Review of Learning Theories For Teachers: Rosario M. Cabreza
Review of Learning Theories For Teachers: Rosario M. Cabreza
Review of Learning Theories For Teachers: Rosario M. Cabreza
Rosario M. Cabreza
Discussant
Topics:
• Educational Objective
• Radical Behaviorism
• Communities of Practice
• Situated Learning
• Conversation Theory
• Competency-Based Theory
• Problem-Based Learning
• Place-Based Education
• Question-Based Learning
• Learning Blends/ Combination Learning
23. EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES
Taxonomy of learning objectives that educators set for students in three
“domains” : Cognitive, Affective, and Psychomotor. Learning at the higher
levels is dependent on achieving lower levels. Designed to motivate educators
to focus on all three domains, creating a more holistic form of education.
Cognitive Domain
1. Knowledge remembering of previously learned material; of terminology; specific facts; ways
and means of dealing with specifics (conventions, trends and sequences, classifications and
categories, criteria, methodology); universals and abstractions in a field (principles and
generalizations, theories and structures):
Knowledge is (here) defined as the remembering (recalling) of appropriate, previously
learned information.
o defines; describes; enumerates; identifies; labels; lists; matches; names; reads; records;
reproduces; selects; states; views; writes;.
2. Comprehension: Grasping (understanding) the meaning of informational materials.
o classifies; cites; converts; describes; discusses; estimates; explains; generalizes; gives examples;
illustrates; makes sense out of; paraphrases; restates (in own words); summarizes; traces;
understands.
3. Application: The use of previously learned information in new and concrete situations to solve
problems that have single or best answers.
4. Analysis: The breaking down of informational materials into their component parts, examining (and
trying to understand the organizational structure of) such information to develop divergent conclusions by
identifying motives or causes, making inferences, and/or finding evidence to support generalizations.
o appraises; compares & contrasts; concludes; criticizes; critiques; decides; defends; interprets;
judges; justifies; reframes; supports.
Radical Behaviorism is the school of thought pioneered by B. F. Skinner that argues that behavior,
rather than mental states, should be the focus of study in psychology.
Skinner’s science of behavior emphasizes the importance of reinforcement and the relationships
between observable stimuli and responses. Behaviors do not depend on thoughts, feelings, or other internal
processes; rather, they are natural events that occur as a result of other events in the environment. Benefits and
consequences of a behavior either increase or decrease the probability of that behavior occurring in the future.
For example, if Sarah bites her nails, she does so not as a conscious or unconscious decision to relieve anxiety
but because the behavior is rewarding in some way.
25. Communities of Practice
Groups of people who share a concern of a passion for something they do and learn how
to do it better as they interact regularly.
The domain: A community of practice is not merely a club of friends or a network of connections between
people. It has an identity defined by a shared domain of interest. Membership therefore implies a
commitment to the domain, and therefore a shared competence that distinguishes members from other
people. (You could belong to the same network as someone and never know it.) The domain is not
necessarily something recognized as “expertise” outside the community. A youth gang may have
developed all sorts of ways of dealing with their domain: surviving on the street and maintaining some kind
of identity they can live with. They value their collective competence and learn from each other, even
though few people outside the group may value or even recognize their expertise.
The community: In pursuing their interest in their domain, members engage in joint activities and
discussions, help each other, and share information. They build relationships that enable them to learn from
each other; they care about their standing with each other. A website in itself is not a community of practice.
Having the same job or the same title does not make for a community of practice unless members interact
and learn together.
The practice: A community of practice is not merely a community of interest–people who like certain kinds of
movies, for instance. Members of a community of practice are practitioners. They develop a shared repertoire
of resources: experiences, stories, tools, ways of addressing recurring problems—in short a shared practice.
This takes time and sustained interaction. A good conversation with a stranger on an airplane may give you all
sorts of interesting insights, but it does not in itself make for a community of practice.
Other researchers have further developed Situated Learning theory. Brown, Collins & Duguid
emphasize the idea of cognitive apprenticeship. “Cognitive apprenticeship supports learning in a domain by
enabling students to acquire, develop and use cognitive tools in authentic domain activity. Learning, both
outside and inside school, advances through collaborative social interaction and the social construction of
knowledge.”
27. Conversation Theory
A cybernetic and dialectic framework that offers a scientific theory to explain how interactions lead
to ‘knowing.’
