The Art of Strategy: A Game Theorist'S Guide To Success in Business and Life
The Art of Strategy: A Game Theorist'S Guide To Success in Business and Life
Coopertate
$100 profit for
Entry Newcleaners
Fastcleaners
$0 profit
No entry
- Begin with cooperation and just only defect if the rival defect, cause many further steps thus
players can response to the rival immediately
- To get to a Nash Equilibrium, all players have to choose best responses – which is
relatively straightforward.
- Moreover, they all have to have correct beliefs about what the other players will be
doing in this game
If A goes first:
- A chooses Ad, B will get 5 or 0 => B chooses Ad
to get 5 => equilibrium (Ad;Ad) equivalent to
(10;5)
-A chooses Not Ad, B will get 8 or 2 => B chooses
Ad to get 8 => equilibrium (Ad; Not Ad)
equivalent to (15;0)
If B goes first:
-B chooses Ad, A will get 10 or 6 => A chooses
Ad to get 10 => equilibrium (Ad; Ad) equivalent
to (10;5)
-B chooses Not Ad, A will get 15 or 9 => A
choose Ad to get 15 => equilibrium (Ad; Not Ad),
equivalent to (15;0)
Sequential Simultaneous
As an example above, in case B goes first, its Nash Equilibriums of example above are
max value of payoff is 8 if A chooses Not Ad (Ad;Ad) and (Ad; Not Ad) which equivalent to
and B chooses Ad. However, in the shoes of A, (10;5) and (15;0).
If B chooses Ad, A will chooses Ad as well to
maximize their profit (10). At this time, the To choose the best equilibrium, it requires
equilibrium will be (Ad;Ad) equivalent to action from each player. For example, If B
(10;5). sees A hires more Marketing employees, can
If B chooses Not Ad, A will still choose Ad guess that A will chooses Ad => B can choose
cause the equilibrium will be (Ad; Not Ad) Ad to optimize the profit.
equivalent to (15;0).
=> To get the best profit, B has to choose Ad
as the same as A to get equilibrium (Ad;Ad)
equivalent to (10;5)