begin to
develop.
Inferior borders of the
fourth vertebrae remain
flat. Vertebral bodies of
third and fourth vertebrae
are nearly rectangular in
shape.
65 to 85% growth remains.
Transition:
Distinct concavities are
shown on the inferior
borders of second and third
vertebrae.
A concavity begins to
develop on the inferior
border of fourth vertebra.
Vertebral bodies of third
and fourth are rectangular
in shape.
25 to 65% growth remains.
(maximally use)
Deceleration:
Distinct concavities can be
observed on the inferior
borders of second, third
and fourth cervical
vertebrae.
Vertebral bodies of third
and fourth begin to be
more square in shape.
10 to 25% growth
remains.
Maturation:
Marked concavities are
observed on the inferior
border of second, third and
fourth cervical vertebrae.
Vertebral bodies of third
and fourth are almost
square in shape.
5 to 10 % growth
remains.
Completion:
Deep concavities are
observed on the second,
third, and fourth cervical
vertebrae.
Vertebral bodies are
greater vertically than
horizontally.
Pubertal growth has been
completed.
CVM
Modified Stages of Cervical Vertebral
Maturation (2005)
Mandibular Canine Calcification as an
Indicator of Skeletal Maturation
Canine stage F indicates the initiation of puberty.
The timing of stage G coincides with the capping of the third, middle and
the fifth proximal phalanges and the presence of the adductor sesamoid
The intermediate stage between stages F and G should be used to identify
the early stages of the pubertal growth spurt.
Development of Mandibular Third Molar as an
Indicator of Skeletal Maturation
Frontal Sinus as Skeletal Maturity Indicator
SKELETAL GROWTH
Possibilities for growth @ cellular level
Hypertrophy--prominent feature
Hyperplasia--special circumstances
Cells to secrete extracellular material--important in the
growth of the skeletal system. Accertion
Growth of Soft tissues
Interstitial growth
Hyperplasia
Hypertrophy
Secretion of extracellular material
All soft tissues & uncalcified cartilage
Hard tissue growth
Direct or surface apposition of bone
Hyperplasia
Hypertrophy
Secretion of extracellular material
Endochondral Intramembranous (cranial vault and
both jaws)
The maxilla forms initially from a center of mesenchymal
condensation in the maxillary process. This area is located
on the lateral surface of the nasal capsule, the most
anterior part of the chondrocranium, but although the
growth cartilage contributes to lengthening of the head
and anterior displacement of the maxilla, it does not
contribute directly to formation of the maxillary bone. An
accessory cartilage, the zygomatic or malar cartilage,
which forms in the developing malar process, disappears
and is totally replaced by bone well before birth, unlike
the mandibular condylar cartilage, which persists.
The overall growth of bones, resulting in their
recognizable expansion, is a function of two phenomena:
remodeling and transposition. Remodeling is a
combination of accretional growth and resorption of bone
and is a response, at least in part, to periosteal functional
matrices.
SITES AND TYPES OF GROWTH IN THE
CRANIOFACIAL COMPLEX
GROWTH FIELDS
The outside and inside surfaces of the bone are blanketed by soft tissues,
cartilage or osteogenic membranes. With in this, blanket areas known as
growth fields which are spread all along the bone in a mosaic pattern, are
responsible for producing an alteration in the growing bone.
GROWTH SITES
Growth sites are growth fields that have special significance in the growth
of a particular bone, e.g. epiphyseal plates of long bones. These are
supposed to have an intrinsic growth potential.
REMODELING
It is differential growth activity involving deposition and resorption on the
inner and outer surfaces of the bone, e.g , ramus moves posteriorly by a
combination of resorption and deposition.
GROWTH FIELDS
The outside and inside
surfaces of the bone are
blanketed by soft tissues,
cartilage or osteogenic
membranes. With in this,
blanket areas known as
growth fields which are
spread all along the bone
in a mosaic pattern, are
responsible for producing
an alteration in the
growing bone
GROWTH SITES
Growth sites are growth fields that have special
significance in the growth of a particular bone, e.g.
epiphyseal plates of long bones. These are supposed to
have an intrinsic growth potential.
Bone Relocation & Remodeling
REMODELING
It is differential growth
activity involving
deposition and resorption
on the inner and outer
surfaces of the bone, e.g ,
ramus moves posteriorly
by a combination of
resorption and deposition.
