Forensic Engineering: Prof. Ranjith Dissanayake Senior Professor

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 191
At a glance
Powered by AI
The key takeaways are the definition of forensic engineering and that it involves investigating failures of structures, materials or components to determine the cause and assign responsibility.

Some of the main causes of structural failures discussed are poor workmanship, inadequate design, use of substandard materials, extraordinary loads, alterations made without reanalysis.

Some examples of structural failures mentioned are the collapse of a roof truss system, collapsed bridges in Bandaragama and Paragastota, collapse of the Sampoong Department Store in Seoul, collapse of telecom towers.

Forensic Engineering

Prof. Ranjith Dissanayake


Senior Professor
Dept. of Civil Engineering
University of Peradeniya

Date: 23rd January 2018 University of Peradeniya


Definition

Forensic Engineering –
Activities related to
failure investigation
Forensic Engineering
• The investigation of
– materials,
– products,
– structures or
– components
that fail or do not operate or function as intended,
causing personal injury or damage to property.
The consequences of failure are dealt with by the
law.
15 JAN 2018 IN INDONESIA

636x382_MP4_4143614805273823235.mp4
17 JAN 2018 IN COLOMBIA
10 DIED
21 JAN 2018 IN PERADENIYA

• One reported dead & 2


others rescued following
an earth bund collapsing
at a construction site in
Peradeniya, Kandy
17 MAY 2017 IN COLLAPSED
WELLAWATTE BUILDING
ONE WAS KILLED
Building Collapse Due to
shoddy construction in
Bangladesh, 2013
The final embrace of a couple that
died after a factory collapsed in
Bangladesh. More 150 died
1780 B. C. E.
• By Hammurabi, the ruler of Babylon
• "If a builder builds a
house and kills its owner,
then that builder shall be
put to death”
Alteration
l s
Fai Site
Why selection
/ o d e
u re m
Design Fail
a m e nt a l
Fund
t ruc ti o nc e/
Co ns i nt e n a
Ma n
n r atio
Ope
c k
Ext L o ad s Lu ate ri al
M
Responsibility?

Cause?
Future…
Responsibility?
Responsibility

N SI C
O R E
COLLAPSE OF A ROOF TRUSS

An auditorium roof, supported on steel


trusses forming a dome type frame
Plan of hexagonal roof
Steel framing of roof
Sequence of construction

Fixed End

STAGE
Fixed End Fixed End
5
1 4

TR6~1 TR4~1 TR6~4

7 8
Fixed End TR5~1 TR5~2 Free End

TR6~3 TR4~2 TR6~2

3 6 2

TR4~1 truss type


Free End Free End
4 co ns t r uc t ion
s equence
Free End
SYSTEM PRIOR TO FAILURE
Reason
• Trusses were wobbling during construction
• but no steps had been taken.

• Cables used to prevent wobbling,


• They had not been very effective.

• When the first TR5 truss was put in place


• wobbling was very noticeable.
• Second TR5 truss was hoisted with the crane
and in order to connect truss to the column,
the crane operator had released the belts

• Belt had snapped and the truss system


collapsed
Failed
Truss System
Poor Workmanship

0f bolt holes
Poor Workmanship

In base plate
Poor Workmanship
Welding connections
Reasons…
• Not enough supports

• Un-symmetric supporting

• Poor workmanship
Consultant’s lapses

No clear instructions

No reports on poor quality

Payments approved
Abandoned

FAILED
TRUSS SYSTEM
Responsible Parties #

Client Politician

Consultant

Contractor
Cause?

