100% found this document useful (2 votes)
466 views35 pages

Environmental System: Goals &values Subsystem

MANAGERIAL SUBSYSTEM GOAL SETTING PLANNING ASSEMBLING RESOURCE ORGANISING IMPLEMENTATION

Uploaded by

ali
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (2 votes)
466 views35 pages

Environmental System: Goals &values Subsystem

MANAGERIAL SUBSYSTEM GOAL SETTING PLANNING ASSEMBLING RESOURCE ORGANISING IMPLEMENTATION

Uploaded by

ali
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 35

ORGANISATIONAL SYSTEM

ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEM
GOALS &VALUES TECHNICAL
SUBSYSTEM SUBSYSTEM

• CULTURE • TASK REQUIREMENT


• PHILOSPHY • KNOWLEDGE
• OVERALL GOALS • TECHNIQUES
MANAGERIAL SUBSYSTEM • LAYOUT OF
• INDIVIDUAL GOALS
FACILITIES
.
• GOAL SETTING • MACHY EQUIPMENT
• PLANNING • INFORMATION
• ASSEMBLING
PSYCHOSOCIAL • RESOURCE STRUCTURAL
SUBSYSTEM • ORGANISING SUBSYSTEM
• IMPLEMENTATION • TASKS
• HR • WORK FLOWS
• ATTITUDES • WORK GROUPS
• MOTIVATION • AUTHORITY &1`ORG
• GP DYNAMICS CHARTS
• LEADERSHIP • INFORMATION FLOWS
• INFLUENCE SYSTEMS
• PROCEDURES & RULES
1
PSYCHOSOCIAL SUBSYSTEM

• INDIVIDUAL AND THEIR RELATIONSHIPS ARE THE


PRIMARY ELEMENTS OF THIS SUBSYSTEM.

• PSYCHOSOCIAL SYSTEMS CAN BE UNDERSTOOD


INTERMS OF MOTIVATION AND BAHAVIOUR
OCCURRING IN AN ENVIRONMENT WHICH
INCLUDES

2
PSYCHOSOCIAL SUBSYSTEM
GROUP DYNAMICS

• SMALL GPS PROVIDE A MEDIATING MECHANISM


BETWEEN INDLS AND ORGS.
• ACTIVITIES, INTER ACTION AND SENTIMENTS PLAY AN
IMP PART IN ORG BEHAVIOUR.
• INDLS HIGH LEVEL NEEDS (SOCIAL ESTEEM AND SELF
ACTUALISATION) ARE SATISFIEDVIA HIS POSITION IN A
SMALL GP OR A LARGE ORG.
• COMMUNICATION IS THE BASIS OF GROUP DYNAMICS.

3
PSYCHOSOCIAL SUBSYSTEM
INFLUENCE SYSTEMS

• INCLUDES VIRTUALLY ANY INTERPERSONAL


TRANSACTION WHICH HAS PSYCHOLOGICAL OR
BEHAVIORAL EFFECTS.

• EXERTED IN MANY DIRECTIONS - UP AND DOWN THE


HIERARCHY AND LATERALLY IN PEER GROUP
RELATIONSHIPS.

• CHANGES IN BEHAVIOR OF A PERS/GROUP DUE TO


ANTICIPATION OF THE RESPONSE OF OTHERS –
RELATIONSHIPS AMONG PEOPLE.

• WAYS TO INFLUENCE BEHAVIOUR - EMULATION


,SUGGESTION PERSUASION, COERCION.
4
PSYCHOSOCIAL SUBSYSTEM
LEADERSHIP
• ABILITY TO PERSUADE TO SEEK DEFINED OBJECTIVES
ENTHUSIASTICALLY .

• BINDS A GROUP TOGETHER AND MOTIVATES IT TOWARDS GOALS.

• TAPPING OF LATENT HUMAN CAPABILITY IN ACHIEVING GROUP


OBJECTIVES.

5
PSYCHOSOCIAL SUBSYSTEM

HR ATTITUDES.

• NORMS, VALUES AND CULTURE OF THE ORG MAKE UP


THIS SUB SYSTEM.

