Normalization is the process of minimizing redundancy from a

relation or set of relations. Redundancy in relation may cause

insertion, deletion and updation anomalies.
So, it helps to minimize the redundancy in relations. Normal
forms are used to eliminate or reduce redundancy in database
tables.
There are various level of normalization. These are some of
them:
1. First Normal Form (1NF)

2. 2. Second Normal Form (2NF)

3. 3. Third Normal Form (3NF)

4. 4. Boyce-Codd Normal Form (BCNF)

5. 5. Forth Normal Form (4NF)

6. 6. Fifth Normal Form (5NF)

A relation is in first normal form if every attribute in that

relation is singled valued attribute.

A table is in 1 NF iff:

There should be Single Valued Attributes.

Attribute Domain should not change.

There should be Unique name for Attributes/Columns.

The order in which data is stored, does not matter.

 First Normal Form (1NF)
A table is considered to be in 1NF if all the fields contain
only scalar values (as opposed to list of values).
Example (Not 1NF)

ISBN Title AuName AuPhone PubName PubPhone Price

0-321-32132-1 Balloon Sleepy, 321-321-1111, Small House 714-000-0000 $34.00

Snoopy, 232-234-1234,
Grumpy 665-235-6532

0-55-123456-9 Main Street Jones, 123-333-3333, Small House 714-000-0000 $22.95

Smith 654-223-3455
0-123-45678-0 Ulysses Joyce 666-666-6666 Alpha Press 999-999-9999 $34.00

1-22-233700-0 Visual Roman 444-444-4444 Big House 123-456-7890 $25.00

Basic

Author and AuPhone columns are not scalar

Example-1:
Relation STUDENT in table 1 is not in 1NF because of multi-valued attribute STUD_PHONE. Its
decomposition into 1NF has been shown in table 2.
 1NF - Decomposition
1. Place all items that appear in the repeating group in a new
table
2. Designate a primary key for each new table produced.
3. Duplicate in the new table the primary key of the table from
which the repeating group was extracted or vice versa.
Example (1NF)
ISBN AuName AuPhone

0-321-32132-1 Sleepy 321-321-1111

ISBN Title PubName PubPhone Price 0-321-32132-1 Snoopy 232-234-1234

0-321-32132-1 Balloon Small House 714-000-0000 $34.00 0-321-32132-1 Grumpy 665-235-6532

0-55-123456-9 Main Street Small House 714-000-0000 $22.95 0-55-123456-9 Jones 123-333-3333

0-123-45678-0 Ulysses Alpha Press 999-999-9999 $34.00 0-55-123456-9 Smith 654-223-3455

1-22-233700-0 Visual Big House 123-456-7890 $25.00 0-123-45678-0 Joyce 666-666-6666

Basic
1-22-233700-0 Roman 444-444-4444
 Functional Dependencies
1. If one set of attributes in a table determines another
set of attributes in the table, then the second set of
attributes is said to be functionally dependent on the
first set of attributes.

Example 1
ISBN Title Price Table Scheme: {ISBN, Title, Price}
0-321-32132-1 Balloon $34.00 Functional Dependencies: {ISBN}  {Title}
0-55-123456-9 Main Street $22.95
{ISBN}  {Price}
0-123-45678-0 Ulysses $34.00

1-22-233700-0 Visual $25.00

Basic
 Functional Dependencies
Example 2
PubID PubName PubPhone Table Scheme: {PubID, PubName, PubPhone}
1 Big House 999-999-9999 Functional Dependencies: {PubId}  {PubPhone}
2 Small House 123-456-7890 {PubId}  {PubName}
3 Alpha Press 111-111-1111 {PubName, PubPhone}  {PubID}

Example 3
AuID AuName AuPhone
1 Sleepy 321-321-1111
Table Scheme: {AuID, AuName, AuPhone}
2 Snoopy 232-234-1234
Functional Dependencies: {AuId}  {AuPhone}
3 Grumpy 665-235-6532
{AuId}  {AuName}
4 Jones 123-333-3333
{AuName, AuPhone}  {AuID}
5 Smith 654-223-3455

6 Joyce 666-666-6666

7 Roman 444-444-4444
 Second Normal Form (2NF)
For a table to be in 2NF, there are two requirements
– The database is in first normal form
– All nonkey attributes in the table must be functionally dependent on the
entire primary key
Note: Remember that we are dealing with non-key attributes