SI C
E N
O R
F !
Failure r
of
l te
Aa bridge
n !
o
Collapsed Bridge

1906
• Kala Oya
• Timber deck 1965 1999
• Paragastota • Timber Deck
• Timber Deck • Concrete Deck

Bandaragama, 1999
Forensic
Engineering
1990 deck1965
was concreted
Member 17
el

49.800

PARAGASTOTA STEEL BRIDGE


1999
Findings
Findings
•No
1 assesment cal
l i ti
Po
•Dead load
2
Investigation
Member Applied load Elastic
D+I/ (kN) Capacity (kN)

#17 1950 1870


Critical Member # 17
•Yielding

•Deformation

•Fracture
Future

Research SI C
E N
O R
F
a tio n
e stig
i c I nv g e
e n s B ri d
For co m a
of T a
a tio n
e stig
i c I nv g e
e n s B ri d
For co m a
of T a
INFLUENCED THE DESIGN OF ALL
THE WORLD’S GREAT
LONG-SPAN BRIDGE.
tion s
stiga
c Inve
re n s i
Fo Ronan
Point
L
Collapse -
F AL
E S
N O
IG ILDIN G S London
D
H EST BU
E
D T L
NC E TA L
LU E D ’ S
INF O RL
W
THE
Results @

• Lives • Litigation

• Property • Abandoning

• Delays
e
Failure
t r
of
A l
Dageba !
i on
161 BC

• By King Dutu
Gemunu 1980- 1990-
• 2100 years 1987 1993
• Started • Completed
• Failed
Forensic
Investigation
Investigation

Preliminary
investigation/
Planning

Condition Field Load


Material Testing
Survey Testing

Analysis

No
Validation
Yes

Conclusion
Date: 17th July 2014
Findings

• No assesment

• Tension -dead
load
Failure of
a Highway
Bridge
Forensic
Engineering
26th May 2007
Completed Structure

Colombo End Matara end


Completed in April
2009.
Filed December Filed April
2008 2009

Structure Deformed

Colombo End Matara end


Wing Wall & Ring Beam Separated
Due to the movement of Metal
Crack Appeared in the
Structure Cracks Appeared on Side
Colombo the Embankment
Ring Beam
To Rectify started the removal in Colombo end
in April 2009
Excavated Only
the Colombo End

Colombo End Matara end


Excavated
The Colombo End

Colombo End Matara end


Soil is heaped at Mathara Side

Excavated Material Placed on top of the


Structure

Excavated the Colombo End


Collapse
26th May 2009

Colombo End Matara end


Reasons
Findings

Improper

Construction

Retrofitting
i tr
A r b
n
G ED E
AM A T UR
X : D RU C
I M L ST
CL A E TA
M
International Arbitration
Collapse of water tank in Ampara

Cylindrical tank
with conical bottom
and conical dome,
Supported on
cylindrical shaft

Diameter = 25 m
Height = 30 m
Capacity = 1125 m3
Shaft Dia. = 6 m
Construction Sequence

Tower

Tank

Lifting
Expected procedure
1 Cylindrical shaft
2 Tank at ground level
3 Lift the tank to position while conical top is
propped
4 Support the conical bottom inner edge on ring
beam built into the cylinder
5 Connect conical dome inner edge to the cylinder
6 Remove dome props
Deviated from this Procedure
The tank was lifted after removing dome props
Cracks

wall

eave
WHAT
HAPPENED
?
Circumferential cracks appeared in the Dome outer edge

Cracks

Construction failure
wall

eave
FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS

Dome top edge

Cylindrical tank wall bottom edge - Fixed


MERIDIONAL MOMENTS – Top Supported

Moment at dome outer edge = 18.6 kN m/m


(hogging)
Top Free MERIDIONAL MOMENTS – Top Free

Moment at dome outer edge = 33.3 kN m/m (hogging)


Reason for the failure

Excessive meridional hogging


moments generated at the
dome outer edge due to the
removal of shuttering
Contractor’s laps

Not following the given


construction procedure
Consultant’s lapses

Not giving clear instructions procedure

Not reviewing Contractor’s work

Not supervising the work properly


Swimming Pool UOP
• Started -1978 Failed
Reason- Leakages 22 years
Tiling pool before testing (BS 8007 9.2)
• Restarted – 2000
• Finished - 2002
Civil Engin. Disasters in Korea
– Collapse of Sungsoo Bridge
– Collapse of Sampoong Dept. Store
– Reconstruction of Dangsan Steel Bridge

