0% found this document useful (0 votes)
44 views51 pages

37 Interference in Light

Wave optics describes phenomena that cannot be explained by ray optics, including interference, diffraction, and polarization. Interference occurs when two waves combine, producing constructive or destructive interference depending on whether their amplitudes add or cancel out. For light waves to interfere, the sources must be coherent and monochromatic. Young's double-slit experiment demonstrated interference by passing light through two slits, producing a pattern of bright and dark fringes on a screen due to the paths taken by waves from each slit. The positions of these fringes can be calculated based on the path difference between waves.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
44 views51 pages

37 Interference in Light

Wave optics describes phenomena that cannot be explained by ray optics, including interference, diffraction, and polarization. Interference occurs when two waves combine, producing constructive or destructive interference depending on whether their amplitudes add or cancel out. For light waves to interfere, the sources must be coherent and monochromatic. Young's double-slit experiment demonstrated interference by passing light through two slits, producing a pattern of bright and dark fringes on a screen due to the paths taken by waves from each slit. The positions of these fringes can be calculated based on the path difference between waves.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 51

Interference of Light Waves

Wave Optics
 Wave optics is a study concerned with
phenomena that cannot be adequately
explained by geometric (ray) optics
 These phenomena include:
 Interference
 Diffraction
 Polarization
Interference
 In constructive interference the amplitude of
the resultant wave is greater than that of
either individual wave
 In destructive interference the amplitude of
the resultant wave is less than that of either
individual wave
 All interference associated with light waves
arises when the electromagnetic fields that
constitute the individual waves combine
Conditions for Interference
 To observe interference in light waves, the
following two conditions must be met:
 1) The sources must be coherent
 They must maintain a constant phase with respect to
each other
 2) The sources should be monochromatic
 Monochromatic means they have a single wavelength
Producing Coherent Sources
 Light from a monochromatic source is used to
illuminate a barrier
 The barrier contains two narrow slits
 The slits are small openings
 The light emerging from the two slits is
coherent since a single source produces the
original light beam
 This is a commonly used method
Diffraction
 From Huygens’s
principle we know
the waves spread
out from the slits
 This divergence of
light from its initial
line of travel is
called diffraction
Young’s Double-Slit
Experiment: Schematic
 Thomas Young first
demonstrated interference
in light waves from two
sources in 1801
 The narrow slits S1 and S2
act as sources of waves
 The waves emerging from
the slits originate from the
same wave front and
therefore are always in
phase
Resulting Interference Pattern
 The light from the two slits
forms a visible pattern on a
screen
 The pattern consists of a
series of bright and dark
parallel bands called
fringes
 Constructive interference
occurs where a bright
fringe occurs
 Destructive interference
results in a dark fringe
Active Figure 37.2
 Use the
active figure
to vary slit
separation
and the
wavelength
 Observe the
effect on the
interference
pattern
Interference Patterns
 Constructive interference
occurs at point P
 The two waves travel the
same distance
 Therefore, they arrive in
phase
 As a result, constructive
interference occurs at this
point and a bright fringe is
observed
Interference Patterns, 2
 The lower wave has to
travel farther than the
upper wave to reach point
P
 The lower wave travels
one wavelength farther
 Therefore, the waves arrive
in phase
 A second bright fringe
occurs at this position
Interference Patterns, 3
 The upper wave travels
one-half of a wavelength
farther than the lower wave
to reach point R
 The trough of the upper
wave overlaps the crest of
the lower wave
 This is destructive
interference
 A dark fringe occurs
Young’s Double-Slit
Experiment: Geometry
 The path difference, δ,
is found from the tan
triangle
 δ = r2 – r1 = d sin θ
 This assumes the paths
are parallel
 Not exactly true, but a
very good approximation
if L is much greater than
d
Interference Equations
 For a bright fringe produced by constructive
interference, the path difference must be
either zero or some integral multiple of the
wavelength
 δ = d sin θbright = mλ
 m = 0, ±1, ±2, …
 m is called the order number
 When m = 0, it is the zeroth-order maximum
 When m = ±1, it is called the first-order maximum
Interference Equations, 2
 When destructive interference occurs, a dark
fringe is observed
 This needs a path difference of an odd half
wavelength
 δ = d sin θdark = (m + ½)λ
 m = 0, ±1, ±2, …
Interference Equations, 4
 The positions of the fringes can be measured
vertically from the zeroth-order maximum
 Using the blue triangle
 ybright = L tan qbright
 ydark = L tan qdark
Interference Equations, final
 Assumptions in a Young’s Double Slit
Experiment
 L >> d
 d >> λ
 Approximation:
 θ is small and therefore the small angle approximation
tan θ ~ sin θ can be used
 y = L tan θ ≈ L sin θ
λL
 For bright fringes ybright  m (m  0,  1,  2 )
d
Uses for Young’s Double-Slit
Experiment
 Young’s double-slit experiment provides a
method for measuring wavelength of the light
 This experiment gave the wave model of light
a great deal of credibility
 It was inconceivable that particles of light could
cancel each other in a way that would explain the
dark fringes
Intensity Distribution: Double-
Slit Interference Pattern
 The bright fringes in the interference pattern
do not have sharp edges
 The equations developed give the location of only
the centers of the bright and dark fringes
 We can calculate the distribution of light
intensity associated with the double-slit
interference pattern
Intensity Distribution,
Assumptions
 Assumptions:
 The two slits represent coherent sources of
sinusoidal waves
 The waves from the slits have the same angular
frequency, ω
 The waves have a constant phase difference, φ
 The total magnitude of the electric field at any
point on the screen is the superposition of the
two waves
Intensity Distribution,
Electric Fields
 The magnitude of each
wave at point P can be
found
 E1 = Eo sin ωt
 E2 = Eo sin (ωt + φ)
 Both waves have the
same amplitude, Eo
Intensity Distribution,
