DIBELS Overview&use HEC

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 74

DIBELS : Overview and Use

TM

Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (Eds.). (2002). Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early
Literacy Skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of
Educational Achievement. Available: http://dibels.uoregon.edu/.

Funded through the Centers for Implementing K-3 Behavior and


Reading Intervention Models
Preventing Reading Difficulties: A Three-Tiered Intervention Model
U.S. Department of Education grant contract number H324X010013
Principal Investigator: Sharon Vaughn, Ph. D.
Co-Principal Investigators: Sylvia Linan-Thompson, Ph. D. and
Batya Elbaum, Ph. D.
DIBELS : Overview and Use
TM

Kim Rodriguez & Thea Woodruff


University of Texas
Center for Reading and Language Arts
Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (Eds.). (2002). Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy
Skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement.
Available: http://dibels.uoregon.edu/.
Objectives

 Learn how to administer select DIBELSTM


measures for screening and progress
monitoring.

 Learn how to use DIBELSTM to inform


instruction.

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


TM
DIBELS Benchmark Assessment

Assessment of Big Ideas in Beginning Reading


Early Childhood Research Institute on Measuring Growth
and Development

Institute for the Development of


Educational Achievement

University of Oregon, College of Education

Oregon Department of Education

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


What are the DIBELS™?

Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills™

 Brief, standardized, individually administered


measures
 Assess development of pre-reading and early
reading skills
 Correspond to the 5 critical elements of reading
instruction

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


What are the DIBELS™?

 Each measure assesses accuracy and


fluency

 The measures are predictive of later reading


proficiency

 Multiple forms make DIBELS™ a useful tool


for frequent progress monitoring

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


DIBELS Measures
TM

Today’s measures

 Letter Naming Fluency (LNF) K-1

 Oral Reading Fluency (DORF) 1-3

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


DIBELS Measures
TM

Additional measures
 Initial Sound Fluency (ISF) PK-K

 Phoneme Segmentation Fluency (PSF) K-1

 Nonsense Word Fluency (NWF) K-2

 Word Use Fluency (WUF) PK-3

 Oral Retell Fluency (RTF) 1-3

 Spanish versions for K-3

 Website: http://dibels.uoregon.edu/
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
The DIBELSTM

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


BIG IDEAS in Early Literacy Skills
 Phonemic Awareness.
 The awareness and understanding of the sound structure of our
language, that “cat” is composed of the sounds /k/ /a/ /t/.

 Phonics or Alphabetic Principle. Based on two parts:


 Alphabetic Understanding. Words are composed of letters that
represent sounds, and
 Phonological Recoding. Using systematic relationships between
letters and phonemes (letter-sound correspondence) to retrieve the
pronunciation of an unknown printed string or to spell.

 Accuracy and Fluency with Connected Text.


 Readers who are not fluent at decoding are not able to focus their
attentional resources on comprehension.

National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific
research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups.
Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Big Ideas and DIBELS TM

 Big ideas of early literacy should drive the


curriculum and instruction. And,
 Big ideas should drive the measures we use.
Big Idea of Literacy DIBELS Measure
General Risk Indicator Letter Naming Fluency
Phonological Awareness Initial Sounds Fluency
Phoneme Segmentation Fluency
Alphabetic Principle Nonsense Word Fluency
Accuracy and Fluency with DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency
Connected Text
Comprehension Retell Fluency

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


General Instructions
 Each section is a one-minute, timed measure.
 Read scripted directions.
 You will need:
 DIBELSTM 6th Edition Administration and Scoring Manual
 Student stimulus packet
 Timer
 Clipboard
 Colored Pen

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


DIBELSTM Letter Naming Fluency (LNF)

Prior editions were supported, in part, by the Early Childhood


Research Institute on Measuring Growth and Development
(H180M10006) and Student-Initiated Grant (H023B90057) funded
by the U. S. Department of Education, Special Education
Programs.

Kaminski, R. A., & Good, R. H. (2002). Letter Naming


Fluency. In R. H. Good & R. A. Kaminski (Eds.), Dynamic Indicators of
Basic Early Literacy Skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the
Development of Educational Achievement. Available:
http://dibels.uoregon.edu/.

