Final Project of LTE

for S1
- Find a curriculum/syllabus of high school or higher
education
- Make test specification (blueprint)
- Construct a multiple-choice test of at least 25 items
- Try-out the test to at least 30 students
- Analyze the test result
- The test covers: Listening, Reading, Grammar and
Vocabulary (at least 10 items for each)
 Test Specification (Blueprint)
Subject: ___English__________________________________
Semester/Class: ____________________________________
School: ___________________________________________
Test Techniques: __Multiple-Choice____________________
Test Type: __Written Test____________________________
Test description: ____________________________________
Basic Objective/ Types of
No. Domain Items
Competence Indicators Question
1. Listening … C1 Specific Info, 1–6
Explicit Info
… C3 Comparison 7 – 12
of Ideas
2. Reading … C2 Main Ideas
3. Gremmer … … … …
4. Vocablery … … … …
 Structure of the Report
Chapter I: Introduction (background, coverage, and place of try-out)
Chapter II: Test Specifications, The Constructed Tests, Answer Keys,
and Scoring Rubric
Chapter III: Analysis:
- Data Presentation (Frequency Distribution),
- Mean Score & Standard Deviation
- Reliability (split-half or Test-retest)
- Validity,
- Difficulty Level,
- Discrimination Power, and
- Distractor Power
Chapter IV: Conclusion (the good and acceptable items)
Appendices: Surat Izin (if any)
Samples of Students’ Answer sheets (>4)
Curriculum/syllabus
Surat Keterangan telah melakukan ujicoba tes
 Data Presentation
Raw Final
No. Tally Frequency Percentage
Score Score
1 23 92  1 2.5
2 22 88  1 2.5
3 20 80  2 5.0
4 19 76  1 2.5
5 18 72  4 10.0
6 17 68  2 5.0
7 16 64  4 10.0
8 15 60   6 15.0
9 14 56  5 12.5
10 13 52  3 7.5
11 12 48  2 2.5
12 11 44  3 7.5
13 10 40  1 2.5
14 9 36  2 5.0
15 8 32  1 2.5
16 7 28  1 2.5
17 5 20  1 2.5
Total 40 40 100
Calculation of Mean
No. x f fx
1 9.2 1 9.2
2 8.8 1 8.8
3 8.0 2 16.0
4 7.6 1 7.6
5 7.2 4 28.8
6 6.8 2 13.6
7 6.4 4 25.6
8 6.0 6 36.0
9 5.6 5 28.0
10 5.2 3 15.6
11 4.8 2 9.6
12 4.4 3 13.2
13 4.0 1 4.0
14 3.6 2 7.2
15 3.2 1 3.2
16 2.8 1 2.8
17 2.0 1 2.0
Total 239 N=40 Σfx = 231.2
 Standard Deviation
No. x d d2 21 6.0 0.22 0.0484
1 9.2 3.42 11.6964 22 5.6 -0.18 0.0324
2 8.8 3.02 9.1204 23 5.6 -0.18 0.0324
3 8.0 2.22 4.9284 24 5.6 -0.18 0.0324
4 8.0 2.22 4.9284 25 5.6 -0.18 0.0324
s.d . 
d 2

5 7.6 1.82 3.3124 26 5.6 -0.18 0.0324 N

6 7.2 1.42 2.0164 27 5.2 -0.58 0.3364
7 7.2 1.42 2.0164 28 5.2 -0.58 0.3364
8 7.2 1.42 2.0164 29 5.2 -0.58 0.3364
9 7.2 1.42 2.0164 30 4.8 -0.98 0.9604
10 6.8 1.02 1.0404 31 4.8 -0.98 0.9604
11 6.8 1.02 1.0404 32 4.4 -1.38 1.9044
12 6.4 0.62 0.3844 33 4.4 -1.38 1.9044
13 6.4 0.62 0.3844 34 4.4 -1.38 1.9044
14 6.4 0.62 0.3844 35 4.0 -1.78 3.1684
15 6.4 0.62 0.3844 36 3.6 -2.18 4.7524
16 6.0 0.22 0.0484 37 3.6 -2.18 4.7524
17 6.0 0.22 0.0484 38 3.2 -2.58 6.6564
18 6.0 0.22 0.0484 39 2.8 -2.98 8.8804
19 6.0 0.22 0.0484 40 2.0 -3.78 14.2884
20 6.0 0.22 0.0484 Ttl 231.2 0 97.264
 Table for Validity Calculation
TEST ITEM
No Testees SX
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 Taufik 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 7
2 Ahmad 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 9
3 Nurdin 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 5
4 Rini 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 6
5 Aminah 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8
6 Andini 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 3
7 Karim 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 7
8 Fadli 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 6
9 Halim 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 6
10 Rahman 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 4
SX 8 3 2 6 8 8 7 8 8 3 61
 Validity
Item # 1
M p  Mt p
 x 8 rpbi 
p   0.8 SDt q
1 N 10

