Time Extension Manual Final Copy - PPTX Revised 4132015
Time Extension Manual Final Copy - PPTX Revised 4132015
Time Extension Manual Final Copy - PPTX Revised 4132015
Contract Time Suspension -It is the temporary work stoppage, wholly or partly by
written order for such period as may be deemed necessary, due to the particular
circumstances enumerated in the applicable clause of the General Conditions of
Contract, and such conditions as provided under Section 9 of R.A. 9184. (The
suspension of the running of the Contract time upon request by the Contractor or at
the instance of the Government due to valid causes)
Time Extension- It is the incorporation of additional contract time into the approved
construction schedule brought about by circumstances deemed worthy of
consideration, such as those provided in Section 10 of R.A. 9184
DEFINITION OF TERMS
Resumption Order– an order to continue work activity relative to a Contract Time
Suspension.
1. As-Built Plans
2. Detailed Engineering Design Plans (Preliminary Plans/Final Plans)
3. As-Staked/Revised Plans
4. Specifications
5. Programs of Work (POW)
6. Approved Budget of Contract (ABC)
7. Resolution of Award
8. Special Allotment Release Order (SARO)
9. Contract
10. Pre-Clearance for Variation Order/Negotiated Procurement/Supplemental
Agreement
Department Order No. 52 series of 2012
11. Change Order/Extra Work Order
12. Final Variation Order
13. Negotiated Contract
14.Contract Time Extension/Suspension
15. PERT/CPM
16. Memorandum of Agreement (MOA)/Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
17. Performance Bond/Surety Bond/Letter of Credit/Bank Guarantee/CARl/Credit
Line Certificate
18. IROW Payment
19. IROW Payment with RAP
20. Advance Payment
21. First Progress Payment
22. Interim Progress Payment
23. Final Progress Payment
24. Release of Retention
25. Price Escalation Payment
Department Order No. 52 series of 2012
Processing cycle starts in the preparation of these documents until the
signing of the approving official.
The checklist of required supporting documents and attachments for the DoTS is
contained in Annex G.
The DoTS Evaluation Committee created under Special Order No. 70, Series of
2007, is hereby authorized to make necessary changes in the annexes hereof in coordination
with the implementing offices.
This Order supersedes Department Order No. 67 Series of 2011 and takes effect
immediately.
DPWH Standards Specifications 1988, Volume 1
– Prospective Bidders Responsibility
Item 10 – It shall be the sole responsibility of the prospective Bidder to
determine and to satisfy himself by such means as he considers
necessary or desirable as to all matters pertaining to the project,
including the location and the nature of work; climatic conditions;
geological conditions at the site; transportation and
communication facilities; the requirement and the availability of
materials, labor, water, electric power and roads; the location and
extent of aggregate sources; and other factors that may affect the
cost, duration and execution of work. The prospective Bidder by
the act of submitting his Bid acknowledges that he has inspected
the site and determined the general characteristics of the project
and the conditions stated above.
Monthly Suspension Report It should contain the daily activities and status
of site workability.
It should be duly signed by the appropriate
official.
Breakdown of Pre- It should be as provided in the approved
determined original contract.
rainy/unworkable days A certified true copy of the pages of contract
document containing such information may
be submitted to support such information
(COPA, Proposal Book or Appendix to Bid).
Certification from the It should indicate the balance of pre-
Implementing Office/ determined rainy/unworkable days.
Consultant It certifies that the pre-determined
rainy/unworkable days, as provided in the
contract, has yet to be utilized or has already
been exhausted, based on previously
approved time suspension(s)/extension(s)
CHECKLIST OF REQUIREMENTS AS PER D.O. NO.52, SERIES OF 2012
b. Due to Road Right-of-Way Problem
Pictures/Photographs It should show the part of the project site with RROW problem. It
must be clear taken pictures and must be sufficient to cover all of
the affected part.
It is suggested to be presented pasted in coupon bonds with
captions and with corresponding location and station limits.