Example 1 (Not 2NF)

Scheme  {Title, PubId, AuId, Price, AuAddress}
1. Key  {Title, PubId, AuId}
2. {Title, PubId, AuID}  {Price}
3. {AuID}  {AuAddress}
4. AuAddress does not belong to a key
5. AuAddress functionally depends on AuId which is a subset of a key
 Second Normal Form (2NF)
Example 2 (Not 2NF)
Scheme  {City, Street, HouseNumber, HouseColor, CityPopulation}
1. key  {City, Street, HouseNumber}
2. {City, Street, HouseNumber}  {HouseColor}
3. {City}  {CityPopulation}
4. CityPopulation does not belong to any key.
5. CityPopulation is functionally dependent on the City which is a proper subset of the
key

Example 3 (Not 2NF)

Scheme  {studio, movie, budget, studio_city}
1. Key  {studio, movie}
2. {studio, movie}  {budget}
3. {studio}  {studio_city}
4. studio_city is not a part of a key
5. studio_city functionally depends on studio which is a proper subset of the key
 2NF - Decomposition
1. If a data item is fully functionally dependent on only a part of the
primary key, move that data item and that part of the primary key
to a new table.
2. If other data items are functionally dependent on the same part of
the key, place them in the new table also
3. Make the partial primary key copied from the original table the
primary key for the new table. Place all items that appear in the
repeating group in a new table
Example 1 (Convert to 2NF)
Old Scheme  {Title, PubId, AuId, Price, AuAddress}
New Scheme  {Title, PubId, AuId, Price}
New Scheme  {AuId, AuAddress}
 2NF - Decomposition
Example 2 (Convert to 2NF)
Old Scheme  {Studio, Movie, Budget, StudioCity}
New Scheme  {Movie, Studio, Budget}
New Scheme  {Studio, City}

Example 3 (Convert to 2NF)

Old Scheme  {City, Street, HouseNumber, HouseColor, CityPopulation}
New Scheme  {City, Street, HouseNumber, HouseColor}
New Scheme  {City, CityPopulation}
 Third Normal Form (3NF)
This form dictates that all non-key attributes of a table must be functionally
dependent on a candidate key i.e. there can be no interdependencies
among non-key attributes.

For a table to be in 3NF, there are two requirements

– The table should be second normal form
– No attribute is transitively dependent on the primary key

Example (Not in 3NF)

Scheme  {Title, PubID, PageCount, Price }
1. Key  {Title, PubId}
2. {Title, PubId}  {PageCount}
3. {PageCount}  {Price}
4. Both Price and PageCount depend on a key hence 2NF
5. Transitively {Title, PubID}  {Price} hence not in 3NF
 Third Normal Form (3NF)
Example 2 (Not in 3NF)
Scheme  {Studio, StudioCity, CityTemp}
1. Primary Key  {Studio}
2. {Studio}  {StudioCity}
3. {StudioCity}  {CityTemp}
4. {Studio}  {CityTemp}
5. Both StudioCity and CityTemp depend on the entire key hence 2NF
6. CityTemp transitively depends on Studio hence violates 3NF

Contractor
Example 3 (Not in 3NF) BuildingID Fee

Scheme  {BuildingID, Contractor, Fee} 100 Randolph 1200

1. Primary Key  {BuildingID} 150 Ingersoll 1100
2. {BuildingID}  {Contractor} 200 Randolph 1200
3. {Contractor}  {Fee}
250 Pitkin 1100
4. {BuildingID}  {Fee}
300 Randolph 1200
5. Fee transitively depends on the BuildingID
6. Both Contractor and Fee depend on the entire key hence 2NF
 3NF - Decomposition
1. Move all items involved in transitive dependencies to a new entity.
2. Identify a primary key for the new entity.
3. Place the primary key for the new entity as a foreign key on the
original entity.

