Diffraction
Diffraction
Diffraction
Scattering
Interaction with a single particle
Diffraction
Interaction with a crystal
The anode is a pure metal. Cu, Mo, Fe, Co and Cr are in common use in XRD
applications. Cu, Co and Mo will be available on our new systems.
E h
• In the equations at left:
(2) • E is the energy of the electron flux in KeV
• h is Planck’s constant (4.135 x 10-15 eVs)
• v is the frequency
• c is the speed of light (3 x 1018 Å/s)
hc • is the wavelength in Å
Target Of K
Metal radiation (Å)
Mo 0.71
Cu 1.54
Co 1.79
Fe 1.94
Cr 2.29
The high intensity nearly monochromatic K x-rays can be used as a radiation source for X-ray
diffraction (XRD) studies a monochromator
Disclaimer: The above materialcan
is purelybe used
for teaching to further decrease the spread of
purpose
only
wavelengths in the X-ray
X-ray Diffraction: Generation of X-ray
(a) Schematic design of a filament X-ray tube. (b) Use of Ni to filter out Cu Kβ and
white radiation.
Noble
prize
1915!
A portion of the crystal is shown for clarity- actually, for destructive interference to occur many planes are
required (and the interaction volume of x-rays is large as compared to that shown in the schematic).
The scattering planes have a spacing ‘d’.
Ray-2 travels an extra path as compared to Ray-1 (= ABC). The path difference between Ray-1 and Ray-2
= ABC = (d Sin + d Sin) = (2d.Sin).
For constructive interference, this path difference should be an integral multiple of :
n = 2d Sin the Bragg’s equation.
The path difference between Ray-1 and Ray-3 is = 2(2d.Sin) = 2n = 2n. This implies that if Ray-1
and Ray-2 constructively interfere Ray-1
Disclaimer:and Ray-3
The above materialwill also
is purely constructively
for teaching purpose interfere. (And so forth).
only
Understanding the Bragg’s equation
n = 2d Sin
The equation is written better with some descriptive subscripts:
n Cu K 2 d hkl Sin hkl If this equation is satisfied, then is Bragg
The interplanar spacing appears in the Bragg’s equation, but not the interatomic spacing ‘a’
along the plane (which had forced incident = scattered); but we are not free to move the atoms
along the plane ‘randomly’.
For large interplanar spacing the angle of reflection tends towards zero → as d increases, Sin
decreases (and so does ).
The smallest interplanar spacing from which Bragg diffraction can be obtained is /2 → maximum
value of is 90, Sin is 1 from Bragg
Disclaimer: equation
The above d =for/2.
material is purely teaching purpose
only
In XRD nth order reflection from (h k l) is considered as 1st order reflection from (nh nk nl)
d300 1
d100 3
Note:
Technically, in Miller indices we factor out the common factors. Hence, (220) 2(110) (110).
In XRD we extend the usual concept of Miller indices to include planes, which do not pass through lattice
points (e.g. every alternate plane belonging to the (002) set does not pass through lattice points) and we
allow the common factors to remain in the indices.
Disclaimer: The above material is purely for teaching purpose
only
The missing ‘reflections’
We had mentioned that Bragg’s equation is a negative statement: i.e. just because Bragg’s equation is
satisfied a ‘reflection’ may not be observed.
Let us consider the case of Cu K radiation ( = 1.54 Å) being diffracted from (100) planes of Mo (BCC,
a = 3.15 Å = d100).
1.54
2 d100 Sin100 Sin100 0.244 100 14.149 But this reflection
2 d100 2(3.15) is absent in BCC Mo
The missing reflection is due to the presence of additional atoms in the unit cell
(which are positions at lattice points) which we shall consider next.
As diffraction occurs only at specific Bragg angles, the chance that a reflection is observed
when a crystal is irradiated with monochromatic X-rays at a particular angle is small (added to
this the diffracted intensity is a small fraction of the beam used for irradiation).
The probability to get a diffracted beam (with sufficient intensity) is increased by either
varying the wavelength () or having many orientations (rotating the crystal or having
multiple crystallites in many orientations).
The three methods used to achieve high probability of diffraction are shown below.
LAUE λ variable
Panchromatic X-rays Single
TECHNIQUE θ fixed
ROTATING λ fixed
Monochromatic X-rays Varied by rotation CRYSTAL
METHOD θ rotated
Only the powder method (which is commonly used in materials science) will be considered in this text.
Disclaimer: The above material is purely for teaching purpose
only
New powder method
OLD powder method
Detector
X-ray
tube
w 2
• The incident angle, w, is defined between the X-ray source and the sample.
• The diffracted angle, 2, is defined between the incident beam and the detector angle.
• The incident angle w is always ½ of the detector angle 2 .
• In a :2 instrument (e.g. Rigaku RU300), the tube is fixed, the sample rotates at °/min
and the detector rotates at 2 °/min.
• In a : instrument (e.g. PANalytical X’Pert Pro), the sample is fixed and the tube rotates at
a rate - °/min and the detector rotates at a rate of °/min.
2
At 20.6 °2, Bragg’s law The (110) planes would diffract at 29.3 The (200) planes are parallel to the (100)
fulfilled for the (100) planes, °2; however, they are not properly planes. Therefore, they also diffract for this
producing a diffraction peak. aligned to produce a diffraction peak crystal. Since d200 is ½ d100, they appear at
(the perpendicular to those planes does 42 °2.
not bisect the incident and diffracted
beams). Only
Disclaimer: Thebackground
above material isis observed.
purely for teaching purpose
only
XRD of a polycrystalline material
all possible diffraction peaks should be observed.
2 2 2
For every set of planes, there will be a small percentage of crystallites that are properly
oriented to diffract (the plane perpendicular bisects the incident and diffracted beams).
Basic assumptions of powder diffraction are that for every set of planes there is an
equal number of crystallitesDisclaimer:
thatThewill diffract
above material is purely and that
for teaching purposethere is a statistically relevant
only
number of crystallites, not just one or two.
How to visualize the occurrence of peaks at various angles?
It is ‘somewhat difficult’ to actually visualize a random assembly of crystallites giving peaks at various angels in a XRD
scan. The figures below are expected to give a ‘visual feel’ for the same. [Hypothetical crystal with a = 4Å is assumed with
=1.54Å. Only planes of the type xx0 (like (100,110)are considered].
Random assemblage of
As the scan takes place at increasing
crystallites in a material angles, planes with suitable ‘d’, which
diffract are ‘picked out’ from
favourably oriented crystallites
1
− h,k,l : indices of the diffraction plane under consideration
− u,v,w : co-ordinates of the atoms in the lattice
− N : number of atoms
− fn : scattering factor of a particular type of atom
SC 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 …
BCC 2 4 6 8 10 12 … …
FCC 3 4 8 11 12 …
DC 3 8 11 16 …
Note that we have to consider the ratio of only two lines to distinguish FCC and DC.
I.e. if the ratios are 3:4 then the lattice is FCC.
But, to distinguish between SC and BCC we have to go to 7 lines!
Whole
2→ Sin Sin2 Sin2θ/Sin2θ1 number d a
ratios
And the detector may not be able to resolve these peaks if they come too close!
Disclaimer: The above material is purely for teaching purpose
only
Crystal
Intensity →
Schematics
Sharp peaks
0 90 180
Diffraction angle (2) →
Monoatomic gas
Intensity →
No peak
0 90 180
Diffuse Peak
0 90 180
65.70 1.42 20
76.08 1.25 30
84.11 1.15 30
89.94 1.09 5
(a) Index (i.e., give h, k, and l indices) for each of these peaks.