Introduction To Criminal Procedure
Introduction To Criminal Procedure
Procedure
By: Hifajatali Sayyed
Introduction
The object of criminal law is to protect the society from crime and to
punish the offenders.
The effect of the statute was to apply British procedural law while
deciding upon the cases of Crown’s subjects. After 1857 Revolt, the
crown took over the Indian administration. The British parliament
passed the Criminal Procedure Code, 1861.
i. The accused person must get a fair trial in accordance with the
accepted principles of natural justice.
iii. The procedure should, to the utmost extent possible, ensure fair
deal to the poorer sections to the community.
However sec 5 states that the CrPC does not affect any special
jurisdiction or power conferred, or any special form of
procedure prescribed, by any other law for the time being in
force.
For how can State insist on good behaviour from other when
State’s own behaviour is blameworthy, unjust and illegal?
So, the procedure adopted by the State must be just, fair and reasonable.
• In this case the Supreme Court stated that it is well established that
even where there is no specific provision in a statute or rules made
there under for showing cause against action proposed to be taken
against an individual, which affects the rights of that individual, the
duty to give reasonable opportunity to be heard will be
implied from the nature of the function to be performed by the
authority which has the power to take punitive or damaging action.
Importance of Fair trial
ii. ‘Nemo Debet Esse Judex In Propria Causa’ which means that no one
ought to be a judge in his own case. It applies to two types of
cases. Firstly, a judge is precluded from presiding over a case in which
he directly appears as a party. Secondly a judge is precluded from
decided a case in which he has an interest. Impartiality, absence
of bias, fearlessness and assertion are the qualities highlighted by an
unbiased approach to the judicial system.
• In this case, the chairman of the election tribunal was declared as unfit
for the position because his wife was a member of the party through
which a party in the dispute emerged.
Importance of Fair trial
Talab Haji Hussain vs Madhukar Purshottam (AIR 1958
SC 376)
• In this case the Supreme Court stated that the primary object of
criminal procedure is to ensure a fair trial of accused
persons. Every criminal trial begins with the presumption of
innocence in favor of the accused ; and provisions of the Code are
so framed that a criminal trial should begin with and be
throughout governed by this essential presumption ; but a fair trial
has naturally two objects in view; it must be fair to the accused and
must also be fair to the prosecution. The test of fairness in a
criminal trial must be judged from this dual point of view.
Importance of Fair trial
Zahira Habibullah Sheikh and ors v. State of Gujarat
and ors [(2006) 3 SCC 374]
• In this case the Supreme Court observed each one has an inbuilt
right to be dealt with fairly in a criminal trial. Denial of a fair
trial is as much injustice to the accused as it is to the
victim and to society. Fair trial obviously would mean a trial
before an impartial judge, a fair prosecutor and an atmosphere of
judicial calm. Fair trial means a trial in which bias or prejudice for
or against the accused, the witness or the cause which is being
tried, is eliminated.