Conversation Theory is based in Pask’s interest in cybernetics. Cybernetics can be defined as the theoretical
study of control processes in electronic, mechanical, and biological systems. It comes from the Greek word meaning
steersman. Some define it as the science of communication and control in the animal and the machine, or the
communication within an observer and between the observer and his environment.
Conversation Theory as developed by Pask originated from this cybernetics framework and attempts to explain
learning in both living organisms and machines. The fundamental idea of the theory was that learning occurs through
conversations about a subject matter which serves to make knowledge explicit.
For students to learn a subject matter, they must learn the relationships among the concepts. For
teachers, the explicit explanation of the subject matter facilitates student understanding (e.g., use
of teachback technique). However, students differ in their preferred manner of learning relationships
(serialists versus holists).
28. Competency-Based Learning
Competency-Based Learning Lacks a Common Definition But Has Four Common Elements
No single, agreed upon definition of competency-based learning was found in state and district policies
or in interviews with administrators; however, researchers identified four common elements of the
reform:
1. Students must demonstrates mastery of all required competencies to earn credit or graduate.
2. Students advance once they have demonstrated mastery, and students receive more time, and
possibly personalized instruction, to demonstrate mastery if needed.
3. Students are assessed using multiple measures to determine mastery, usually requiring that
students apply their knowledge, not just repeat facts.
4. Students can earn credit toward graduation in ways other than seat time, including
apprenticeships, blended learning, dual enrollment, career and technical education programs,
and other learning opportunities outside the traditional classroom setting.
Cont…
Needed Supports for Implementing Competency-Based Learning Include Communication
Strategies, Ongoing Teacher Support, and Access to More Research and Models Students must
demonstrates mastery of all required competencies to earn credit or graduate.
The common resources and supports needed to help districts and schools implement
competency –based learning were identified as the following:
1. A clear communications strategy for all stakeholders to establish understanding,
acceptance, and support of the reform.
2. Ongoing support for teachers, including professional development and time for
collaboration.
3. More research and models to help districts guide their implementation and ongoing efforts.
29. Problem-Based Learning
An approach to learning where the solving or important ‘problems,’ often through inquiry
and Project-Based Learning catalyzes the learning experience.
Problem-based approaches to learning have a long history. They are one of many instructional
approaches that situate learning in a meaningful task, such as case-based instruction and project-based
learning. In the traditions of Kilpatrick (1918, 1921) and Dewey (1938), these approaches argue for the
importance of practical experience in learning. Problem-based learning (PBL) is part of this tradition of
meaningful, experiential learning. In PBL, students learn by solving problems and reflecting on their
experiences (Barrows and Tamblyn, 1980). PBL is well suited to helping students become active learners
because it situates learning in real-world problems and makes students responsible for their learning. It has a
dual emphasis on helping learners develop strategies and construct knowledge(Cognitionand Technology
Group at Vanderbilt [CTGV], 1997; Collins et al., 1989; Hmelo and Ferrari, 1997; Kolodner et al., 1996).
Cont…
PBL AND OTHER EXPERIENTIAL APPROACHES
PBL is focused, experiential learning organized around the investigation, explanation, and resolution of
meaningful problems (Barrows, 2000; Torp and Sage, 2002). In PBL, students work in small collaborative groups
and learn what they need to know in order to solve a problem. The teacher acts as a facilitator to guide student
learning through the learning cycle depicted in Fig. 1. In this cycle, also known as the PBL tutorial process, the
students are presented with a problem scenario. They formulate and analyze the problem by identifying the
relevant facts from the scenario. This fact-identification step helps students represent the problem. As students
understand the problem better, they generate hypotheses about possible solutions.
Cont…
Cont…
GOALS OF PBL
Problem-based curricula provide students with guided experience in learning through solving complex,
real-world problems. PBL was designed with several important goals (Barrows and Kelson, 1995). It is
designed to help students
1) construct an extensive and flexible knowledge base;
2) develop effective problem-solving skills;
3) develop self-directed, lifelong learning skills;
4) become effective collaborators; and
5) become intrinsically motivated to learn.
Steps to a Problem-Based Learning Approach
Step 1: Explore the issue. Gather necessary information; learn new concepts, principles, and skills about the
proposed topic.