• INCLUDES SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS AND COMMON


NETWORK.

6
• HOW PEOPLE COMMUNICATE AND ACTUALLY
DO THE WORK, STRONGLY INFLUENCES THE
ORG THROUGH THE PSYCHOSOCIAL
SUBSYSTEM.

• TAVISTOCK EXPERIMENTS – PROBLEM WAS


WORKERS HAD PROBLEM COMMUNICATING
WITH MANAGEMENT.

• WHEN A PERSON ENTERS OR LEAVES THE


ORG THE PSYCHOSOCIAL SYSTEM CHANGES.

7
FACTORS AFFECTING HUMAN
BEHAVIOUR
CURRENT
REWARD SYSTEM PERSONAL PAST EXPERIENCE
ECONOMIC,INCENTIVES SITUATION
PERCEPTION

MANAGERIAL SYSTEM PERSONAL VALUE SYSTEM


(PLG & CONT DECISIONS (ATTITUDES ,PROPENSITIES TO ACT)
LEADERSHIP)
COGNITION MOTIVATION

GROUP RELATIONDHIPS
WORK SITUATION
(TASK &TECHNOLOGY)
CULTURE (NORMS )
8
MANAGERIAL SUBSYSTEM

• MGMT – PROCESS OF INTEGRATING HUMAN AND


MATERIAL RESOURCES INTO A TOTAL SYSTEM FOR
OBJECTIVE ACCOMPLISHMENT.

• LINKS OTHER PRIMARY SUBSYSTEMS OF ORGS.

• INTEGRATES ACTIVITIES TOWARDS ACHIEVEMENT


OF EXPLICIT/IMPLICIT GOALS.

9
• PLG & CONT ARE THE PRIMARY ACTIVITIES
INVOLVED IN INTEGRATING PURPOSEFUL ORG
ACTIVITY.

• PLG & CONTROL HAVE TO CONSIDERTHE


IMPACT OF EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENTAL
SYSTEM AND THE INTERNAL TECHNICAL AND
PSYCHOSOCIAL SYSTEM.

• BEHAVIOUR IS GOAL ORIENTED AND HUMAN


BEINGS MOVE TOWARDS GOALS BY CHOOSING
AN ALTERNATIVE.

• BEHAVIOUR IS A RESULT OF SEQUENCE OF DM.

10
GOALS AND VALUE SUBSYSTEM

• BASIC VALUES WHICH UNDERLIE GOAL SETTING AND


DM ARE A FUNDAMENTAL PART OF THE ORG SYSTEM.
• NORMATIVE VIEWS OF WHAT IS GOOD AND DESIRABLE.
• PROVIDE STANDARDS WHICH INFLUENCES CHOICE OF
ACTIONS.
• SOCIAL VALUES REFLECT A SYSTEM.
• CULTURAL VALUES PROVIDE COHESIVENESS

11
• FIVE LEVELS.
• INDIVIDUAL VALUES.
• GROUP VALUES – AFFECT INDL BEHAVIOUR
AND ACTIONS OF ORG.
• ORGANIZATIONAL VALUES.
• VALUES OF CONSTITUENTS – CUSTOMERS,
COMPETITORS OF ENVIRONMENT AND GOVT
AGENCIES.
• CULTURAL VALUES – VALUES OF THE TOTAL
SOCIETY.

12
GOALS AND VALUE SUBSYSTEM

• THREE PRIMARY PERSPECTIVES.


• ENVIRONMENTAL LEVEL – THE SOCIAL GOALS
IMPOSED ON THE ORG.
• ORGANISATIONAL LEVEL – SYSTEM GOALS.
• INDIVIDUAL LEVEL – PARTICIPANTS GOALS.

13
• GOALS - INFLUENCE THE INTERACTIONS WITH
ENVIRONMENTAL SUPRASYSTEM AND THE
OTHER SYSTEMS.
• FOCUS THE ATTENTION OF PARTICIPANTS
UPON ACTIONS WHICH ARE
ORGANIZATIONALLY RELEVANT.
• HELP DETERMINE THE TECHNOLOGY REQD.
• SET BASIS FOR SPECIALISATION OF EFFORT,
AUTHORITY PATTERNS , COMMUNICATION AND
DECISION NETWORKS AND OTHER
STRUCTURAL RELATIONSHIPS.

