Chi Square Tests and F Distribution

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 83

Chi-Square Tests and the F-

Distribution

Larson/Farber 4th ed 1
Example:
• A radio station claims that the distribution of music
preferences for listeners in the broadcast region is as
shown below.
Distribution of music Preferences
Classical 4% Oldies 2%
Country 36% Pop 18%
Gospel 11% Rock 29%
Each outcome is The probability for
classified into each possible
categories. outcome is fixed.

Larson/Farber 4th ed 2
Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test

Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test


• Used to test whether a frequency distribution fits an
expected distribution.
• The null hypothesis states that the frequency
distribution fits the specified distribution.
• The alternative hypothesis states that the frequency
distribution does not fit the specified distribution.

Larson/Farber 4th ed 3
Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test
Example:
• To test the radio station’s claim, the executive can
perform a chi-square goodness-of-fit test using the
following hypotheses.
H0: The distribution of music preferences in the
broadcast region is 4% classical, 36% country,
11% gospel, 2% oldies, 18% pop, and 29% rock.
(claim)
Ha: The distribution of music preferences differs from
the claimed or expected distribution.

Larson/Farber 4th ed 4
Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test

• To calculate the test statistic for the chi-square


goodness-of-fit test, the observed frequencies and the
expected frequencies are used.
• The observed frequency O of a category is the
frequency for the category observed in the sample
data.

Larson/Farber 4th ed 5
Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test

• The expected frequency E of a category is the


calculated frequency for the category.
 Expected frequencies are obtained assuming the
specified (or hypothesized) distribution. The
expected frequency for the ith category is
Ei = npi
where n is the number of trials (the sample size)
and pi is the assumed probability of the ith
category.

Larson/Farber 4th ed 6
Example: Finding Observed and
Expected Frequencies
A marketing executive randomly
selects 500 radio music listeners Survey results
from the broadcast region and asks (n = 500)
each whether he or she prefers Classical 8
Country 210
classical, country, gospel, oldies,
Gospel 72
pop, or rock music. The results are
Oldies 10
shown at the right. Find the
Pop 75
observed frequencies and the Rock 125
expected frequencies for each type
of music.

Larson/Farber 4th ed 7
Solution: Finding Observed and
Expected Frequencies
Observed frequency: The number of radio music
listeners naming a particular type of music

Survey results observed frequency


(n = 500)
Classical 8
Country 210
Gospel 72
Oldies 10
Pop 75
Rock 125

Larson/Farber 4th ed 8
Solution: Finding Observed and
Expected Frequencies
Expected Frequency: Ei = npi

Type of % of Observed Expected


music listeners frequency frequency
Classical 4% 8 500(0.04) = 20
Country 36% 210 500(0.36) = 180
Gospel 11% 72 500(0.11) = 55
Oldies 2% 10 500(0.02) = 10
Pop 18% 75 500(0.18) = 90
Rock 29% 125 500(0.29) = 145
n = 500

Larson/Farber 4th ed 9
Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test

For the chi-square goodness-of-fit test to be used, the


following must be true.
1. The observed frequencies must be obtained by using
a random sample.
2. Each expected frequency must be greater than or
equal to 5.

Larson/Farber 4th ed 10
Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test

• If these conditions are satisfied, then the sampling


distribution for the goodness-of-fit test is approximated
by a chi-square distribution with k – 1 degrees of
freedom, where k is the number of categories.
• The test statistic for the chi-square goodness-of-fit test is
(O  E ) 2
2   The test is always
E a right-tailed test.
where O represents the observed frequency of each
category and E represents the expected frequency of each
category.

Larson/Farber 4th ed 11
Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test
In Words In Symbols
1. Identify the claim. State the State H0 and Ha.
null and alternative
hypotheses.
2. Specify the level of Identify .
significance.
3. Identify the degrees of d.f. = k – 1
freedom.
4. Determine the critical Use Table 6 in
value. Appendix B.
Larson/Farber 4th ed 12
Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test
In Words In Symbols
5. Determine the rejection region.
(O  E)2
6. Calculate the test statistic.  
2
E
7. Make a decision to reject or fail If χ2 is in the
to reject the null hypothesis. rejection region,
reject H0.
Otherwise, fail to
reject H0.
8. Interpret the decision in the
context of the original claim.