Payment vouchers for It should be certified as true copy of the original payment
RROW acquisition vouchers for RROW acquisition.
It should be duly countersigned by the appropriate official.
Permit to Enter It should be certified as true copy of the original Permit to Enter. It
must be duly signed with conformity of the affected stakeholders.
The date should be within the date of the issuance of the resume
order/affected dates.
Parcellary Plans It should be a certified as true copy of the original Parcellary Plan
showing the affected location.
Certification from DTI It should be issued by the local DTI Office that the required
materials are not available in the market.
A certified true copy of the original may be submitted.
Straight Line It should show the affected part of the work in view of the
Diagram unavailability of construction materials.
Color coding is suggested for easy understanding.
It should be duly countersigned by the appropriate official.
Prescribed Time
Activity Office
TO :
__________________
Project Engineer
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL: APPROVED:
_______________________________ _______________________________
Assistant District Engineer District Engineer
DATE: _________________________
________________________
(Contractor)
By:
________________________
Authorized Representative
SUSPENSION ORDER NO. ___
(S.O./R.O. above 30 up to 60 c.d.)
TO :
__________________
Project Engineer
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL: APPROVED:
_______________________________ _______________________________
District Engineer Regional Director
DATE: _________________________
________________________
(Contractor)
By:
________________________
SUSPENSION ORDER NO. ___
(S.O./R.O. above 60 up to 90 c.d.)
TO :
__________________
Project Engineer
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL:
______________________________
District Engineer (If D.E.O. project)
APPROVED:
_______________________________ _______________________________
Regional Director Assistant Secretary for Operations
DATE: _________________________
________________________
(Contractor)
By:
________________________
Authorized Representative
SUSPENSION ORDER NO. ___
(S.O./R.O. above 90 up to 120 c.d.)
TO :
__________________
Project Engineer
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL:
______________________________
District Engineer (If D.E.O. project)
APPROVED:
_____________________________ _______________________________
Regional Director Undersecretary for Operations
DATE: _________________________
________________________
(Contractor)
By:
________________________
Authorized Representative
SUSPENSION ORDER NO. ___
(S.O./R.O. above 120 c.d.)
TO :
__________________
Project Engineer
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL:
______________________________
District Engineer (If D.E.O. project)
APPROVED:
DATE: _______________________
________________________
(Contractor)
By:
________________________
Authorized Representative
SUSPENSION ORDER
SUSPENSION ORDER NO. ___
(S.O./R.O. above 90 up to 120 c.d.)
TO :
__________________
Project Engineer
NOTED:
__________________
District Engineer
____________________________ ______________________________
Regional Director Undersecretary for Operations
DATE: _________________________
_______________________
(Contractor)
By:
________________________
Authorized Representative
MONTHLY TIME SUSPENSION REPORT MONTHLY TIME SUSPENSION REPORT
for the month of _____________
Name/Location of Project:
Name of Contractor:
TIME
DATE WEATHER REMARKS SUSPENSION
RECOMMENDED
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
TOTAL SUSPENSION OF TIME RECOMMENDED THIS MONTH
TOTAL SUSPENSION OF TIME RECOMMENDED PREVIOUSLY
GRAND TOTAL TO DATE
TOTAL PREDETERMINED UNWORKABLE RAINY DAYS
TOTAL NUMBER OF UNWORKABLE RAINY DAYS CONSIDERED FOR TIME EXTENSION
ORIGINAL CONTRACT TIME (Calendar Days)
DATE OF EFFECTIVITY OF CONTRACT
ORIGINAL EXPIRY DATE
REVISED EXPIRY DATE due to approved Variation Orders
REVISED EXPIRY DATE due to previously approved Time Extensions
REVISED EXPIRY DATE DUE TO THIS SUSPENSION/ EXTENSION
PERCENT TIME ELAPSED
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
(CONTRACT TIME EXTENSION/SUSPENSION)
x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-
x-x-
______________________________________________________________________________
2. Action Recommended: ___________________________________________________________
3. Implementing Office : ____________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
4. Reviewing Offices: _______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
5. Reasons for Time Suspension/Extension :__________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
6. Contractor : ____________________________________________________________________
7. Contractual Data:
:________________________________________________________________
8. Effect of Cost: __________________________________________________________________
9. Physical Status : _________________________________________________________________
10. Remarks : ______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
WALTER R. OCAMPO
Director IV
Bureau of Construction
Monthly weather chart
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Additional References
MINUTES OF Construction Engineers’ Meeting held at Puerto
Princesa City, Palawan March 20, 2014
IV. Construction Engineers’ Meeting held at Puerto Princesa City, Palawan
March 20, 2014
A Suspension Order should be issued on/or before its effectivity date and should be
forwarded for approval to the DPWH authorized approving official within one (1) week
from its issuance.
