3G Ranop 1: - Drive Test Analysis

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 56

3G RANOP 1

Module 4 – Drive Test Analysis

For internal use


1 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
3G RAN Optimization
• Cluster health checks • 3G<>2G Cell reselection
• Parameter consistency • Neighbour Planning
Cluster check Inter-System • Handover Process and
• Neighbour list verification Working and compressed mode
Preparation • Uplink interference as a Optimisation • 3G ISHO service analysis
problem indicator (AMR and PS)
• GSM ISHO Optimisation

• RF optimisation
RF Optimisation • New Site Integration • Use of Parameters to optimise
and Neighbour • Neighbour plan Parameter network performance
Planning optimisation Optimisatio
n
• RRC Establishment
Signalling • RAB Establishment • HSDPA Air Interface Capacity
• SHO HSDPA • HSDPA Drive Test KPIs and
Flows • ISHO Optimisatio Parameter Optimisation
n
• Drive Survey Analysis
Drive Test • System Performance
Analysis (RRC and RAB phases)

For internal use


2 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Drive Test Process

Cluster Data Preparation Data Analysis Trouble


Preparation and Collection • Levels of Reporting Shooting
• Define Cluster • Services to test • Failure Type • Root Cause
• Define Drive Route • KPI definitions Breakdown Analysis
• Equipment • Post Processing • Corrective Action
• Exclusions functionality • Further data
• Call Patterns • KPI Gap Analysis logging (maybe)
• OSS Alarms
• Network Stats

Why Drive the network?

• New Site Integration


• RF Tuning
• Network Optimisation
• Network Benchmarking (Golden Routes)
For internal use
3 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Drive Test Analysis – Test Equipment
• Nemo Outdoor Multi with UE’s, Scanner and GPS

Land Unit
NQMP

FTP
Server

• Important to drive with Call logging equipment


and 3G and 2G scanner in the same vehicle

For internal use


4 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Drive Test Analysis – Test Equipment, Scanner
• The purpose of using the RF scanner is to be able to scan and measure all
used carriers/cells and their corresponding DL scrambling codes.

• For low coverage areas


• For antenna installation problems
• For missing neighbours
• For coverage optimisation
• With the scanner you can get the following info from the surrounding cells:
• Different Scrambling codes
• CPCIH RSCP value (dBm)
• CPICH EcNo value (dB)

For internal use


5 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Drive Test Analysis – Test Equipment, UE
• The Scanner measures all SCs, whereas the UE only measures SC signals from the cells
that the system has informed/ordered the UE through the BCH (neighbour list) or via the
“measurement control” message.
• RSCP Active/Monitored Set
• Carrier RSSI
• Ec/No Active/Monitored Set
• UL/DL Data Throughput
• The BLER downlink
• Pilot BER
• Random Access Initial Tx Power
• Random Access Preamble Count
• Random Access Preamble Step
• Random Access Tx Power
• SIR target (UE dependent)
• UE Tx Power
• Call Statistic: AMR, CS and PS data calls
For internal use
6 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Drive Test Analysis – Call Patterns
• Enough call samples have to be made to make the measurement statistically valid.
• In a 50 call sample one dropped call will cause a change in performance of -2%
• In a 500 call sample one dropped call will cause a change in performance of -0.2%
• Call length should be defined at the beginning
• We can use different call testing patterns for different optimisation techniques
• Short Calls (for Calls setup performance and delay)
• Long calls (for Drop call performance and SHO performance)

AMR Call PS Call


Mobile Originated Calls (MOC) • GPRS Attach,
• 2 min calls • PDP Context Activation
• 30 sec idle • FTP Download (1MB file)/FTP Upload (500 KB file)
• UE in Dual mode (2G/3G) • PDP Context Deactivation
Mobile Terminated Calls (MTC) • GPRS Detach
• 2 min calls • Alternate download and upload with 30 sec idle
• 30 sec idle time
• UE in dual mode (2G/3G) • Session is upload or download
• UE in Dual mode (2G/3G)
For internal use
7 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
PS Data KPI Report

Drive Test Analysis – Defining KPIs KPI Thresholds


Attach Time
PDP Activation Time
Value
4
2
Unit
sec
sec
AMR Statistics FTP Download Throughput 110 kbit/s
FTP Upload Throughput 55 kbits

