3G Ranop 1: - Drive Test Analysis
3G Ranop 1: - Drive Test Analysis
3G Ranop 1: - Drive Test Analysis
• RF optimisation
RF Optimisation • New Site Integration • Use of Parameters to optimise
and Neighbour • Neighbour plan Parameter network performance
Planning optimisation Optimisatio
n
• RRC Establishment
Signalling • RAB Establishment • HSDPA Air Interface Capacity
• SHO HSDPA • HSDPA Drive Test KPIs and
Flows • ISHO Optimisatio Parameter Optimisation
n
• Drive Survey Analysis
Drive Test • System Performance
Analysis (RRC and RAB phases)
Land Unit
NQMP
FTP
Server
Threshold KPIs
MOC Setup time 5 sec Signalling Statistics Count Success rate
MOC CCR 99 % Attach Attempt 155
Attach Success 140 90.32%
Attach Time more than threshold 5 3.57%
RAW END USER Attach Time less than threshold 135 96.43%
Event Count Ratio Count Ratio Attach Failed 15 9.68%
Call Attempts 132 122 Average Attach Setup Time 1.36
Activate PDP Context Attempt 124
Call Setup Success Rate 108 81.8% 108 88.5%
Activate PDP Context Success 124 100.00%
Call Setup Failure Rate 24 18.2% 14 11.5% Activation Time more than threshold 2 1.60%
Failures due to Tool (TSF) 10 41.7% Activation Time less than threshold 123 98.40%
Failures due to Core Problem 10 41.7% 10 71.4% Activate PDP Context Failed 0 0.00%
Failure ASU (Sync) Problem 2 8.3% 2 14.3% Average PDP Context Activation Time 0.96
FTP Download Attempts 51
Failure due to Low Coverage Levels 2 8.3% 2 14.3%
FTP Download Success 48 94.12%
Call Setup Success and Setup Time > 5s 7 6.5% 7 6.5% FTP Download throughput more than threshold 25 52.08%
Long Setup due to slow cell reselection 0.0% 0 0.0% FTP Download throughput less than threshold 23 47.92%
Long Setup due to clash with InterRAT reselection 0.0% 0 0.0% Average FTP Download Throughput 107.02
Long Setup due to Unknown (suspect UE) 0.0% 0 0.0% FTP Upload Attempts 32
FTP Upload Success 30 93.75%
Long Setup due to Unknown 0.0% 0 0.0% FTP Upload throughput more than threshold 20 66.67%
Average Call Setup Time 3.66 3.66 FTP Upload throughput less than threshold 10 33.33%
Call Completetion Rate 105 97.2% 105 97.2% Average FTP Upload Throughput 55.53
Call Drop Rate 3 2.8% 3 2.8% Data Transfer Cut-off Ratio 6.02%
PDP Context Dropped 4 3.23%
Call Drop Poor 3G Coverage 1 33.3% 1 33.3% Deactivate PDP Context Request 121
Call Drop on GSM due to Interference 2 66.7% 2 66.7% Deactivate PDP Context Accept 121 100.00%
Overall Call Completion Rate 105 79.5% 105 86.1% Deactivate PDP Context Failure 0 0.00%
ISHO Attempt 14 14 Detach Request 281
Detach Accept 129 45.91%
ISHO Success 14 100.0% 14 100.0%
Overall Data Session Completion Rate 78 62.90%
ISHO Failed 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
ISHO Failed cause physical channel failure 0 N/A 0 N/A RAU Statistics Count Success rate
RAU Attempt 22
•What ‘End User’ will contain Cell Reselection from UMTS to GSM Delay E2E
Cell Reselection from UMTS to GSM Delay Signalling
15.27
N/A
Cell Reselection from GSM to UMTS Attempts 1
Call Released
Uplink Direct Transfer (Authentication & Ciphering Response) RANAP: Authentication & Ciphering Response
Security Mode Command RANAP: Security Mode Command
INITIAL DIRECT TRANSFER (Active PDP Context Request) DIRECT TRANSFER (Active PDP Context Request)
RANAP: RAB ASSIGNMENT
RRC: Radio Bearer Set-up REQUEST
RRC: Radio Bearer Set-up Complete
RANAP: RAB ASSIGNMENT
RRC: Measurement Control RESPONSE
DIRECT TRANSFER (Active PDP context Accept)
For internal use
13 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Failure Breakdown
• Non-genuine failures
• Measurement system fault (Collection
Tool or Analysis)
• Genuine failures
It is beneficial to • RF issue (Coverage / Interference /
categorise call failures Poor dominance)
during the analysis and
• Missing neighbour
reporting
• System issue WBTS
• System issue RNC
• Core network issue
• System
• (Unknown )
UE
Iub Iu
WBT RNC Core NW
For internal use
S
14 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Failure Breakdown
RSCP
Example of Call Success Criteria Ec/No
Signal Call
above OK
Signal above
Call Call - (B) Ec/No
RSCP Call
- 80dBm OK
NOK - 5dB threshold
threshold
- -95dBm - 12dB
Signal Signal
below below
RSCP Call Ec/No
threshold -110dBm
Threshold
OK
Call
- 20dB threshold
Call- (A) NOK Discard sample
Time
5% 5% Equipment 0%
0%
0%
Registration Clash
0% Equipment
15%
Core Network 19% 19% Registration Clash
20%
Fail in 2G Core Network
Fail in 2G
RAN (fixed in next release) 0%
0% RAN (fixed in next release)
Site maintenance (TMUK) 0%
Site maintenance (TMUK)
0% RAN (Other)
RAN (Other)
10%
5% Missing neighbours
Missing neighbours