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Letter Knowledge
(measured by Letter Naming Fluency)

 Accuracy of naming letters

 Fluency in naming letters

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Materials

 Student copy of LNF probe

 Examiner copy of LNF probe

 Timer

 Colored pen

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Probe 1 LNF Probes
c c N u Q M u h S i
n b e N F f o a K k
g p k p a H C e G D
 Each probe is a
b w F i h O x j I K
random sort of 2
x t Y q L d f T g v
lower case and 2
T V Q o w P J t B X
upper case
alphabets.
Z v U P R l V C l W
R J m O z D G y U Y
Z y A m X z H S M E  Lines help
q n j s W r d s B I students to keep
r A E L c c N u Q M their place.
Total: ____/110

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Directions
1. Place the student copy of randomized alphabets in front
of the student.

2. Place the examiner copy of randomized alphabets in front


of you on the clipboard, but shielded so that the student
cannot see what you record.

3. Say these specific directions to the student:


Here are some letters (point). Tell me the names of as
many letters as you can. When I say “begin,” start here
(point to first letter), and go across the page (point). Point to
each letter and tell me the name of that letter. If you
come to a letter you don’t know I’ll tell it to you. Put your
finger on the first letter. Ready, begin.

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Probe 1 Directions
c c N u Q M u h S i
n b e N F f o a K k 4. Start your stop
watch after saying
g p k p a H C e G D
“Ready, begin.” If
b w F i h O x j I K the student fails to
x t Y q L d f T g v say the first letter
T V Q o w P J t B X
after 3 seconds, tell
him/her the letter
Z v U P R l V C l W and mark it as
R J m O z D G y U Y incorrect.
Z y A m X z H S M E
q n j s W r d s B I 5. Follow along on your
r A E L c c N u Q M
copy. Put a slash (/)
Total: ____/110
through letters
named incorrectly.
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Probe 1
Directions
c c N u Q M u h S i
n b e N F f o a K k 6. If a student stops or
struggles with a letter for
g p k p a H C e G D
3 seconds, tell the
b w F i h O x j I K student the letter and
x t Y q L d f T g v mark it as incorrect.
Prompt the student by
T V Q o w P J t B X pointing to the next letter
Z v U P R l V C l W and saying, “What
letter?” (if necessary).
R J m O z D G y U Y
Z y A m X z H S M E
7. At the end of 1 minute,
q n j s W r d s B I place a bracket (]) after
r A E L c c N u Q M the last letter named and
say, "Stop."
36
Total: ____/110

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Scoring Directions

1. Put a slash (/) through letters omitted or


named incorrectly.

2. The following responses should be counted


as errors:
a. The student substitutes a different letter for the
stimulus letter, e.g., the student says "B" for "D".
b. The student stops or struggles with a letter for 3
seconds.
c. The student omits a letter.

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Articulation and Dialect

 Articulation and Dialect. The student is not


penalized for imperfect pronunciation due to dialect,
articulation, or second language interference. For
example, if the student consistently says /th/ for /s/
and pronounces "thee" for "see" when naming the
letter "C", he or she should be given credit for
correct letter naming. This is a professional
judgment and should be based on the student's
responses and any prior knowledge of his/her
speech patterns.

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Scoring Notes

 If a student skips an entire row, draw a line through


the row and do not count the row as correct.

 Upper case letter “i” and lower case letter “L” are
hard to differentiate. A response of either “i” or “L” is
scored as correct.

 If a student makes an error and corrects him/herself


within 3 seconds, write "SC" above the letter and do
not count it as an error.

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Time to Practice!

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


DIBELSTM Oral Reading Fluency (DORF)

Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A., & Dill, S. (2002). DIBELS Oral
Reading Fluency. In R. H. Good & R. A. Kaminski (Eds.), Dynamic
Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR:
Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement. Available:
http://dibels.uoregon.edu/.
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Oral Reading Fluency
 Develop irregular words and sight words
 Improve decoding skills
 Build fluent reading of text
 Activate and build prior knowledge
 Develop comprehension strategies

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Materials

 Student copy of passage

 Examiner copy

 Clipboard

 Timer

 Colored pen

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Directions for Administration

1. Place the reading passage in front of the


student.

2. Place the examiner copy on clipboard and


position so that the student cannot see what
you record.