Threshold KPIs
MOC Setup time 5 sec Signalling Statistics Count Success rate
MOC CCR 99 % Attach Attempt 155
Attach Success 140 90.32%
Attach Time more than threshold 5 3.57%
RAW END USER Attach Time less than threshold 135 96.43%
Event Count Ratio Count Ratio Attach Failed 15 9.68%
Call Attempts 132 122 Average Attach Setup Time 1.36
Activate PDP Context Attempt 124
Call Setup Success Rate 108 81.8% 108 88.5%
Activate PDP Context Success 124 100.00%
Call Setup Failure Rate 24 18.2% 14 11.5% Activation Time more than threshold 2 1.60%
Failures due to Tool (TSF) 10 41.7% Activation Time less than threshold 123 98.40%
Failures due to Core Problem 10 41.7% 10 71.4% Activate PDP Context Failed 0 0.00%
Failure ASU (Sync) Problem 2 8.3% 2 14.3% Average PDP Context Activation Time 0.96
FTP Download Attempts 51
Failure due to Low Coverage Levels 2 8.3% 2 14.3%
FTP Download Success 48 94.12%
Call Setup Success and Setup Time > 5s 7 6.5% 7 6.5% FTP Download throughput more than threshold 25 52.08%
Long Setup due to slow cell reselection 0.0% 0 0.0% FTP Download throughput less than threshold 23 47.92%
Long Setup due to clash with InterRAT reselection 0.0% 0 0.0% Average FTP Download Throughput 107.02
Long Setup due to Unknown (suspect UE) 0.0% 0 0.0% FTP Upload Attempts 32
FTP Upload Success 30 93.75%
Long Setup due to Unknown 0.0% 0 0.0% FTP Upload throughput more than threshold 20 66.67%
Average Call Setup Time 3.66 3.66 FTP Upload throughput less than threshold 10 33.33%
Call Completetion Rate 105 97.2% 105 97.2% Average FTP Upload Throughput 55.53
Call Drop Rate 3 2.8% 3 2.8% Data Transfer Cut-off Ratio 6.02%
PDP Context Dropped 4 3.23%
Call Drop Poor 3G Coverage 1 33.3% 1 33.3% Deactivate PDP Context Request 121
Call Drop on GSM due to Interference 2 66.7% 2 66.7% Deactivate PDP Context Accept 121 100.00%
Overall Call Completion Rate 105 79.5% 105 86.1% Deactivate PDP Context Failure 0 0.00%
ISHO Attempt 14 14 Detach Request 281
Detach Accept 129 45.91%
ISHO Success 14 100.0% 14 100.0%
Overall Data Session Completion Rate 78 62.90%
ISHO Failed 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
ISHO Failed cause physical channel failure 0 N/A 0 N/A RAU Statistics Count Success rate
RAU Attempt 22

• Need to agree RAU Success


RAU Failed
13
9
59.09%
40.91%

•What ‘raw’ figures will contain Cell Reselection Statistics


Cell Reselection from UMTS to GSM Attempts
Count
2
Success rate

Cell Reselection from UMTS to GSM Success 1 50.00%

•What ‘End User’ will contain Cell Reselection from UMTS to GSM Delay E2E
Cell Reselection from UMTS to GSM Delay Signalling
15.27
N/A
Cell Reselection from GSM to UMTS Attempts 1

•Other cuts of Data


Cell Reselection from GSM to UMTS Success 0 0.00%
Cell Reselection from GSM to UMTS Delay E2E N/A

