0% found this document useful (0 votes)
70 views17 pages

How To Deal With Data From Local Lab

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
70 views17 pages

How To Deal With Data From Local Lab

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 17

How to deal with data from local labs

© 2010 PAREXEL International | Confidential


Laboratory Data Transfer with SDTM to the LB
domain

• Overview of topics:

• Challenge getting lab results into LB


• SDTM Requirements
• Data provided by Central Laboratories
• Data provided by Local Laboratories

• Standardized units

• Conversion factors

• Non-Convertible Units

2
SDTM Requirement

• The task: beside the original result and original unit coming from the
DB add
• LBTESTCDs when the lab test is not part of the CT
• Original ranges
• You need ONE standard unit per lab parameter
• Standardized section, including
• Converted result (if the standardized unit is different to the original unit)
• Standardized unit
• Converted ranges (if the standardized unit is different to the original unit)
• Reference range identicators
• Test methods and other supplemental information

3
Variable Conversion

•Need to convert all data from Original to Standard

Original Variable Standardized Variable

LBSTRESC
Results LBORRES
LBSTRESN

Units LBORRESU LBSTRESU

LBORNRLO LBSTNRLO
Ranges LBORNRHI LBSTNRHI

4
Data provided by Central Laboratories

• Central Laboratories are normally uncomplicated

• Standardized exports from their database

• Normally already only a single unit per test

• Ranges attached to values consistent with the timepoint of the test

• Reference range identicators in place

• Additional information often given

5
Data provided by Local Laboratories

• Local Laboratories are a challenge:

• Result and unit entered in CRF, Ranges often collected separately

• Every site could have their own unit per lab parameter

• Conversion of „local“ unit to selected „standard“ unit needed

• Define conversion factors per original unit which is different

• Variability of syntax of local units

• This includes similar units such as g/L == mg/mL


or semantic differences such as x10^6/L == 10E6/L == 10^6/L

• Use of „other unit“ fields

• Both original and standard unit must be mapped to Controlled Terminology

6
Example for Multiple Units per Parameter

7
Data provided by Local Laboratories (2)

• Need to collect the ranges per investigator per lab parameter

• Need to collect each range per gender and age of the subject

• Ranges have to be consistent with the unit of the value

• Ranges sometimes are valid only for a period - have to be updated

• Ranges may be from their lab, but they may have other references.

• Inconstitencies between result units and range units possible

• Data validation necessary for results out of range

• Investigator assessments must be included

8
Data provided by Local Laboratories (3)

• Other interesting things that could happen…

• The site changes the unit and/or ranges from visit to visit per subject

• Typos of units which has been entered per hand

• Do you know „LAKHS/CMM“ ?

• Handle exotic local units – and find conversion factors

• Identify the meaning for some abbrivated units

• You have to spend lots of resources to get the local lab part into a good shape

• Paper CRFs are much harder to handle than eDC eCRFs

9
Standardized units

• You need ONE standard unit per lab parameter

• Who determines this standard unit?

• There is no library to check for the correct unit per parameter

• Only for some lab parameter a „SI unit“ is defined

• Often a misunderstanding between „SI unit“ and „standardized unit“

• Different terms and syntax for the same unit

10
Standardized units (2)

• Sponsor defined the standard unit for „his“ submission

• Standard Unit must be defined -> sponsor specific

• often SI where available, but might be protocol or CRF driven as well

• Not all sponsors have such standardized unit per lab parameter
=> some times „standardized unit” per study

• Another problem: use of the same LBTEST for different LBCATs

• E.g. Glucose (GLUC) for Chemestry and Urinalysis

• Should the same LBTESTCD/LBTEST for the different categories?

11
Conversion factors

• Same problems and questions

• Who determines this conversion factors?

• There is no library to check for the correct conversion factors

• Need to validate each conversion factor

• Has to be hardcoded in the transfer program

• New data could mean: update of transfer program - because of new units

• Has to be used for values and ranges

12
What would make our life easier…

•General consideration: each sponsor should have a lab model defined,


e.g. a library, that defines…

• LBTESTCDs for non-CT lab parameter

• Laboratory categories for each lab test (need a concept of categorizing tests)

• Standardized units per lab parameter

• Conversion factors

•Question: is there a need to create such library within CDISC?

13
Special Issue: Non-Convertible Units

• Check for mixture of absolute and relative results for one parameter

• e.g. Basophils: given in “X 10*9/L” and “%”

• There are two different SDTM CT entries for Basophils:


• absolute Basophils BASO
• relative Basophils/Leukocytes BASOLE

• Depending on the original unit use the correct LBTESTCD/LBTEST

• Never convert such values since these are two separate parameters

14
Special Issue: Non-Convertible Units - Example

• Incorrect dataset
LBTESTCD LBTEST LBORRES LBORRESU LBSTRESC LBSTRESN LBSTRESU
BASO Basophils 0 % 0 0 X 10*9/L
BASO Basophils 0 % 0 0 X 10*9/L
BASO Basophils 1 PER 100 BLOOD CELLS 1 1 X 10*9/L
BASO Basophils 1 PER 100 BLOOD CELLS 1 1 X 10*9/L
BASO Basophils 2 PER 100 BLOOD CELLS 2 2 X 10*9/L
BASO Basophils 0.028 X 10*9/L 0.028 0.028 X 10*9/L
BASO Basophils 0.041 X 10*9/L 0.041 0.041 X 10*9/L
BASO Basophils 0.056 X 10*9/L 0.056 0.056 X 10*9/L

• Correct dataset
LBTESTCD LBTEST LBORRES LBORRESU LBSTRESC LBSTRESN LBSTRESU
BASOLE Basophils/Leukocytes 0 % 0 0%
BASOLE Basophils/Leukocytes 0 % 0 0%
BASOLE Basophils/Leukocytes 1 PER 100 BLOOD CELLS 1 1%
BASOLE Basophils/Leukocytes 1 PER 100 BLOOD CELLS 1 1%
BASOLE Basophils/Leukocytes 2 PER 100 BLOOD CELLS 2 2%
BASO Basophils 0.028 X 10*9/L 0.028 0.028 X 10*9/L
BASO Basophils 0.041 X 10*9/L 0.041 0.041 X 10*9/L
BASO Basophils 0.056 X 10*9/L 0.056 0.056 X 10*9/L

15
It’s not only LB…

• This standardized requirement may occurs for all Finding Domains

• Everywhere using different units for one parameter check for issues
• e.g. VS domain:
• Temperature collected in °C and °F
• Weight collected in kg and lbs
• Height collected in cm and inch

16
Thank you

17

You might also like