The document analyzes liability for damage caused by animals under tort law. It discusses three heads of liability: the scienter rule, cattle trespass, and ordinary liability in tort. The scienter rule imposed strict liability for harm directly caused by an animal to a person. Cattle trespass refers to when cattle stray from one's land onto another's. Ordinary liability in tort examines when an animal's actions could lead to other types of liabilities involving scienter, such as unreasonable interference. Liability may arise from general tort principles based on negligence or notions of strict liability.
The document analyzes liability for damage caused by animals under tort law. It discusses three heads of liability: the scienter rule, cattle trespass, and ordinary liability in tort. The scienter rule imposed strict liability for harm directly caused by an animal to a person. Cattle trespass refers to when cattle stray from one's land onto another's. Ordinary liability in tort examines when an animal's actions could lead to other types of liabilities involving scienter, such as unreasonable interference. Liability may arise from general tort principles based on negligence or notions of strict liability.
The document analyzes liability for damage caused by animals under tort law. It discusses three heads of liability: the scienter rule, cattle trespass, and ordinary liability in tort. The scienter rule imposed strict liability for harm directly caused by an animal to a person. Cattle trespass refers to when cattle stray from one's land onto another's. Ordinary liability in tort examines when an animal's actions could lead to other types of liabilities involving scienter, such as unreasonable interference. Liability may arise from general tort principles based on negligence or notions of strict liability.
The document analyzes liability for damage caused by animals under tort law. It discusses three heads of liability: the scienter rule, cattle trespass, and ordinary liability in tort. The scienter rule imposed strict liability for harm directly caused by an animal to a person. Cattle trespass refers to when cattle stray from one's land onto another's. Ordinary liability in tort examines when an animal's actions could lead to other types of liabilities involving scienter, such as unreasonable interference. Liability may arise from general tort principles based on negligence or notions of strict liability.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 10
FACULTY: Ms.
Shruti Kaakar “ CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF TORTS CLAIM ON LIABILITY FOR ANIMALS. Liability for animals
People who keep animals whether they are
dangerous or non-dangerous animals are under a duty of care to prevent harm to other people by their animals. Includes:
The liability for the damage done by animals can
be studied under the following three heads : • SCIENTER RULE. • CATTLE TRESPASS. • ORDINARY LIABILITY IN TORT. SCIENTER RULE
The scienter action is a category within tort
law in some common law jurisdictions that deals with the damage done by an animal directly to a human. It had a long history in English law until it was abolished by the Animals Act 1971. (a) Liability for keeping animals “ferae naturae” Ferae naturae is a Latin word which means, of a wild nature. A qualified property in such animals might be acquired by taking or taming them or while they are on one's estate. Other examples taken from cases: bees, rats, foxes bears and wild geese.
(b) Liability for keeping “mansuetae naturae”
Mansuetae naturae is a Latin term meaning animals which are generally domestic, presumed gentle and readily tamed. For example, dogs, cats, cows and horses. CATTLE TRESPASS At the very outset a distinction must be made between Cattle Trespass on the one hand and the personal trespass which one may commit through the medium of one's animals. If, for example, my cattle stray from my land and go onto the land of another, this is properly called cattle trespass. ORDINARY LIABILITY IN TORT: The activities that animals engage in can lead to other kinds of liabilities that may involve scienter. For instance, an animal’s owner may have scienter if he keeps his animal is such a manner that it unreasonably interferes with his neighbour’s enjoyment of his property. CONCLUSION First, in so far as liability may arise under the general principles of tort it may be based either on the fault concept (Negligence, Trespass to Person, etc.) or it may be based on notions of strict liability. Second, the scienter rule when it applies imposes strict liability on the keeper of the animal. Similarly, strict liability arises by statute for injury done by dogs to cattle. Third, the law imposes strict liability for cattle trespass. And fourth, the law confers immunity on the owner of cattle which cause injury while straying on a public highway. Thank you