Bone Relocation & Remodeling
The process of relocation, as
indicated in underlies most of the
remodeling changes that take
place during bone growth. In the
mandible, for example, portions
of the condyle become converted
by remodeling into the neck. In
these superimposed growth
stages, sections of A and B show
the local changes in size and
shape that occur as the bone
enlarges. Remodeling is a process
of reshaping and resizing as a
consequence of progressive,
continuous relocation
GROWTH MOVEMENTS
Growth movements are primarily of two types:
Cortical drift
Cortical drift is a type of growth movement occurring towards the
depository surface by a combination of resorption and deposition on
the opposing surfaces simultaneously.
Displacement
Displacement is the movement of the whole bone as a unit. Two
types are seen.
Primary displacement: Displacement of bone in conjuction with
its own growth. It produces space within which the bones continue
to grow.
Secondary displacement: Displacement of bone as a result of
growth and enlargement of adjacent bone.
Cortical drift
Cortical drift is a type of
growth movement
occurring towards the
depository surface by a
combination of resorption
and deposition on the
opposing surfaces
simultaneously.
Displacement
Displacement is the
movement of the whole
bone as a unit. Two types
are seen.
Primary displacement
Displacement of bone in
conjunction with its own
growth. It produces space
within which the bones
continue to grow.
Secondary displacement
Displacement of bone as a
result of growth and
enlargement of adjacent
bone.
V principle
For bones that have a "V" shape (or
funnel shape), bone deposition
occurs on the inner side of the V,
resorption takes place on the
outside surface. The direction of
movement is toward the wide end
of the V.
Surface Principle
Bone sides that face the
direction of growth are
subject to deposition and
oppose are subject to
resorption.
THEORIES OF GROWTH CONTROL
The Genetic "Theory"
The Genetic "Theory"
The genetic theory simply said that “genes determine all”.
Although called a theory it was more assumed than
proven.
After the general assumptions were found to be flawed,
some said "perhaps this part is genetically controlled
while that is not," or "this part, is more controlled by
heredity than that." Such statements showed uneasiness
with the all-embracing aspects of the' 'theory. "
Sicher's Hypothesis (Sutural Dominance)
Sicher deduced from the many studies using vital dyes
that the sutures were causing most of the growth; in fact,
he said "the primary event in sutural growth is the
proliferation of the connective tissue between the two
bones. If the sutural connective tissue proliferates it
creates the space for appositional growth at the borders of
the two bones."
Replacement of the proliferating connective tissue was
necessary for functional maintenance of the bones.
Sicher's Hypothesis (Sutural Dominance)
He felt that the connective tissue in sutures of both the
nasomaxillary complex and vault produced forces which
separated the bones, just as the synchondroses expanded the
cranial base and the epiphyseal plate’s lengthened long bones.
Sicher viewed the cartilage of the mandible somewhat
differently, stating that it grew both interstitially, as epiphyseal
plates, and appositionally, as bone grows under periosteum.
His ideas came to be called the "sutural dominance
theory," but it would seem he held sutures, cartilage, and
periosteum all responsible for facial growth and assumed all
were under tight intrinsic genetic control.
Scott's Hypothesis (Nasal Septum)
Scott held that they continued to dominate facial growth
postnatally. He specifically emphasized how the cartilage of the
nasal septum during its growth paced the growth of the maxilla.
Sutural growth, Scott felt, came in response to the growth of other
structures including cartilaginous elements, brain, the eyes, and
so forth.
Latham elaborated on Scott's ideas about the nasal septum and
maxillary growth, emphasizing the role of the septo-premaxillary
ligament beginning in the later part of the fetal period.
He felt the maxillary sutures began as sliding joints adapting to
initiating growth forces elsewhere, but later manifest increasing
osteogenesis, contributing to the main displacing force at the free
surfaces. Thus, he combines ideas of Scott, Sicher, and Moss.
Moss' Hypothesis (Functional Matrix)
Moss feels that bone and cartilage lack growth
determination and grow in response to intrinsic growth of
associated tissues, noting that the genetic coding for
craniofacial skeletal growth is outside the bony skeleton.
He terms the associated tissues "functional matrices.”
Each component of a functional matrix performs a
necessary service-such as respiration, mastication, speech-
while the skeletal tissues support and protect the
associated functional matrices.
