Depedpang 1
Depedpang 1
Depedpang 1
1. One Sample Case To test for the mean T test for 1 mean (for small
samples)
Z test for 1 mean (for large
samples)
Kruskal-Wallis (H)
Test
Jonkheere Test for
Ordered
Alternatives
LEVEL OF MEASUREMENT
No. of NOMINAL/ ORDINAL/ INTERVAL OR RATIO
Samples/Aim CATEGORICAL ORDERED
Correlation Cramer V Coefficient Spearman rank Pearson Coefficient
correlation (simple and multipl
Phi Kappa coefficient of coefficient e)
Agreement
Kendall Rank-order Kendall’s coefficient
Goodman & Kruskall’s correlation of Concordance
Gamma coefficient
Lambda Sommer’s d
Tau a, b and c
Tschuprow’s T
Correlation Ratio Analysis of Co-
(nominal and interval) variance (ANCOVA)
(simultaneous
Point Biserial Correlation
correlation and
comparison)
Qualitative Odds Ratio
Association: Risk Ratio
TYPES OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
Nature of No. of
Outcome Independent Test
or Variables
Dependent
Variable
Quantitative 1 Simple linear Regression
Row Label
Row Label
TOTAL
Footnote/Source note
NEXT
Table Heading
BACK
BODY
Back
Footnote/Source Note
3. Graphical
- superior over Tabular and narrative
methods
- could show trends or patterns in a large
data set which could be missed if
presented in tabular form
3. GRAPHICAL Presentation
A GRAPH – is a chart representing the
quantitative variations or changes of a
variable itself, or quantitative changes of
variable in comparison with those of
another variables in pictorial or
diagrammatic form.
Purpose of graphing – is to present the
variations, changes, and relationships of
data in a most attractive, appealing,
effective and convincing way.
Advantages of Graphic Method
Who is my audience?
160
140
120
100
Patient 1
80
Patient 2
60
40
20
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Type of Type of Variable/Data Being Purpose of
Graph Gathered Presenting the
Graph
Electricity
1,700
350 Water
550
Gas
6,000 Groceries
1,500
Fare
2,000
Food
Type of Graph Type of Purpose of
Variable/Data Presenting the
Being Gathered Graph
Component Qualitative, or broad Same as the pie
bar diagram/ categories of chart, but is
Chart quantitative better to use
variables when
presenting two
100%
90%
3.1 or more sets of
3.2 7.5 2.5 2.5
80% data.
70% 5.4
60% 7.02 Social Welfare
2.83 2.3 2.3
50% Education
40% 4.8 Defense
2.4 6.51 2.1 1.8
30%
Health
20%
2.3 5.3 1.7 1.76 4.6
10%
0%
1 2 3 4 5
Type of Type of Variable/Data Being Purpose of Presenting
Graph Gathered the Graph
Scatterplo Quantitative (discrete or continuous) To show the nature,
Diagra direction and the
m strength of the
relationship between
two continuous
quantitative variables
Fig. IV-1.
Relationship Between Age and Reliability
30
25
20
Age
15
10
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
SD
Discussion
• major inconsistencies
• statements about failures and
explanatory comments
• incidental findings may prove to be
more important than anticipated
results
• be alert for unexpected behavior/s
Organization of the subject area
• each problem are arranged in
sequential order
Presentation of Data in Table
• all related tables containing the
data are sequentially arranged and
discussed.
Narrative Presentation
• Start with a brief introductory
paragraph, giving the purpose of
the data
• Follow it with a statement
presenting the table itself, and
• analyze and interpret the
findings therein.
Tables, Graphs
• it is recommended that a table follow
immediately after it is mentioned in the
text.
• It should be relatively simple and easy
to read.
• The title usually placed above the table,
should be clear, concise and should
indicate what is being tabulated
Tables, Graphs
•Must be read and understood without
reference to the text.
•Must be numbered consecutively.
•Must be related to the text.
•All illustrative material in the
research report should be called
figures.
Data Analysis and Interpretation
To ensure depth analysis, answer
the following:
• what do the data/findings mean?
• How significant are they in terms of
your own theory and that of the cited
authority?
• are there inconsistencies in the
findings?
• what are the circumstances that may
have influenced the unexpected
outcomes of the study?
• what are the practical implications of
the findings to your own field of
specialization?
PRINCIPLE EXAMPLE
-Review the objective to which each table is
linked
-Indicate the subtitle of the data -Sex and knowledge on research
interpretation based on the title of the table
Start or end with a generalization backed up -Females are more knowledgeable of
by supporting data. This generalization should research than males
be guided by the objective and the hypothesis
Focus on the highest and lowest data to show -Most of the local tourists were in their 30s
trends. Do not mention all the categories and (50%) and 40s (40%). The least represented
the data to prevent confusion among readers. were those in their 20s.
Readers interested on details will see the
tables.
Discuss reasons to explain some results or -There is a higher percentage of local
findings based on review on literature, tourists in their 30s and 40s than those in
observation or impression. their 20s. This trend could be due to the
relatively higher salary and higher position
of the older respondents.
Round off figures and avoid remainders, to -Ninety percent (90 instead of 89.8%) of
facilitate recall of data. those who went on local tourism were in
their 30s and 40s.
The amount of statistical information
that is disseminated to the public for one
reason or another is phenomenal, and what
part of it is “good” statistics and what part
of it is “bad “ statistics is anybody’s guess
LIES…DAMNED LIES…and
STATISTICS
ANALYSIS OF QUALITATIVE DATA
Analysis of data in a research project
involves summarizing the mass of data
collected and presenting the results in a way
that communicates the most important
features. In quantitative research analysis
involves things like the frequencies of
variables, differences between variables,
statistical tests designed to estimate the
significance of the results and the probability
that they did not occur by chance.
