Circumstantial evidence (al-Qarinah) refers to evidence that relies on an inference to connect it to a conclusion of fact. It includes anything that can be used to prove or disprove something. The four Sunni schools accept al-Qarinah as a method of proof based on Quranic verses and hadith. For al-Qarinah to be admitted as evidence, it must reach the standard of prevailing probability (al-Zann al-Ghalibah) by being strong and convincing. There are differing views on whether al-Qarinah alone can prove hudud crimes or establish murder. Jurisprudence has outlined various types
Circumstantial evidence (al-Qarinah) refers to evidence that relies on an inference to connect it to a conclusion of fact. It includes anything that can be used to prove or disprove something. The four Sunni schools accept al-Qarinah as a method of proof based on Quranic verses and hadith. For al-Qarinah to be admitted as evidence, it must reach the standard of prevailing probability (al-Zann al-Ghalibah) by being strong and convincing. There are differing views on whether al-Qarinah alone can prove hudud crimes or establish murder. Jurisprudence has outlined various types
Circumstantial evidence (al-Qarinah) refers to evidence that relies on an inference to connect it to a conclusion of fact. It includes anything that can be used to prove or disprove something. The four Sunni schools accept al-Qarinah as a method of proof based on Quranic verses and hadith. For al-Qarinah to be admitted as evidence, it must reach the standard of prevailing probability (al-Zann al-Ghalibah) by being strong and convincing. There are differing views on whether al-Qarinah alone can prove hudud crimes or establish murder. Jurisprudence has outlined various types
Circumstantial evidence (al-Qarinah) refers to evidence that relies on an inference to connect it to a conclusion of fact. It includes anything that can be used to prove or disprove something. The four Sunni schools accept al-Qarinah as a method of proof based on Quranic verses and hadith. For al-Qarinah to be admitted as evidence, it must reach the standard of prevailing probability (al-Zann al-Ghalibah) by being strong and convincing. There are differing views on whether al-Qarinah alone can prove hudud crimes or establish murder. Jurisprudence has outlined various types
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 19
AL-QARINAH
(circumstantial evidence) Al_Qarinah O Definition-literally means together, accompany, related/ anything which explains or shows something.
O Abdul Karim Zaidan:
anything which may be used as proof to establish the existence/non existence of a thing. Example:- A man if a man appeared out of a house with a knife in his hand, he being stain with blood, moving fast, and with symptoms of fear and when people entered the house they found a man slain, there was no other man went out of the house. Can be inferred that the man kad killed the victim.
Stolen items were found in a person`s house.-inference can be
made that, the person had stolen the item, he had bought the stolen item from the thief, or the thief had put the items in the man`s house. LEGAL BASIS The 4 sunni schools have accepted qarinah as a method of proof based on the following authorities Surah Yusuf 12:18-They stained his shirt with false blood. He ( Prophet Yaakob) said ‘Nay, but your minds have made up a tale (that may pass) with you. For me, patience is most fitting…’ Yaakob has treated the blood stained shirt as an evidence showing that Yusuf is still alive, since the blood stain shirt was not torn as it should had been if Yusuf was really attacked by wolves. Yaakob was narrated to have said ‘when did wolves become so clever, that they could eat Yusuf without tearing his shirt’. Surah Yusuf 12: 25-27-’And they both raced to the door, and she tore his shirt from the back, and they found her husband at the door. She said, "What is the recompense of one who intended evil for your wife but that he be imprisoned or a painful punishment?"[Joseph] said, "It was she who sought to seduce me." And a witness from her family testified. "If his shirt is torn from the front, then she has told the truth, and he is of the liars. But if his shirt is torn from the back, then she has lied, and he is of the truthful.“ The facts that Yusuf`s shirt was torn at the back is a qarinah showing that Yusuf did not try to molest zulaikha. The prophet Sulaiman was reported to have decided a case based on qarinah:- when he was approached by 2 women carrying a child, both were claiming over the child. The prophet said ‘bring a knife so that I would cut the child into 2, and I could give each half to each of you. The older woman agreed, but the younger one said ‘ May Allah give His mercy on you, please do not do such a thing. the child is hers. Then the prophet gave the child to the younger. O Ibn Qayyim commented, the fact that the younger women was ready to give up her claim to the older woman shows that she was the true mother, because no true mother would stand to see her child being cut into two due to maternal love and special bond existing between mother and child. Standard of Proof for the admissibility of al- Qarinah Not all Q have same quality and value in evidence. There are strong and weak Q. only strong Q will be accepted-weak and unconvincing Q will be rejected. Strong Q is the one tt makes a fact established or shows a convincing indication and the conclusion made out of it is unrebuttable. Acc. to Abdul Mun`im al-Baha`i- the Q which will be taken into consideration is the one which is strong in the sense tt it can be used as a basis of deciding a matter. Art. 1741 says ‘ a complete presumptive proof is an inference which attains the degree of positive knowledge.’ By this Art. it is understood tt a Q must reach the standard of Yakin. h/w the jurists are of the opinion tt the standard of Yakin here does not mean beyond any shadow of doubt.-only needs to reach al-Zann al- Ghalibah, coz as a presumptive evidence, no matter how strong it is, it still carries doubts. Thus to be admitted the Q must at least attain the standard of al-Zann al-Ghalibah. Qarinah in Hudud matters Zina case.(unmarried pregnant women) unanimously agreed can be established by Iqrar and Shahadah. at odds whether can be established by Q (i.e unwet pregnant women) Abu Hanifah & al-Syafi`e-zina had cannot be imposed due to doubt. To them Q evidence is not conclusive, still carries doubt. Imam Malik-can if the women not resident and not known to the place unless element of force and doubt exist. Hambalis- cannot be imposed, may be due to rape or man`s seminal gets into the her womb thru other device or coincidentally. Drinking Liquor unanimously agreed can be established by Iqrar and Shahadah. at odds whether can be established by Q (smell of mouth/vomit containing liquor) -2 views Syafi`ies, Hanafies and other-cannot establish- due to uncertainty, could have been forced, mistakenly, ignorantly taken. Khulafa’ al-Rasyidin, Imam Malik, Ahmad-can establish-the smell of liquor in breath/vomit-is a strong Q. Qarinah in Qisas matters
Issue: whether Q can be admitted to prove a
murder Majority-murder can be proven by way of Q in the form of al-Lauth entitling the victim`s family to demand the process of Qasamah. (the taking of 50 times oath either by accused/accuser). If the victim` family takes the oaths; Imam Malik and Ahmad-the accused be put to death Imam Syafi`ie- Diyyah (compensation) by the accused to the victim`s family. Qarinah In SCE (FT) 1997 Facts forming part of same transaction are qarinah 6. Facts which, though not in issue, are so connected with a fact in issue as to form part of the same transaction are qarinah. ILLUSTRATION:-A is accused of beating B, his wife. Whatever was said or done by A or B or bystanders at the beating or so shortly before or after it as to form part of the same transaction is qarinah. O Facts which are the occasion, cause or effect of facts in issue or relevant facts O 7. Facts which are the occasion, cause or effect, immediate or otherwise, of facts in issue or relevant facts, or which constitute the state of things under which they happened or which afforded an opportunity of their occurrence or transaction, are qarinah. Motive, preparation and previous or subsequent conduct 8. (1) Any fact is qarinah which shows or constitutes a motive or preparation for any fact in issue or relevant fact. (2) The conduct of any party, or of any agent to any party, toany suit or proceeding in reference to that suit or proceeding, or in reference to any fact in issue therein or relevant thereto, and the conduct of any person an offence against whom is the subject of any proceeding, is qarinah if the conduct influences or is influenced by any fact in issue or relevant fact, and whether it was previous or subsequent there Facts showing existence of state of mind or of body or bodily feeling are qarinah 14. Facts showing the existence of any state of mind, such as intention, knowledge, good faith, negligence, rashness, ill-will or good- will towards any particular person, or showing the existence of any state of body or bodily feeling, are qarinah when the existence of any such state of mind or body or bodily feeling is in issue or relevant. O Facts bearing on question whether act was accidental or intentional O 15. When there is a question whether an act was accidental or intentional or done with a particular knowledge or intention, the fact that the act formed part of a series of similar occurrences, in each of which the person doing the act was concerned, is qarinah. O ILLUSTRATION O A is employed to receive fitrah as amil from the public. It is A’s duty to make entries in a book showing the amounts received by him. He makes an entry showing that on a particular occasion he received less than he really did receive. O The question is whether this false entry was accidental or intentional. O The fact that other entries made by A in the same book are false and that the false entry is in each case in favour of A are qarinah. Decided cases ; PENDAKWA v AZIMAH
PENDAKWA v YUSNADY & SAIFUL BAHRI
SAHUL HAMID v MUINS KAMARIAH v MANSJUR G. RETHINASAMY v MUIPP MUSTAFA BATCA v HABEEBA ZAINAB v ABDUL LATIF