Larson/Farber 4th ed 13
Example: Performing a Goodness of Fit
Test
Use the music preference data to perform a chi-square
goodness-of-fit test to test whether the distributions are
different. Use α = 0.01.
Distribution of Survey results
music preferences (n = 500)
Classical 4% Classical 8
Country 36% Country 210
Gospel 11% Gospel 72
Oldies 2% Oldies 10
Pop 18% Pop 75
Rock 29% Rock 125
Larson/Farber 4th ed 14
Solution: Performing a Goodness of Fit
Test
• H0: music preference is 4% classical, 36% country,
11% gospel, 2% oldies, 18% pop, and 29% rock
• Ha: music preference differs from the claimed or
expected distribution
• α = 0.01 • Test Statistic:
• d.f. = 6 – 1 = 5
• Rejection Region • Decision:

0.01 • Conclusion:
χ2
0 15.086
Larson/Farber 4th ed 15
Solution: Performing a Goodness of Fit
Test
Type of Observed Expected
music frequency frequency
Classical 8 20
Country 210 180
Gospel 72 55
Oldies 10 10
Pop 75 90
( O  E ) 2
2   Rock 125 145
E
(8  20)2 (210  180) 2 (72  55) 2 (10  10) 2 (75  90) 2 (125  145) 2
     
20 180 55 10 90 145
 22.713

Larson/Farber 4th ed 16
Solution: Performing a Goodness of Fit
Test
• H0: music preference is 4% classical, 36% country,
11% gospel, 2% oldies, 18% pop, and 29% rock
• Ha: music preference differs from the claimed or
expected distribution
• α = 0.01 • Test Statistic:
• d.f. = 6 – 1 = 5 χ2 = 22.713
• Rejection Region • Decision: Reject H0
There is enough evidence to
0.01 conclude that the distribution
of music preferences differs
χ2
0 15.086
22.713
from the claimed distribution.
Larson/Farber 4th ed 17
Example: Performing a Goodness of Fit
Test
The manufacturer of M&M’s candies claims that the
number of different-colored candies in bags of dark
chocolate M&M’s is uniformly distributed. To test this
claim, you randomly select a bag that contains 500 dark
chocolate M&M’s. The results are shown in the table on
the next slide. Using α = 0.10, perform a chi-square
goodness-of-fit test to test the claimed or expected
distribution. What can you conclude? (Adapted from
Mars Incorporated)

Larson/Farber 4th ed 18
Example: Performing a Goodness of Fit
Test

Color Frequency Solution:


Brown 80 • The claim is that the
Yellow 95 distribution is uniform, so
Red 88 the expected frequencies of
Blue 83 the colors are equal.
Orange 76 • To find each expected
Green 78 frequency, divide the sample
n = 500 size by the number of colors.
• E = 500/6 ≈ 83.3

Larson/Farber 4th ed 19
Solution: Performing a Goodness of Fit
Test
• H0: Distribution of different-colored candies in bags
of dark chocolate M&Ms is uniform
• Ha: Distribution of different-colored candies in bags
of dark chocolate M&Ms is not uniform
• α = 0.10 • Test Statistic:
• d.f. = 6 – 1 = 5
• Rejection Region • Decision:

0.10 • Conclusion:
χ2
0 9.236
Larson/Farber 4th ed 20
Solution: Performing a Goodness of Fit
Test

Observed Expected
Color frequency frequency
Brown 80 83.3
Yellow 95 83.3
Red 88 83.3
Blue 83 83.3
(O  E ) 2 Orange 76 83.3
2   Green 78 83.3
E
(80  83.3)2 (95  83.3) 2 (88  83.3) 2 (83  83.3) 2 (76  83.3) 2 (78  83.3)2
     
83.3 83.3 83.3 83.3 83.3 83.3
 3.016

Larson/Farber 4th ed 21
Solution: Performing a Goodness of Fit
Test
• H0: Distribution of different-colored candies in bags
of dark chocolate M&Ms is uniform
• Ha: Distribution of different-colored candies in bags
of dark chocolate M&Ms is not uniform
• α = 0.01 • Test Statistic:
• d.f. = 6 – 1 = 5 χ2 = 3.016
• Rejection Region • Decision: Fail to Reject H0
There is not enough evidence
0.10 to dispute the claim that the
distribution is uniform.
χ2
0 9.236
3.016
Larson/Farber 4th ed 22
Section 10.2 Objectives

• Use a contingency table to find expected frequencies


• Use a chi-square distribution to test whether two
variables are independent

Larson/Farber 4th ed 23
Contingency Tables

r  c contingency table
• Shows the observed frequencies for two variables.
• The observed frequencies are arranged in r rows and
c columns.
• The intersection of a row and a column is called a
cell.