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills
University of Oregon
First Grade Benchmark 2 – DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency, Passage 1
Directions
The Robin’s Nest

There was a robin’s nest outside our kitchen window. The


nest was in a tall bush. The mother robin sat in the nest all day 3. Say these specific
long. One day when I was watching, the mother bird flew directions to the student:
away. I saw the eggs she was sitting on. There were four blue
eggs.
Please read this (point)
I watched and watched. The eggs moved. I watched some out loud. If you get stuck,
more. The eggs started to crack. Finally, the eggs hatched. I I will tell you the word so
saw four baby birds. The baby birds opened their beaks wide.
you can keep reading.
I heard them peeping. Soon the mother bird came back. Then
the mother robin put worms in their mouths.
When I say, “stop” I may
Every day I watched the baby birds and their mother. ask you to tell me about
Pretty soon the babies were so fat there was no room for the what you read, so do
mother. Then one morning the nest was gone from the bush.
your best reading. Start
here (point to the first word of
the passage). Begin.
© 2001 Good & Kaminski Page 6

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Timing
4. Start your stopwatch when the student says the first word
of the passage. The title is not counted. If the student fails
to say the first word after 3 seconds, tell them the word
and mark it as incorrect, then start your stopwatch.

5. The maximum time for each word is 3 seconds. If the


student does not provide the word within 3 seconds, say
the word and mark the word as incorrect.

6. At the end of 1 minute, place a bracket ( ] ) after the last


word provided by the student and say “Stop.” Record the
total number of words read correctly on the bottom of the
scoring sheet.

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Scoring

7. Follow along on the examiner copy of the


probe. Put a slash ( ) over words read
incorrectly.

8. Score reading passages immediately after


administration.

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Directions for Scoring
1. Hesitate or struggle with words. If a student
hesitates or struggles with a word for 3 seconds,
tell the student the word and mark the word as
incorrect. If necessary, indicate for the student to
continue with the next word.

Scoring Correct Words


Passage Student Says Procedure / Total Words
I have a goldfish. “I have a … I have a goldfish. 3 /4
(3 seconds)”

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Hyphenated Words

2. Hyphenated words. Hyphenated words count as


two words if both parts can stand alone as individual
words. Hyphenated words count as one word if
either part cannot stand alone as an individual word.

Number of
Passage Words
I gave Ben a red yo-yo. 6
We did push-ups, pull-ups, and sit-ups. 9

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Numerals

3. Numerals. Numerals must be read correctly in the


context of the sentence.

Scoring Correct Words


Passage Student Says Procedure / Total Words
My father is 36. “My father is thirty-six.” My father is 36. 4 /4
My father is 36. “My father is three six.” My father is 36. 3 /4
I am 6 years “I am six years old.” I am 6 years old. 5 /5
old.

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Mispronounced Words

4. Mispronounced words. A word is scored as


correct if it is pronounced correctly in the context
of the sentence. If the word is mispronounced in
the context, it is scored as an error.
Correct Words
Passage Student Says Scoring Procedure / Total Words
Dad read the paper. “Dad reed the paper.” Dad read the paper. 3 /4
(i.e., long e)

I ate too much. “I eat too much.” I ate too much. 3 /4

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Self Corrections

5. Self Corrections. A word is scored as correct if it


is initially mispronounced but the student self
corrects within 3 seconds. Mark SC above the
word and score as correct.
Scoring Correct Words
Passage Student Says Procedure / Total Words
SC
Dad read the “Dad reed … red the Dad read the 4 /4
paper. paper.” (i.e., self- paper.
corrects to short e)

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Repeated Words

6. Repeated Words. Words that are repeated are not


scored as incorrect and are ignored in scoring.

Scoring Correct Words


Passage Student Says Procedure / Total Words
I have a goldfish. “I have a … I I have a goldfish. 4 /4
have a goldfish.”

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Articulation and Dialect
7. Articulation and dialect. The student is not penalized for
imperfect pronunciation due to dialect, articulation, or second
language interference. For example, if the student consistently
says /th/ for /s/, and reads “rest” as “retht,” he or she should be
given credit for a correct word. This is a professional judgment
and should be based on the student’s responses and any prior
knowledge of his/her speech patterns.
Correct Words
Passage Student Says Scoring Procedure / Total Words
It is time for “It is time for a retht.” It is time for a rest. 6 /6
a rest. (articulation)

We took the “We took the shot cut.” We took the short 5 /5
short cut. (dialect) cut.

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Inserted Words
8. Inserted words. Inserted words are ignored and
not counted as errors. The student also does not
get additional credit for inserted words. If the
student frequently inserts extra words, note the
pattern at the bottom of the scoring page.
Correct Words
Passage Student Says Scoring Procedure / Total Words
It is time for “It is time for a It is time for a rest. 6 /6
a rest. long rest.”
I ate too “I ate way too I ate too much. 4 /4
much. much.”