For internal use Time in System Seconds Ratio


8 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date GSM 171 1.02%
UMTS 16559 98.98%
Drive Test Analysis – Test Case definition Examples
Short calls to test
Call Setup Success
KPI ID Criteria Test Description Trigger Statistics Success
Rate
KPI-01 Voice 12.2 •1 MOC+ 1 MTC in the same van, •Call set-up trigger point: •Cluster_AMR_Overall_CCSR_% = Call 98%
kbps AMR 2 Ues •Party A’s UE sends 1st ‘RRC Connection Request’ Completion / Call Attempts *100
CCSR •1 call (party A to party B, party A •Call completion trigger point:
terminates the call): 15 seconds •Party A’s UE receives ‘RRC Connection Release (cause normal)’
call + 15 seconds idle. Party A to •Successful completion if:
be logged •15 sec call duration (from RRC Conn. Request to RRC Conn.
•350 calls Release)
•Party A’s UE receives ‘RRC Connection Release (cause normal)’
KPI-02 Voice DCR •1 MOC to PSTN, 1 Ue •Call Set-up trigger point: •Cluster_AMR_Overall_DCR_% = 1 - Call < 2%
•1 call: 90 seconds call + 15 •3G UE receives ‘RRC: Downlink Direct Transfer (Alerting for NZ, Completion / Set up Calls *100
seconds idle Connect Acknowledge for AU)’
•350 calls •Call completion trigger point:
•3G UE receives ‘RRC Connection Release (cause normal)’
•Successful completion if:
Long calls to test •90 sec call duration (from RRC Conn. Request to RRC Conn.
Drop call ratio Release)
•3G UE receives ‘RRC Connection Release (cause normal)’
KPI-03 Voice 3G- •1 MOC to PSTN, 1 Ue in dual •3G to 2G HO start point: •Cluster_Voice_3Gto2G_HO_Overall_SR_% = HO 98%
2G mode •UE receives ‘RRC: Handover From UTRAN Command’ Completion / HO Attempts *100
Handover •1 call: continuous call until 3G2G •3G to 2G HO completion trigger point:
(inter- & coverage border is passed •UE sends ‘Handover Complete’ to 2G BSS
intra-MSC) •50 occurrences as a minimum •Successful completion if:
•UE sends ‘Handover Complete’ to 2G BSS

KPI-08 PS PDP •Same as 10 •PS PDP activation trigger point: •Cluster_PDP_Context_Activation_SR_% = PDP 98%
context •350 occurrences •UE not PS attached Context Activation Completion / PDP Context
activation •UE sends 1st ‘RRC Connection Request’ Activation Attempts *100
•PS PDP activation completion trigger point:
•UE receives ‘RRC: Downlink Direct Transfer (SM: Activate PDP
Context Accept)’
•Successful completion if:
•UE receives ‘RRC: Downlink Direct Transfer (SM: Activate PDP
Context Accept)’
KPI-09 PS •Repeated FTP calls, 1 Mbyte file •Data Session Set-up trigger point: •Cluster_PS_DL_Throughput = Average 200 Kbps
throughput download, 1 Ue •UE receives 1st DL packet Throughput Over Data Sessions
downlink •384 kbps •Data Session Completion trigger point:
•Average throughput •UE receives last packet
•350 calls •Session output:
For internal use •Average downlink throughput
9 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Need to Define the KPI measurement (from Drive test)

• Call Setup Success - CSSR (voice, circuit switched data)


• Successful call setup means that “DL/UL Direct Transfer (CC: Alerting)” message is received by
UE.
• Call Setup Time (voice, circuit switched)
• Call setup delay is measured from L3 messages, starting from “RRC Connection Setup” message
to “DL Direct Transfer (CC: Alerting)” message.
• Call Drop (voice, circuit switched)
• A dropped call occurs. The call will be dropped in case RRC connection release (not normal
release) message has been send from RNC to UE.

• Session Setup Success (packet switched)


• This is related to PDP context activation. Successfully activated PDP context means that activate
PDP context accept message has been sent from RNC to UE (RRC: downlink direct transfer
(SM:activate PDP context Accept)).
• Session Setup Time (packet switched)
• The “session setup time” is the delay between the time the UE sends the data session activation
request until GPRS attach and PDP context activation has been successfully completed.
• Session Drop (packet switched)
• Session drop rate can be defined as the number of successful PDP deactivations against number
of successful PDP activations.
For internal use
10 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Definition of Call Set-Up Success Rate (CSSR)
UE RNC CN
BTS
RRC: Connection Request
RRC Connection Setup phase
Resource Reservation in RNC, BTS, Transmission
RRC: RRC Connection Request Setup
RRC Connection Access phase
RNC waits reply from UE
RRC: RRC Connection Completed
RRC: Initial Direct Transfer cm service request
RANAP: Initial UE Message
DIRECT TRANSFER (Call Call Set-up
Proceeding) Success
RANAP: RAB Assignment
Rate
Request
RAB Connection Setup phase
Resource Reservation in RNC, BTS, Transmission
Call Set-up
RRC: Radio Bearer Set-up Time