0% 3G RF 3G RF
0%
0%
slow cell Reselection 0% Slow cell reselection
• Measurement systems are often not perfect and may introduce errors in data
collection or analysis
LA Update
Request
Call attempt
RRC
Release
LA Update
Request
RRC
Connection for
Inter-RAT cell
reselection
• RF issue
• Interference / Dominance / Coverage
• Missing neighbour
• System Issue - BTS
• No response to “RRC Connection Request”
• “RRC Connection Reject” to “RRC Connection Request”
• System issue - RNC
• “CC Disconnect” after “Call Proceeding” due to “DL RRC Connection Release”
• Core NW
• “CM Service Abort” after “CM Service Request”
• System issue (test number)
• “CC Disconnect” after “CC Progress”
• RF issue
• Interference / Dominance / Coverage
• Missing Neighbours
• System issue BTS
• Sudden “CC Disconnect” due to “DL RRC Connection Release”
• Sudden drop to idle, no disconnect messaging
• System issue RNC
• Sudden “CC Disconnect” due to “DL RRC Connection Release”
• Analyse the
signalling flow
to find the
location of
failure and
potential
cause
• UE log may
only capture
some of the
messages
4. RAB set-up
6. Service Established
8. Service Released
Yes
UL coverage & RACH
B parameter. Optimization
(changing serving cell)
No
AICH(ACK) received? Report & Finish
(Check failure cause)
Yes No
“RRC Connection
Setup” received?
No “RRC Setup
Reject” received?
C
Yes Yes
AC optimization (check PrxNoise
Yes E
Report & Finish
Check failure cause
For internal use (Not radio problem/cell update)
28 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Call setup failures – RF issue A
• RF issue? Coverage / Interference / Dominance
• The Basic theory for RACH setup procedure and planning parameters can be
found in Module 6 – Parameter Optimisation
Acquisition Indicator/AICH
L1 Synchronisation
UE in CELL_DCH state
For internal use
32 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
RACH Process B
L1 ACK / AICH
Downlink Not detected
BS
UEtxPowerMaxPRACH
PowerRampStepPRACHpreamble
…… ……
Uplink
MS Preamble Preamble Message part
1 2
PowerOffsetLastPreamblePRACHmessage
PRACH_preamble_retrans
# PRACH preambles transmitted during one PRACH cycle without receiving AICH response
RACH_tx_Max
# preamble power ramping cycles that can be done before RACH transmission failure is reported
No
Max UE Tx power hit To increase PRACH_Preamble_retrans
the UE_P_MAX(24dBm)? Or PowerRampStepPRACHPreamble
Yes
Yes
Is UL Interference Report there might be an interfering
abnormally HIGH? source Nearby the serving cell
No
Change the Serving cell to cover the problem Area
=> UE is too far to reach the serving cell
• RRC: Initial Direct Transfer message is sent using acknowledged mode RLC to the CS core
domain. Routing is to be based upon the local P-TMSI
• The NAS message is not read by the RNC but is forwarded to the multimedia gateway. The NAS
message includes the IMSI as a UE identity
• The SCCP: Connection Request message establishes the connection orientated signalling link in
the same way as it was for the RRC connection phase.This does not reserve any resources for the
AMR call itself.
• The Connection Confirm message identifies the RNC with a destination local reference which is the
same as the source reference within the Connection Request message
• The Connection Confirm message identifies the CS core with a source local reference
• The CS core sends a RANAP: Location Reporting Control message to the RNC requesting
information regarding the location of a particular UE
• The RANAP: Common ID message specifies the IMSI belonging to the UE
• The Security Mode Command message triggers the start or stop of ciphering and integrity
For internal use
protection.
43 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Call setup failures – System Issue (test number) E
• “CC Disconnect” after “CC Progress”
• Cause: recovery on timer expiry
• The call goes via IN SCP to a recording.
• A static test was done by Nokia
Customer Care and in few instances the
call dropped after 30 seconds of
recording passed. Hence the problem is
associated with the test number not the
RAN
30
sec
Cause: recovery
on timer expiry
No
Best server’s No
Coverage Optimization
RSCP > -102dBm
Yes
Check Iur Inter RNC HO
Yes
Check neighbour definition parameters
No
Yes No DL ASU
Fix SC Clash SC Clash
received
C
Yes
No
DL Tx Power Max No
Yes
D
Yes Load Optimisation/
Uplink Interference
External Interferer
Yes
No
Yes
Link Unbalanced CPICH Optimisation
TrChAgg and DL
DPCCH BER high
Transport Channel
BER. Btw UE<->RNC
(MAC layer)
Drop to IDLE
Sum of UL PC commands
< 1500, UE not receiving
all the PC commands.