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Omitted Words

9. Omitted words. Omitted words are scored


as incorrect.

Correct Words
Passage Student Says Scoring Procedure / Total Words

It is time for a “It is time for It is time for a rest. 5 /6


rest. rest.”

I ate too “I ate much.” I ate too much. 3 /4


much.

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Word Order

10. Word Order. All words that are read


correctly but in the wrong order are scored as
incorrect.
Correct Words
Passage Student Says Scoring Procedure / Total Words

The ice cream “The cream ice The ice cream man comes. 3 /5
man comes. man comes.”
I ate too much. “I too ate much.” 2 /4
I ate too much.

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Abbreviations
11. Abbreviations. Abbreviations should be read in
the way you would normally pronounce the
abbreviation in conversation. For example, TV
could be read as “teevee” or “television” but Mr.
would be read as “mister.”
Correct Words
Passage Student Says Scoring Procedure / Total Words
May I watch TV? “May I watch May I watch TV? 4 /4
teevee?”
May I watch TV? “May I watch May I watch TV? 4 /4
television?”
My teacher is Mr. “My teacher is My teacher is Mr. Smith. 5 /5
Smith. mister Smith.”
My teacher is Mr. “My teacher is My teacher is Mr. Smith. 4 /5
Smith. ‘m’ ‘r’ Smith.”

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Skipped Text

 If a student skips a line of text, draw a line


through the skipped text and do not count the
skipped text in scoring.

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


DORF Score

 The score is the median (or middle) score


when three passages are administered for
screening purposes.

 During progress monitoring, only one


passage is administered.

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Time to Practice!

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Acknowledgements

Centers for Implementing K-3 Behavior and


Reading Intervention Models
Preventing Reading Difficulties: A Three-Tiered
Intervention Model
 U.S. Department of Education grant contract
number H324X010013
 Principal Investigator: Sharon Vaughn, Ph. D.
 Co-Principal Investigators: Sylvia Linan-Thompson,
Ph. D. and Batya Elbaum, Ph. D.

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Different Levels of Use

 State level
 District level
 School level
 Classroom level
 Individual student level

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Classroom Level

 Screening
 Progress Monitoring

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Screening
 Conduct screening assessments 3 times per year in first
grade and above (beginning, middle, and end of the year)

 Conduct screening assessments 2 times per year in


kindergarten (middle and end of the year)

 Assess all students on appropriate measures

 Examine students’ scores in relationship to established goals

 Use to help inform both whole group and small group


instruction

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


TM
Initial Screening: DIBELS Goals

Measure Goal When?

Initial Sounds Fluency 25 or more Middle of K

27 or more Middle of K
Letter Naming Fluency
37 or more Beginning of 1st
Phonemic Segmentation 18 or more Middle of K
Fluency 35 or more Beginning of 1st
13 or more Middle of K
Nonsense Word Fluency
24 or more Beginning of 1st

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Screening: Kindergarten Example
LNF Goal NWF Goal ISF Goal PSF Goal
27 or more 13 or more 25 or more 18 or more
Date: __1/15/04_

Student Letter Nonsense Initial Phoneme Comments/Error Patterns


Name Naming Word Sounds Segmentation
Fluency Fluency Fluency Fluency
Tashaun 57 33 48 17 d/b mix up; u/n mix up; good w/sounds/names; good initial sounds
Olivia 51 22 38.2 39
Leta 51 5 9.7 2 Rhymes words not segment; slow w/letter sounds
Delia 50 29 26.7 21
Edna 47 16 22.9 6 Can only segment initial sounds in PA
Tyson 47 25 10.3 5 Only segments initial sounds in PA SLOWLY
Naomi 46 19 40.9 63
Anya 45 25 33.6 46 d/b mix up; fairly fluent names/sounds/good PA skills
Essence 42 22 30 11 Only segments initial sounds in PA; slow but accurate letter names
Will iam 40 17 20.8 3 Only segments initial sounds in PA
Destiny 37 3 12.7 30 Fairly high PA; slow w/letter names/sounds; vo wel sound problems
David 33 25 30 56
Matt 26 10 18 9 Only segments initial sounds in PA; getting lots of letters mixed up
No response during PA; knows letters in his name and a few
Edwin 18 2 0 2
others
Chris 17 12 9.7 0 No response during PA; problems w/h,n,x,z,v; fair w/sounds

