Chapter Five Decision Making and Relevant Information
This document discusses various types of business decisions that managers must make, including how to identify relevant costs and revenues. It covers decisions around make-or-buy, special orders, adding/dropping product lines, and allocating constrained resources. Managers need to consider both quantitative and qualitative factors, only using costs and revenues that differ among alternatives to identify the optimal decision.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
27 views32 pages
Chapter Five Decision Making and Relevant Information
This document discusses various types of business decisions that managers must make, including how to identify relevant costs and revenues. It covers decisions around make-or-buy, special orders, adding/dropping product lines, and allocating constrained resources. Managers need to consider both quantitative and qualitative factors, only using costs and revenues that differ among alternatives to identify the optimal decision.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 32
CHAPTER FIVE
DECISION MAKING AND
RELEVANT INFORMATION 5.1.INTRODUCTION Cont…. • Managers within an organization make many decisions regarding the economic activity of a company. • Decisions like: • To make or buy component parts • Price of product • Channels of distribution • Accepting special orders at special price • Every decision involves choosing among at least two alternatives. • While making a decision, managers need to see the cost and benefit of each alternative. • Managers usually follow a decision model for choosing among different courses of actions. • A decision model is a formal method of making a choice that often involves both quantitative and qualitative analyses. • It uses the five-step decision-making process to make decisions which are identify the problem and uncertainties; obtain information; make predictions about the future; make decisions by choosing among alternatives; and implement the decision, evaluate performance, and learn. • In business organizations, to make a decision, managers need to understand what relevant costs and revenues are. • Relevant costs are expected future costs, and relevant revenues are expected future revenues that differ among the alternative courses of action being considered. • Revenues and costs that are not relevant are said to be irrelevant. 5.2.COST CONCEPTS FOR DECISION MAKING • Understanding the following costs is important for clearly seeing relevant costs. • Differential costs: a difference in cost between any two alternatives. • Is a broad term which incorporates incremental and decrement costs. • Incremental cost: could also refer to an increase in cost from one alternative to another. • Avoidable cost: a cost that can be eliminated in whole or in part by choosing one alternative over another. • Opportunity cost: the potential benefit that is given up when one alternative is selected over another. • Sunk cost: is a cost that has already been incurred and that cannot be changed by decision made now or in the future. • The following two criteria’s are important to identify relevant costs and benefits • It has to occur in the future • It must differ among • For example: Suppose that a company is about to make a decision to purchase office supplies. • The required supplies can be purchased, from supplier A, for $5,000 and from Supplier B, for $4,800. However, Supplier B is in another state and, if the purchase is made from supplier B, the company must pay freight in cost amounted $300. • Also, the company has $500 of supplies on hand. • One approach is to include all costs including irrelevant costs: • In the above analysis, the cost of supplies to be purchased is relevant because there is a difference of $200 in favor of buying from supplier B. • The cost of supplies on hand is irrelevant for two reasons: (1) the cost is the same and (2) It is a past cost already made. • Supplies on hand are not a future cost. Regardless from which supplier the supplies are purchased, the same amount of past /or future supplies cost will appear as irrelevance. • Therefore, by considering only the relevant costs, the company will decide to purchase from supplier A because its costs only $5000 which is less than cost of buying from supplier B which is $5100. • The make or buy decision • This decision is encountered when whether a company should make a component part or buy it from a supplier which is called make or buy decision for products and insourcing VS outsourcing for service giving companies. • The make or the outsourcing decision is purchasing goods and services from outside vendors rather than producing the same goods or providing the same services within the organization, which is making or in sourcing. • When a certain company is providing product or services, it needs to pass through many steps which are called value chain. • Some of the steps in the value chain might be performed by the company and some might be given to other companies. • When a company is involved in more than one activity in the entire value chain, it is vertically integrated. • Vertical integration could be upward integration or downward integration. • Upward integration is when a company is producing its own raw material to be used in the production process were as downward integration is when a company is involved in the next process in the value chain. • A decision to carry out one of the activities in the value chain internally rather than to buy externally from a supplier is called the make or buys decision. • This decision involves whether to buy a particular part or make it internally. • This is also applicable for service giving companies and the decision is whether to outsource a given task or not. • Advantage of vertical integration _ deciding to make • Companies will be less dependent on suppliers. • They can control quality of the inputs • Companies could get additional profit from parts it is making • Advantages of non-integration _deciding to buy from outside supplier • Outside suppliers have economics of sale therefore the parts will have lower cost than if they were produced internally. • While making this decision, managers need to concentrate on relevant costs. • Those are costs which can be eliminated by choosing to make rather than buy or those costs that can be eliminated by choosing to buy rather than make. • If there was an opportunity cost which could be incurred, it needs to be considered while making decision. • Special orders • A special order: is a onetime order that is not considered part of the company’s normal