14
GOALS AND VALUE SUBSYSTEM

• INFLUENCES ON GOALS
• PERSONALITY OF TOP EXECUTIVES.
• HISTORY OF THE ORG.
• COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT.
• NORMS ON VALUES WITH WHICH THE ORG DEALS.
• STRUCTURE.
• CULTURAL SAFETY

15
• RESPONDING TO ENVIRONMENT LEADS TO A
CONTINUOUS NEED TO ELABORATE THE GOAL
SET OF THE ORG AND IS INFLUENCED BY
INTERACTION –COMPETITION , BARGAINING,
CO-OPTATION AND COALITION.
• SYSTEM GOALS
• SELF PERPETUATION , STABILITY OF OP, HIGH
RATE OF RETURN, GROWTH , SATISFACTION OF
PARTICIPANTS , TECH LEADERSHIP AND
INNOVATION.

16
AUTONOMOUS WORKGROUPS

• SOCIO TECH THEORY.


• WORKERS ARE LIKELY TO BE PRODUCTIVE AND
SATISFIED WHEN THEIR SOCIAL NEEDS ARE MET.
• TAVISTOCK RESEARCHES – CONCEPT OF
AUTONOMOUS WORK GROUPS.
• WORKERS WORK AS A TEAM TO COMPLETE AN
ENTIRE TASK VIS A VIS WORKERS PERFORMING A
PARTICULAR CHORE ALONG AN ASSY LIVE.

17
• TWO APPROACHES.
• TEAM BUILDING
• MATRIX ORG – COMPROMISE BETWEEN
STAFF AND COMPLETE
• AUTHORITY.
- VERTICAL FLOW OF AUTHORITY FROM
VARIOUS FM MANAGERS.
- HORIZONTAL FLOW OF PROJECT AUTH.

18
AUTONOMOUS WORKGROUPS

• CHANGES IN EACH SYSTEM AFFECTS THE OTHER


SYSTEMS FOR eg
THE PROBLEM OF RETAINING WORKERS.

MGMT SUBSYSTEM – MGMT OF WORKERS.

• TECHNICAL SUB SYSTEM - AVAILABILITYOF TOOLS


AND RESOURCES.

• PSYCHO SOCIAL SUB SYSTEM --- INTER PERSONNEL


RELATIONSHIPS.

19
UNCERTAINITY

• BURNS AND STALKER SUGGESTED TWO


FACTORS DETERMINANT OF ORG STRUCTURE
AND PERFORMANCE - RATE OF CHANGE AND
THE LEVEL OF UNCERTAINITY IN THE
ENVIRONMENT.TWO TYPES OF SYSTEMS
RECOMMENDED.

20
LAWRENCE AND LORSCH

• SPECIALISED SYSTEM DEVELOP IN RESPONSE TO


DIFFERENT ASPECTS OF THE ORGANISATION
ENVIRONMENT.
• PRODUCTION DEPATRMENTS WHICH HAD STABLE
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS TEND TO BE MORE
BUREACRATIC THAN RESEARCH DEPARTMENT.
• HIGH LEVEL OF DIFFERENTIATION REQUIRED BY THE
ENVIRONMENT LED TO THE PROBLEM OF
INTEGRATING THE DEPARTMENT.
• THIS PROBLEM SOLVED BY SOME FIRMS EMPLOYING
A GROUP OF MANAGERS TO COORDINATE THE
DIFFERENT DEPARTMENTS.

21
AFFECT OF SIZE

• RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SIZE AND LEVEL OF


BUREACRATISATION
• ORG SIZE AND JOB SATISFACTION STUDY BY
REVANS AND PORTER--- LARGER THE ORG
LOWER THE JOB SATISFACTION LEVEL ,HIGH
LEVEL OF ABSENTEEISM AND LABOUR
TURNOVER.