RAB Connection Access phase


RNC waits reply from UE
RRC: Radio Bearer Setup
Complete
RANAP: RAB Assignment
DIRECT TRANSFER (Alerting) Response
DIRECT TRANSFER (Connect)
DIRECT TRANSFER (Connect
Acknowledge)
Successful call setup means
that “DL/UL Direct Transfer
(CC: Alerting)” message is
For internal use
11 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
received by UE
Definition of the Call Completion Rate (CCR)
UE Node B RNC MGW

DIRECT TRANSFER (Alerting)


DIRECT TRANSFER (Connect)
DIRECT TRANSFER (Connect
Acknowledge)
Call Established
Call Drop
Direct Transfer (Disconnect) Rate
Direct Transfer (Release)
Direct Transfer (Release Complete)
Iu Release Command Call
Iu Release Complete
Duration
RRC Connection Release
RRC Connection Release Complete
RRC Connection Release Complete
RRC Connection Release Complete
Radio Link Deletion Request
Radio Link Deletion Response
ALCAP: Release Request
ALCAP: Release Response
ALCAP: Release Request
ALCAP: Release Response

Call Released

For internal use


12 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Definition of Session Setup Time - PS
UE WBTS RNC
CN
UE already has an RRC connection
INITIAL DIRECT TRANSFER (Attach Request)
INITIAL UE MESSAGE (GPRS Attach)
SCCP: Connection Request

SCCP: Connection Confirm


Downlink Direct Transfer (Authentication & Ciphering Request) RANAP: Authentication & Ciphering Request

Uplink Direct Transfer (Authentication & Ciphering Response) RANAP: Authentication & Ciphering Response
Security Mode Command RANAP: Security Mode Command

Security Mode Command RANAP: Security Mode Command


RANAP: Common ID
Downlink Direct Transfer: Identity Request RANAP: Identity Request
Uplink Direct Transfer: Identity Response RANAP: Identity Response

Direct Transfer: Attach Accept Session


Downlink Direct Transfer: Attach Accept
Set-up
Uplink Direct Transfer: Attach Complete Direct Transfer: Attach Complete Time

INITIAL DIRECT TRANSFER (Active PDP Context Request) DIRECT TRANSFER (Active PDP Context Request)
RANAP: RAB ASSIGNMENT
RRC: Radio Bearer Set-up REQUEST
RRC: Radio Bearer Set-up Complete
RANAP: RAB ASSIGNMENT
RRC: Measurement Control RESPONSE
DIRECT TRANSFER (Active PDP context Accept)
For internal use
13 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Failure Breakdown

• Non-genuine failures
• Measurement system fault (Collection
Tool or Analysis)
• Genuine failures
It is beneficial to • RF issue (Coverage / Interference /
categorise call failures Poor dominance)
during the analysis and
• Missing neighbour
reporting
• System issue WBTS
• System issue RNC
• Core network issue
• System
• (Unknown )
UE

Iub Iu
WBT RNC Core NW
For internal use
S
14 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Failure Breakdown

• The KPI measurement conditions should be used to define exclusion areas


during drive test for acceptance of a cluster.
• All failures happening in those area, that do not respect the coverage
requirements should be discarded.

RSCP
Example of Call Success Criteria Ec/No
Signal Call
above OK
Signal above
Call Call - (B) Ec/No
RSCP Call
- 80dBm OK
NOK - 5dB threshold
threshold

- -95dBm - 12dB
Signal Signal
below below
RSCP Call Ec/No
threshold -110dBm
Threshold
OK
 Call
- 20dB threshold
Call- (A) NOK Discard sample

Time

For internal use


15 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Failure Breakdown
AMR Call Setup Failures
Call Set-up Failures Breakdown - Benchmark Drive
Call Setup Failure Breakdown - Final Drive

5% 5% Equipment 0%
0%
0%
Registration Clash
0% Equipment
15%
Core Network 19% 19% Registration Clash
20%
Fail in 2G Core Network

Fail in 2G
RAN (fixed in next release) 0%
0% RAN (fixed in next release)
Site maintenance (TMUK) 0%
Site maintenance (TMUK)
0% RAN (Other)
RAN (Other)
10%
5% Missing neighbours
Missing neighbours
0% 3G RF 3G RF
0%
0%
slow cell Reselection 0% Slow cell reselection