Sungsoo Sampoong DangsanProblems Our Duties


Sungsoo Bridge before collapse

Sungsoo Sampoong DangsanProblems Our Duties


Sungsoo Bridge when collapsed
New Sungsoo Bridge

Sungsoo Sampoong DangsanProblems Our Duties


Summary of
Sungsoo Bridge Collapse
• Built in 1979
– 1160.8 m long(120m span)
– a truss gerber bridge
• Collapsed in Oct 21, 1994
– only 15 years after construction
• mistake in fabrication and poor inspection
– the dead : 32
– the injured : 17
• A new bridge was built.
– August 15, 1997

Sungsoo Sampoong DangsanProblems Our Duties


Collapse of
Sampoong Department Store

Sungsoo Sampoong DangsanProblems Our Duties


Summary of
Sampoong Dept. Store
• Date : 1995. 6. 29
• Building
– Luxury Dept. Store in downtown of Seoul
– 5 stories high & 4 stories under the ground
– reinforced concrete structure
• The dead & injured
– the dead & missing : 501
– the injured : over 900

Sungsoo Sampoong DangsanProblems Our Duties


Building Collapse in
Shanghai
Soil is heaped at Mathara Side

Excavated Material Placed on top of the


Structure

Excavated the Colombo End


ter
A l !
on
Findings

No

construction

commonsense
Failure of
Telecom Tower
Forensic
Engineering
70 m Tower

Four legged
angled–iron
Analysis (Two)

Final

Collapse
At Design Stage
Before Collapse
Findings

O K
• Slendeness ratio?
:
s ig n
l De O K
• FNo a
in Bracings l s :
e r ia i n g
a t
M l Bu c k l
o
• Unfixed c a
top and bolts
L
The Leaning Tower of Pisa
A great example that goes “beyond” the definition

• Height is 56.7m; foundation outer


diameter is 19.6m. Its weight is about
14,200 tons.
• It was built over a span of about 200
years.
• The evidence tilt of the tower was first
noticed during the initial phase of
construction which began in 1173 AD.
The Leaning Tower of Pisa
• The tower was built on
top of very soft soils…
uniform settlements
were expected…
wasn’t the case!
• Possible primary cause
of tilt attributed to the
fluctuating water table
which was perched
higher on one side of
the tower.
i l ure
k y Fa
Lu c
Extraordinary Loading
Materials
Forensic Engineering
& S tu d y
C a s e
Retrofitting
Roller Press Building
Photos
First Observation
Shear cracks
Bending cracks
SI C
E N
on major beams due to self
R
weight of the structure
O
F
• Design is incorrect
1

• Effective depth and r/f are


2 not sufficient

• Low strength concrete is not


3 the reason for the failure
Retrofitting
Additional columns
Strengthening by
concrete/Steel / FRP.
Check the pile design
Suggestions for FRP Design
Pull-off test
Tensile test
Strengthening
Work
• Reinforced
concrete shear
walls
Steel and FRP Strengthening

Steel
FRP
Steel and FRP Strengthening

FRP
Steel and FRP Strengthening

FRP
FRP Strengthening

FRP
Steel and FRP Strengthening

Steel
Steel and FRP Strengthening

FRP
Steel and FRP Strengthening

FRP

Steel
Steel and FRP Strengthening

FRP
Monitoring the Structure
During & After
Construction
Roller Press (156 tons)
Location of roller press (13.20 m level)
Gauge Locations
FEM up to 13.20 m level
Cracks observed on new shear wall
FEM of shear wall
CONCLUDING
Concluding Remarks
• Review…
• Any alterations must
be re-analyzed
• Engineering
Commonsense
Final Remarks

•Take
Care
Acknoledgement
• Prof. M. P.
Ranaweera
• Dr. Siriwardane
• Dr. Bandara
• Dr. Kushan ……
Ranjith Dissanayake
Senior Professor
Dept. of Civil Engineering
University of Peradeniya
[email protected]

University of Peradeniya

Date: 4th January 2018

You might also like