Larson/Farber 4th ed 24
Contingency Tables
Example:
• The contingency table shows the results of a random
sample of 550 company CEOs classified by age and
size of company.(Adapted from Grant Thornton LLP, The
Segal Company)
Age
Company 39 and 70 and
40 - 49 50 - 59 60 - 69
size under over
Small /
42 69 108 60 21
Midsize
Large 5 18 85 120 22
Larson/Farber 4th ed 25
Finding the Expected Frequency

• Assuming the two variables are independent, you can


use the contingency table to find the expected
frequency for each cell.
• The expected frequency for a cell Er,c in a
contingency table is
(Sum of row r)  (Sum of column c)
Expected frequency Er,c 
Sample size

Larson/Farber 4th ed 26
Example: Finding Expected Frequencies
Find the expected frequency for each cell in the
contingency table. Assume that the variables, age and
company size, are independent.
Age
Company 39 and 70 and
40 - 49 50 - 59 60 - 69 Total
size under over
Small /
42 69 108 60 21 300
Midsize
Large 5 18 85 120 22 250
Total 47 87 193 180 43 550

marginal totals
Larson/Farber 4th ed 27
Solution: Finding Expected Frequencies
(Sum of row r)  (Sum of column c)
Er,c 
Sample size
Age
Company 39 and 70 and
40 - 49 50 - 59 60 - 69 Total
size under over
Small /
42 69 108 60 21 300
Midsize
Large 5 18 85 120 22 250
Total 47 87 193 180 43 550
300  47
E1,1   25.64
550
Larson/Farber 4th ed 28
Solution: Finding Expected Frequencies
Age
39 and 70 and
40 - 49 50 - 59 60 - 69 Total
Company size under over
Small /
42 69 108 60 21 300
Midsize
Large 5 18 85 120 22 250
Total 47 87 193 180 43 550

300  87 300  193


E1,2   47.45 E1,3   105.27
550 550
300  180 300  43
E1,4   98.18 E1,5   23.45
550 550

Larson/Farber 4th ed 29
Solution: Finding Expected Frequencies
Age
39 and 70 and
40 - 49 50 - 59 60 - 69 Total
Company size under over
Small /
42 69 108 60 21 300
Midsize
Large 5 18 85 120 22 250
Total 47 87 193 180 43 550

250  47 250  87 250  193


E2,1   21.36 E2,2   39.55 E2,3   87.73
550 550 550

250  180 250  43


E2,4   81.82 E2,5   19.55
550 550

Larson/Farber 4th ed 30
Chi-Square Independence Test

Chi-square independence test


• Used to test the independence of two variables.
• Can determine whether the occurrence of one variable
affects the probability of the occurrence of the other
variable.

Larson/Farber 4th ed 31
Chi-Square Independence Test

For the chi-square independence test to be used, the


following must be true.
1. The observed frequencies must be obtained by using
a random sample.
2. Each expected frequency must be greater than or
equal to 5.

Larson/Farber 4th ed 32
Chi-Square Independence Test
• If these conditions are satisfied, then the sampling
distribution for the chi-square independence test is
approximated by a chi-square distribution with
(r – 1)(c – 1) degrees of freedom, where r and c are the
number of rows and columns, respectively, of a
contingency table.
• The test statistic for the chi-square independence test is
(O  E ) 2
The test is always a
2   right-tailed test.
E
where O represents the observed frequencies and E
represents the expected frequencies.
Larson/Farber 4th ed 33
Chi-Square Independence Test
In Words In Symbols
1. Identify the claim. State the State H0 and Ha.
null and alternative
hypotheses.
2. Specify the level of Identify .
significance.
3. Identify the degrees of d.f. = (r – 1)(c – 1)
freedom.
4. Determine the critical value. Use Table 6 in
Appendix B.
Larson/Farber 4th ed 34
Chi-Square Independence Test
In Words In Symbols
5. Determine the rejection
region.
(O  E)2
6. Calculate the test statistic.  
2
E
7. Make a decision to reject or If χ2 is in the
fail to reject the null rejection region,
hypothesis. reject H0.
Otherwise, fail to
reject H0.
8. Interpret the decision in the
context of the original claim.
Larson/Farber 4th ed 35
Example: Performing a χ2 Independence
Test
Using the age/company size contingency table, can you
conclude that the CEOs ages are related to company
size? Use α = 0.01. Expected frequencies are shown in
parentheses.
Age
39 and 70 and
40 - 49 50 - 59 60 - 69 Total
Company size under over
Small / 42 69 108 60 21 300
Midsize (25.64) (47.45) (105.27) (98.18) (23.45)
5 18 85 120 22 250
Large
(21.36) (39.55) (87.73) (81.82) (19.55)
Total 47 87 193 180 43 550