10% site configuration & maintenance


site configuration & maintenance
(Nokia)
35% (Nokia) Other
Other
5%
52%

Call Set-up Failures Call Set-up Failures


Call Set-up Exceptions
Failure Type total % Failure Type total %
Equipment 1 5.0 Equipment 0 0.0
Registration Clash 4 20.0 Registration Clash 0 0.0
Core Network 0 0.0 Core Network 0 0.0
Fail in 2G 1 5.0 Fail in 2G 6 19.4
RAN (fixed in next release) 0 0.0 RAN (fixed in next release) 0 0.0
Site maintenance (TMUK) 0 0.0 Site maintenance (TMUK) 16 51.6
RAN (Other) 2 10.0 RAN (Other) 0 0.0
Missing neighbours 1 5.0 Missing neighbours 0 0.0
3G RF 7 35.0 3G RF 3 9.7
slow cell Reselection 3 15.0 Slow cell reselection 0 0.0
site configuration & maintenance (Nokia) 0 0.0
site configuration & maintenance (Nokia) 0 0.0
Other 1 5.0
Other 6 19.4
For internal use
16 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Drive Survey Analysis Process Summary Diagram

For internal use


17 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Non Genuine Call Setup Failure Scenarios

• Measurement systems are often not perfect and may introduce errors in data
collection or analysis

• Examples of non-genuine failures seen:

• Uplink: CM Service Abort within milliseconds from CM Service Request


• Call attempt during Location Area update (‘LA clash’)
• User initiated “UL CC Disconnect”
• Location Area update interpreted as call setup failure
• Cell reselection back to 3G from 2G interpreted as call setup failure

For internal use


18 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Non Genuine Call Setup Failures

• Measurement system failures by drive test tool


• “CM Service Abort” within milliseconds from “CM Service Request”
• No time for response from NW

For internal use


19 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Non Genuine Call Setup Failures
• Measurement system failures by
drive test tool
• Call attempt during Location Area
update (LA update clash)

LA Update
Request

Call attempt

RRC
Release

For internal use


20 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Non Genuine Call Setup Failures
Measurement system failures by Actix workbook
• Successful or failed Location Area update interpreted as call setup failure

LA Update
Request

RRC
Connection for
Inter-RAT cell
reselection

For internal use


21 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Non Genuine Drop Call Scenarios

Measurement system failure examples:


• Drive test tool
• User initiated “UL CC Disconnect”
• Analysis Workbook
• Inter-Rat cell reselection from 2G to 3G interpreted as drop call
• Complete (e.g 90 seconds) call on either 3G or 2G
• No drop in the log file / same drop listed twice

For internal use


22 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Genuine Call Setup Failure Scenarios

• RF issue
• Interference / Dominance / Coverage
• Missing neighbour
• System Issue - BTS
• No response to “RRC Connection Request”
• “RRC Connection Reject” to “RRC Connection Request”
• System issue - RNC
• “CC Disconnect” after “Call Proceeding” due to “DL RRC Connection Release”
• Core NW
• “CM Service Abort” after “CM Service Request”
• System issue (test number)
• “CC Disconnect” after “CC Progress”

For internal use


23 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Genuine Drop Call scenarios

• RF issue
• Interference / Dominance / Coverage
• Missing Neighbours
• System issue BTS
• Sudden “CC Disconnect” due to “DL RRC Connection Release”
• Sudden drop to idle, no disconnect messaging
• System issue RNC
• Sudden “CC Disconnect” due to “DL RRC Connection Release”

For internal use


24 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Failure Location

• Analyse the
signalling flow
to find the
location of
failure and
potential
cause

• UE log may
only capture
some of the
messages

For internal use


25 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Module 4 – Drive Test Analysis
Call Setup Failure Analysis

For internal use


26 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
AMR CS Call Phases
UE WBTS DRNC SRNC CN
1. Cell search, BCCH
decoding & RACH access

2. RRC connection set-up

3. UE <--> CS-CN signalling

4. RAB set-up

5. UE <--> CS-CN Signalling

6. Service Established

7. Branch addition/deletion & Active set update

8. Service Released

For internal use


27 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Call Setup Failure Start

Analysis Process A Coverage Optimization


Best server’s No
RSCP > -102dBm
Missing No
Dominance Optimization
Yes Neighbour ?
Best server’s No
Yes Neighbour list Optimization
Ec/No > -12dB

Yes
UL coverage & RACH
B parameter. Optimization
(changing serving cell)
No
AICH(ACK) received? Report & Finish
(Check failure cause)
Yes No

“RRC Connection
Setup” received?
No “RRC Setup
Reject” received?
C
Yes Yes
AC optimization (check PrxNoise

D Report & Finish


(Reason of problem: L1 sync fail)
No (DCH) “RRC Connection setup
Completed” sent from UE?
& interferer around BTS)

Report & Finish


Yes

Report & Finish No “Radio Bearer setup


(Check failure cause) failure”Received?

