CH 03

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 28

Research Design

Chapter Outline
1) Overview
2) Research Design: Definition
3) Research Design: Classification
4) Exploratory Research
5) Descriptive Research
i. Cross-Sectional Design
ii. Longitudinal Design
iii. Advantages and Disadvantages of
Longitudinal and Cross-Sectional
Designs
6) Causal Research
7) Relationships Among Exploratory,
Descriptive, and Causal Research
Chapter Outline (cont.)
8) Potential Sources of Error
i. Random Sampling Error
ii. Non-sampling Error
a. Non-response Error
b. Response Error
9) Budgeting and Scheduling
10) Marketing Research Proposal
11) International Marketing Research
Chapter Outline (cont.)
12) Ethics in Marketing Research
13) Internet and Computer
Applications
15) Focus on Burke
14) Summary
15) Key terms and Concepts
16) Acronyms
definition
Framework or blueprint
Details the procedure discussed.
“nuts and bolts ” of implementing that
approach.
Fig. 3.1 A Classification of Marketing
Research Designs
Research Design

Exploratory Conclusive
Research Research
Design Design
Descriptive Casual
Research Research

Cross-Sectional Longitudinal
Design Design

Single Cross- Multiple Cross-


Sectional Design Sectional Design
Tasks

Describe the exploratory phase of research.


Define info needed
Specify measurement and scaling procedure
Construct questionnaires
Sampling process and size.
Table 3.1 Difference between Exploratory and
Conclusive Research
Exploratory Conclusive
Objective: To provide insights and To test specific
understanding. hypotheses and examine
relationships.
Character Information needed is
-istics: defined only loosely. Information needed is
Research process is clearly defined. Research
flexible and process is formal and
unstructured. Sample is structured. Sample is
small and non- large and representative.
representative. Data analysis is
Analysis of primary data quantitative.
Findings / is qualitative.
Results:

Outcom Tentative. Conclusive.


e:
Generally followed by
further exploratory or Findings used as input
Table 3.2 A Comparison of Basic Research Designs
Exploratory Descriptive Causal
Objective: Discovery of Describe market Determine
ideas and characteristics cause and
insights or functions effect
relationships
Characteristi Flexible, Marked by the
cs: versatile prior formulation Manipulation
of specific of one or more
hypotheses independent
variables
Often the front Preplanned and
end of total structured Control of
research design other
design mediating
Secondary data variables
Methods: Expert Surveys
surveys Panels Experiments
Pilot surveys Observation and
Secondary other data
Table 3.3 Consumption of Soft Drinks by
Various Age Cohorts
Age 1950 1960 1969 1979
8-19 52.9 62.6 73.2 81.0
20-29 45.2 60.7 76.0 75.8 C8
30-39 33.9 46.6 67.7 71.4 C7
40-49 23.2 40.8 58.6 67.8 C6
50+ 18.1 28.8 50.0 51.9 C5
C1 C2 C3 C4

C1: cohort born prior to 1900 C5: cohort born 1931-40


C2: cohort born 1901-10 C6: cohort born 1940-49
C3: cohort born 1911-20 C7: cohort born 1950-59
C4: cohort born 1921-30 C8: cohort born 1960-69
Relative Advantages and Disadvantages of
Longitudinal and Cross-Sectional Designs

Evaluatio Cross- Longitudina


n Criteria Sectional l Design
Design
Detecting Change - +
Large amount of data - +
collection - +
Accuracy + -
Representative Sampling + -
Response bias
Note: A “+” indicates a relative advantage over
the other design, whereas a “-” indicates a
relative disadvantage.
Table 3.5 Cross-Sectional Data May
Not Show Change
Brand Purchased Time Period
Period 1 Period 2
Survey Survey
Brand A 200 200
Brand B 300 300
Brand C 500 500
Total 1000 1000
Table 3.6 Longitudinal Data May
Show Substantial Change

Brand Brand Purchased in Period 2


Purchase
d in Brand A Brand B Brand C Total
Period
Brand A1 100 50 50 200
Brand B 25 100 175 300
Brand C 75 150 275 500
Total 200 300 500 1000
NASCAR
RIP 3.1 Tries to Shed Redneck Image
The National Association of Stock Car Auto
Racing (NASCAR) in the past has appealed to
Southerners with lower incomes that work in
laborer-type jobs. NASCAR, in an attempt to
increase its audience, chose to make-over its
stereotyped image and used exploratory and
descriptive research to generate ideas for
reaching a more affluent market.
NASCAR conducted exploratory
research to identify ways to
penetrate the non-race market,
reach younger fans, and build its
brand image across the nation.

Extensive focus groups revealed


that:
(1) NASCAR had a rural sports image
(2) that this image was not
necessarily negative, and
(3) companies that supported sports
RIP 3.1 Contd.

