Microeconomics Lecture 1
Microeconomics Lecture 1
24.09.18
10.12.18
q q q
27/08/2019 ECON 20501: Microeconomic Analysis 3 ©Horst.Zank 5
Comparative statics
Two static situations: we have equilibrium under the “ceteris
paribus” (i.e., one variable changes but all others remain fixed)
D’
p D S p D S
D’
p**
p**
p* p*
q q
p**
p* p*
R
R
q q
Which Equilibrium is better: for Consumer; for Producer; for Society
27/08/2019 ECON 20501: Microeconomic Analysis 3 ©Horst.Zank 8
Positive vs. Normative Economics
Positive: is descriptive. Take the approximation of real markets and
construct theories. Use them for comparative analyses: e.g., how
resources are allocated. Beyond description such analysis may also be
able to make predictions.
Normative: is judgemental. What allocation of resources is best for
society? What behaviour is best for consumers (smoking, health care)?
How do we measure welfare (inequality or poverty) in a society?
Should we care about the next generations and how do we measure
their welfare (climate change)? Often such theories involve personal
views on ethics, behavioural norms, moral or fairness.
Pareto improvement: occurs if one person’s welfare can be improved
without detriments to others. If not possible, we have Pareto Efficiency
Question: suppose we have downwards sloping demand and decide to
allocate units of a good randomly. Is this Pareto efficient?
27/08/2019 ECON 20501: Microeconomic Analysis 3 ©Horst.Zank 9
Historical view
Early views: “Theory of Value” of goods is not “Price” of goods.
Adam Smith: distinguished “Price=Value in Exchange” and
“Value=Value of Commodity” (so-called “water-diamond paradox”)
Labour Theory of Value: if a good is twice as costly to produce relative
to a second good, then it should cost twice as much. This is a “cardinal”
approach to value: one good’s price is a multiple of another good’s
price. Today: demand and supply determine “relative prices”.
Marginalist Revolution: Jevons, Marshall (partial equilibrium) and later
Walras (general equilibrium) built comprehensive theories of value
where the price of the “last incremental unit of a good” determined its
value. They moved to what is called an “ordinal” approach to value: all
market forces in all markets determine the “value” of a good. (this
includes consumers and producers)