Phase Relationships
 The phase difference between the two waves
at P depends on their path difference
 δ = r2 – r1 = d sin θ
 A path difference of λ (for constructive
interference) corresponds to a phase
difference of 2π rad
 A path difference of δ is the same fraction of
λ as the phase difference φ is of 2π
2π 2π
 This gives φ  δ d sin θ
λ λ
Intensity Distribution,
Resultant Field
 The magnitude of the resultant electric field
comes from the superposition principle
 EP = E1+ E2 = Eo[sin ωt + sin (ωt + φ)]
 This can also be expressed as
φ  φ
EP  2Eo cos   sin  ωt  
2  2
 EP has the same frequency as the light at the slits
 The magnitude of the field is multiplied by the
factor 2 cos (φ / 2)
Intensity Distribution,
Equation
 The expression for the intensity comes from
the fact that the intensity of a wave is
proportional to the square of the resultant
electric field magnitude at that point
 The intensity therefore is
 πd sin θ  2  πd 
I  Imax cos 
2
  Imax cos  y
 λ   λL 
Light Intensity, Graph
 The interference
pattern consists of
equally spaced fringes
of equal intensity
 This result is valid only
if L >> d and for small
values of θ
Lloyd’s Mirror
 An arrangement for
producing an interference
pattern with a single light
source
 Waves reach point P either
by a direct path or by
reflection
 The reflected ray can be
treated as a ray from the
source S’ behind the mirror
Interference Pattern from a
Lloyd’s Mirror
 This arrangement can be thought of as a
double-slit source with the distance between
points S and S’ comparable to length d
 An interference pattern is formed
 The positions of the dark and bright fringes
are reversed relative to the pattern of two real
sources
 This is because there is a 180° phase change
produced by the reflection
Phase Changes Due To
Reflection
 An electromagnetic wave
undergoes a phase
change of 180° upon
reflection from a medium
of higher index of
refraction than the one in
which it was traveling
 Analogous to a pulse on
a string reflected from a
rigid support
Phase Changes Due To
Reflection, cont.
 There is no phase
change when the wave
is reflected from a
boundary leading to a
medium of lower index
of refraction
 Analogous to a pulse on
a string reflecting from a
free support
Interference in Thin Films
 Interference effects are commonly observed
in thin films
 Examples include soap bubbles and oil on water
 The various colors observed when white light
is incident on such films result from the
interference of waves reflected from the two
surfaces of the film
Interference in Thin Films, 2
 Facts to remember
 An electromagnetic wave traveling from a medium
of index of refraction n1 toward a medium of index
of refraction n2 undergoes a 180° phase change
on reflection when n2 > n1
 There is no phase change in the reflected wave if n2 <
n1
 The wavelength of light λn in a medium with index
of refraction n is λn = λ/n where λ is the
wavelength of light in vacuum
Interference in Thin Films, 3
 Assume the light rays are
traveling in air nearly
normal to the two surfaces
of the film
 Ray 1 undergoes a phase
change of 180° with respect
to the incident ray
 Ray 2, which is reflected
from the lower surface,
undergoes no phase
change with respect to the
incident wave
Interference in Thin Films, 4
 Ray 2 also travels an additional distance of 2t
before the waves recombine
 For constructive interference
 2nt = (m + ½)λ (m = 0, 1, 2 …)
 This takes into account both the difference in optical
path length for the two rays and the 180° phase
change
 For destructive interference
 2nt = mλ (m = 0, 1, 2 …)
Interference in Thin Films, 5
 Two factors influence interference
 Possible phase reversals on reflection
 Differences in travel distance
 The conditions are valid if the medium above
the top surface is the same as the medium
below the bottom surface
 If there are different media, these conditions are
valid as long as the index of refraction for both is
less than n
Interference in Thin Films, 6
 If the thin film is between two different media,
one of lower index than the film and one of
higher index, the conditions for constructive
and destructive interference are reversed
 With different materials on either side of the
film, you may have a situation in which there
is a 180o phase change at both surfaces or at
neither surface
 Be sure to check both the path length and the
phase change
Interference in Thin Film, Soap
Bubble Example
Newton’s Rings
 Another method for viewing interference is to
place a plano-convex lens on top of a flat glass
surface
 The air film between the glass surfaces varies in
thickness from zero at the point of contact to
some thickness t
 A pattern of light and dark rings is observed
 These rings are called Newton’s rings
 The particle model of light could not explain the origin
of the rings
 Newton’s rings can be used to test optical lenses
Newton’s Rings,
Set-Up and Pattern
Problem Solving Strategy with
Thin Films, 1
 Conceptualize
 Identify the light source
 Identify the location of the observer
 Categorize
 Be sure the techniques for thin-film interference
are appropriate
 Identify the thin film causing the interference
Problem Solving with Thin
Films, 2
 Analyze
 The type of interference – constructive or destructive – that
occurs is determined by the phase relationship between the
upper and lower surfaces
 Phase differences have two causes
 differences in the distances traveled
 phase changes occurring on reflection
 Both causes must be considered when determining constructive
or destructive interference
 Use the indices of refraction of the materials to determine the
correct equations
 Finalize
 Be sure your results make sense physically
 Be sure they are of an appropriate size
Michelson Interferometer
 The interferometer was invented by an
American physicist, A. A. Michelson
 The interferometer splits light into two parts
and then recombines the parts to form an
interference pattern
 The device can be used to measure
wavelengths or other lengths with great
precision
Michelson Interferometer,
Schematic
 A ray of light is split into
two rays by the mirror
Mo
 The mirror is at 45o to the
incident beam
 The mirror is called a
beam splitter
 It transmits half the light
and reflects the rest
Michelson Interferometer,
Schematic Explanation, cont.
 The reflected ray goes toward mirror M1
 The transmitted ray goes toward mirror M2
 The two rays travel separate paths L1 and L2
 After reflecting from M1 and M2, the rays
eventually recombine at Mo and form an
interference pattern
Active Figure 37.14
 Use the active figure
to move the mirror
 Observe the effect
on the interference
pattern
 Use the
interferometer to
measure the
wavelength of the
light