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Using Data to Inform Instruction

 Examine class as a whole to inform whole


group instruction

 Examine groups of students to inform small


group instruction

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Whole Class Instruction: Kindergarten
Example
 80% of the students in this class met the goal
of naming 27 letters or more in one minute
 Tier 1 (core) instruction in this area is meeting
its goal
 40% of the students met the goal of
segmenting 18 sounds or more in one minute
 Tier 1 instruction in this area is NOT meeting
its goal
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Small Group Instruction:
Kindergarten Example
 Small group to help the 20% in letter naming:
 Chris, Edwin, Matt

 Small groups to help the 60% in phonological


awareness:
 Chris, Edwin, Leta
 William, Tyson, Edna, Matt
 Essence, Tashaun, Delia

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Screening: First Grade Example
LNF Goal NWF Goal PSF Goal
37 or more 24 or more 35 or more
Date: _9/5/03_

Student Letter Naming Nonsense Word Phoneme Oral Comments/Error Patterns


Name Fluency Fluency Segmentation Reading
Fluency Fluency
Natalia 72 50 56
Felicia 54 37 59 Mix up on b/d
Clarissa 42 36 31 Slow but accurate PA
Jade 54 33 39 Mix up on b/d
Aaron 39 32 38
Rey 24 25 0 No response on PA; accurate sound id on NWF
Larah 37 23 38 Mix up in e/i and o/u and b/d sounds on NWF
Gerry 35 23 11 Only initial sounds on PA; accurate but not fluent on NWF
Chris 33 21 52 Accurate but not fluent on NWF
Jay 36 18 36 Mixes up all vowel sounds on NWF
Tina 38 18 44 Mix up on e/i and g/j and z/v and b/d on NWF
Only initial sounds on PA; mixes up o/u and c/s and v/z;
Alex 31 12 8
does not know sounds for f,t,r
Problems w/vowel sounds on PA; mixes up all vowel
Angela 25 12 29
sounds on NWF
Only responds to hard sounds on PA; knows sounds for a,
Antwon 18 7 6
m, s, t
Delia 10 4 8
Dora 27 3 8
Daniel 5 2 22 Problems with vowel sounds on PA
Eliza 1 1 1
Rodney 0 0 0
*Fluency rate is optional and not typically calculated at the beginning of first grade.

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Whole Class Instruction:
First Grade Example
 35% of the students in this class met the goal of reading 24
sounds or more in one minute

 40% of the students met the goal of segmenting 35 sounds in


one minute

 Tier 1 instruction will need to be as good as it possibly can be


to catch these students up

 Tier 2 instruction (intervention) may be necessary for some


students who do not make adequate progress in Tier 1

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Small Group Instruction:
First Grade Example
 Small groups to help the 65% in letter-sound
correspondences:
 Rodney, Eliza, Daniel
 Dora, Delia, Antwon
 Angela, Alex, Tina, Jay
 Chris, Gerry, Larah, Rey

 Small groups to help the 60% in phonological awareness:


 Rodney, Eliza, Rey
 Antwon, Alex, Dora, Delia
 Gerry, Daniel, Angela, Clarissa

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Progress Monitoring

 Conduct progress monitoring assessments every 2-3


weeks

 Assess only students who do not meet goals on


appropriate screening measures

 Examine students’ scores to look for progress in meeting


established goals

 Use to help inform both whole group and small group


instruction

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


TM
Next Screening: DIBELS Goals

Measure Goal When?

Letter Naming Fluency 40 or more End of K

Phonemic Segmentation End of K


35 or more
Fluency Middle of First
25 or more End of K
Nonsense Word Fluency
50 or more Middle of First

Oral Reading Fluency 20 or more Middle of First

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Progress Monitoring: Kindergarten
LNF Example
Student 28-Jan 13-Feb 27-Feb 9-Mar 26-Mar 2-Apr 23-Apr May
Anya 45 54
Chris 17 34 38 34
David 33 46
Delia 50 55
Destiny 37 34
Edna 47 54
Edwin 18 25 26 25 28 32 31
Essence 42 46
Tashaun 57 59
Leta 51 63
Matt 26 30 32 27 25 30 26
Naomi 46 63
Olivia 51 61
Tyson 47 51
William 40 57
Taylor 49

