Unit 5: Decision Making: DR Juhi Garg

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 30

Unit 5: Decision Making

Dr Juhi Garg
Nature of Decision Making
The process by which managers respond to opportunities and
threats that confront them by analyzing options and making
determinations about specific organizational goals and courses of
action.
Decisions in response to opportunities occurs when managers
respond to ways to improve organizational performance to benefit
customers, employees, and other stakeholder groups

Decisions in response to threats events inside or outside the


organization are adversely affecting organizational performance
Decision Making

Programmed Decision
• Routine, virtually automatic decision making that
follows established rules or guidelines.
• Managers have made the same decision many times before
• Little ambiguity involved
Decision Making

Non-Programmed Decisions
• Nonroutine decision made in response to unusual or
novel opportunities and threats.
• The are no rules to follow since the decision is new.
• Decisions are made based on information, and a manager’s
intuition, and judgment.
Decision Making
• Intuition
• feelings, beliefs, and hunches that come readily to mind, require little
effort and information gathering and result in on-the-spot decisions.

• Reasoned judgment
• decisions that take time and effort to make and result from careful
information gathering, generation of alternatives, and evaluation of
alternatives
The Classical Model

Classical Model of Decision Making


• A prescriptive model of decision making that assumes the
decision maker can identify and evaluate all possible
alternatives and their consequences and rationally choose the
most appropriate course of action.
• Optimum decision
• The most appropriate decision in light of what managers
believe to be the most desirable future consequences for
their organization.
The Classical Model of Decision Making

Figure 7.1
The Administrative Model

Administrative Model of Decision Making


• An approach to decision making that explains why decision making is
inherently uncertain and risky and why managers can rarely make decisions
in the manner prescribed by the classical model
Administrative Model of Decision Making
• Bounded rationality
• There is a large number of alternatives and available information can be so
extensive that managers cannot consider it all.
• Decisions are limited by people’s cognitive limitations.
• Incomplete information
• Because of risk and uncertainty, ambiguity, and time constraints
Why Information Is Incomplete

Figure 7.2
Causes of Incomplete Information
• Risk
• Present when managers know the possible outcomes of a particular course
of action and can assign probabilities to them.
• Uncertainty
• Probabilities cannot be given for outcomes and the future is unknown.
Ambiguous Information
• Information whose meaning is not clear allowing it to be interpreted in
multiple or conflicting ways.
Causes of Incomplete Information

• Time constraints and information costs


• managers have neither the time nor money to search for all possible alternatives and
evaluate potential consequences
• Satisficing
• Searching for and choosing an acceptable, or satisfactory response to problems and
opportunities, rather than trying to make the best decision.
• Managers explore a limited number of options and choose an acceptable
decision rather than the optimum decision.
• This is the typical response of managers when dealing with incomplete
information.
Six Steps in Decision Making

Figure 7.4
Decision Making Steps

Step 1. Recognize Need for a Decision


• Sparked by an event such as environment changes.
• Managers must first realize that a decision must be
made.
Step 2. Generate Alternatives
• Managers must develop feasible alternative courses of
action.
• If good alternatives are missed, the resulting
decision is poor.
• It is hard to develop creative alternatives, so
managers need to look for new ideas.
Decision Making Steps

Step 3. Evaluate Alternatives


• What are the advantages and disadvantages of each
alternative?
• Managers should specify criteria, then evaluate.
Decision Making Steps

Step 3. Evaluate alternatives


Criteria

Legality Is the alternative legal and will not violate any


domestic and international laws or
government regulations?

Ethicalness Is the alternative ethical and will not bring


harm stakeholders unnecessarily?

Economic Feasibility Can organization’s performance goals sustain


this alternative?
Practicality Does the management have the capabilities
and resources required to implement the
alternative?
General Criteria for Evaluating Possible
Courses of Action
Decision Making Steps

Step 4. Choose Among Alternatives


• Rank the various alternatives and make a decision
• Managers must be sure all the information available is brought to bear on
the problem or issue at hand
Decision Making Steps

Step 5. Implement Chosen Alternative


• Managers must now carry out the alternative.
• Often a decision is made and not implemented.
Step 6. Learn From Feedback
• Managers should consider what went right and wrong with the decision
and learn for the future.
• Without feedback, managers do not learn from experience and will
repeat the same mistake over.
Feedback Procedure

1. Compare what actually happened to what was expected to


happen as a result of the decision
2. Explore why any expectations for the decision were not met
3. Derive guidelines that will help in future decision making
Cognitive Biases and Decision Making

Heuristics
• Rules of thumb that simplify the process of making decisions.
• Decision makers use heuristics to deal with bounded rationality.
• If the heuristic is wrong, however, then poor decisions result from
its use.
• Systematic errors – errors that people make over and over and that
result in poor decision making
Types of Cognitive Biases

• Prior Hypothesis Bias


• Allowing strong prior beliefs about a relationship between
variables to influence decisions based on these beliefs even
when evidence shows they are wrong.
• Representativeness
• The decision maker incorrectly generalizes a decision from a
small sample or a single incident.
Types of Cognitive Biases

• Illusion of Control
• The tendency to overestimates one’s own ability to control
activities and events.
• Escalating Commitment
• Committing considerable resources to project and then
committing more even if evidence shows the project is
failing.
Group Decision Making

• Superior to individual making


• Choices less likely to fall victim to bias
• Able to draw on combined skills of group members
• Improve ability to generate feasible alternatives
Group Decision Making

• Allows managers to process more information


• Managers affected by decisions agree to cooperate
Group Decision Making

• Potential Disadvantages
• Can take much longer than individuals to make decisions
• Can be difficult to get two or more managers to agree because of different
interests and preferences
• Can be undermined by biases
Group Decision Making

Groupthink
• Pattern of faulty and biased decision making that occurs in
groups whose members strive for agreement among
themselves at the expense of accurately assessing
information relevant to a decision
Improved Group Decision Making
• Devil’s Advocacy
• Critical analysis of a preferred alternative to ascertain its
strengths and weaknesses before it is implemented
• One member of the group who acts as the devil’s advocate
by critiquing the way the group identified alternatives and
pointing out problems with the alternative selection.
Improved Group Decision Making

• Dialectical Inquiry
• Two different groups are assigned to the problem
and each group is responsible for evaluating
alternatives and selecting one of them
• Top managers then hear each group present their
alternatives and each group can critique the other.
• Promote Diversity
• Increasing the diversity in a group may result in
consideration of a wider set of alternatives.
Devil’s Advocacy and Dialectical Inquiry

Figure 7.7
Organizational Learning and Creativity
Creativity
• The ability of the decision maker to discover novel ideas
leading to a feasible course of action.
• A creative management
staff and employees are
the key to the learning
organization.

You might also like