PLAY
ACTIVE FIGURE
Michelson Interferometer –
Operation
 The interference condition for the two rays is
determined by their path length difference
 M1 is moveable
 As it moves, the fringe pattern collapses or
expands, depending on the direction M1 is
moved
Michelson Interferometer –
Operation, cont.
 The fringe pattern shifts by one-half fringe
each time M1 is moved a distance λ/4
 The wavelength of the light is then measured
by counting the number of fringe shifts for a
given displacement of M1
Michelson Interferometer –
Applications
 The Michelson interferometer was used to
disprove the idea that the Earth moves
through an ether
 Modern applications include
 Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)
 Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave
Observatory (LIGO)
Fourier Transform Infrared
Spectroscopy
 This is used to create a high-resolution
spectrum in a very short time interval
 The result is a complex set of data relating
light intensity as a function of mirror position
 This is called an interferogram
 The interferogram can be analyzed by a
computer to provide all of the wavelength
components
 This process is called a Fourier transform
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-
Wave Observatory

 General relativity predicts the existence of


gravitational waves
 In Einstein’s theory, gravity is equivalent to a
distortion of space
 These distortions can then propagate through
space
 The LIGO apparatus is designed to detect the
distortion produced by a disturbance that
passes near the Earth
LIGO, cont.
 The interferometer uses laser beams with an
effective path length of several kilometers
 At the end of an arm of the interferometer, a
mirror is mounted on a massive pendulum
 When a gravitational wave passes, the
pendulum moves, and the interference
pattern due to the laser beams from the two
arms changes
LIGO in Richland, Washington

You might also like