22
• ORG SIZE AND UNIONISATION
• BAIN SUGGESTS A STRONG POSITIVE
CORRELATION BETWEEN ORG SIZE AND WHITE
COLLAR UNIONISATION.

• ORG SIZE AND STRIKE PRONENESS

• RESEARCH BY DOE AND PRAIS SUGGEST


LARGER THE FACTORY GREATER THE
FREQUENCY OF STRIKES.

23
Contingency Theory as a Model of Change
• Systems thinking approach adopted by Lawrence
and Lorsch
• Studied the characteristics of organizations and their
environment.

• Believed that determining the best structure and


leadership for an organization is contingent on the
relation of the organization to its environment.

• The systems that constitute the organizations are


affected by “boundaries” and by a process called
“differentiation & integration”.

24
Boundaries:
• The boundary between an open system and its
environment is permeable; similar to cells in human body.
• Sales people going out in the market to sell.
• Resource mobilization like physical goods and
human resource from environment.
• The problems in an organization first becomes visible at
the boundaries.
• Drop in sales and complaints from customer – a
sign of organizations unresponsiveness towards
customers needs
• Organizations must be attuned and responsive to
environmental changes that occur at the boundary.
25
Contingency Theory as a Model of
Change ..Contd..
Integration:

• Specialized groups / units for tasks

• Independent style of interaction with the organization

• Different impact of their behavior on organization

• Need for coordination between units to achieve


organizations overall goals

26
• The effective coordination between units is called
Integration
• Need for appropriate structure – such as
bureaucratic or matrix
• Need for appropriate leadership

Differentiation:
The organizational units vary on following four
dimensions:
• Formality of structure
• Goal Orientation
• Time Orientation
• Interpersonal Orientation
27
Formal and Informal Systems

• Deals with:
• The formal policies and procedures of the organization.
• The informal ways in which organizational members work
together.

• Two theories have been put forward by:


• Marvin Weisbord’s
• The Six – box model – Formal Systems
• The organizational fit – Formal and Informal
Interactions
• Nadler & Tushman’s
• Congruence Model - Formal and Informal Interactions

28
The 6 Box Model
Purposes:
What business are we in?
Agreement on goals in
missions
Relationships: Structure:
How do we manage conflict How do we assign the
among people with work and how it gets
technologies? How do workers done?
get along

Leadership:
Does some one keep the
boxes in balance?

Helpful mechanisms:
Have we adequate
Rewards:
coordinating technologies?
Do all needed tasks
Like budgeting, planning &
have incentives?
control, and management
information

29
Organizational Fit

• How the organization fits within its environment


• Compatibility with customers, government, union

• How the individual fits with in the organization


• Compatibility of individual’s personal values, political
orientation, hobbies, style of dress with other
organizational members

30
The Congruence Model

• Organizationdraws inputs from environment in the


following form
• Capital, raw material, technology and people
• Organization history
• Pattern of employee behavior
• Organizational policies and procedures
• Management’s method for decision making
• The model takes into account the inputs and resulting
output after transformation

31
• The transformation process includes four components:
• Task – job and their inherent characteristics
• Informal organizational structure – social structure
among organizational members including informal
communication, politics and authority structure
• Individual – personal characteristics of employee
such as age, sex, education
• Formal organizational arrangements –
documented managerial and operational structure,
the pay system, the management information
system
• Outputs are the outcomes for the organization, the
work group and the individual.

32
A Change – Based Organizational Framework

• According to Porras and Robertson model, the factors in the


internal organizational environment that shape and guide the
behavior of workers fit into four categories:
• Organizing arrangements – the formal elements that
coordinate the behavior of people and groups in an
organization
• Goals & Strategies
• Structure & administrative policies and procedures
• Administrative system & reward system
• Ownership

33
• Social factors – characteristics of the people in the
organization and their relations
• The culture, management style, interaction
process, informal patterns & networks and
individual attributes
• Physical settings
• The building and locations
• Technology
• Equipments, IT, job design, work flow design,
technical expertise & procedures and technical
systems

34
Thank You

35

You might also like