If a Suspension Order issued by the implementing office reach already the limit of their
authority and still cannot be resumed which requires further suspension, a request for
continuous suspension shall be made within one (1) week for approval of the succeeding
authorized DPWH officials in accordance with D.O. No. 59, Series of 0213.
Granting of additional time extension due to rainy/unworkable days over and above
the original estimated time shall be processed for approval only after the total
number of predetermined rainy/unworkable days has been fully utilized.
SEPT 4, 2013 –
OCT 25, 2013
S.O./RO NO. 1
FEB 1- 14, 2014 APRIL 7- 20, MAY 12-26, 2014 JUNE 1-SEPT
NOV 5, 2013 – S.O./R.O. NO. 2014 S.O./R.O. S.O./R.O. NO. 30, 2014 S.O.
NOV 13, 2013 5 NO. 7 8 NO. 9
S.O./RO NO. 2
NOV 15, 2013 – JAN 17-23, 2014 MAR 10-24,
JAN 3, 2014 S.O./R.O. NO. 2014 S.O./R.O.
S.O./RO NO. 3 4 NO. 6
APPROVED T.E. NO. 1
51 + 9 = 52 + 7 + 14 + 15 + 14 + 15 + 113 = 230
60
SUSPENDED
The contractor, BCT TRADING & CONSTRUCTION, in his letters dated May
12, 2014, May 27, 2014, June 10, 2014 and October 1, 2014 requested for
approval of Suspension Order Nos. 8 & 9/ Resume Order No. 8 & 9 and
Time Extension No. 2 equivalent to One Hundred Twenty Eight (128)
calendar days due to unworkable site condition brought about by Low
Pressure Area and Typhoons that hit the locality. However, the suspended
period covering Suspension/ Resume Order Nos. 3 to 7 equivalent to One
Hundred Two (102) calendar days had no approved time extension. Hence
it was included in this request for contract time extension covering a total
time extension of 230 calendar days for approval of Secretary broken down
as follows:
ANALYSIS
S. O./R. O./T.E. CALENDAR DAYS REMARKS
S. O. No. 1 / R. O. No. 1 S. O. / R. O. No. 1 Approved
51 C. D.
(Sept. 4, 2013 – Oct. 25, 2013) by the Regional Director
Time Extension due to V.O. No. Approved by the Regional
60 C.D.
1 Director
S. O. No. 2 / R. O. No. 2 S. O. / R. O. No. 2 Approved
9 C. D.
(Nov. 5, 2013 – Nov. 13, 2013) by the Regional Director
Time Extension No. 1 due to Approved by the Regional
60 C. D
SO/RO No. 1 & 2 Director
S. O. No. 3 / R. O. No. 3 S. O. / R. O. No. 3 duly
(Nov. 15, 2013 – Jan. 3, 2014) 52 C. D. approved by Usec. Romeo S.
Momo
S. O. No. 4 / R. O. No. 4 S. O. / R. O. No. 4 duly
(Jan. 17, 2014 – Jan. 23, 2014) 7 C. D. approved by Usec. Romeo S.
