Social Cognitive Theory-Bandura
Social Cognitive Theory-Bandura
Social Cognitive Theory-Bandura
Theory
Daleep Parimoo
Intellectual Developments
1. Attention
2. Symbolic representation and retention
3. Transformation to action or production
4. Motivation
Johnson’s 1984 model
Similar to a regression model
Y = X1 + X2 + X3 + Error
1. Intentionality.
2. Forethought.
3. Self-Reactiveness.
4. Self-Reflectiveness.
Motivation
1. Enactive mastery.
2. Social modeling or vicarious experience.
3. Social persuasion.
4. Physical and emotional states.
Applications of Bandura’s Work
Individual
Treatment of phobias (modeling therapy)
Treatment of drug and alcohol abuse,
bulimia, anxiety (self-control therapy)
Explanations of moral engagement and
disengagement.
Academic success (self-regulated learning)
Applications of Bandura’s Work (cont.)
Social
Reduction of birthrates in countries with high
birthrates and high poverty
Improvement of treatment of women in AIDS
prone areas
Productivity in organizations
“There is much talk about
the validity of theories, but
surprisingly little attention is
developed to their social
utility…Theories are
predictive and operative
tools. In the final analysis,
the evaluation of a scientific
enterprise in the social
sciences will rest heavily on
its social utility.” (2005)
Observations on SCT
Strengths
Interdisciplinary and integrative
Helps link agency and social structure
SCT passes the test of self-reference
Strong research methodology
One of only a handful of social scientists to discuss
fortuity
Path models
Many applications leading to social betterment
Observations on SCT (cont.)
Weaknesses
Perhaps gives too much weight to human freedom of
action
Perhaps gives too much weight to human rationality
Downplays biological and upward causation (he
does a great job on downward causation:
agency/mind directing one’s intentionality and
behavior)
Perhaps tries to include too much conceptual
territory in a single theory