Satyam Fiasco2
Satyam Fiasco2
Satyam Fiasco2
Governance
Presented by:-
1. Gaurav Jain
2. Jayesh mukhraya
3. Ashish patil
4. Tajender singh
5. Navneet
6. Tarunum naaz
Satyam Fiasco
Corporate Governance
Dec: 16
The board of directors of Satyam Computer Services has approved proposals to acquire 100%
stake in Maytas Properties and 51% In Maytas Infra.
The total outflow for both the acquisitions is expected to be US$ 1.6 billion comprising of US$
1.3 billion for the 100% stake In Maytas Properties and US$ 0.3 billion for the 51% stake in
Maytas Infra.
Why Mr. Raju want to Buy Maytas
• Raju was trying to keep Satyam stock value high so that he can pledge
as well as sell Satyam’s shares for higher price & Invest the same
money for creating the assets.
Inflated figures
• Marginal gap between actual operating profit and the one reflected in the
books continued to grow over the years. It had attained unmanageable
proportions as the size of the company’s operations grew over the years.
• Inflated cash & bank balances of Rs.5040 crore (As against Rs.5361
crore reflected in the books).
• An accrued interest of Rs.376 crore which is non-existent.
• The investigating agency during the probe found that the accused relied heavily on
technology to generate nearly 7,000 fake invoices to the tune of Rs 4,500 crore.
• The gap in balance sheet has arisen purely on account of inflated profits over a
period of last several years.
• Actual number of employees were only 40,000 and not 53,000 Mr. Raju was
allegedly withdrawing INR 20 crores every month paying these non-existent
employees.
Sr. No. Inflated Figures Effect in Balance Sheet
• It would be naive to believe in the comments by select industry leaders and select politicians
that the Satyam case is one-off and that the entire Indian IT sector (or for that matter, the
entire Indian business fraternity) cannot be tarred by the same paintbrush.
• Satyam most certainly is not a only one-off high profile situation that India has been forced to
face. It is not the first one in the last 25 years, and will certainly not be the last of the high
profile ones in the next few years.
• To start with, we must accept that Satyam is our problem and we are expected to find the
solution ourselves.
• It may be easy to blame Price Waterhouse, that they did not perform their duties as auditors
correctly. We must accept that there would be many very large audit firms, who may also be
routinely turning a blind eye to the shenanigans of various promoters.
• We hope, that now, & perhaps finally, the regulatory systems and bodies responsible for
ensuring compliance will start to function as they should have done before the Satyam
blowout.
suggestions
• More vigilant directors
• Auditors rotation
• Use of investigative audit techniques & forensic audits
• Stricter norms for independent directors
• Audit conduction in accordance with the Auditing and
Assurance Standards (AAS)
• Identifying and assessing the risk of material misstatement in
financial statements & contacting major customers/suppliers
• Black listing of Chartered Accountants by ICAI for indulging in
fraudulent accounting practices.
Thank you