Case Discussion 20-9-18

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 25

CASE DISCUSSION

02

DR SAI SARATH KUMAR


CASE REPORT

Name: Master. Irfaan

Age: 10 Years

Gender: Male

Registration Number: 422508


Chief complaint: complained of broken teeth in his upper front
tooth region

History of presenting illness: patient presented to the clinic 16


hours later after a trauma and had broken his teeth followed by a
traumatic fall while involving in sports activity in a play ground.

When

how Where
Past medical history:
• No history of bleeding disorders, cardiac diseases, epilepsy, allergies

• Anti- tetanus booster was taken

• Trauma dis not cause any loss of consciousness, amnesia, drowsiness,


vomiting or headache.

Past dental history:


• First dental visit

• Had no previous trauma

Pre-natal, natal, post natal history:


• Full tern delivery, no history of jaundice or blood transfusion

• Feeding habits were combination

• Devolping milestones were normal

• History of prolonged thumb sucking habit upto 5 years


EXTRA ORAL EXAMINATION

• Oval facial form

• Symmetrical face

• Straight facial divergence

• Competent lips

• No extraoral wounds, bruises or lacerations were


seen

• No signs of swelling extraorally


SOFT TISSUE EXAMINATION
No abnormalities detected in lips, mucosa, palate, floor
of mouth, tongue and gingiva

HARD TISSUE EXAMINATION

16 55 54 53 12 11 21 22 63 64 65 26
46 85 44 8342 42 31 32 73 34 75 36

• Decayed: 16
• Missing: nil
• Filled: nil
• Other findings: fractured 21, 22
PRE-OPERATIVE OCCLUSAL VIEW

complicated crown fracture of the maxillary left central


incisor and lateral incisor
PRE-OPERATIVE MAXILLARY VIEW

Ulcerated and exposed pulp seen in 21 and 22


PRE-OPERATIVE MANDIBULAR VIEW
PROVISIONAL DIAGNOSIS

Class III (ELLIS AND DAVIS) fracture in 21 and 22

CLOSED APEX
OR
OPEN APEX
INVESTIGATIONS

periapical radiographic examination


in relation to 21 and 22 loss of
tooth structure, fracture line
involving enamel, dentin and pulp

showed complete root development,


closed apices, no periapical injury,
and no alveolar bone fractures
FINAL DIAGNOSIS

1. Class III (Ellis And Davis) – 21 and 22


(extensive fracture of crown involving considerable
dentin and exposing dental pulp)
(Or)
Crown fracture with pulpal involvement N 502.52(WHO
classification)

2. Class 1 dental caries in 16


TREATMENT PLAN

Immediate phase: root canal treatment in 21


and 22

Preparatory phase: oral prophylaxis and oral


hygiene instructions

Corrective phase: post- endodontic restoration in


21 and 22, restoration of 16

Maintenance phase: recall once in 3 months


DISCUSSION FOR TREATMENT PLAN

Selection of treatment procedure will depend upon:


1. Length of time the pulp tissue is exposed
2. Size of pulp exposure
3. Root development.

Three possible treatments:


1. Pulp capping
2. Pulpotomy
3. Complete endodontics
Pulp capping:
• Primarily indicated where pulp has not neen exposed for more
than few hours and where pulp exposure is confined to a small
area

• Prognosis of pulp capping with teeth having closed apices is not


favorable owing principally to the more confined area in the pulp
chamber

Pulpotomy:
• Indicated in a long standing pulp exposure, large pulp exposures,
teeth with incomplete root formation

• Any attempt to preserve the vitality of the pulp in a tooth with


closed apex and a large pulp exposure is not recommended

Complete endodontics:
• The treatment of choice is conventional root canal therapy
followed by a post-retained crown
VISIT O1

Patient accompanied with his grandmother

Communication was established

Case history was recorded

Pre-operative photographs and radiographs were taken

Treatment plan was discussed

Topical anesthetic agent was applied and Local anesthesia was administered in
relation to 21 and 22
Access opening was done in 21 and 22, pulp remnants were extirpated, BMP was
done.
Calcium hydroxide was placed and closed dressing was given with ZOE.

Antibiotics and analgesics were prescribed

Post-operative instructions were given


VISIT 02

Patient accompanied with grandmother

Under rubber dam isolation, access was reopened in 21 and 22,


irrigation and drying of canals, followed by obturation using lateral
compaction technique. Access was sealed with type II GIC
Post- operative instructions were given.
ROOT CANAL TREATMENT

Master cone radiograph Obturation done in 21


21- 55 and 22 with lateral
22- 50 compaction technique
VISIT 03
Patient accompanied with grandmother

Oral hygiene status was reviewed

Post- space was created using GG drills and fiber


post was cemented using type I GIC in 21 and 22.
Core build up was done using packable composite

Post-operative instructions was given


POST AND CORE

Post space was created, fiber post was cemented with Type I
Glass Ionomer Cement.
Composite core build up was done in 21 and 22
VISIT 04

Patient accompanied with grandmother

Oral hygiene status was reviewed

Tooth preparation was done in 21 and 22

Upper and lower alginate impressions were made

Acrylic jacket crowns were fabricated and cemented with IRM

Post-operative Instructions Given

Advised review and recall once in 3 months


TOOTH PREPARATION

Tooth preparation was done in 21 and 22,


followed by maxillary and mandibular
impressions for post-endodontic restoration
POST-ENDODONTIC RESTORATION

Acrylic jacket crowns were fabricated and


cemented with IRM in 21 and 22
3RD MONTH FOLLOW -UP
Clinical and
No symptoms or radiographic
no tooth sensitivity or
radiographic defects examination showed no
pain was registered
were present. periodontal or
periapical pathology,

the restorations were aesthetically


functionally acceptable gratifying

You might also like