Moss' Hypothesis (Functional Matrix)
Moss divides the skull into a series of discrete functional components each
comprised of a functional matrix and an associated skeletal unit, (designating
functional matrices as either periosteal or capsular. A periosteal functional
matrix affects deposition and resorption of adjacent bony tissue; therefore,
the matrix controls remodeling and the size and shape of a bone (e. g., the
interaction between the temporal muscle and the coronoid process of the
mandible).
Moss identifies two large, enveloping capsular matrices: the cerebral and
the facial
Each contain specific tissues and structures and spaces, spaces which must
remain open to fulfill their functions. As each capsular matrix and its
associated elements expand, all of the bones, endochondral and
intramembranous, grow to maintain the physiologic spaces.
Thus, Moss argues, the skeletal tissues grow only in response to soft-tissue
growth. The effect is a passive translation of skeletal components in space.
Petrovic's Hypothesis (Servosystem)
Using the language of cybernetics, Petrovic reasoned that it is the
interaction of a series of causal change and feedback mechanisms
which determines the growth of the various craniofacial regions.
According to this servosystem theory of facial growth, control of
primary cartilages takes a cybernetic form of a "command" whereas, in
contrast, control of secondary cartilage (e.g., the mandibular condyle) is
comprised not only of a direct effect of cell multiplication but also of
indirect effects.
In his experiments Petrovic detected no genetically predetermined final
length for the mandible rather; the direction and magnitude of condylar
growth variation are perceived as quantitative responses to the
lengthening of the maxilla.
Petrovic's provocative ideas are specially useful in understanding the
role of functional appliances in mandibular growth.
Van Limborgh theory
Recent hypothesis assumes that postnatal facial skeletal
development is controlled by a multifactorial system
which is influenced by genetic, intrinsic and local factors
(Van Limborgh 1970, Petrovic, 1970).
FACTORS AFFECTING PHYSICAL
GROWTH
The development of the dentofacial complex is dependent on
the following three elements:
Genetic :
Inherited genotype, like heredity
Operation of genetic mechanisms, like race.
Environmental factor:
Nutrition and biochemical interactions
Physical phenomena like temperature, pressure, hydration etc
Functional forces:
Extrinsic and intrinsic forces of muscle actions, like exercises
Space occupying organs and cavities
Growth expansion
Regional Growth
To understand growth in any area of the body, it is
necessary to understand:
(1) The sites or location of growth,
(2) The type of growth occurring at that location, and
(3) The determinant or controlling factors in that growth
Cranial Vault
Flat bones
Intramembranous bone formation, without cartilaginous
precursors.
Periosteal growth
Remodeling and growth occur
-at the periosteum- -the cranial sutures,
-& periosteal activity also changes both the inner and outer surfaces of these
plate-like bones.
Simultaneous Bone removal & deposition result in
changes in contour.
Func. of sutures:
unite bone, absorb forces, act as joint , growth sites
Fontanelles
At birth, the flat bones of the skull are rather widely separated by
relatively loose connective tissues. These open spaces, the fontanelles,
allow a considerable amount of deformation of the skull at birth. This is
important in allowing the relatively large head to pass through the birth
canal. After birth they closes.
Fontanelles
Anterior : lozonges shaped @ saggital and coronal surturs closes @ age 1 yrs.
Posterior : triangular , @ saggital and Parieto occipital sutures closes@ 2
months.
Posteriolateral: rectangular ,@ paritomastoid, parioto occipital, and
occipitomastoid,chages @ 1 yrs.
Anteriolateral: @ coronal & sphenoparietal suture.
Closes 3-6 month
The cranial base
Cranial base are formed by endochondral ossification.
*Midline structures. More lat surface remodeling become
more important.
Synchondroses
Synchondroses remain between the centers of ossification.
spheno-occipital synchondrosis, (12-15yrs)
intersphenoid synchondrosis, ( fuse @ birth)
spheno-ethmoidal synchondrosis, ( fuse @ birth)
Cranial base flexure
Dolichocephalic Brachycephalic
Brain is narrow & long Brain is wide and rounded
Cranial flexure is open Cranial fleaxure is more
Nasomaxillary complex is upright
forward and lowered Naso maxillary process is
Mn rotate downward and posteriorly placed
lowered Mn rotate upward nad
Class II profile forward
Class I or III
Nasomaxillary complex
Develops postnatally by intramembranous ossification.
growth occurs in two ways:
(1) by apposition of bone at the sutures
(2) by surface remodeling.