All this is done basically by counting how
often something appears in the data and
comparing one measurement with others. At
the end of the analysis, not only do we have
a mass of results but we also have what we
might call "the big picture", the major
findings.
In qualitative research we are also interested in
discovering the big picture but use different
techniques to find it. As in quantitative research,
there may be some data which are measurable but for
the most part we are interested in using the data to
describe a phenomenon, to articulate what it means
and to understand it.
The basic process of analyzing
quantitative and qualitative data is the
same. We start by labelling or coding
every item of information so that we can
recognize differences and similarities
between all the different items. Imagine
a questionnaire which has been used to
collect quantitative information about
why patients go to the health centre.
Formal Analysis of Data
1. Constant Comparison/Grounded Theory
Look for indicators of categories in events and
behavior - name them and code them on document
Compare codes to find consistencies and differences
Consistencies between codes (similar meanings or
pointing to a basic idea) reveals categories. So need
to categorize specific events
Memo on the comparisons and emerging categories
Eventually category saturates when no new codes
related to it are formed
Eventually certain categories become more central
focus - axial categories and perhaps even core
category.
Formal Analysis of Data
2. Analytic Induction - Looking at an event and
developing a hypothetical statement of what
happened. Then look at another similar event
and see if it fits the hypothesis. Begin looking
for exceptions to hypothesis, when found,
revise the hypothesis to fit all examples
encountered. Eventually a hypotheses will
develop that accounts for all observed cases.
3. Logical Analysis/Matrix Analysis- An outline of
generalized causation, logical reasoning
process, using flow charts, diagrams, etc. to
pictorially represent these, as well as written
descriptions.
Formal Analysis of Data
4. Quasi-statistics- Counting the number of times
something is mentioned in field notes as very
rough estimate of frequency. Often
enumeration is used to provide evidence for
categories created or to determine if
observations are contaminated.
5. Event Analysis/Microanalysis-Emphasis is on
finding precise beginnings and endings of
events by finding specific boundaries and things
that mark boundaries or events. Specifically
oriented toward film and video. After find
boundaries, find phases in event by repeated
viewing.
Formal Analysis of Data
6. Metaphorical Analysis – Examining various
metaphors and determining how they will fit
what is observed.
"HE
was alright" (He was alright but I wasn't so
keen on the others)
"He
WAS alright" (He used to be but he isn't
now)
"Hewas alright?" (Well you might think so but I
don't)
By listening and noting the intensity and feeling in
the interviewee's voice it is possible to detect the
following:
PRESENTATION •DESCRIPTION
•DESCRIPTIVE
•MEANINGS
•STATISTICAL
•IMPLICATIONS QUANTITATIVE
DATA
INTERPRETATION ANALYSIS
QUALITATIVE DATA
•Context
DESCRIPTION •Intention
•Process
•Open
•Data •Axial
•Author •Selective
•Method •Thematic
QUALITATIVE
•Themes
DATA
CONNECTING: CLASSIFICATION:
TRIANGULATION CODING
EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION IS
Clear
Concise
Precise - every word used means
exactly what it is intended to mean
Simple - short words are easier to
understand than long ones
Plain language and direct statements
Avoid colloquial expressions
WAYS OF EXPRESSING PERCENTAGES
PERCENTAGE VALUE EXPRESSION
APA MLA
Shute, N. (2007, August 18). Why Shute, Nancy. “Why Do We Age?”
do we age? U.S. News & World U.S. News & World Report 18 Aug.
Report, 123, 55-57. 2007: 55-57.
APA MLA
APA MLA
Herring, S. (2003)
Herring, Susan. “Gender
Gender and Democracy and Democracy in
in computer-mediated Computer-mediated
communication.
Communication.”
Electronic Journal of Electronic Journal of
Communication, 3.2. Communications 3.2
Retrieved 7 September, (1993). Web. 7 Sept.
2009 from 2007
http://www.cios.org
Orientation
an overview
Focused exploration
Focused confirmation and
closure
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION-BUREAU OF CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT
Qualitative Design Features
Control over the independent
variable
Type of group comparisons
Number of data collection points
Occurrence of the independent
& dependent variables
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION-BUREAU OF CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT
ACTIVITY
Perform a simulation activity showing a
scenario depicting how data could be
obtained from different sources:
Grp 1- Interview
Grp 2- Focus Group Discussion
Grp 3- Observation
Grp 4- Documents
Grp 5- Social Media/Other Media
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION-BUREAU OF CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION-BUREAU OF CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT
Stages in the Analysis of Qualitative Data
Stage 1: Immersion
The researcher intensively reads or listens to material, assimilating as
much of the explicit and implicit meaning as possible
Stage 2: Categorization
Systematically working through the data, assigning coding categories or
identifying meanings within the various segments / units of the ’text’
Stage 3: Reduction
questioning or interrogating the meanings or categories that have been
developed? Are there other ways of looking at the data? Do some codes
mean the same thing?
Stage 4: Triangulation
sorting through the categories. Deciding which categories are recurring
and central and which are less significant or are invalid or mistaken
Stage 5: Interpretation
making sense of the data from a wider perspective. Constructing a
model or using an established theory to explicate the findings of the
study
Coding data
Developing a description from the data
Defining themes from the data
Connecting and interrelating themes
EDUC 7741/Paris/Terry
ACTIVITY
Form a group of 10 members.
Discuss among group members possible
conclusions and recommendations out of
the given findings. Using a prescribed
template, write down the formulated
conclusions and recommendations.