GE STS - Human Flourishing As Reflected in Progress and Development

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 11

Human Flourishing as Reflected

in Progress and Development


GE-STS
Learning Outcomes
• Critique human flourishing vis-à-vis the
progress of science and technology;
• Explain Hickel’s paradigm of “de-
development”; and
• Differentiate it from the traditional notions of
growth and consumption.
Go-Go-Mo
• You’ll be given 5 minutes to read the text.
• After reading the text you’ll be given another 5 minutes
to:
• Walk around the room and find a partner.
• Give one idea to your partner.
• Get one idea from the partner and write it
down.
• Move one to another partner!
• Move fast!
Debriefing
• What are the ideas that you
got from the text?
• What is the problem?
• What is the solution?
• UN’s new sustainable development goals
(SDGs)
– Main objective is to eradicate poverty by
2030
– Main strategy for eradicating poverty is the
same: growth
– Growth
• Main object of development for the past 70
years
• Global economy has grown by 380%
• People living in poverty on less than $5/day has
increased by more than 1.1 billion
• Orthodox economists
– All we need is yet more growth
– Shift some of the yields of growth from the richer to
the poorer, evening things out a bit
• Neither approach is adequate
– We’re overshooting our planet’s bio-capacity by more
than 50% each year
• Growth is not an option any more – we’ve
already grown too much
• Global crisis due almost entirely to
overconsumption in rich countries
• Enough resources for each of us to consume 1.8
“global hectares” annually – a standardized unit
that measures resource use and waste
• Average person in Ghana or
Guatemala consumes
• US and Canada consume about 8
hectares/person
• Europeans 4.7 hectares/person
• Peter Edward
–Instead of pushing poorer countries to
“catch up” with rich ones, rich
countries should “catch down” to more
appropriate levels of development
• Look at societies where people live long and happy
lives at relatively low levels of income and
consumption
• exemplars of efficient living
• US
– Life expectancy – 79 years
– GDP per capita - $53 000
• Cuba
– Life expectancy – comparable to the US and one of the
highest literacy rates in the world
– GDP per capita - $6 000
– Consumption – 1.9 hectares
– Similar to Peru, Ecuador, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Tunisia
• Philippines
– Life expectancy – 69.3
– GDP per capita - $2 891
• Costa Rica
– One of the highest happiness indicators and life
expectancies in the world with a per capita
income one-fouth that of the US
– Underdeveloped to appropriately developed
• Rich countries to justify their excesses
• De-developing rich countries
– Tricky but not impossible
– 70% of people in middle and high-income
countries believe overconsumption is putting out
planet and society at risk
• Problem
– Pundits promoting this kind of transition are using the
wrong language
– De-growth, zero-growth, de-development
• Like asking people to stop moving positively thorough life, to
stop learning, improving, growing
• “Steady-state” economics
– Quality instead of quantity
• Latin Americans
• Buen vivir or good living
• Robert and Edward Skidelsky
– Banning advertising, shorter working week and a basic
income
– Improve life while reducing consumption
• It’s not about giving up
• Not about living a life of voluntary
misery
• Not about imposing harsh limits on
human potential
• But. . . . . .
• It’s about reaching a higher level of
understanding and consciousness
about what we’re doing here and why.

You might also like