Example 1 (Convert to 3NF)

Old Scheme  {Title, PubID, PageCount, Price }
New Scheme  {PubID, PageCount, Price}
New Scheme  {Title, PubID, PageCount}
 3NF - Decomposition
Example 2 (Convert to 3NF)
Old Scheme  {Studio, StudioCity, CityTemp}
New Scheme  {Studio, StudioCity}
New Scheme  {StudioCity, CityTemp}

Example 3 (Convert to 3NF) BuildingID Contractor Contractor Fee

Old Scheme  {BuildingID, Contractor, Fee} 100 Randolph Randolph 1200

150 Ingersoll Ingersoll 1100
New Scheme  {BuildingID, Contractor}
200 Randolph Pitkin 1100
New Scheme  {Contractor, Fee} 250 Pitkin
300 Randolph
 Boyce-Codd Normal Form (BCNF)
• BCNF does not allow dependencies between attributes that belong to candidate keys.
• BCNF is a refinement of the third normal form in which it drops the restriction of a non-key
attribute from the 3rd normal form.
• Third normal form and BCNF are not same if the following conditions are true:
– The table has two or more candidate keys
– At least two of the candidate keys are composed of more than one attribute
– The keys are not disjoint i.e. The composite candidate keys share some attributes

Example 1 - Address (Not in BCNF)

Scheme  {City, Street, ZipCode }
1. Key1  {City, Street }
2. Key2  {ZipCode, Street}
3. No non-key attribute hence 3NF
4. {City, Street}  {ZipCode}
5. {ZipCode}  {City}
6. Dependency between attributes belonging to a key
 Boyce Codd Normal Form (BCNF)
Example 2 - Movie (Not in BCNF)
Scheme  {MovieTitle, MovieID, PersonName, Role, Payment }
1. Key1  {MovieTitle, PersonName}
2. Key2  {MovieID, PersonName}
3. Both role and payment functionally depend on both candidate keys thus 3NF
4. {MovieID}  {MovieTitle}
5. Dependency between MovieID & MovieTitle Violates BCNF

Example 3 - Consulting (Not in BCNF)

Scheme  {Client, Problem, Consultant}
1. Key1  {Client, Problem}
2. Key2  {Client, Consultant}
3. No non-key attribute hence 3NF
4. {Client, Problem}  {Consultant}
5. {Client, Consultant}  {Problem}
6. Dependency between attributess belonging to keys violates BCNF
 BCNF - Decomposition
1. Place the two candidate primary keys in separate
entities
2. Place each of the remaining data items in one of the
resulting entities according to its dependency on the
primary key.
Example 1 (Convert to BCNF)
Old Scheme  {City, Street, ZipCode }
New Scheme1  {ZipCode, Street}
New Scheme2  {City, Street}
• Loss of relation {ZipCode}  {City}
Alternate New Scheme1  {ZipCode, Street }
Alternate New Scheme2  {ZipCode, City}
 Decomposition – Loss of Information
1. If decomposition does not cause any loss of information it is called
a lossless decomposition.
2. If a decomposition does not cause any dependencies to be lost it is
called a dependency-preserving decomposition.
3. Any table scheme can be decomposed in a lossless way into a
collection of smaller schemas that are in BCNF form. However the
dependency preservation is not guaranteed.
4. Any table can be decomposed in a lossless way into 3rd normal form
that also preserves the dependencies.
• 3NF may be better than BCNF in some cases

Use your own judgment when decomposing schemas

 BCNF - Decomposition
Example 2 (Convert to BCNF)
Old Scheme  {MovieTitle, MovieID, PersonName, Role, Payment }
New Scheme  {MovieID, PersonName, Role, Payment}
New Scheme  {MovieTitle, PersonName}
• Loss of relation {MovieID}  {MovieTitle}
New Scheme  {MovieID, PersonName, Role, Payment}
New Scheme  {MovieID, MovieTitle}
• We got the {MovieID}  {MovieTitle} relationship back

Example 3 (Convert to BCNF)

Old Scheme  {Client, Problem, Consultant}
New Scheme  {Client, Consultant}
New Scheme  {Client, Problem}
 Fourth Normal Form (4NF)
• Fourth normal form eliminates independent many-to-one relationships
between columns.
• To be in Fourth Normal Form,
– a relation must first be in Boyce-Codd Normal Form.
– a given relation may not contain more than one multi-valued attribute.