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Progress Monitoring: Kindergarten
PSF Example
Student 28-Jan 13-Feb 27-Feb 9-Mar 26-Mar 2-Apr 23-Apr May
Anya 46 67
Chris 0 0 3 0 5 0 7 10
David 56 57
Delia 21 17
Destiny 30 57
Edna 6 7 12 20 18 17 51
Edwin 2 2 4 7 7 10 19
Essence 11 11 16 18 13 13 46
Tashaun 17 9 17 15 13 20
Leta 2 5 0 0 4 11 12
Matt 9 9 9 10 8 7 13
Naomi 63 70
Olivia 39 24
Tyson 5 8 11 3 5 8 8
William 3 9 12 13 11 8 17
Taylor 37

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Progress Monitoring:
First Grade NWF Example
Student 24-Sep 17-Oct 31-Oct 14-Nov 21-Nov 5-Dec 12-Dec 14-Jan 27-Jan
Eliza 1 0 0 0
Jade 33 53 43
Alex 12 9 38 35 48 50
Aaron 32 47 38
Daniel 2 0 1 3
Rey 25 38 37 32 47
Rodney 0 2 0 0 0 0
Felicia 37 42 59 46
Jay 18 43 37 52 49
Chris 21 29 32 36 25 38 18 36
Delia 4 11 18 18 13 8 9 15
Dora 3 17 14 36 28 33 37 32
Angela 12 24 20 22 23 19 28 40 40
Tina 18 12 26 25 37 31 44
Larah 23 34 34 42 31 39 46
Antwon 7 20 33 35 38 52
Clarissa 36 54 54
Natalia 50 56 65
Gerry 23 26 49 46 45
Kelly 29 26

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Individual Level

 Screening

 Progress Monitoring

 Error Analysis

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Initial Screening:
Kindergarten Example
Studen t: ___Willi am_________________________________

Middle of the Yea r Admi nis tration Date: ___1/15/04_____


Middl e of the Year
Established Emerging Deficit
Assessment Concept Assessed Score Decision Criteria
(  ) ( ) ()
> 27 = E stablished
Screening 1 Letter Naming Fluency 40 27 > LNF < 21 = E merging 
< 21 = D eficit

> 13 = E stablished
Nonsense Word 
Screening 2 17 13 > NWF < 4 = Emerging
Fluency
< 4 = Deficit

> 25 = E stablished
Screening 3 Initial Sounds Fluency 20.8 25 > ISF < 9 = Emerging 
< 9 = Deficit

> 18 = E stablished
Phoneme Segmentation 
Screening 4 3 18 > PSF < 7 = Emerging
Fluency
< 7 = Deficit

Comm ents/Error Patterns: ___Only segments initi al sounds in PA____

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Initial Screening:
Kindergarten Example
Studen t: ___Anya ____________________________________

Middle of the Yea r Admi nis tration Date: ___1/15/04_____


Middl e of the Year
Established Emerging Deficit
Assessment Concept Assessed Score Decision Criteria
( ) ( ) ( )
> 27 = E stablished
Screening 1 Letter Naming Fluency 45 27 > LNF < 21 = E merging 
< 21 = D eficit

> 13 = E stablished
Nonsense Word 
Screening 2 25 13 > NWF < 4 = Emerging
Fluency
< 4 = Deficit

> 25 = E stablished
Screening 3 Initial Sounds Fluency 33.6 25 > ISF < 9 = Emerging 
< 9 = Deficit

> 18 = E stablished
Phoneme Segmentation 
Screening 4 46 18 > PSF < 7 = Emerging
Fluency
< 7 = Deficit

Comm ents/Error Patterns: _d/b mi x up; fairly fluent na mes/sound s; good PA skill s_

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Initial Screening:
Kindergarten Example
Studen t: ______Edna _________________________________

Middle of the Yea r Admi nis tration Date: ___1/15/04_____


Middl e of the Year
Established Emerging Deficit
Assessment Concept Assessed Score Decision Criteria
( ) ( ) ( )
> 27 = E stablished
Screening 1 Letter Naming Fluency 47 27 > LNF < 21 = E merging 
< 21 = D eficit

> 13 = E stablished
Nonsense Word 
Screening 2 16 13 > NWF < 4 = Emerging
Fluency
< 4 = Deficit

> 25 = E stablished
Screening 3 Initial Sounds Fluency 22.9 25 > ISF < 9 = Emerging 
< 9 = Deficit