Momo
S. O. No. 5 / R. O. No. 5 S. O. / R. O. No. 5 duly
(Feb. 1, 2014 – Feb. 14, 2014) 14 C. D. approved by Usec. Romeo S.
Momo
ANALYSIS
S. O./R. O./T.E. CALENDAR DAYS REMARKS
S. O. No. 6 / R. O. No. 6 S. O. / R. O. No. 6 duly
(Mar. 10, 2013 – Mar. 24, 2014) 15 C. D. approved by Usec. Romeo S.
Momo
S. O. No. 7 / R. O. No. 7 S. O. / R. O. No. 7 duly
(Apr. 7, 2014 – Apr. 20, 2014) 14 C. D. approved by Usec. Romeo S.
Momo
S. O. No. 8 / R. O. No. 8 S. O. / R. O. No. 8 For
(May 12, 2014 – May 26, 2014) 15 C. D. Approval by Secretary
Rogelio L. Singson
S. O. No. 9 / R. O. No. 9 S. O. / R. O. No. 9 For
(June 1, 2014 – Sept. 30, 2014 113 C. D. Approval by Secretary
Rogelio L. Singson
SUB-TOTAL 230 C. D.
For approval of Sec.
Total Time Extension No. 2 230 C. D.
Rogelio L. Singson
analysis
The Regional Director per his 2nd Undated Executive Summary stated that the
Contract Time Suspension/Resumption and Time Extension No. 2 is being
requested based on the provisions of Sub-Sections 9.3 & 10.5 of Annex E of the
Revised IRR of R.A. 9184 and Clause 47.3 (V. O. No. 1 covers January 3, 2014
to March 4, 2014) (Time Extension No. 1 for SO/RO No. 1 & 2 covers
September to November 2013) of the General Conditions of Contract, to quote
“In case of total suspension or suspension of activities along the critical path
which is not due to any fault of the contractor, the Procuring Entity shall adjust
the contract time for the elapsed time between the effective order of
suspending operation and the order to resume work”… and “Extension of
contract time shall be granted for rainy/unworkable days considered
unfavorable for the prosecution of the works at the site, based on the actual
conditions obtained at the site in excess of the number of rainy / unworkable
days pre-determined by the government in relation to the original contract
time… and other meritorious causes as determined by the government
authorized Engineer and approved by Procuring Entity”, unquote.
This road project was certified that no pre-determined rainy/unworkable days
were incorporated in the computation of contract duration per Certification
issued by DOMINIC G. SERRANO, Construction Division, Chief of DPWH-Region
IVB.
analysis
Physical Accomplishment as of December 31, 2014
Schedule Physical Accomplishment : 100.00%
Actual Accomplishment : 100.00%
Remarks
This request for approval of Suspension/Resume Order Nos. 8 & 9 / Time Extension
No. 2 was originally forwarded by the Implementing Office per Memorandum dated
December 22, 2014 addressed to Secretary Rogelio L. Singson and was returned by
BOC per memorandum dated January 27, 2015 due to necessary lacking documents.
Per compliance the request was submitted addressed to BOC Director Walter R.
Ocampo on February 12, 2015 with attached additional documents.
On the basis of the latest submitted documents as enumerated in the herein Checklist,
this Office found the request meritorious since it is beyond the control of the
contractor the delayed implementation of the project caused by bad weather condition
in the project area, and it is in accordance with the provisions as prescribed under
Sub-section 9.3 & 10.5 as cited above as well as Sub-section 9.1 and 10.3 of the
Annex E of Revised IRR of R.A. 9184, to quote
analysis
Sub-Section 9.1 The procuring entity shall have the authority to suspend the
work wholly partly by written such period as may be deemed necessary, due to
force majeure or any fortuitous events… the contractor shall immediately
comply with such order to suspend the work wholly or partly.
