100% found this document useful (1 vote)
109 views13 pages

Writing Task 1 - Academic: Sessions 5+6: Comparative Graphs Instructor: Kiana Rafiee

The summaries compare how energy was produced in France in 1995 and 2005. In 1995, coal, oil and petrol contributed almost equally at around 30% each. By 2005, France's dependence on petrol fell by around 10 percentage points. Nuclear and other sources saw their shares increase, reaching a combined share of just over 20% in 2005.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
109 views13 pages

Writing Task 1 - Academic: Sessions 5+6: Comparative Graphs Instructor: Kiana Rafiee

The summaries compare how energy was produced in France in 1995 and 2005. In 1995, coal, oil and petrol contributed almost equally at around 30% each. By 2005, France's dependence on petrol fell by around 10 percentage points. Nuclear and other sources saw their shares increase, reaching a combined share of just over 20% in 2005.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 13

WRITING TASK 1 - ACADEMIC

Sessions 5+6: Comparative Graphs

Instructor: Kiana Rafiee


WHAT TO DO

 Read the title, which tells you what the graph describes.
 Think of what you should compare.
 Decide what tenses you need to use.
 Choose the most noticeable features including the highest and lowest numbers,
similarities and key differences.
 Write an introduction to the topic using your own words.
 Write an overview that describes the big picture.
 Pick some details to mention.
LANGUAGE FOR MAKING COMPARISONS 1

 Correct the mistakes:


 1. I can read in English easier than before.
 2. Living in the environment is the better way to learn the language.
 3. Travelling is becoming more clean and safe.
 4. The most highest percentage appeared in 1991.
 5. Workers’ salaries got worser in 2000.
 6. I want to study abroad so that I can get a more better-paid job in the future.
 7. If you can’t understand a text, try reading it slowest.
LANGUAGE FOR MAKING COMPARISONS 1

 Correct the mistakes:


 1. I can read English more easily than before.
 2. Living in the country is the best way to learn the language.
 3. Travelling is becoming cleaner and safer.
 4. The highest percentage appeared in 1991.
 5. Worker’s salaries got worse in 2000.
 6. I want to study abroad so that I can get a better-paid job in the future.
 7. If you can’t understand a text, try reading it more slowly.
LANGUAGE FOR MAKING COMPARISONS 1

the city vs. the countryside

 The city is more polluted and noisier than the countryside. (adjective)
 More people live in the city, so there is more noise. (noun)
 There are fewer jobs in the country, but there is less stress. (noun)
 People live more peacefully in the country. (adverb)
 Accommodation costs more in the city. (verb)
LANGUAGE FOR MAKING COMPARISONS 1

the city vs. the countryside

 The city is much more polluted and noisier than the countryside. (adjective)
 The rural population lives slightly happier lives than the urban population. (adjective)
 Many more people live in the city, so there is considerably more noise. (noun)
 There are significantly fewer jobs in the country, but there is remarkably less stress. (noun)
 People live far more peacefully in the country. (adverb)
 Accommodation costs enormously more in the city. (verb)
PRACTICE

 1. Travelling by train is slightly…


 2. A night in a hotel costs much…
 3. London is considerably…
 4. You will learn a language far…
LANGUAGE FOR MAKING COMPARISONS 2

the city vs. the countryside

 The country isn’t as polluted as the city. (adjective)


 Not as many people live in the country, so there isn’t as much noise there. (noun)
 There aren’t as many jobs in the country, but there isn’t as much stress as there is in the
city. (noun)
 In the city, people do not live as peacefully as they do in the country. (adverb)
 Accommodation does not cost as much in the country as in the city. (verb)
LANGUAGE FOR MAKING COMPARISONS 2

the city vs. the countryside

 The country isn’t nearly as polluted as the city.


 Not nearly as many people live in the country, so there isn’t quite as much noise there.
 There aren’t nearly as many jobs in the country, but there isn’t nearly as much stress as
there is in the city.
 In the city, people do not live nearly as peacefully as they do in the country.
 Accommodation does not cost nearly as much in the country as in the city.
DESCRIBING NUMBERS
percentage percentage fraction ratio
50% fifty percent a half one in two
25% twenty-five percent a quarter one in four
75% seventy-five percent three quarters three in four
33.3% a third one in three
66.6% two thirds two in three
10% ten percent a tenth one in ten

Just over three quarters…


Nearly/almost half of…
Just under a quarter…
Around/about/approximately a third…
Three out of ten Britons…
 NUMERICAL COMPARISONS

Favorite Film Genre


 Action movies are twice as popular as
45
comedies for men.
40
35
30
 Three times as many men prefer thrillers as
25 romantic comedies.
20
15  Half as many women like science fiction as
10 westerns and thrillers.
5
0
Men Women
 Science fiction and westerns are only half as
popular as comedies among men.
Action Comedy thriller
Western Sci-fi romantic comedy
SAMPLE
1995
 The two pie charts compare how energy was produced in
France in the years 1995 and 2005. nucl othe
ear6 r gas
.4 4.9 29.6
 Overall, it can be seen that the most common ways to 3
generate energy in both years were coal, gas and petrol – petr
ol
all fossil fuels. The first two methods did not experience 29.2
significant change, while France’s dependence on petrol 7
coal 2005
fell by around ten percentage points, leaving more room
29.8
for the two remaining categories. other
9.1
 Looking at the details, in 1995, coal, oil and petrol
nuclear gas
contributed almost equally to the total energy gas coal petrol 10.1 30.31
nuclear other
production, about 30% each. The remaining 10% came petrol coal
from nuclear sources and other ways, whose share 19.55 30.93
increased to 9.10% and 10.10% respectively in 2005,
reaching a combined share of just above 20% of the
country’s energy production.
gas coal petrol
nuclear other
SAMPLE
1995
 It is also worth mentioning that, in 2005, France nucl othe
ear6 r gas
allocated approximately 60% of its energy 29.6
.4 4.9
production to coal and gas, which was only petr
3
marginally higher than the figure for 1995. ol
Moreover, the source that saw the highest increase 29.2
7
was ‘other’, whose share more than doubled in the coal 2005
period in question, going up from 4.90% to 10.10%. 29.8
other
9.1
(172 words)
nuclear gas
gas coal petrol 10.1 30.31
nuclear other
petrol coal
19.55 30.93

gas coal petrol


nuclear other

You might also like