Step 2: State what is known. Individual students and groups list what they already know about the scenario and list
what areas they are lacking information.
Step 3: Define the issues. Frame the problem in a context of what is already known and information the students
expect to learn.
Step 4: Research the knowledge. Find resources and information that will help create a compelling argument.
Step 5: Investigate solutions. List possible actions and solutions to the problem, formulate and test potential
hypotheses
Step 6: Present and support the chosen solution. Clearly state and support your conclusion with relevant information
and evidence.
Step 7: Review your performance. Often forgotten, this is a crucial step in improving your problem-solving skills.
Students must evaluate their performance and plan improvements for the next problem.
30. Place-Based Education
The emphasis of a meaningful ‘place’ (that is, one meaningful to the learner) in the circumstance of
learning.
Place-based education is the process of using the local community and environment as a starting
point to teach concepts in language arts, mathematics, social studies, science and other subjects across
the curriculum. Emphasizing hands-on, real-world learning experiences, this approach to education
increases academic achievement, helps students develop stronger ties to their community, enhances
students’ appreciation for the natural world, and creates a heightened commitment to serving as active,
contributing citizens. Community vitality and environmental quality are improved through the active
engagement of local citizens, community organizations, and environmental resources in the life of the
school.
31. Question-Based learning
A formal process of inquiry where questions are formed, then improved based on the revelation of
relevant, significant, and accurate data.
32. Learning Blends / Combination Learning
An alternative to traditional academic ‘lessons,’ combination learning blends are combinations of
learning ingredients (e.g., topic, audience, outcome, apps,
The purpose of this guide is to give you a quick overview of the Question Formulation Technique™ (QFT™) and to
provide you with an outline you can use to experience the question formulation process.
KEY COMPONENTS OF THE QUESTION
FORMULATION TECHNIQUE
The Question Formulation Technique (QFT) is a simple step-by-step, rigorous process
that facilitates the asking of many questions. The process includes the following steps:
2. The Rules for Producing Questions – Each of the four rules supports a behavior
that facilitates effective question formulation.
§ Ask as many questions as you can
§ Do not stop to discuss, judge, or answer any questions
§ Write down every question exactly as it is stated
§ Change any statement into a question
The first step for producing questions is to review the rules and name potential
challenges in following them.
The rules can be difficult to follow at times because you are being asked to work in a way
that might be new or different from what you are accustomed to. The goal here is to
create awareness of the difficulties and help you abide by the rules as you work
producing questions.
www.rightquestion.org Experiencing the Question Formulation Technique (QFT™)
KEY COMPONENTS OF THE QUESTION FORMULATION TECHNIQUE
3. Produce Questions- You will use the Question Focus (QFocus) to formulate as
many questions as you can. Ask all kinds of questions about the topic, phrase, image,
situation, etc. presented. Please make sure to follow the rules.
This part of the process allows you to think freely without having to worry about the
quality of the questions you are asking.
4. Improving the Questions – Once you have a list of questions, the next step is to
learn about two different types of questions you might have on your list: closed-ended
questions– questions that can be answered with a “yes” or “no” or with one word - and
open-ended questions –questions that require and explanation.
o First, please review your list and identify the closed-ended questions with a “C”
and the open-ended with an “O.”
o Second, think about and name the advantages and disadvantages of asking each
type of question. You will see that there is value in asking both types of questions.
o Third, practice changing questions from one type to another. Changing the
questions will help you learn how to edit your questions to meet your purpose.
KEY COMPONENTS OF THE QUESTION FORMULATION TECHNIQUE
5. Prioritizing Questions – You might have a lot of questions on your list. It will be
easier to work with the questions if some priorities are established. You will now choose
three questions based on actions you want to take. For example, three most important
questions, three questions you would like to address first, three questions you want to
explore further, etc.
After choosing the priority questions your next step is to name a rationale for
choosing.
As a last step in prioritizing, please pay attention to the numbers of your priority
questions. Are your priority questions at the beginning, in the middle or at the end?
6. Next Steps – Your questions can now be put into action. You might already have
criteria on what to do with the questions. For example, you may use the questions to do
research, develop a project, use the questions as a guide, etc.
7. Reflection – This is the last step in the process. It is now time to reflect on the work
you have done: what you have learned and how you can use it. The reflection helps
internalize the process, its value and how to apply it further.
Thank you for listening.