Scribd
Upload
19 views9 pages

English Assessment Development: Merifa Rahmawati Siti Khoriyoh Tohyoh

Uploaded by

Merifa

This document discusses the validity and reliability of an English language assessment. It analyzes the assessment based on construct validity, clarity of instructions, clarity of questions, quality of language used, practicality, and use of natural language in dialogues. Overall, the assessment demonstrates good grammar and ease of understanding, but lacks clear instructions for some questions and does not provide adequate time allocation.

Copyright:

© All Rights Reserved
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt

English Assessment Development: Merifa Rahmawati Siti Khoriyoh Tohyoh

Uploaded by

Merifa
19 views9 pages
This document discusses the validity and reliability of an English language assessment. It analyzes the assessment based on construct validity, clarity of instructions, clarity of questions, quality of language used, practicality, and use of natural language in dialogues. Overall, the assessment demonstrates good grammar and ease of understanding, but lacks clear instructions for some questions and does not provide adequate time allocation.

Original Title

EAD.pptx

Copyright

© © All Rights Reserved

Available Formats

PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

This document discusses the validity and reliability of an English language assessment. It analyzes the assessment based on construct validity, clarity of instructions, clarity of questions, quality of language used, practicality, and use of natural language in dialogues. Overall, the assessment demonstrates good grammar and ease of understanding, but lacks clear instructions for some questions and does not provide adequate time allocation.

Copyright:

© All Rights Reserved
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
19 views9 pages

English Assessment Development: Merifa Rahmawati Siti Khoriyoh Tohyoh

Uploaded by

Merifa
This document discusses the validity and reliability of an English language assessment. It analyzes the assessment based on construct validity, clarity of instructions, clarity of questions, quality of language used, practicality, and use of natural language in dialogues. Overall, the assessment demonstrates good grammar and ease of understanding, but lacks clear instructions for some questions and does not provide adequate time allocation.

Copyright:

© All Rights Reserved
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 9

ENGLISH

ASSESSMENT
DEVELOPMENT

MERIFA RAHMAWATI

SITI KHORIYOH TOHYOH


Validity
• THE FORMAT : Multiple Choice and Essay
• The theory: construct validity shows that the result of the test
really presentents the same construct with the ability of the
students which is being measured (Djiwanjono, 1996: 96)
CONSTRUCT VALIDITY

1 Speaking 11 Writing 21 Writing 31 Reading 41 Writing

2 Speaking 12 Reading 22 Speaking 32 Reading 42 Writing

3 Writing 13 Writing 23 Speaking 33 Reading 43 Writing

4 Writing 14 Writing 24 Speaking 34 Reading 44 Writing

5 Speaking 15 Writing 25 Writing 35 Reading 45 Writing

6 Speaking 16 Speaking 26 Speaking 36 Reading 46 Writing

7 Speaking 17 Speaking 27 Reading 37 Reading 47 Writing

8 Speaking 18 Speaking 28 Reading 38 Writing 48 Writing

9 Listening 19 Writing 29 Reading 39 Writing 49 Writing

10 Speaking 20 Writing 30 Reading 40 Writing 50 Writing


RELIABILITY
1. CLARITY INSTRUCTION
Not clear
No 3, 6, 7,10, 16, 17, 19,
21,22, 24.

For example in number 3 the instruction just “ look at the picture!” after that we dont know what the
instruction. It should be in this question can addition in this instruction make statement about the picture or
describe about yuli in this picture . And the other number just blank space nothing the instruction.
2. CLARITY OF QUESTION

In this question it is not clear, because the picture in this paper is


very small, and no thing the color. For example in number 4. The
written is very small, and nothing spacy in after next number.
3. QUALITY OF THE LANGUAGE USED

• Good in Grammar
GOOD

• Easy to understanding
EASY
PRACTICALLITY

Number GOOD The number and indicator has


matche with indikators

Because in this question not

Time Allocation
NOT have time allocation, so it’s
mean make difficult to us answer
GOOD question with the target the
time.
CONTEXTUALIZED TEST ITEM THE DIALOGUES
IN THE QUESTION USING NATURAL LANGUAGE
– CAN BE PRACTICALLY BY STUDENTS – GOOD AND EASY TO
UNSERSTANDING

You might also like