1) Traditional notions of development through economic growth are unsustainable given current levels of overconsumption and environmental degradation.
2) The concept of "de-development" proposes that rich countries reduce their levels of consumption and resource use rather than pushing poorer countries to continue growing their economies.
3) Examples like Cuba and Costa Rica show that high life satisfaction and outcomes can be achieved at much lower levels of consumption than in rich Western nations, suggesting rich countries need to "catch down" rather than encouraging all to "catch up".
1) Traditional notions of development through economic growth are unsustainable given current levels of overconsumption and environmental degradation.
2) The concept of "de-development" proposes that rich countries reduce their levels of consumption and resource use rather than pushing poorer countries to continue growing their economies.
3) Examples like Cuba and Costa Rica show that high life satisfaction and outcomes can be achieved at much lower levels of consumption than in rich Western nations, suggesting rich countries need to "catch down" rather than encouraging all to "catch up".
1) Traditional notions of development through economic growth are unsustainable given current levels of overconsumption and environmental degradation.
2) The concept of "de-development" proposes that rich countries reduce their levels of consumption and resource use rather than pushing poorer countries to continue growing their economies.
3) Examples like Cuba and Costa Rica show that high life satisfaction and outcomes can be achieved at much lower levels of consumption than in rich Western nations, suggesting rich countries need to "catch down" rather than encouraging all to "catch up".
1) Traditional notions of development through economic growth are unsustainable given current levels of overconsumption and environmental degradation.
2) The concept of "de-development" proposes that rich countries reduce their levels of consumption and resource use rather than pushing poorer countries to continue growing their economies.
3) Examples like Cuba and Costa Rica show that high life satisfaction and outcomes can be achieved at much lower levels of consumption than in rich Western nations, suggesting rich countries need to "catch down" rather than encouraging all to "catch up".
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 11
Human Flourishing as Reflected
in Progress and Development
GE-STS Learning Outcomes • Critique human flourishing vis-à-vis the progress of science and technology; • Explain Hickel’s paradigm of “de- development”; and • Differentiate it from the traditional notions of growth and consumption. Go-Go-Mo • You’ll be given 5 minutes to read the text. • After reading the text you’ll be given another 5 minutes to: • Walk around the room and find a partner. • Give one idea to your partner. • Get one idea from the partner and write it down. • Move one to another partner! • Move fast! Debriefing • What are the ideas that you got from the text? • What is the problem? • What is the solution? • UN’s new sustainable development goals (SDGs) – Main objective is to eradicate poverty by 2030 – Main strategy for eradicating poverty is the same: growth – Growth • Main object of development for the past 70 years • Global economy has grown by 380% • People living in poverty on less than $5/day has increased by more than 1.1 billion • Orthodox economists – All we need is yet more growth – Shift some of the yields of growth from the richer to the poorer, evening things out a bit • Neither approach is adequate – We’re overshooting our planet’s bio-capacity by more than 50% each year • Growth is not an option any more – we’ve already grown too much • Global crisis due almost entirely to overconsumption in rich countries • Enough resources for each of us to consume 1.8 “global hectares” annually – a standardized unit that measures resource use and waste • Average person in Ghana or Guatemala consumes • US and Canada consume about 8 hectares/person • Europeans 4.7 hectares/person • Peter Edward –Instead of pushing poorer countries to “catch up” with rich ones, rich countries should “catch down” to more appropriate levels of development • Look at societies where people live long and happy lives at relatively low levels of income and consumption • exemplars of efficient living • US – Life expectancy – 79 years – GDP per capita - $53 000 • Cuba – Life expectancy – comparable to the US and one of the highest literacy rates in the world – GDP per capita - $6 000 – Consumption – 1.9 hectares – Similar to Peru, Ecuador, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Tunisia • Philippines – Life expectancy – 69.3 – GDP per capita - $2 891 • Costa Rica – One of the highest happiness indicators and life expectancies in the world with a per capita income one-fouth that of the US – Underdeveloped to appropriately developed • Rich countries to justify their excesses • De-developing rich countries – Tricky but not impossible – 70% of people in middle and high-income countries believe overconsumption is putting out planet and society at risk • Problem – Pundits promoting this kind of transition are using the wrong language – De-growth, zero-growth, de-development • Like asking people to stop moving positively thorough life, to stop learning, improving, growing • “Steady-state” economics – Quality instead of quantity • Latin Americans • Buen vivir or good living • Robert and Edward Skidelsky – Banning advertising, shorter working week and a basic income – Improve life while reducing consumption • It’s not about giving up • Not about living a life of voluntary misery • Not about imposing harsh limits on human potential • But. . . . . . • It’s about reaching a higher level of understanding and consciousness about what we’re doing here and why.