Human Resource Management: Crispina Rafol Corpuz, PH.D
Human Resource Management: Crispina Rafol Corpuz, PH.D
Human Resource Management: Crispina Rafol Corpuz, PH.D
Management
Crispina Rafol Corpuz, Ph.D.
Presented by:
Joel Faderon Sarillo, MBA
Part 3
Development of Human
Resources
(Training and Development)
Chapter 4
Cost Value
Analysis
1.) If you were Erlynn, how will you solve the absence
of career development at Caffmaco Feeds, Inc.
Performance Review
and
Appraisal
Performance Evaluation
• Performance review is the ongoing process of
evaluating and improving employees performance.
It is a process by which an individual’s work
performance is assessed and evaluated. It answer
the question “ How well has the employee
performed during the period of time in question”
• Performance is measured in terms f result.
Performance may be defined then as the
accomplishment of an employee or managers
assigned duties and the outcome produced on a
specified job function or activity during a specified
time period.
Why Measure Performance
• 1.) Managers cannot manage and define what
is expected, give feedback and recognition
without defining the basis or performance
measures. It allows management to specify
what must be done, combines feedback and
goal setting.
• 2.) On the part of the employee, he cannot
improve on what he is supposed to do without
the necessary data before and after to see if
performance is actually improving.
Why Measure Performance
• 3.) Creating high performance requires a
definition or clear goals so you will know it when
you see it. In addition, all high performers get
there because they have clear picture of
where they are going.
• 4.) Pay for performance requires metrics. If the
organization will be giving pay based on
performance, there is a need to have some
way of knowing when the pay-out has been
earned.
Objectives of Performance
Appraisal
• 1.) Provides information upon which promotion,
transfer, demotion, lay off, discharge and salary
decisions can be made. It could justify reward
decisions including merit increases, promotions and
other forms of rewards.
• 2.) Provides an opportunity for the supervisor and his
subordinates to review and identify the subordinates
strengths, and weakness or work related behavior.
This in turn lets both of them develop a plan for
correcting any deficiencies the appraisal might
have unearthed and reinforce the things the
subordinate does right. This feedback clarifies for
employees the job expectation held by his
supervisor.
Objectives of Performance
Appraisal.
• 3.) Basis in identifying the training needs of
employees as well as evaluating the success of
training and development initiatives are not
based on opinions but rather on results.
• 4.) Helps in the firms career planning process
because it provides a good opportunity to
review the person’s career plans in light of this
exhibited strengths and weaknesses. Thus, it
could produce evidence and/or opportunity
for career progression.
Objectives of Performance
Appraisal.
• 5. ) For easy monitoring and supervision
• 6.) Helps to evaluate the relative individual or
team contributions in achieving the
organization’s goals.
• 7.) Provides information to evaluate
effectiveness of selection and placement
decisions.
Performance Criteria
Three Criteria that are included in the construction of
performance evaluation:
a.) Relevance = relevant performance
dimensions are determined by the duties and
responsibilities contained in the job description.
b.) Reliability = should produce consistent and
repeatable evaluation.
c.) Freedom from Contamination = should
measure each employee’s performance without
being contaminated by factors that an employee
cannot control such as economic conditions, material
shortages or poor equipment.
Sources of Data in Appraisal
• Production data = evaluate the degree of
dependable task accomplishment by measuring
quantity and quality of performance. Example:
number of units produced per hour, peso volume of
sales, profit, return on investment. These are
considered the best measure of performance
because they are directly observable and they can
be counted.
• Personal data = type of information found in an
individual’s personnel files. Example: absenteeism,
tardiness, training program completed, critical
incidents. Except for critical incidents, these data
are directly observable and can be reliably
measured.
Sources of Data in Appraisal
• Judgment of Others = many of these
spontaneous and innovative behaviors
so important to organizational
effectiveness can only be assessed by
the judgments of others and ought to be
obtained in every evaluation
Performance Appraisal Methods
• A.) Multiple Person Evaluation Methods
• 1.) Ranking Method = ranking employees from the
most efficient to the least capable on each trait or
quality to be used in judging the employees
performance. This can be very difficult to do if the
supervisor is asked to rank a large number of
subordinates and many traits are involved.
• 2.) Paired Comparison = consist of asking an evaluator
to consider only two individuals at one time and to
decide which of the two is better. Then another pair of
names is presented to the evaluator for another
evaluation.