Larson/Farber 4th ed 36
Solution: Performing a Goodness of Fit
Test
• H0: CEOs’ ages are independent of company size
• Ha: CEOs’ ages are dependent on company size
• α = 0.01
• d.f. = (2 – 1)(5 – 1) = 4 • Test Statistic:
• Rejection Region
• Decision:
0.01
χ2
0 13.277

Larson/Farber 4th ed 37
Solution: Performing a Goodness of Fit
Test

(O  E ) 2
2  
E
(42  25.64)2 (69  47.45)2 (108  105.27)2 (60  98.18)2 (21  23.45)2
    
25.64 47.45 105.27 98.18 23.45
(5  21.36)2 (18  39.55)2 (85  87.73)2 (120  81.82)2 (22  19.55)2
    
21.36 39.55 87.73 81.82 19.55
 77.9

Larson/Farber 4th ed 38
Solution: Performing a Goodness of Fit
Test
• H0: CEOs’ ages are independent of company size
• Ha: CEOs’ ages are dependent on company size
• α = 0.01
• d.f. = (2 – 1)(5 – 1) = 4 • Test Statistic:
• Rejection Region χ2 = 77.9
• Decision: Reject H0
0.01
There is enough evidence to
conclude CEOs’ ages are
χ2 dependent on company size.
0 13.277
77.9

Larson/Farber 4th ed 39
Section 10.2 Summary

• Used a contingency table to find expected frequencies


• Used a chi-square distribution to test whether two
variables are independent

Larson/Farber 4th ed 40
Section 10.3

Comparing Two Variances

Larson/Farber 4th ed 41
F-Distribution

• Let s12 and s22 represent the sample variances of two


different populations.
• If both populations are normal and the population
variances σ 12 and σ 22 are equal, then the sampling
distribution of
s12
F 2
s2
is called an F-distribution.

Larson/Farber 4th ed 42
Properties of the F-Distribution

1. The F-distribution is a family of curves each of


which is determined by two types of degrees of
freedom:
 The degrees of freedom corresponding to the
variance in the numerator, denoted d.f.N
 The degrees of freedom corresponding to the
variance in the denominator, denoted d.f.D
2. F-distributions are positively skewed.
3. The total area under each curve of an F-distribution
is equal to 1.
Larson/Farber 4th ed 43
Critical Values for the F-Distribution

1. Specify the level of significance .


2. Determine the degrees of freedom for the numerator,
d.f.N.
3. Determine the degrees of freedom for the denominator,
d.f.D.
4. Use Table 7 in Appendix B to find the critical value. If
the hypothesis test is
a. one-tailed, use the  F-table.
b. two-tailed, use the ½ F-table.

Larson/Farber 4th ed 44
Example: Finding Critical F-Values

Find the critical F-value for a right-tailed test when


α = 0.05, d.f.N = 6 and d.f.D = 29.
Solution:

The critical value is F0 = 2.43.


Larson/Farber 4th ed 45
Example: Finding Critical F-Values

Find the critical F-value for a two-tailed test when


α = 0.05, d.f.N = 4 and d.f.D = 8.

Solution:
• When performing a two-tailed hypothesis test using
the F-distribution, you need only to find the right-
tailed critical value.
• You must remember to use the ½α table.
1 1
  (0.05)  0.025
2 2

Larson/Farber 4th ed 46
Solution: Finding Critical F-Values

½α = 0.025, d.f.N = 4 and d.f.D = 8

The critical value is F0 = 5.05.