Other areas
NASAL SEPTUM
ALVELAR PROCESS
Nasomaxillary complex
As growth of surrounding
soft tissues translates the
maxilla downward and
forward, opening up space
at its superior and
posterior sutural
attachments, new bone is
added on both sides of the
sutures.
Nasomaxillary complex
As the maxilla is carried
downward and forward, its
anterior surface tends to
resorb. Resorption
surfaces are shown here in
pink. Only a small area
around the anterior nasal
spine is an exception.
The overall growth changes are the result of both a downward and forward translation
of the maxilla and a simultaneous surface remodeling.
Nasomaxillary complex
It is not necessarily true
that remodeling changes
oppose the direction of
translation. Depending on
the specific location,
translation and remodeling
may either additive or
subtractive,
Ex. on the roof of the
mouth.
Nasomaxillary complex
Adolescence Nasomaxillary
growth
Adolescence Nasomaxillary growth
Growth of the nasomaxillary area is The cranial base lengthens and
produced by two basic mechanisms: the anterior lobes of the brain grow in size.
(1) Passive displacement, created by
growth in the cranial base that pushes
the maxilla forward, and
(2) Active growth of the maxillary
structures and nose
Adolescence Nasomaxillary growth
As the maxilla is translated downward
and forward, bone is added at the
sutures and in the tuberosity area
posteriorly, but at the same time,
surface remodeling removes bone
from the anterior surfaces (except for a
small area at the anterior nasal spine).
For this reason, the amount of forward
movement of anterior surfaces is less
than the amount of displacement. In
the roof of the mouth, however,
surface remodeling adds bone, while
bone is resorbed from the floor of the
nose. The total downward movement
of the palatal vault, therefore, is
greater than the amount of
displacement.
Mandible Growth
Mandible
Intramembranous
Endochondral ;
Condylar process, cronoid,
symphesis
Mn Remodeling
Mandible
Both endochondral and
periosteal activity are
important in growth of the
mandible.
Mandible ramus remodeling
As the mandible grows in
length, the ramus is
extensively remodeled, so
much so that bone at the
tip of the condylar process
at an early age can be
found at the anterior
surface of the ramus some
years later.
Mandible growth
Adolescence Mandibular growth
Adolescence Mandibular growth
Growth of the mandible
continues at a relatively
steady rate before puberty.
Average, ramus height
increases 1 to 2 mm /yr
Body length increases 2 to
3 mm/yr.
Chin growth
One feature of mandibular growth is an accentuation of
the prominence of the chin.
Small amounts of bone are added,
Resorption b/w chin and alveolar process.
The increase in chin prominence with maturity results from a
combination of forward translation of the chin as a part of the
overall growth pattern of the mandible and resorption above the
chin that alters the bony contours.
Timing of Growth in Width, Length, and
Height.-------------------------------------- Width
Growth in width-length,-height.
Growth in width of both jaws, completed before the
adolescent growth spurt.
Intercanine width is more likely to decrease than increase
after age 12.7
Length
Growth in length and height of both jaws continues
through the period of puberty.
In girls, the maxilla grows slowly downward and forward
to age 14 to 15 on the average (more accurately, by 2 to 3
years after first menstruation), then tends to grow slightly
more almost straight forward
Height
Height of the face continues longer than growth in length,
with the late vertical growth primarily in the mandible.
Increases in facial height and concomitant eruption of
teeth continue throughout life, but decline to the adult
level.
Facial Growth in Adults
Facial Growth in Adults
Facial growth had continued during adult life.
3D increase in all of the facial dimensions.
Vertical changes >anteroposterior changes.
Width changes were least evident.
An apparent deceleration of growth in females in the late
teens was followed by a resumption of growth during the
twenties.
The data also revealed that rotation of both jaws continued
into adult life, in concert with the vertical changes and
eruption of teeth.
Facial Growth in Adults
Male growth changes age 37 to age 77 (red).
Growth changes in a woman age 34 and 83. Note that both
Note that both the maxilla and mandible grew forward, jaws grew forward and somewhat downward, and that the
and the nose grew considerably. nasal structures enlarged.
Facial Growth in Adults
A, Mean dimensional changes in
the mandible for males in adult
life. It is apparent that the
pattern of juvenile and
adolescent growth continues at a
slower but ultimately significant
rate.
Examples include:
TMJ syndrome
RAS syndrome etc.