Section 10.3 Extension of contract time may be granted only when the affected
activities fall within the critical path of the PERT/CPM network.
The requested Time Extension equivalent to Two Hundred Eight (230) calendar days
were computed based on the Project Weather Chart duly signed by the Project
Engineer, Monthly Weather Report from PAGASA and Monthly Suspension Report. The
request for approval of Suspension /Resume Order Nos. 3 to 9 equivalent to Two
Hundred Thirty (230) calendar days covering the period from November 15, 2013 to
September 30, 2014 was reduced to Two Hundred Eight (208) calendar days
considering the minimum amount of rainfall data from PAGASA of 7.5mm and the
accomplishment of 4.73% for the month of July 2014.
analysis
ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS
S. O./R. O./T.E. CALENDAR DAYS REMARKS
S. O. No. 1 / R. O. No. 1 S. O. / R. O. No. 1 Approved
51 C. D.
(Sept. 4, 2013 – Oct. 25, 2013) by the Regional Director
Time Extension due to V.O. No. Approved by the Regional
60 C.D.
1 Director
S. O. No. 2 / R. O. No. 2 S. O. / R. O. No. 2 Approved
9 C. D.
(Nov. 5, 2013 – Nov. 13, 2013) by the Regional Director
Time Extension No. 1 due to Approved by the Regional
60 C. D
SO/RO No. 1 & 2 Director
S. O. No. 3 / R. O. No. 3 S. O. / R. O. No. 3 duly
(Nov. 15, 2013 – Jan. 3, 2014) 52 C. D. approved by Usec. Romeo S.
Momo
S. O. No. 4 / R. O. No. 4 S. O. / R. O. No. 4 duly
(Jan. 17, 2014 – Jan. 23, 2014) 7 C. D. approved by Usec. Romeo S.
Momo
S. O. No. 5 / R. O. No. 5 S. O. / R. O. No. 5 duly
(Feb. 1, 2014 – Feb. 14, 2014) 14 C. D. approved by Usec. Romeo S.
Momo
ANALYSIS
90 DAYS SUSPENDED
S.O. 1-22 (INTERMITTENT) MAR 14-29, 2014 APRIL 14- SEP 30, 2014
(INTERMITTENT 12 DAYS SUSPENDED 129 DAYS SUSPENDED
) (INTERMITTENT) (INTERMITTENT)
JUNE 15, 2013 R.O. 22
DEC 1, 2013
141 DAYS SUSPENDED (INTERMITTENT)
END OF
START OF
SUSPENSIO
SUSPENSIO
N
N DEC 7, 2013
FEB 23, 2014
PROJECT COMPLETED AS OF
SEPT16 2014
ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENT:
100%
30 DAYS SUSPENDED
(INTERMITTENT)
MONTHLY SUSPENSION REPORT
Section 8.4 – “In case the delay in the completion of the work
exceed a time duration equivalent to ten percent (10 %) of the
specified contract time plus any time extension duly granted to
the contractor, the procuring entity concerned may rescind the
contract, forfeit the contactor’s performance security and
takeover the prosecution of the project or award the same to a
qualified contractor through negotiated contract.”
Therefore the contractor shall pay the corresponding liquidated damages as
computed in the amount of P1,431,081.82 (see attached BOC computation of
Liquidated Damages) but not to exceed 1/10 of the total contract cost
equivalent
Liquidated Damages =(1/10) x 1% ( Balance of work * contract amount) x ( No. of days extended)
Liquidated Damages =(1/10) x 1% ( 100%-82.2%)(49,628,305.54) x (162 days (from Apr 7 – Sep 16, 2014))
Liquidated Damages =(1/10) x 1% ( 17.8% x 49,628,305.54) x (162)
The total contract duration of the project including this proposed time
extension is 312 calendar days on the revised expiry date of April 7, 2014. As
provided above, the project should have been rescinded after 1/10 of the total
duration or 1/10 (312) or 32 calendar days from its expiry date which is April 7,
2014 and forfeit the contractor’s performance security and takeover
prosecution of the project or award the same to a qualified contractor through
negotiated contract. The Implementing Office should explain why the project
was not rescinded on May 9, 2014 and did not forfeit the performance security.