Larson/Farber 4th ed 47
Two-Sample F-Test for Variances

To use the two-sample F-test for comparing two


population variances, the following must be true.
1. The samples must be randomly selected.
2. The samples must be independent.
3. Each population must have a normal distribution.

Larson/Farber 4th ed 48
Two-Sample F-Test for Variances

• Test Statistic
s12
F 2
s2
where s12 and s22 represent the sample variances with
s12  s22.
• The degrees of freedom for the numerator is
d.f.N = n1 – 1 where n1 is the size of the sample
having variance s12.
• The degrees of freedom for the denominator is
d.f.D = n2 – 1, and n2 is the size of the sample having
variance s22.
Larson/Farber 4th ed 49
Two-Sample F-Test for Variances
In Words In Symbols
1. Identify the claim. State the State H0 and Ha.
null and alternative
hypotheses.
2. Specify the level of Identify .
significance.
3. Identify the degrees of d.f.N = n1 – 1
freedom. d.f.D = n2 – 1
4. Determine the critical value. Use Table 7 in
Appendix B.

Larson/Farber 4th ed 50
Two-Sample F-Test for Variances
In Words In Symbols
5. Determine the rejection
region.
s12
6. Calculate the test statistic. F 2
s2
7. Make a decision to reject or If F is in the
fail to reject the null rejection region,
hypothesis. reject H0.
8. Interpret the decision in the Otherwise, fail to
context of the original reject H0.
claim.

Larson/Farber 4th ed 51
Example: Performing a Two-Sample F-
Test
A restaurant manager is designing a system that is
intended to decrease the variance of the time customers
wait before their meals are served. Under the old
system, a random sample of 10 customers had a
variance of 400. Under the new system, a random
sample of 21 customers had a variance of 256. At
α = 0.10, is there enough evidence to convince the
manager to switch to the new system? Assume both
populations are normally distributed.

Larson/Farber 4th ed 52
Solution: Performing a Two-Sample F-
Test
Because 400 > 256, s12  400 and s22  256
• H0: σ12 ≤ σ22 • Test Statistic:
• Ha: σ12 > σ22 s12 400
F 2   1.56
• α = 0.10 s2 256
• d.f.N= 9 d.f.D= 20 • Decision: Fail to Reject H0
• Rejection Region: There is not enough evidence
to convince the manager to
switch to the new system.
0.10

0 1.561.96 F
Larson/Farber 4th ed 53
Example: Performing a Two-Sample F-
Test
You want to purchase stock in a company and are
deciding between two different stocks. Because a
stock’s risk can be associated with the standard
deviation of its daily closing prices, you randomly select
samples of the daily closing prices for each stock to
obtain the results. At α = 0.05, can you conclude that
one of the two stocks is a riskier investment? Assume
the stock closing prices are normally distributed.
Stock A Stock B
n2 = 30 n1 = 31
s2 = 3.5 s1 = 5.7
Larson/Farber 4th ed 54
Solution: Performing a Two-Sample F-
Test
Because 5.72 > 3.52, s12  5.72 and s22  3.52
• H0: σ12 = σ22 • Test Statistic:
• Ha: σ12 ≠ σ22 s12 5.72
F  2  2  2.65
• ½α = 0. 025 s2 3.5
• d.f.N= 30 d.f.D= 29 • Decision: Reject H0
• Rejection Region: There is enough evidence to
support the claim that one of
the two stocks is a riskier
0.025
investment.
0 2.092.65 F
Larson/Farber 4th ed 55
Section 10.3 Summary

• Interpreted the F-distribution and used an F-table to


find critical values
• Performed a two-sample F-test to compare two
variances

Larson/Farber 4th ed 56
Section 10.4

Analysis of Variance

Larson/Farber 4th ed 57
Section 10.4 Objectives

• Use one-way analysis of variance to test claims


involving three or more means
• Introduce two-way analysis of variance

Larson/Farber 4th ed 58
One-Way ANOVA

One-way analysis of variance


• A hypothesis-testing technique that is used to
compare means from three or more populations.
• Analysis of variance is usually abbreviated ANOVA.
• Hypotheses:
 H0: μ1 = μ2 = μ3 =…= μk (all population means are
equal)
 Ha: At least one of the means is different from the
others.

Larson/Farber 4th ed 59
One-Way ANOVA

In a one-way ANOVA test, the following must be true.