Yes E
Report & Finish
Check failure cause
For internal use (Not radio problem/cell update)
28 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Call setup failures – RF issue A
• RF issue? Coverage / Interference / Dominance

See the example in Module 3 – RF Optimisation

For internal use


29 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Call setup failures – Missing Neighbour A
• Missing neighbour analysis over the whole route (3G-3G, 3G-2G)
• Search for failures due to missing 3G-3G neighbours
• Search for failures due to missing 3G –2G neighbours
• It is suggested to place 2G scanner to the test vehicle

For internal use


30 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Call Setup Failure Analysis- Block B - B
• The purpose of this activity is to check the Random Access Process is working
adequately by investigating whether AI (Acquisition Indicator) has been received
through DL AICH
• If AICH was not received by UE, the cause of the problem can be classified into:
• Inadequate RAN parameter related to Random Access: RAN parameter settings for
pre-amble transmission or open loop power control information is not correct.
• UL Coverage limit: UL coverage of UE is smaller compared to serving cells DL
coverage so that UE’s Tx power cannot reach serving cell.

• The Basic theory for RACH setup procedure and planning parameters can be
found in Module 6 – Parameter Optimisation

For internal use


31 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Call Setup Failure Analysis- Block B - B
UE WBTS RNC
Preamble/RACH

Acquisition Indicator/AICH

RRC: RRC Connection Request/PRACH


NBAP: RADIO LINK SETUP REQUEST
NBAP: RADIO LINK SETUP RESPONSE

RRC: RRC CONNECTION SETUP/FACH

L1 Synchronisation

NBAP: SYNCHRONISATION INDICATOR

RRC: RRC CONNECTION SETUP COMPLETE/DCH

UE in CELL_DCH state
For internal use
32 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
RACH Process B
L1 ACK / AICH
Downlink Not detected
BS
UEtxPowerMaxPRACH
PowerRampStepPRACHpreamble

…… ……
Uplink
MS Preamble Preamble Message part
1 2
PowerOffsetLastPreamblePRACHmessage
PRACH_preamble_retrans
# PRACH preambles transmitted during one PRACH cycle without receiving AICH response

RACH_tx_Max
# preamble power ramping cycles that can be done before RACH transmission failure is reported

Initial preample power:


•Ptx = CPICHtransmissionPower-RSCP(CPICH) +RSSI(BS) +
PRACHRequiredReceivedCI

For internal use


33 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Call Setup Failure Analysis- Block B- B
• Solutions for RACH optimisation

No
Max UE Tx power hit To increase PRACH_Preamble_retrans
the UE_P_MAX(24dBm)? Or PowerRampStepPRACHPreamble

Yes
Yes
Is UL Interference Report there might be an interfering
abnormally HIGH? source Nearby the serving cell

No
Change the Serving cell to cover the problem Area
=> UE is too far to reach the serving cell

For internal use


34 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Call Setup Failure Analysis- Block B B

Open loop Power Control


parameters from RACH Info
message

For internal use


35 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Call setup failures – System issue BTS C
• No response to “RRC Connection Request”
• Good RF conditions
• Wrong MHA settings or cable loss settings can cause the site not to “hear” the UE
• PrxNoise statistics, receive link parameters and HW units to be checked (faulty MHA,
wrong MHA parameters, wrong cable / feeder loss parameters, faulty units)

For internal use


36 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Call setup failures – System issue BTS C
• “RRC Connection Reject” after “RRC Connection Request”
• Good RF conditions
• Admission Control can reject too many (or admit too many) connection requests due
to wrong PrxNoise measurements.
• PrxNoise statistics, receive link parameters and HW units to be checked

