BS-II Attock-Cherrat
BS-II Attock-Cherrat
BS-II Attock-Cherrat
Location
Attock-Cherrat lies b/w Peshawar basin on
north and Kala Chitta Ranges South; Nizampur
basin to SE
At west of Nizampur Basin; Attock-Cherrat Ranges
merges into Kala Chitta Ranges
Attock-Cherrat Ranges divided into three main
blocks, from north to south;
1. Nothern Block
Khairabad Fault
2. Central Block
Cherrat Fault
3. Southern Block
Stratigraphy
Type Locality
Named after village Maki (330 57’ 00’’ N; 710 58’ 00’’ E)
Lithology
Argillite, slate and Phyllite; of dark grey, thin bedded
Rocks are dark greenish grey or dark grey on fresh surface and olive grey or reddish brown on
weathered surface
Argillite and slates contains two sets of cleaveages; one parallel to bedding and other axial plain
Thickness/Distribution
Distributed in Attock-Cherrat ranges and Ghandghar Ranges
Max thickness 950m
Fossils
Not yet found
Age
Age of Manki Formation is Precambrian based on lithological correlation; equivalent to Hazara
Formation
Contact
Lower: not exposed
Upper: conformable with Shakot Bala Formation
2. Shakot Bala Formation
Tahirkheli 1970, Shakot Bala Formation
Type Locality
Village Shakot Bala (330 51’ 00’’ N; 710 52’ 00’’ E), well developed between Shakot Bala and
Shakhi Nala
Lithology
Limestone and Argillite
Limestone is cherty, yellowish grey and hard at the base, in upper part is thin bedded having
stromatolites
Argillite is dark and greenish grey
Thickness/Distribution
Exposed in the Attock-Cherrat Range and Ghandghar Range
About 300m thick
Fossils
Not well documented but bryozoans can be found
Age
Precambrian
Contact
Lower: conformable with Manki Formation
Upper: conformable with Utch-Khattak Limestone
3. Utch Khattak Limstone
Tahirkheli 1970, Khattak limestone
Hussain 1983, Utch Khattak Formation
SCP called it as Utch Khattak Limestone
Type Locality
Located at 330 54’ 00’’ N; 710 48’ 00’’ E
Lithology
Limestone and shale
Limestone is thin to thick bedded, lower part of limestone is grey, thin bedded at places contains
stromatolites
Shale is dark greenish grey, to brown, thinnly laminated
Thickness/Distribution
Well distributed in Attock-Cherrat and Ghandghar Range
Total thickness 200-250m and max thickness recorded at Shekhai Nala
Fossils
Not documented
Age
The age by 87Sr/86Sr ratio is to be Late-Precambrian
Contact
Lower: conformable with Shakot Bala Formation
Upper: conformable with Shekhai Formation
4. Shekhai Formation
Hussain and Yeats 1987, Shekhai Formation
Type Locality
Shekhai in Cherrat Range (330 53’ 00’’ N; 710 55’ 00’’ E)
Lithology
Largely limestone and Marble interbeds with lesser amount of quartzite, dolomite and shale
Limestone varies in colour, from grey, light brown to pink, thin to massive bedded, locally oolitic
Ghanghar Range; patches of white brecciated of marble accociated with igneous dykes, suggest local
thermal metamorphism of limestone
Fossils
Not yet reported
Age
Late-Precambrina
Contact
Lower: conformable with Utch-Khattak Formation in Cherrat, by Hussain and Yeasts 1987 while
Pouge et al 1999 suggested that it is unconformable with Utch-Khattak Formation
at Ghandghar Range it is unconformable with Manki Formation
Upper: Faulted with Dakhner Formation
at Ghandghar Range unconformable with Tanol Formation
5. Dakhner Formation
Wynne 1873, Attock Slates
Tahirkheli 1970, Attock Formation
Hussain and Yeats 1987, Dakhner Formation
Type Locality
Dakhner Formation after Village
Lithology
Sandstone, argillite and limestone
Sandstone and argillite are grey to greenish grey, sandstone having thick to massive bedded having
ripple marks
At one place dolomite dyke is observed
Thickness/Distribution
Distributed in Attock-Cherrat ranges, thickness reported from here is about 1000m
Fossils
Not reported
Age
Precambrian
Contact
Lower: Faulted with Shekhai Formation
Upper: Faulted with Darwazai Formation
6. Darwazai Formation
Darwazai first used by Tahirkheli et al 1970
Type Locality
Type near Darwazai Village (300 49’ 00’’ N; 720 14’ 00’’ E)
Lithology
Limestone and dolomite; are cream in colour and are overlain by argillite
Thickness/Distribution
Older sequence in the southern block
Fossils
Not yet reported
Age
Cambrian
Contact
Lower: may be faulted with Dakhner Formation
Upper: conformable with Hissartang Formation
7. Hissartang Formation
First term used by Tahirkheli 1970; Hissartang Formation with two members
Nasir and Shafiq 1980, called this two member as Hissartang Group
Later Hussain 1984, differentiate the upper of the group as Inzari Limestone and Lower one as
Hissartang Formation
Type Locality
Hissartang Village, southern foothills of Attock-Cherrat ranges (300 50’ 00’’ N; 720 10’ 00’’ E)
Lithology
Quartzite with argillite beds in the middle
Quartzite; white to grey, fine grained, contains impression of worm burrows
Argillite; dark grey to black, laminated
Thickness/Distribution
In Attock-Cherrat Ranges; thickness about 650m
Fossils
Not reported yet
Age
Middle Ordovician
Contact
Lower: conformable with Darwazai Foramtion
Upper: conformable with Inzari Limestone
8. Inzari Limestone
Tahirkheli 1970, member of Hissartang Formation
Nasir and Shafiq, included it in Hissartang Group
Hussain 1984, Place it in separate Formation
Type Locality
Name after Inzari Village in the southern faulted block of Attock-Cherrat
Lithology
Limestone; thin bedded, yellowish to greenish grey and crystalline, stylolites
are common
Fossils
Not yet reported
Age
Hussain et al 1990, Early Devonian
Contact
Lower: conformable with Hissartang Formation
Upper: Upper faulted contact, at some localities is overlain by Hangu
Formation