ongoing business. • In this case managers should decide whether to accept these special orders and how much price to charge. • Basic decision criterion: • Determine if you have the "capacity" to accept the special order. • If the special order has to be produced, then all variable manufacturing costs will be relevant. (If the units have already been produced, the production costs are sunk costs, therefore irrelevant.) • Determine if all or part of the normal selling costs might be avoided on the special order. If so, then the avoidable selling costs are irrelevant to your decision to accept the special order. • Other considerations: • If the special order is "ongoing" then fixed costs may need to be considered. There are also strategic implications. What might they be? • If you expand capacity to accept the special order, additional fixed production costs will have to be added to the total production costs. • Are your regular customers affected by accepting the special order? If you are unable to service your regular customers because of accepting the special order, then the lost revenue from regular customers becomes an opportunity cost. • This opportunity cost must be added in to the costs of producing the special order. • In general, special order is profitable if incremental revenue from special order exceeds the incremental cost of the order. 3. Adding and dropping product line and other segments • Decision relating to whether product lines or other segments of a company should be dropped and new ones added are among the most difficult that a manager has to make. • In such decisions, many qualitative and quantitative factors mush be considered. • The question of dropping a product line or segment is raised when one or more of the product or segment is making loss. • If the products or segments are making profit, then need to bather about dropping the product or segments. • Likewise, a company wants to introduce a new product line or segment if it believes it will increase the profitability of the company. • In this situation the decision criteria is that of cost and benefit analysis. • By adding a product line if the firms overall profitability are increased, then the proposal for adding the product line is acceptable. • Basic rule of thumb: compare the contribution margin that will be lost against the costs that can be avoided if the product line or segment is dropped. • If the fixed cost that will be avoided is greater than the contribution margin lost (i.e. avoidable fixed cost > contribution margin lost), product line or segment should be dropped. • If the fixed cost that will be avoided is less than the contribution margin lost (i.e. avoidable fixed cost < contribution margin lost), then the product line or segment should be kept. • A segment should be added only if the increase in total contribution margin is greater than the increase in fixed costs. • A new product line adding losses to the firm should be dropped. • Common fixed costs are fixed costs that support the operation of more than one segment, but are not traceable in whole or in part to any one segment. • Thus they continue even when the product line is dropped. • Remember: allocated fixed costs cannot be avoided, unless the fixed asset giving rise to the allocation is sold or disposed off. • If the fixed costs that can be avoided are less than the contribution lost, then do not drop the product line. Utilization of a constrained resource (product mix decision with constrained capacity) • When a limited resource restricts a company’s ability to satisfy demand, the company has a constraint or scarcity. • Constrained resource is the resource that restricts or limits the production or sales of a product or service. • In this case, managers have to decide how constrained resources are going to be used . • The constrained resource could be machine-hour, labor-hour, office space, warehouse space, laborers, material etc… • A company is faced with such kind of decision 1. If it is producing multiple products, 2. If it has constrained resource. • Such kind of decision does not affect fixed costs. • Therefore, managers should decide to select the course of action that will maximize the company’s total contribution margin. • Managers, to decide between products that will make the best use of the constrained resources, should favor the product that provides the highest contribution martin per unit of the constrained resource • CM/unit of constrained resource = product CM/unit Amount of the constrained resource required for making a unit of that product 5.Joint product – sell or process further decision • Two or more products that are produced from a common input are known as joint products. • Important terminologies • Joint cost: cost incurred up to the split-off point before the joint product become separate and independent. • Split-off point: point in manufacturing process at which the joint products can be recognized as separate products • Intermediate product: a product which have not reached the finished product stage. • Separate cost: a cost incurred after the split off point. • Remember the concept of relevant revenues and costs. • Relevant revenues:-expected future revenues that differ among alternative course of action. • Relevant costs: - expected future costs that differ among alternative course of action. • We apply these concepts to decisions on whether a joint product or main product should be sold at the split-off point or processed further. • Incremental revenues are additional revenues generated for an activity. • Incremental costs are additional costs incurred for an activity. • To process further, the incremental (differential) revenue from further processing less the incremental processing costs must be positive. The differential revenue is the ultimate sales price less the sales price at the split-off point. • If incremental revenue is greater than incremental cost, then process further; otherwise, sell at the split-off point. • The decision to incur additional costs for further processing should be based on the incremental operating income attainable beyond the split off point • Incremental revenues are greater than incremental costs for products A, B and C resulting in an increase in operating income, so the manager decides to process further. • But for product D, Incremental revenue is less than incremental costs resulting in a decrease in operating income, so the manager decides to sell product D at the split off point. • The $100,000 joint costs incurred before the split off point are irrelevant in deciding whether to process further. Thank you!!!