DISEASE
It is defined literally as “deviation or interruption of normal structure or
function of an organ characterized by a specific set of signs and symptoms”
Examples are:
Influenza
Mumps
Hepatitis etc
ASSOCIATION.
Examples are:
Blood group O
peptic ulcers.
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SYNDROME
AND DISEASE
SYNDROME disease
1. In a syndrome usually the In a disease there is mostly
cause and the etiological factor a recognizable cause or
Is not known. etiological factor present.
2. In a syndrome the signs In a disease there is a
and symptoms are too specific set of signs and
variable. Symptoms.
3. In a syndrome consistent In a disease consistent
anatomical alterations are not anatomical alterations
seen. are seen.
4. In a syndrome the treatment is In a disease underlying cause
usually symptomatic because is treated.
cause is not known.
Down Syndrome
Down Syndrome
DiGeorge (VELOCARDIOFACIAL)syndrome
TREACHER-COLLINS SYNDROME
Robin
Crouzen
Apert Syndrome
THEORIES OF THE CRANIOFACIAL
GROWTH
Part 2
4 vicarage mews bradford bd24 lg
Thanku
Various theories have been proposed to explain the exact
mechanism involved in the growth of bone. All theories
however, were based on three basic principles:
PRIMARY DETERMINANTS OF GROWTH?
Bones?
Cartilage?
Soft Tissues?
It is verified that that growth is strongly influenced by
genetic factors, but it also can be significantly affected by
environmental factors such as nutritional status, physical
activity, & health or illnesses.
The major difference in these various theories, is the
location at which genetic control is expressed.
A. THE GENETIC THEORY
It simply determines that the genes determine all. This
theory is more assumed than proven & hence is more of
just a hypothesis, with the general assumption found to be
flawed.
SICHER`S HYPOTHESIS (SUTURAL
DOMINANCE)
Sicher deduced from various studies using vital dyes that
growth was mainly caused by sutures. He stated that:
“the primary event in sutural growth is the proliferation
of connective tissue between two bones.”
Replacement of the proliferating connective tissue was necessary
for functional maintenace of the two bones. He felt that the
connective tissue in the suture of both, the nasomaxillary
complex & the cranial vault produced forces which separated the
bones, just as the synchondrosis expanded the cranial base, & the
epiphyseal plates lengthened the long bones.
He however believed that the cartilage of the mandible grew
both interstitially (as epiphyseal plates) as well as appositionally(
as bone grows under the periosteum).
Sicher thus believed that the facial growth was controlled by
sutures, cartilage & periosteum & all were under tight genetic
control. This theory thus came to be known as the Sutural
Dominance Theory
The hypothesis become discredited because:
Translatory growth of bones continues normally either in
the absence of sutures.
In untreated clefts of palate sutures are not present, yet
growth continues.
Occurance of microcephaly & hydrocephaly raises doubt
about the intrinsic genetic stimulus of sutures in
determining growth.
SCOTT`S HYPOTHESIS (NASAL SEPTUM)
He stated that the intrinsic growth controlling factors are
present in the cartilage & periosteum, with sutures being
only secondary & growth is thus dependant on extra-oral
influence.
Scott based his theory noting the prenatal importance of
cartilaginous portion of the head, nasal capsule, mandible
& cranial base. He felt this development was under
intrinsic genetic control & that they continued to dominate
facial growth post-natally.
He emphasized how cartilage of the nasal septum, during
its growth was in pace with growth of the maxilla. He
stated sutural growth came in reponse to growth of other
structures such as cartilagenous elements as well as soft
tissues such as brain, eyes, etc.
Thus according to Scott`s theories, growth is in response
to synchondrosis proliferation & local environmental
factor.
Thus the experimental evidences to support this theory
include:
Atraumatic resection of nasal septum leads to significance
interference in growth of midface or maxilla.
In cases of cleft palate where there are no sutures, growth
still takes place.
MOSS`S HYPOTHESIS( FUNCTIONAL
MATRIX THEORY)
Supports Environmental influence.
Facial response occur as a response to functional needs &
is mediated by the Soft tissue in which the jaws are
embedded
EXAMPLES;
Orbit grows due to eye growth.
Maxillary sinus growth with oxygen demand.
Cranium growth due to brain growth.
Examples in Orthodontics:
RPE, Functional Appliances, Tongue volume effect on
lower dental arch size.
VAN LIMBORGH THEORY