On the basis of the submitted documents, indicated in the checklist (Annex
“3.24”), this Office found the request for Contract Time Extension No. 2
meritorious because it is not the fault of the contractor and beyond the control of
the Implementing Office that the bad weather condition occured in the project
site and hampered the activities within the critical path of the project. Also, it is
in accordance with the above mentioned provisions of Sub-Sections 9.1, 9.3, 10.3
and 10.5 Annex “E” of the Revised IRR of R.A. 9184 as mentioned above and
recommends approval of twelve (12) calendar days contract time extension,
broken down as follows:
S.O./R.O./T.E. Covered Period Remarks
S.O./R.O. Nos. 1-22 June 15, 2013 to Nov 30, 2013 (intermittent) due to bad
90 C.D. weather condition
with Time Extension No. 1
Dec 7, 2013 to Feb 23, 2014 (intermittent)
Time Extension No. 2
due to bad weather condition
duly approved by 30 C.D.
U/Sec Romeo S. Momo
Mar 14, 2014 to Mar 29, 2014 (intermittent) due to bad
Total T.E. No. 3, if approved
weather
As Recommended by I.O. 141 C.D.
For approval of Sec. Rogelio L. Singson
As Recommended by BOC 12 C.D.
Based on the approved PERT/CPM Network Diagram, the Items of Work affected
by Time Extension No. 2 that fall within the critical path are Reflectorized
Thermoplastic Pavement Markings and Demobilization. The request for contract
time extension was submitted to cover up the period for affected activities that
impeded the operation for the entire project affecting the completion expiry date
of the whole project contract.
In view of the above premises, the request for Contract Time Extension No. 2
equivalent to twelve (12) calendar days is respectfully recommended pursuant to
D.O. No. 69, Series of 2013 for the Secretary’s consideration and approval, subject
however to the condition that the contractor will not file any monetary
claim by virtue of the time extension and the written consent of bondsmen
must be submitted and the validity of the performance security shall be
correspondingly extended.
Sample No. 3
Time Extension due to Unfavorable Weather Condition
1. Contractual Data:
2. Action Requested :
Approval of time suspension request due to ordinary rainy/inclement weather condition covering the
period from 21 January 1998 to 20 April 1998 (selective) or a total of 34 cal. days.
3. Given Conditions:
a) The predetermined unworkable days of 160 cal. days considered during the estimation of
contract time has been fully utilized as of 30 November 1997 as certified by the Project
Engineer (Government).
b) All supporting documents are hereto attached.
c) There were no previously approved time suspension/extension.
4. Evaluation:
Determine the actual working days which became unworkable due to weather condition.
January 22,26,30,31 - 4 cal. days
February 01,02,03,09,10,12,16,17,18,18,23,26 - 11 cal. days
March 02,03,04,05,15,16,17,26,28 - 8 cal. days
April 03,04,05,07,08,09,12,18,20 - 6 cal. days
29 cal. days
Conversion from the working days to calendar days (W.D. to C.D.) from the proposed
time extension to consider sundays and holidays:
1999
February 24 W.D. 28 C.D.
March 5 W.D. Say 5 C.D.
-------- ---------
28 W.D. 33 C.D.
Period covered by the proposed time extension in lieu of
work suspension from February 22 to April 20, 1998
(intermittent) is February 1, 1999 to March 5,1999.
7. Premature Total Suspension. There are other workable items that the
contractor can work on before total
suspension.
8. The project is suspended, however The equivalent duration for the accomplished
the contractor is continuously works shall be deducted to the requested time
working on the project. extension
PANEL DISCUSSION
(Observations/Issues and Concerns)
THANK YOU.