For internal use


37 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Call Setup Failure Analysis C
• UE has the appropriate DL/UL coverage but if RNC does not allow to set up the RRC
connection of the requested RAB (Radio Access Bearer), Call setup will fail.
• Admission Control (AC) is involved in RRC connection setup. AC can reject RRC reject
RRC connection Setup due the DL Load, UL load or DL Spreading codes

• Marginal Load Area:


• If measured UL (PrxTotal) or DL (PtxTotal) load exceeds target thresholds
(PrxTarget and PtxTarget) AC can still admit new RAB to the cell if a new non-
controllable load keeps below target thresholds (in practice this means that AC
can admit only new controllable load RABs i.e. NRT RABs)
• Overload Area:
• If measured UL (PrxTotal) or DL (PtxTotal) load exceeds overload thresholds
(PrxTarget + PrxOffset and PtxTarget + PtxOffset) then AC can't admit more
RABs to the cell

For internal use


38 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Call Setup Failure Analysis C
• During the pre-optimization phase it is unlikely that AC will stop an RRC
connection setup during the drive testing because there are normally very few
UEs in the network. (Traffic loading is trivial)
• However, it should be checked that measured PtxTotal and PrxTotal are less than
PtxTarget (e.g. 40dBm) and PrxTarget (e.g. 4dB, 60% loading) respectively.
• If DL AC does not allow RRC setup check the Tx power of WBTS, # of
channels transmitted, Signaling messages.
• If UL AC does not allow RRC setup: Check out if there is an interfering source
nearby the serving cell.

For internal use


39 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Call Setup Failure Analysis D
To check if Layer 1 Synchronization (slot/frame sync) has failed
• If “RRC Connection Setup” was received by UE but UE does not send “RRC Connection
Setup Completed”, we will report “L1 synchronization failure” and have to check L1 system
messages.

For internal use


40 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Call setup failures – System issue RNC E
• “CC Disconnect” after “Call
Proceeding”
• Good RF conditions
• Failures in RAB setup
occur between the “RAB
Assignment Request” being
received from Core
Network and the RAN
sending out Radio Bearer
Setup. Therefore the failure
is between BTS and Core
Network.

For internal use


41 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Call setup failures – System issue RNC E
• “CC Disconnect” after “Call
Proceeding” (cont.)
• An example (site shows high
values on counter
“RAB_STP_FAIL_CS_VOICE
_BTS” during the drive test
• In the recent check the
counter showed no failures.

For internal use


42 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Call setup failures – Core NW E
• “CM Service Abort” after “CM
Service Request”
• Good RF conditions
• “Security Mode Command”-
message not received by
UE, thus the failure is
believed to be at Core
Network. UE Node B

RRC Connection Establishment


RNC MGW

Initial Direct Transfer (CM Service Request) SCCP: Connection Request

SCCP: Connection Confirm


Location Reporting Control
Common ID
Security Mode Command

• RRC: Initial Direct Transfer message is sent using acknowledged mode RLC to the CS core
domain. Routing is to be based upon the local P-TMSI

• The NAS message is not read by the RNC but is forwarded to the multimedia gateway. The NAS
message includes the IMSI as a UE identity
• The SCCP: Connection Request message establishes the connection orientated signalling link in
the same way as it was for the RRC connection phase.This does not reserve any resources for the
AMR call itself.
• The Connection Confirm message identifies the RNC with a destination local reference which is the
same as the source reference within the Connection Request message
• The Connection Confirm message identifies the CS core with a source local reference
• The CS core sends a RANAP: Location Reporting Control message to the RNC requesting
information regarding the location of a particular UE
• The RANAP: Common ID message specifies the IMSI belonging to the UE
• The Security Mode Command message triggers the start or stop of ciphering and integrity
For internal use
protection.
43 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Call setup failures – System Issue (test number) E
• “CC Disconnect” after “CC Progress”
• Cause: recovery on timer expiry
• The call goes via IN SCP to a recording.
• A static test was done by Nokia
Customer Care and in few instances the
call dropped after 30 seconds of
recording passed. Hence the problem is
associated with the test number not the
RAN
30
sec

Cause: recovery
on timer expiry

For internal use


44 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Module 4 – Drive Test Analysis
Drop Call Analysis

For internal use


45 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Call Drop Failure Analysis Process Start
SHO Failure Yes
SHO Failed
Analysis
No

