The document discusses three approaches to understanding the relationship between humans and the environment: 1) A cosmos-centric approach which sees humans and nature in harmony governed by natural laws. Imbalances can cause illness. 2) A theocentric approach where God entrusted humans as stewards of the earth. Forgetting this leads to environmental problems. 3) An anthropocentric approach beginning in the 16th century that emphasizes human dominion over the earth without God, and is the most widely used today.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
146 views10 pages
The Human Person in His/Her Environment
The document discusses three approaches to understanding the relationship between humans and the environment: 1) A cosmos-centric approach which sees humans and nature in harmony governed by natural laws. Imbalances can cause illness. 2) A theocentric approach where God entrusted humans as stewards of the earth. Forgetting this leads to environmental problems. 3) An anthropocentric approach beginning in the 16th century that emphasizes human dominion over the earth without God, and is the most widely used today.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10
THE HUMAN PERSON IN
HIS/HER ENVIRONMENT APPROACHES TO UNDERSTANDING THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE HUMAN PERSON WITH THE ENVIRONMENT 1. Cosmos-centric Approach
• Human beings are in harmony with nature.
1. Cosmos-centric Approach
• Yin,Yang and Qi (Taoism)
1. Cosmos-centric Approach
• Natural laws govern the movement of Qi as Yin
and Yang to create a harmonious balance in the universe. • Too much Yang creates typhoons & severe droughts. • Too much Yin (indifference or laziness) leads to self-destruction. • An imbalanced energy in the environment leads to illness of humans. 1. Cosmos-centric Approach
• Human beings are microcosm of the cosmos.
• It means the universe is reflected in us, a small version of the universe. • When there is imbalance within the person, there would be imbalance in everything around it. 2. Theocentric Approach
• Theo means “God”.
• An understanding coming from a religious interpretation of “Go and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it.” • This story tells that God entrusted the earth to man and woman by giving them the role of stewards of creation. 2. Theocentric Approach
• We may be able to trace the immediate causes of
environmental degradation through technical and scientific explanations, if we forget our responsibility, we will never be able to address the problem. • Therefore, we are the problem and we, ourselves, are the solution. 3. Anthropocentric Approach
• Anthropos means “man”.
• Like theocentric approach that puts human person in dominion over the earth, but de- emphasizes the role of God. • This approach began in the sixteenth century in Europe and has become the most widely used all over the world until today.