Guided By: Presented By:: Mr. Sunny KC Name: SNEHA MOHAN (STC16CE040/S5) KARTHIKA S (STC16CE022/S5)
Guided By: Presented By:: Mr. Sunny KC Name: SNEHA MOHAN (STC16CE040/S5) KARTHIKA S (STC16CE022/S5)
Guided By: Presented By:: Mr. Sunny KC Name: SNEHA MOHAN (STC16CE040/S5) KARTHIKA S (STC16CE022/S5)
Expensive
Cannot be applied partially to structures unlike other
retrofitting.
Challenging to implement in an efficient manner.
This method involves new techniques for improving
the earthquake resistance of buildings.
It also relies upon damping and energy dissipation
provided by lead rubber bearings.
A certain amount of vibration energy is transferred to
the building by earthquake ground motion.
Buildings themselves possess an ability to dissipate or
damp energy.
Acceleration is decreased.
The rubber isolation bearings don’t suffer any
damage.
The plug dissipates the energy of motion convert to
heat energy and reducing the energy to enter into
building and reduces vibrations.
Most of the earthquake ground motion is in
horizontal direction.
Building column undergo displacement relative to
motion of ground.
Hence the damping device is installed as apart of
bracing system.
Frictional Dampers; these utilizes frictional forces to
dissipate energy.
Metallic Dampers; utilize the deformation of metal
elements within the damper.
Viscoelastic Dampers; utilizes the controlled shearing
of solid.
Viscous Dampers; Utilized the forced movement of
fluids with in the damper.
This method is achieved by removal of one or more
storey’s from the structure.
In this case evident that removal of the mass will lead
to a decrease in the period, which will lead to an
increase in the required strength.
Figure. 9
Seismic Retrofitting
by mass reduction
An effective solution when large openings are required.
Adding steel bracings provide Potential advantages due
to higher strength and stiffness , openings for natural
light can be provided.
Amount of work is less since foundation cost may be
minimized .
This method adds much less weight to existing
structure.
IS : 1893-2002 ( part-1) criteria for Earthquake
Resistant Design of Structures –Code of Practice.
IS : 4326-2002 Earthquake Resistant Design and
Construction of Buildings –Code of Practice.
IS : 13920-1993 Ductile Detailing of Reinforce
Concrete Structures subjected to Seismic Forces –Code
of Practice.
Is : 13827-1993 Improving Earthquake Resistance of
Low Strength Masonry Buildings – Guidelines.
REINFORCEMENT IN MASONRY :-
Since steel is ductile, providing steel reinforcements
in masonry will improve the ductility of the system. A
hollow cavity is made between two layers of bricks
and steel rebars, in both horizontal and vertical
reinforcements, are inserted into this cavity and then
grout is poured into the cavity to fill the space.
Through this arrangement, steel is sandwiched
between the layers of masonry, thereby helping in
resisting the horizontal seismic force.
The method of seismic retrofitting of existing masonry
constructions reduces the deficiencies in the beam column
joint
Ensure safety & security of the building, employees ,
structural functionality ,machinery etc..
Hence the marketability is improved and the risk of injury
is reduced , it also provides structural improvement to
reduce seismic hazards.
Figure 11: Isometric of Figure 12: Isometric of
the URM Building the Truck-under Building
This method is essential to reduce hazard and losses
from non-structural elements occurs due to
earthquakes.
Predominantly concerned with structural Improvement
to reduce seismic hazard.
Insurance companies.
• This method is useful for application for seismic
retrofitting of existing masonry constructions
vulnerable to earthquakes.
• It discusses about earthquake engineering problems and
the traditional methods of seismic retrofitting.
• In short this method provide existing structures with
more resistance to seismic activity.
Lakshmanan, N. (2006). “Seismic Qualification of Reinforced
Concrete Structures”, Proceedings of the National Conference
on Earthquake Analysis and Design of Structures (EQADS-06),
PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore, pp. K33-K48
ATC (1996). “Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete
Buildings”, Report ATC-40, Applied
Technology Council, Redwood City, U.S.A. (also Report SSC
96-01, Seismic Safety Commission,
State of California, Sacramento, U.S.A.).
Cosenza, E., Manfredi, G. and Ramasco, R. (1993). “The Use of
Damage Functionals in Earthquake
Engineering: