Moderating Effect
Moderating Effect
Parallel Design
What is a Moderating Effect
The effect of a moderating variable is characterized statistically as an interaction; that
is, a categorical (e.g., sex, ethnicity, class) or quantitative (e.g., level of reward) variable
that affects the direction and/or strength of the relation between dependent and
independent variables
In statistics and regression analysis, moderation occurs when the relationship
between two variables depends on a third variable. The third variable is referred to
as the moderator variable or simply the moderator.The effect of a moderating
variable is characterized statistically as an interaction; that is, a categorical (e.g., sex,
ethnicity, class) or quantitative (e.g., level of reward) variable that affects the
direction and/or strength of the relation between dependent and independent
variables. Specifically within a correlational analysis framework, a moderator is a
third variable that affects the zero-order correlation between two other variables, or
the value of the slope of the dependent variable on the independent variable.
In analysis of variance (ANOVA) terms, a basic moderator effect can be represented
as an interaction between a focal independent variable and a factor that specifies
the appropriate conditions for its operation.
What is convergent parallel design?
Quantitative study group. Turkey has 48,321 social studies teachers working at schools
affiliated with the Ministry of National Education (MoNE, 2016). The researcher had access
to all teachers via the MoNE-Survey tool thanks to the permission and support of MoNE. This
system allows researchers to choose teachers according to many criteria such as field of
study, location, gender, and more.
Data Collection Tools
Qualitative data collection tools. In the qualitative stage, the semi-structured interview form
and structured observation form were used. The researcher used the semi-structured interview
form to be able to ask additional probe questions to analyze the issue in depth and to
understand the reasons behind participants’ answers. The interview form is composed of five
main questions and seven probe questions.
Quantitative data collection tools. Personal information form, Teacher Trainees’ Democratic
Values Scale (TTDVS), Pupil Control Ideology Form and Teaching Career Selection Reasons Rating
Scale (TCSRRC) were used as quantitative data collection tools. The participants were asked to
state their ideology or the one to which they feel closest. Those who stated being close to an
ideology were also asked to rank their closeness from 1 to 10.
Data Analysis
Qualitative data analysis. The interviews were face-to-face and recorded using an audio
recorder. Voice recording was done in all observed classes and field notes were kept
frequently. Afterwards, the voice recordings were transcribed. All participants were asked to
check the accuracy of the transcriptions and their consent was taken before the analysis. Later
on, interview transcriptions and field notes from the observation process were read
thoroughly to understand the issue with a holistic point of view, and the files were uploaded
to NVivo 10 for open-axial selective coding.
Quantitative Data Analysis. In the quantitative stage, participants’ answers obtained from the
data collection tools have been processed using the program, PASW 18. Both descriptive and
inferential analyses were performed on the data. The descriptive findings from the qualitative
data were compared with those from the quantitative data.
When to use Convergent Parallel Design
A convergent parallel mixed-methods study design will be used to collect,
analyze and interpret quantitative and qualitative data. Naturalistic
observations of rounds and relevant peripheral information exchange
activities will be conducted to collect time-stamped event data on workflow
and communication patterns (time–motion data) and field notes.
Thank you…