1. Each sample must be randomly selected from a
normal, or approximately normal, population.
2. The samples must be independent of each other.
3. Each population must have the same variance.

Larson/Farber 4th ed 60
One-Way ANOVA
Variance between samples
Test statistic 
Variance within samples
1. The variance between samples MSB measures the
differences related to the treatment given to each
sample and is sometimes called the mean square
between.
2. The variance within samples MSW measures the
differences related to entries within the same sample.
This variance, sometimes called the mean square
within, is usually due to sampling error.

Larson/Farber 4th ed 61
One-Way Analysis of Variance Test

• If the conditions for a one-way analysis of variance


are satisfied, then the sampling distribution for the
test is approximated by the F-distribution.
• The test statistic is
MS B
F
MSW
• The degrees of freedom for the F-test are
d.f.N = k – 1 and d.f.D = N – k
where k is the number of samples and N is the
sum of the sample sizes.
Larson/Farber 4th ed 62
Test Statistic for a One-Way ANOVA
In Words In Symbols
1. Find the mean and  x 2 (x  x )2
x s 
variance of each sample. n n 1
2. Find the mean of all
x
entries in all samples (the x
N
grand mean).
3. Find the sum of squares SS B   ni(xi  x )2
between the samples.
4. Find the sum of squares SSW  (ni  1)si2
within the samples.

Larson/Farber 4th ed 63
Test Statistic for a One-Way ANOVA
In Words In Symbols
5. Find the variance between the SS B SS B
MS B  
samples. k  1 d.f.N

6. Find the variance within the SSW SS


MSW   W
samples N  k d.f.D

MS B
7. Find the test statistic. F
MSW

Larson/Farber 4th ed 64
Performing a One-Way ANOVA Test
In Words In Symbols
1. Identify the claim. State the State H0 and Ha.
null and alternative
hypotheses.
2. Specify the level of Identify .
significance.
3. Identify the degrees of d.f.N = k – 1
freedom. d.f.D = N – k
4. Determine the critical Use Table 7 in
value. Appendix B.

Larson/Farber 4th ed 65
Performing a One-Way ANOVA Test
In Words In Symbols
5. Determine the rejection
region.
MS B
6. Calculate the test statistic. F
MSW

7. Make a decision to reject or If F is in the


fail to reject the null rejection region,
hypothesis. reject H0.
Otherwise, fail to
8. Interpret the decision in the reject H0.
context of the original claim.
Larson/Farber 4th ed 66
ANOVA Summary Table
• A table is a convenient way to summarize the results in
a one-way ANOVA test.

Sum of Degrees of Mean


Variation F
squares freedom squares

SS B MS B
Between SSB d.f.N MS B 
d . f .N MSW

SSW
Within SSW d.f.D MSW 
d. f .D

Larson/Farber 4th ed 67
Example: Performing a One-Way ANOVA
A medical researcher wants to determine whether there
is a difference in the mean length of time it takes three
types of pain relievers to provide relief from headache
pain. Several headache sufferers are randomly selected
and given one of the three medications. Each headache
sufferer records the time (in minutes) it takes the
medication to begin working. The results are shown on
the next slide. At α = 0.01, can you conclude that the
mean times are different? Assume that each population
of relief times is normally distributed and that the
population variances are equal.
Larson/Farber 4th ed 68
Example: Performing a One-Way ANOVA
Medication 1 Medication 2 Medication 3
12 16 14
15 14 17
17 21 20
12 15 15
19
56 85 66
x1   14 x2   17 x3   16.5
4 5 4
s12  6 s22  8.5 s32  7
Solution:
k = 3 (3 samples)
N = n1 + n2 + n3 = 4 + 5 + 4 = 13 (sum of sample sizes)
Larson/Farber 4th ed 69
Solution: Performing a One-Way ANOVA
• H0: μ1 = μ2 = μ3 • Test Statistic:
• Ha: At least one mean
is different
• α = 0. 01 • Decision:
• d.f.N= 3 – 1 = 2
• d.f.D= 13 – 3 = 10
• Rejection Region:

0.01

0 7.56 F
Larson/Farber 4th ed 70
Solution: Performing a One-Way ANOVA

To find the test statistic, the following must be calculated.

 x 56  85  66
x   15.92
N 13

SS B  ni(xi  x ) 2
MS B  
d.f.N k 1
4(14  15.92)2  5(17  15.92)2  4(16.5  15.92)2

3 1
21.92
  10.96
2

Larson/Farber 4th ed 71
Solution: Performing a One-Way ANOVA

To find the test statistic, the following must be calculated.