Example (Not in 4NF)

Scheme  {MovieName, ScreeningCity, Genre)
Primary Key: {MovieName, ScreeningCity, Genre)
1. All columns are a part of the only candidate key, hence BCNF
2. Many Movies can have the same Genre
3. Many Cities can have the same movie Movie ScreeningCity Genre

4. Violates 4NF Hard Code Los Angles Comedy

Hard Code New York Comedy

Bill Durham Santa Cruz Drama

Bill Durham Durham Drama

The Code Warrier New York Horror

 Fourth Normal Form (4NF)
Example 2 (Not in 4NF) Manager Child Employee

Scheme  {Manager, Child, Employee} Jim Beth Alice

1. Primary Key  {Manager, Child, Employee} Mary Bob Jane

2. Each manager can have more than one child Mary NULL Adam

3. Each manager can supervise more than one employee

4. 4NF Violated

Example 3 (Not in 4NF)

Scheme  {Employee, Skill, ForeignLanguage}
1. Primary Key  {Employee, Skill, Language }
2. Each employee can speak multiple languages
3. Each employee can have multiple skills Employee Skill Language
4. Thus violates 4NF 1234 Cooking French

1234 Cooking German

1453 Carpentry Spanish

1453 Cooking Spanish

2345 Cooking Spanish
 4NF - Decomposition
1. Move the two multi-valued relations to separate tables
2. Identify a primary key for each of the new entity.

Example 1 (Convert to 3NF)

Old Scheme  {MovieName, ScreeningCity, Genre}
New Scheme  {MovieName, ScreeningCity}
New Scheme  {MovieName, Genre}

Movie Genre Movie ScreeningCity

Hard Code Comedy Hard Code Los Angles

Bill Durham Drama Hard Code New York

The Code Warrier Horror Bill Durham Santa Cruz

Bill Durham Durham

The Code Warrier New York

 4NF - Decomposition
Example 2 (Convert to 4NF) Manager Child Manager Employee
Old Scheme  {Manager, Child, Employee} Jim Beth Jim Alice

New Scheme  {Manager, Child} Mary Bob Mary Jane

Mary Adam
New Scheme  {Manager, Employee}

Example 3 (Convert to 4NF)

Old Scheme  {Employee, Skill, ForeignLanguage}
New Scheme  {Employee, Skill}
New Scheme  {Employee, ForeignLanguage}

Employee Skill Employee Language

1234 Cooking 1234 French

1453 Carpentry 1234 German

1453 Cooking 1453 Spanish

2345 Cooking 2345 Spanish

 Fourth Normal Form (4NF)
• Although BCNF removes anomalies due to functional
dependencies, another type of dependency called a multi-
valued dependency (MVD) can also cause data redundancy.

• Possible existence of multi-valued dependencies in a

relation is due to 1NF and can result in data redundancy.

26
 Fourth Normal Form (4NF)
• Multi-valued Dependency (MVD)
– Dependency between attributes (for example, A, B,
and C) in a relation, such that for each value of A
there is a set of values for B and a set of values for C.
However, the set of values for B and C are
independent of each other.

27
 Fourth Normal Form (4NF)
• MVD between attributes A, B, and C in a
relation using the following notation:
A −>> B
A −>> C

28
 Fourth Normal Form (4NF)
• A multi-valued dependency can be further defined as being trivial
or nontrivial.
A MVD A −>> B in relation R is defined as being trivial if (a) B is a
subset of A or (b) A  B = R.
A MVD is defined as being nontrivial if neither (a) nor (b) are satisfied.
A trivial MVD does not specify a constraint on a relation, while a
nontrivial MVD does specify a constraint.

29
 Fourth Normal Form (4NF)
• Defined as a relation that is in Boyce-Codd
Normal Form and contains no nontrivial multi-
valued dependencies.

30
4NF - Example

31
 Fifth Normal Form (5NF)
• Fifth normal form is satisfied when all tables are broken into
as many tables as possible in order to avoid redundancy.
Once it is in fifth normal form it cannot be broken into
smaller relations without changing the facts or the meaning.
 Domain Key Normal Form (DKNF)
• The relation is in DKNF when there can be no insertion or
deletion anomalies in the database.
 Fifth Normal Form (5NF)
• A relation decompose into two relations must have the lossless-
join property, which ensures that no spurious tuples are generated
when relations are reunited through a natural join operation.

• However, there are requirements to decompose a relation into

more than two relations. Although rare, these cases are managed
by join dependency and fifth normal form (5NF).

34
 Fifth Normal Form (5NF)
• Defined as a relation that has no join
dependency.

35
5NF - Example

36
5NF - Example

37