ISHO Failure Yes


ISHO Failed
Analysis No

No

Best server’s No
Coverage Optimization
RSCP > -102dBm

Best server’s Missing No


Dominance Optimization
Ec/No > -12dB Neighbour

A Yes Neighbour list


Optimization
Yes
Investigate
possible
B BTS or RNC
problem
For internal use
46 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Call Drop Failure Analysis Process (SHO Analysis)
Start

Yes
Check Iur Inter RNC HO
Yes
Check neighbour definition parameters
No

Yes No DL ASU
Fix SC Clash SC Clash
received
C
Yes
No

Load Yes Congestion on


Optimisation target cell
UE Tx Power Max Check RF Levels
No

DL Tx Power Max No
Yes
D
Yes Load Optimisation/
Uplink Interference
External Interferer
Yes
No

Yes
Link Unbalanced CPICH Optimisation

For internal use


47 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Drop call failures – RF issue A
• RF drops mostly due to poor dominance or
interference
• Poor coverage could lead to ISHO,
although poor dominance or interference
can cause ISHO to fail.
• Rapid field drop can cause drop due to
coverage
• Poor dominance or interference can cause
Compressed Mode (CM) to start even if
RSCP is still good.
• In CM UE transmits with higher power
(more interference) and spends less time
on 3G (less accurate measurement
reporting)
• Poor dominance or interference can lead
to Active Set update failures and Poor dominance
eventually to drop call.
causes Active Set
update failures

For internal use


48 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Drop call failures – RF issue A

DL synchronisation is lost ->


UE has stopped transmitting

TrChAgg and DL
DPCCH BER high

For internal use


49 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Drop call failures – RF issue A
Fairly good
CPICH Pilot
EcNo

Transport Channel
BER. Btw UE<->RNC
(MAC layer)

Sometimes DPCCH BER (btw UE<->WBTS) can be


a better indicator of what's happening to the
dedicated channel than the CPICH EcNo, in
particular in the case that power control may not be
tracking well

For internal use


50 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Drop call failures – System issue BTS B
• Sudden drop to idle, no disconnect messaging
• Site malfunctions to be checked
• In the example below site had faulty unit (WTR)

Drop to IDLE

For internal use


51 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Drop call failures – System issue RNC B
DPCCH BER
• “CC Disconnect” due to
“DL RRC Connection
Release”
• No response to UL
Measurement Reports
• In the example site had no
alarms, good RF & BER
• Not able to add SC265 to
Active Set, next call on the
same cell => no failure.
• Difficult to troubleshoot if
the failure does not
happen systematically =>
follow up in the next weeks Sudden “RRC
drive / do a separate drive Connection Release”
test in the area

For internal use


52 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Drop call failures (SC conflict) C
• Sudden drop to idle mode Transport
(no disconnect channel BLER
messaging) 100%
• Cause of the failure:
overshooting site and SC
reuse
• Short term solution to add
overshooting neighbour in
ADJS definitions

Cell ABC, SC258

For internal use


53 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Drop Call - Uplink Interference D
UL interference from the SIB7
message

For internal use


54 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Drop Call – Link Balance D
• UL & DL Power Control commands can help UE RX power control
indicating problems in link balance. message: DL reception
weak -> UE is ordering
• PC frequency is 1500 Hz, thus ideally the sum of WBTS to increase power.
PC commands to increase or decrease power is
1500
• E.g. if the sum of UL PC commands is < 1500,
this would indicate UE is starting to loose
synchronization
• in Compressed Mode there is less PC
commands, UE spends time on 2G

Sum of UL PC commands
< 1500, UE not receiving
all the PC commands.

For internal use


55 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Drop call failures – System issue RNC or BTS ?
• “CC Disconnect” due to “DL RRC Connection Release” is just a consequence of
failure which can be due to different reasons
• From UE point of view L3-messaging does not identify the point of failure distinctly
• BTS or RNC failure? => Suspect BTS first, then RNC

• Rule out BTS failures


• Check the site performance from Counters (Iub, Service level, cell resources SHO, etc) and that
site is carrying traffic
• PrxNoise, receive link parameters, alarms
• SC–reuse
• UE performance ?
• Identified causes for Active Set Update failure
• “Deaf” sites (PrxNoise)
• Faulty HW
• SC-reuse

For internal use


56 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date

You might also like