EMC Avamar: Never Back Up The Same Data Twice
EMC Avamar: Never Back Up The Same Data Twice
EMC Avamar: Never Back Up The Same Data Twice
Break data into atom (sub-file, Send and store each Avamar
variable-length segments of data) atom only once backup repository
O H H
H H
O
O H
O H H
H H
O
H H
EMC Avamar
Only unique data A Data already backed up, New data segment
segments are B so only unique IDs stored identified and
backed up (20 byte pointers) E backed up
C
D
A B C D E
Deduplication server
(stored backup data)
© Copyright 2010 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. 7
Avamar: Real-World Results
Avamar daily full backups versus traditional daily full backups
While results will vary by data type and mix, Avamar can
dramatically improve backup performance and efficiency
Avamar Server
Verified U.S. Patent No. 6,826,711
checkpoint
Avamar Avamar
VM VM
x86 Architecture
Resource
Pool
Simplifies
– Purchase (single vendor, certified hardware)
– Deployment (minimizes onsite setup)
– Service (single vendor support)
x86 Architecture
Tape catalog eases and
Resource
Pool
vault speeds restoration
Avamar backs up clients
to Avamar server
Replicates selected
Avamar server data to
Avamar coordinates
export of data transport
Leverages existing
data transport node replica through tape backup software
residing on ESX servers backup system (e.g., EMC NetWorker)
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server (SLES) 8, 9, 10, 11 Oracle 9i, 9.2, 10, 10g, 10gR2, 11g, 11gR2
VMware environments
Remote office/branch office (ROBO)
LAN/NAS servers
Desktop/laptop
100% 100%
CPU Utilization
CPU Utilization
80 80
% %
60% 60%
ESX server
40% 40%
Hardware
20% 20%
0% 0%
Shared physical resources
Server A Server B Server C Virtual Virtual Virtual
Server A Server B Server C
vStorage API
Avamar agent resides on the proxy
virtual proxy server
Virtual Machines server with
Avamar agent
Fast, daily full backups
Deduplicates within and across
VMware Virtualization Layer
VMDK files
Mount
x86 Architecture Supports both file-level (Windows
Resource only) and image-level recovery
Pool
NDMP licenses
– Traditional NAS filers require expensive NDMP licenses to
support backup and recovery
How it works
– Avamar Accelerator uses NDMP to communicate to source NAS device
– Accelerator requests only modified data daily
– Accelerator performs source-based deduplication on modified data
Fast, efficient daily full backups for EMC Celerra and NetApp Filers
Flexible recovery
Daily Daily Daily Daily Daily Daily Daily
Full Full Full Full Full Full Full – Restore full file system or single file to
Avamar client or NAS device
– Allows flexible disaster recovery solutions
High availability
– RAIN architecture and replication—no single points of failure
Centralized management
– Streamlines administration and management of remote backups
Consulting Services
Align service levels and Reference Architectures with business requirements
Implementation Services
Minimize risk, accelerate implementation, and speed time to value of new
technologies
Residency Services
Fill missing skill gaps with Avamar services professionals—typical contract
three or more months
Tailor best-practice recommendations, knowledge transfer based on in-depth
understanding of your environment
How it works
NetWorker
Integrated client is a standard feature of NetWorker
NetWorker represents the Avamar Data Store as a
deduplication node
Deduplication is enabled through NetWorker Clients
Data Metadata
Management Console
Save process gathers metadata and sends it to the
NetWorker server and data to the deduplication node NetWorker
On recovery, required deduplication data is requested,
and full dataset is restored at client Metadata
Management Server
Console
NetWorker
Avamar NetWorker
Storage
Data node
Deduplication
Data Store
node
Disk, VTL,
Tape
Unify—See—Act
Automatically collect data from across data
protection infrastructure
Transform disparate data into new insights,
actionable information, and service-level
agreement statistics
Make better, faster decisions to meet service
level agreements, correct issues, and drive
efficiency
Mecklenburg County
Backing up NAS Filers through the Avamar NDMP Accelerator
Before Avamar
Rapid data growth straining existing tape infrastructure
Inadequate bandwidth for data replication
NAS Filer full backups taking 72 hours to complete
High cost of tape-based backup
Solution
“The Avamar system has Avamar NDMP Accelerator
been absolutely
bulletproof since it was With Avamar
fully implemented, it’s
Time to complete full backups was reduced from 72 to two
part of our strategy to
hours
reduce overall costs
and provide more Reducing the tape backup process resulted in annual savings
efficient public services of $50,000
—advantages that can’t
New backup efficiencies have freed up IT staff
be over-emphasized in
today’s economy. Improved data recovery speeds
— Jason Girad,
Storage Engineer Compliance with government regulations
© Copyright 2010 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. 37
USE CASE
Before Avamar
Data center redesign focused on server consolidation
and virtualization
Concern about traditional, tape-based backup in
VMware environment
Backup windows strained; physical resources
overburdened
“Avamar provides a huge
time and cost savings
for backup of multiple With Avamar
virtual machines.”
Deployed agents within virtual machines
With Avamar, we can
centrally manage all of 95% reduction in data moved
our backups, and we
also gain the ability to 90% reduction in backup times
rapidly restore data
down to the file level.” Major reductions in NIC, CPU, and memory usage
— Curtis Damhof,
Network Manager, Centralized management and control
St. Peter’s Health Care Services
Before Avamar
Struggling to meet backup, recovery, and reliability goals
across extended enterprise
Lengthy backup windows caused by increasing data volumes,
threatening network performance
Expanding existing backup solution would require second
master server, two additional tape silos, 16 new LTO tape
drives
“Avamar was much less
expensive than our other
backup and recovery
With Avamar
options. But it also Backup for VMware (24 ESX servers, 332 virtual clients)
provides us faster data
restores, more backup Avamar agents installed in VM guests
capacity, and scalability Eliminated physical tape management
to meet future data
protection needs.” Reduced backup and recovery administrative burden
— Company spokesman,
global industrial manufacturer
Backup performance increased ten-fold
Backup network traffic reduced by 95%
© Copyright 2010 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. 39
USE CASE
Before Avamar
Growing VMware environment struggles to meet backup
window
Daily tape backup and offsite tape shipments—risky slow
recovery
Unable to quickly replicate data through WAN for disaster
recovery
With Avamar
Global deduplication effective within and across VMDK files
More than 70% reduction in first backup and average of 99.7%
thereafter
Compared to traditional alternatives, testing showed:
– Avamar moved 20% of the data that Symantec PureDisk moved
– Avamar moved 190% less data than traditional tape backup software
Before Avamar
73 remote offices, backup to local, direct-attached tape
drives
No local IT staff
Daily backup required five hours per site; six hours to
restore entire server
“Avamar enabled us to
reduce administrative With Avamar
support requirements
by 80%, reduce backup Four hours to back up all 73 offices through existing
windows by 90%, and WAN (56k-T1) to central Avamar server
recover lost files and
servers in minutes 45 minutes to restore entire servers; files restored in
rather than hours.” seconds
— Mike DePhillip,
Backup Administrator, Centralized management and control
Virginia DMV
Corporate Express
Remote office/branch office backup
Before Avamar
Storage demands were rapidly increasing
Tape library was reaching slot capacity and upgrading was not
ideal due to age and maintenance costs
Needed to control costs and simplify data management
Backup and disaster recovery was time consuming
Before Avamar
Strain developing and deploying a coherent IT strategy for
more than 250 sites, 100,000 employees
– Lacked consistent IT infrastructure
– Cumbersome tape backup solution was overextending staff and overtaxing
virtual machines