2 q= 1-p= 1-0.8= 0.2

61
Mt   6.1
3 10
(9  8  7  7  6  6  4  3)
4 Mp   6.3
8

5 SD = 1.8
6.3  6.1 0.8
6 rpbi    0.17
1.8 0.2
 Validity
ITEM Mp Mt SDt p q rpbi QUALITY
1 6.3 6.1 1.8 0.8 0.2 0.17 Not Valid
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
 TABLE FOR RELIABILITY CALCULATION

X X Y X2 Y2 XY
1 7 8
2 5 6
3 6 6
4 9 8
5 6 7
6 8 8
7 4 5
8 7 6
9 6 7
10 8 7
11 6 7
X=11 SX= 72 SY= 75
 TABLE FOR RELIABILITY CALCULATION

X X Y X2 Y2 XY
1 7 8 49 64 56
2 5 6 25 36 30
3 6 6 36 36 36
4 9 8 81 64 72
5 6 7 36 49 42
6 8 8 64 64 64
7 4 5 16 25 20
8 7 6 49 36 42
9 6 7 36 49 42
10 8 7 64 49 56
11 6 7 36 49 42
X=11 SX= 72 SY= 75 SX2= 492 SY2= 521 SFX= 502
 Reliability
N  xy   x  y 
rxy 
[ N  x 2   x  ][ N  y 2   y  ]
2 2

(11  502)  (72  75)

rxy 
[(11  492).(72) 2 ][(11  521).(75) 2 ]

122 122
rxy    0.78
[228].[106] 155.46

For Split Half Reliability + the formula:

2rhh 2  0.78 1.56

rtt  rtt    0.87
1  rhh 1  0.78 1.78
 Sample Table
• Validity: 0.304 – 1.000
• Difficulty: 0.25 – 0.75
• Discrimination: 0.25 – 1.00
ITEM VALIDITY DIFFICULTY DISCRIMINATION QUALITY
1 0.654 0.85 0.30 +V –D +S Improper
2 0.522 0.48 0.35 +V +D +S Proper
3 0.515 0.53 0.35 +V +D +S Proper
4 0.127 0.63 0.15 –V +D –S Improper
5 0.530 0.70 0.40 +V +D +S Proper
6 0.436 0.80 0.40 +V -D +S Improper
7 0.563 0.55 0.30 +V +D +S Proper
Item Difficulty and Discrimination
TEST ITEM
No Testees SX
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 Ahmad 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 9
2 Aminah 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 Upper
3 Karim 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 7 Group
(UG)
4 Taufik 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 7
5 Rini 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 6
6 Arif 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 6
7 Fadli 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 6
8 Halim 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 6 Lower
9 Nurdin 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 5 Group
10 Rahman 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 4 (LG)
11 Andini 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 3
UG 4 2 2 4 4 4 5 4 5 3 37
LG 3 2 0 2 4 4 2 4 3 0 24
 Distractor Power
Item 1 UG LG UG+LG
A 2 5 7
B* 14 4 18 UG  LG 18
IF    0.45
C 1 4 5 N 40
D 3 7 10
O 0 0 0 UG  LG 10
Total 20 20 40 ID    0.50
n 20
Item No. 1 has good distractor power and good difficulty level and index of
discrimination

Item 2 UG LG UG+LG
A* 15 9 24 22
B 5 10 15 IF   0.55
40
C 0 0 0
D 0 0 0
O 0 1 1 6
ID   0.30
Total 20 20 40 20
Item No. 2 has good difficulty level and index of discrimination, but distractors C and
D do not work.