> 18 = E stablished
Phoneme Segmentation 
Screening 4 6 18 > PSF < 7 = Emerging
Fluency
< 7 = Deficit

Comm ents/Error Patterns: _Can only segment initi al sound s in PA_

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Initial Screening:
First Grade Example
Studen t: ___Tina____________________________________

Beginn ing of the Yea r Admi nistration Date: ___9/5/03_____


Beginnin g of the Year
Established Emerging Deficit
Assessment Concept Assessed Score Decision Criteria
( ) ( ) ( )
> 37 = E stablished
Screening 1 Letter Naming Fluency 38 37 > LNF < 24 = E merging 
< 24 = D eficit

> 24 = E stablished
Nonsense Word 
Screening 2 18 24 > NWF < 12 = E merging
Fluency
< 12 = D eficit

> 35 = E stablished
Phoneme Segmentation 
Screening 3 44 35 > PSF < 9 = Emerging
Fluency
< 9 = Deficit

Comm ents/Error Patterns: __Mix up on e/i and g/j and z/v and b /d on NWF__

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Initial Screening:
First Grade Example
Studen t: ___Ange la__________________________________

Beginn ing of the Year Admi nistration Date: ___9/5/03_____


Beginnin g of the Year
Established Emerging Deficit
Assessment Concept Assessed Score Decision Criteria
( ) ( ) ( )
> 37 = E stablished
Screening 1 Letter Naming Fluency 25 37 > LNF < 24 = E merging 
< 24 = D eficit

> 24 = E stablished
Nonsense Word 
Screening 2 12 24 > NWF < 12 = E merging
Fluency
< 12 = D eficit

> 35 = E stablished
Phoneme Segmentation 
Screening 3 29 35 > PSF < 9 = Emerging
Fluency
< 9 = Deficit
Comm ents/Error Patterns: Proble ms w/vo wel sounds on PA; mi x up vowe l sound s on
NWF

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Initial Screening:
First Grade Example
Studen t: ___Antwon__________________________________

Beginn ing of the Year Admi nistration Date: ___9/5/03_____


Beginnin g of the Year
Established Emerging Deficit
Assessment Concept Assessed Score Decision Criteria
( ) ( ) ( )
> 37 = E stablished
Screening 1 Letter Naming Fluency 18 37 > LNF < 24 = E merging 
< 24 = D eficit

> 24 = E stablished
Nonsense Word 
Screening 2 7 24 > NWF < 12 = E merging
Fluency
< 12 = D eficit

> 35 = E stablished
Phoneme Segmentation 
Screening 3 6 35 > PSF < 9 = Emerging
Fluency
< 9 = Deficit
Comm ents/Error Patterns: Only responds to ha rd sounds on PA; knows sound s for a, m,
s, t

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Progress Monitoring: Kindergarten
LNF Examples

Student 28-Jan 13-Feb 27-Feb 9-Mar 26-Mar 2-Apr 23-Apr May


Edwin 18 25 26 25 28 32 31
Matt 26 30 32 27 25 30 26

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Progress Monitoring: Kindergarten
PSF Examples

Student 28-Jan 13-Feb 27-Feb 9-Mar 26-Mar 2-Apr 23-Apr May

Wil iam 3 9 12 13 11 8 17
Edna 6 7 12 20 18 17 51

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Progress Monitoring:
First Grade NWF Examples
Student 24-Sep 17-Oct 31-Oct 14-Nov 21-Nov 5-Dec 12-Dec 14-Jan 27-Jan
Tina 18 12 26 25 37 31 44
Angela 12 24 20 22 23 19 28 40 40
Antwon 7 20 33 35 38 52
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Progress Monitoring:
First Grade NWF Examples
Student 24-Sep 17-Oct 31-Oct 14-Nov 21-Nov 5-Dec 12-Dec 14-Jan 27-Jan
Delia 4 11 18 18 13 8 9 15
Dora 3 17 14 36 28 33 37 32

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


Error Analysis

 Using scored protocols to determine error


patterns
 Used to inform whole group and small
group instruction
 Examples:
 PSF - students provide initial sound only
 NWF - students confuse letter sounds

(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski


DIBELS : Overview and Use
TM

Kim Rodriguez & Thea Woodruff


University of Texas
Center for Reading and Language Arts

Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (Eds.). (2002). Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy
Skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement.
Available: http://dibels.uoregon.edu/.

You might also like