SSW (ni  1)si2
MSW  
d.f.D N k
(4  1)(6)  (5  1)(8.5)  (4  1)(7)

13  3
73
  7.3
10

MS B 10.96
F   1.50
MSW 7.3

Larson/Farber 4th ed 72
Solution: Performing a One-Way ANOVA
• H0: μ1 = μ2 = μ3 • Test Statistic:
• Ha: At least one mean MS B
F  1.50
is different MSW
• α = 0. 01 • Decision: Fail to Reject H0
• d.f.N= 3 – 1 = 2 There is not enough evidence
at the 1% level of significance
• d.f.D= 13 – 3 = 10
to conclude that there is a
• Rejection Region: difference in the mean length
of time it takes the three pain
0.01 relievers to provide relief
from headache pain.
0 7.56 F
1.50
Larson/Farber 4th ed 73
Example: Using the TI-83/84 to Perform a
One-Way ANOVA
Three airline companies offer flights between Corydon
and Lincolnville. Several randomly selected flight times
(in minutes) between the towns for each airline are
shown on the next slide. Assume that the populations of
flight times are normally distributed, the samples are
independent, and the population variances are equal. At
α = 0.01, can you conclude that there is a difference in
the means of the flight times? Use a TI-83/84.

Larson/Farber 4th ed 74
Example: Using the TI-83/84 to Perform a
One-Way ANOVA
Airline 1 Airline 2 Airline 3
122 119 120
135 133 158
126 143 155
131 149 126
125 114 147
116 124 164
120 126 134
108 131 151
142 140 131
113 136 141
Larson/Farber 4th ed 75
Solution: Using the TI-83/84 to Perform a
One-Way ANOVA
• H0: μ1 = μ2 = μ3
• Ha: At least one mean is different
• Store data into lists L1, L2, and L3

• Decision: P-value < α Reject H0


There is enough evidence to support the claim. You can
conclude that there is a difference in the means of the flight
times.

Larson/Farber 4th ed 76
Two-Way ANOVA

Two-way analysis of variance


• A hypothesis-testing technique that is used to test the
effect of two independent variables, or factors, on
one dependent variable.

Larson/Farber 4th ed 77
Two-Way ANOVA

Example:
• Suppose a medical researcher wants to test the effect
of gender and type of medication on the mean length
of time it takes pain relievers to provide relief.
Gender
Male Female
medication

I Males taking type I Females taking type I


Type of

II Males taking type II Females taking type II


III Males taking type III Females taking type III

Larson/Farber 4th ed 78
Two-Way ANOVA Hypotheses

Main effect
• The effect of one independent variable on the
dependent variable.
Interaction effect
• The effect of both independent variables on the
dependent variable.

Larson/Farber 4th ed 79
Two-Way ANOVA Hypotheses

Hypotheses for main effects:


• H0: Gender has no effect on the mean length of time it
takes a pain reliever to provide relief.
• Ha: Gender has an effect on the mean length of time it
takes a pain reliever to provide relief.

• H0: Type of medication has no effect on the mean length of


time it takes a pain reliever to provide relief.
• Ha: Type of medication has an effect on the mean length of
time it takes a pain reliever to provide relief.

Larson/Farber 4th ed 80
Two-Way ANOVA Hypotheses

Hypotheses for interaction effects:


• H0: There is no interaction effect between gender and type
of medication on the mean length of time it takes a
pain reliever to provide relief.
• Ha: There is an interaction effect between gender and type
of medication on the mean length of time it takes a
pain reliever to provide relief.

Larson/Farber 4th ed 81
Two-Way ANOVA

• A two-way ANOVA test calculates an F-test statistic for


each hypothesis.
• It is possible to reject none, one, two, or all of the null
hypotheses.
• Can use a technology tool such as MINITAB to perform a
two-way ANOVA test.

Larson/Farber 4th ed 82
Section 10.4 Summary

• Used one-way analysis of variance to test claims


involving three or more means
• Introduced two-way analysis of variance

Larson/Farber 4th ed 83

You might also like