Survey research showed that:


29% of fans had income over
$50,000
27% worked as professionals
or managers
73% had a positive rural sports
image of NASCAR
71% of fans purchased
products of companies that
support the sport
NASCAR, of course, sought to increase
these percentages and developed
marketing plans that would build on the
image of NASCAR as a rural sport by
emphasizing that most of America is
suburbs and small towns.

NASCAR moved to
reach all of
America, not just
the traditional
Southern market.
Fig. 3.2 Potential Sources of Error in
Research Designs
Total Error

Random Sampling Non-sampling


Error Error

Response Non-response
Error Error

Researcher Interviewer Respondent


Error Errors Error

•Surrogate Information Error •Respondent Selection Error •Inability Error


•Measurement Error •Questioning Error •Unwillingness Error
•Population Definition Error •Recording Error
•Sampling Frame Error •Cheating Error
•Data Analysis Error
RIP 3.2 Citicorp Banks on Exploratory,
Descriptive, and Causal Research
Marketing Research at Citicorp is typical in
that it is used to measure consumer
awareness of products, monitor their
satisfaction and attitudes associated with
the product, track product usage and
diagnose problems as they occur. To
accomplish these tasks Citicorp makes
extensive use of exploratory, descriptive,
and causal research. Often it is
advantageous to offer special financial
packages to specific groups of customers.
In this case, a financial package is being
designed for senior citizens.
RIP 3.2 Contd.

1) A taskforce was created to better define the


market parameters to include all the needs of
the many Citicorp branches. A final decision
was made to include Americans 55 years of
age or older, retired and in the upper half of the
financial strata of that market.
2) Exploratory research in the form of secondary
data analysis of the mature or older market was
then performed and a study of competitive
products was conducted. Exploratory qualitative
research involving focus groups was also carried
out in order to determine the needs and desires
of the market and the level of satisfaction with
the current products.
In the case of
senior citizens, a
great deal of
diversity was found
in the market. This
was determined to
be due to such
factors as
affluence, relative
age, and the
absence or
RIP 3.2 Contd.

3) The next stage of research was


brainstorming. This involved the formation of
many different financial packages aimed for
the target market. In this case, a total of 10
ideas were generated.
4) The feasibility of the 10 ideas generated in
step 3 was then tested. The ideas were tested
on the basis of whether they were possible in
relation to the business. The following list of
questions was used as a series of hurdles that
the ideas had to pass to continue on to the next
step.

• Can the idea be explained in a manner that the


target
market will easily understand it?
• Does the idea fit into the overall strategy of
Citicorp?
RIP 3.2 Contd.

• Is there an available description of a specific


target
market for the proposed product?
• Does the research conducted so far indicate
a
potential match for target market needs and
is the
idea perceived to have appeal to this market?
• Is there a feasible outline of the tactics

and strategies for implementing the program?


• Have the financial impact and cost of the
program
been thoroughly evaluated and determined to
be in
5) A creative work-plan was then generated.
This plan was to emphasize the competitive
advantage of the proposed product as well as
better delineate the specific features of the
product.

6) The previous exploratory research was


now followed up with descriptive research in
the form of mall intercept surveys of people
in the target market range. The survey
showed that the list of special features was
too long and it was decided to drop the
features more commonly offered by RIP 3.2 Contd.
7) Finally, the product was test
marketed in six of the Citicorp
branches within the target
market. Test marketing is a
form of causal research. Given
successful test marketing
results, the product is
introduced nationally.
RIP 3.3 The Greenfield of Online Research

Greenfield Online Research Center,


Inc. (http://www.greenfieldonline.com),
based in Westport, Connecticut, is a
subsidiary of the Greenfield Consulting
Group. The Online Research Center
conducts focus groups, surveys, and
polls over the Internet. The company
has built up a “panel” of close to
200,000 Internet users, from which it
draws survey samples. The samples
may be used for descriptive research
designs like single or multiple cross
sectional designs, as well as
longitudinal designs. Causal designs
can also be implemented. Respondents
may also be chosen from the
RIP 3.3 Contd.
Internet users wishing to take part in surveys
and other projects begin by registering online
at the company’s Web site. The registration
consists of a “sign-up survey” that asks for e-
mail address, type of computer used, personal
interests and information about the
respondent’s household. Once an Internet
user is registered, Greenfield Online matches
the user with research studies that are well-
suited to his or her interests.

Incentives to take part in focus groups or


special surveys are offered by the companies
whose products or services are being
researched. This incentive is cash or valuable
prizes. Incentives are also offered to Internet
users to encourage them to register with
Greenfield’s Internet panel. New registrants

You might also like