Performance Appraisal Methods
• 3.) Forced Distribution = this is similar to grading on a
curve. The Rater is asked to rate employees in some
fixed distribution of categories such as superior, above
average, average, below average and poor.
• B.) Individual Evaluation Methods
• 1.) Graphic Rating Scale = Using this technique, the
rater is presented with a set of traits. The rater is asked
to rate employees on each of the characteristic listed.
It includes both numerical ranges and written
descriptions. For each performance variable (Quality,
Productivity, Job knowledge, dependability and
attendance) there is a listing of levels of performance
ranging from outstanding to unsatisfactory.
Performance Appraisal Methods
• 2.) Critical Incident Method = this technique requires
raters to maintain a log of behavioral incidents that
represent either effective or ineffective performance
for each employees being rated. Such incidents are
actual behavioral accounts recorded as stories or
anecdotes. Supervisors describe briefly the behaviors
of their subordinates, noting any favorable or
unfavorable incidents.
• 3.) Checklist and Weighted Checklist = checklist is a set
of objectives or descriptive statements. If the rater
believes that the employee possesses a traits listed, the
rater checks the item, if not the rater leaves it blank.
The employees evaluation is the sum of the scores.
Drawback of this method is that it is time consuming
and costly to prepare the question for each job
category.
Performance Appraisal Methods
• 4.) Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales (BARS) = this
approach relies on the use of critical incidents to serve
as anchor statements on a scales. This method
evaluates observable behavior rather than subjective
perceptions but it requires a lot of time and effort to
develop the scale. BARS is constructed for each
individual job category and not for individual positions
within these job categories.
• BARS usually contains the following features:
• i) 6-10 performance dimensions are identified and
defined by raters and ratee.
• ii) Dimensions are anchored with + and – critical incidents
• iii.) Each ratee is then rated on the dimensions.
Performance Appraisal Methods
• 5.) Management by Objective (MBO) = is a method by
which managers and subordinates plan, organize,
control, communicate and debate to jointly establish
specific measurable goals and periodically provide
feedback.
• Steps for MBO
• i.) set the organization’s goals
• ii.) Set departmental goals
• iii.) Discuss goals to establish how each employees can
contribute to the departments attainment of its goals.
• iv.) Define expected result (set individual goals) to set short
term performance targets.
• v.) Performance reviews: Measures the result- compare actual
performance of each employee with expected result
• vi.) Provide Feedback
Who Should Evaluate
Performance
• 1.) Supervisor – hierarchical arrangement of formal
authority in most organizations gives the supervisor
legitimate authority to evaluate subordinate. The
rationale is that this individual has the most opportunity to
observe the employees, should have a better
understanding of the job being performed and is
motivated to optimize the employees performance
because supervisor future is directly linked to the
organizational units profitability.
• 2.) Subordinates – upward or subordinates appraisals
provide unique information because they know better
than anyone else whether leadership is good or bad. It
also creates incentives to change and reduces power
differentials. It makes the workplace more democratic
and responsive to human needs as well as increases the
flow of communication.
Who Should Evaluate
Performance
• 3.) Peers = research on peer evaluations has found
them to be predictive of success. It also yielded
good reliability and validity. It also has the potential
to increase the interaction and coordination
between peers. To add, many organizations are
already finding that multiple raters add to the
effectiveness of the appraisal system. Ratings
collected from several sources tend to be more
accurate and have fewer bias.
• 4.) Self-assessment = very valuable for personal
development and the identification of training
needs but not for evaluative purposes. This should
be completed prior to review session and then used
as the agenda for that session.
Who Should Evaluate
Performance
The effectiveness of self-appraisals depends upon a
trusting relationship between superior and subordinate.
• 5.) The Customer/Vendor = customers and vendors,
whether internal or external, can be potential
evaluator. This kind of appraisal would be more
relevant for service organizations such as banks,
where the inputs provided by external customers
can be useful for staffing. But as the customer’s
objectives may not always correspond with the
organizations expectation, customer appraisal
works best only as a part of the appraisal process.
Process Involved in Performance
Evaluation
• . Performance
Information
Goal Setting Standard
Dissemination
Setting
Actual
Performance
Correcting Measurement
Substandard
Performance
Rewarding Feedback
Exemplary Evaluation
Performance Result
Competency-based Assessment