Mini Project Presentation 17C45A0442

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 13

Mini project Presentation on

ERROR DETECTION TECHNIQUE


FOR A MEDIAN FILTER

Presented By
P. Shiva tejaswini(17C45A0432)
A. Mounika(17C45A0443) Under guidance of
M. Saikiran(17C45A0442)
A. Thriveni(17C45A0430) MD. Hameed pasha
Associate Professor & Head, ECE

DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING


JAYAMUKHI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGICAL SCIENCE
(An Autonomous Institute, Accredited by NBA, Affiliated to JNTUH)
,
Narsampet Warangal – 506 332(T.S)
Content
 Abstract
 Introduction
•About project
•About VLSI
 Objectives of project
 Methodology

•Existing method

•Proposed technique

 Outcome of the project

 Conclusion

 Questions and answers


Abstract
 In digital image processing systems, the acquisition stage may
capture impulsive noise along with the image. This physical
phenomenon is commonly referred to as “salt-and pepper” noise.
The median filter is a nonlinear image processing operation used
to remove this impulsive noise from images. This digital filter can
be implemented in hardware to speed up the algorithm. However,
an SRAM-based FPGA implementation of this filter is then
susceptible to configuration memory bit flips induced by single
event upsets (SEUs), so a protection technique is needed for
critical applications in which the proper filter operation must be
ensured. In this project, a fault-tolerant implementation of the
median filter is presented and studied in depth. Our protection
technique checks if the median output is within a dynamic range
created with the remaining non-median outputs. An output error
signal is activated if a corrupted image pixel is detected, then, a
partial or complete reconfiguration can be performed to remove
the configuration memory error.

Keywords:SRAM,FPGA,SEU,median filter
INTRODUCTION
To avoid corruption in the data stored in the
memory, error correction codes(ECCs) are commonly
used. ECCs add parity check bits to each memory
word to detect and correct errors. This requires an
encoder to compute those bits when writing to the
memory and a decoder to detect and correct errors
when reading from the memory. These elements
increase the memory area and the power consumption,
and also reduce the access speed. The proposed
Decoder has been implemented in hardware
description language and mapped to a 65- nm
technology to show its benefits. The main contribution
of this brief is to enable a fast and efficient parallel
correction of the single and double-adjacent errors in
the (24,12)Go lay code.
Introduction to VLSI
 Very-large-scale integration (VLSI) is the process of
creating integrated circuits by combining thousands of
transistor-based circuits into a single chip. VLSI began
in the 1970s when complex semiconductor and
communication technologies were being developed. The
microprocessor is a VLSI device. The term is no longer
As common as it once was, as chips have increased in
complexity into the hundreds of millions of transistors.
This is the field which involves packing more and more
logic devices into smaller and smaller areas.
Design/manufacturing is extremely small. Applications
wide ranging: most electronic logic devices.
Objectives
1. Image sensors often acquire undesirable noise along with the
captured image frame, so it is important to repair these
corrupted pixels to facilitate subsequent image processing
operations such as edge detection or object recognition.
2. In order to remove this noise, image filtering and
enhancement is usually performed immediately after the
image is captured and before any other image processing
operation.
3. SRAM-based FPGAs provide high performance, high
densities, and low cost, while allowing a practically
unlimited number of reconfigurations.
4. Acquisition noise in digital image processing systems may
be composed of impulsive noise such as hot and dead pixels.
5.The term “hot pixels” describes those pixels that
are much brighter than surrounding pixels, and
term ”dead pixels” refers to those permanently
off.
6.When both physical phenomena appear together
in the same image they are commonly referred to
as “salt-and-pepper” noise.
7.They are mainly caused by charge leakages within
the image sensor chip.
8.The median filter can efficiently attenuate the
effects of low percentages of this ” salt-and-
pepper” noise while preserving the edges of the
objects existing in the image.
Existing method
 Redundancy based techniques such as dual modular
redundancy (DMR) or reduced precision redundancy
(RPR) are typically used to protect digital filter. The
main difference between these techniques is that the
RPR method combines the main circuit with a low
precision replica to detect errors in the most
significant bits (MSBs), instead of using a full
precision replica as happens in the DMR scheme. This
means that least significant bits (LSBs) changes cannot
be detected with RPR, but less resource overhead is
added.
Proposed technique
Outcome of project
CONCLUSIONS
 This project is an extension of work presented
in about a fault-tolerant implementation of the
median filter. Our proposed technique checks if
the median output value is within a dynamic
range created each time with the remaining
non-median outputs. The proposed technique
has been compared in terms of resource
utilization and error detection rate with DMR
and RPR schemes. The design has been
implemented in a Xilinx SRAM-based FPGA
and several fault-injection campaigns have
been performed.
 Pixel-level results show that images with
homogeneous pixel-value regions are less susceptible
to be corrupted when processed by a configuration
memory damaged median filter. More homogeneous
pixel-value regions imply more median filter inputs
with equal values, so the probability that a median
filter malfunction alters the median value is
decreased.Although our technique cannot detect as
many corrupted pixels as the DMR scheme,it detects
enough to prevent 91percent of the corrupted images
being erroneously processed by the next image
processing module.Moreover,the remaining 9 percent
of undetected images present a lower MSE value than
the DMR,which means that the image damage
propagation to successive image processing
operations is minimised.

You might also like