Palm Oil (Recent News)

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Recent News

Need to Tackle the Trust Deficit


 This article discusses the European Commission’s decision to phase out palm oil biofuels. The decision is based on
the high carbon footprint of palm oil production.
 The European directive is to bring about good behavioural change in the palm oil industry.
 The article further discusses the conferences and previous instances in which the palm oil industry has been
criticized for its impact on the environment, as well as research findings which incriminate the industry for its carbon
footprint, and thus its contribution towards climate change.
Malaysia, Indonesia join forces to protest EU directive 2018/2001
This article highlights the partnership between Malaysia and Indonesia in objecting the
Delegated Regulation Supplementing Directive 2018/2001 of the European Union Renewable
Energy Directive II.
Malaysian authorities argue that the law discriminates against palm oil-produced biofuels as
compared to other oil crops, without scientific data or reliable information to back up the
decision.
Walk the Talk on Sustainability
This article stresses on the need to ensure that the palm oil industry is sustainable to the
environment in order to reduce the stigma from the Western world.
Statistics show that the palm oil industry has been highly responsible for deforestation,
leading to loss of tree cover, and wildlife deaths.
• Most of the recent articles regarding palm oil point to the decision of the
European Union to phase out palm oil.
• The Delegated Regulation Supplementing Directive 2018/2001 of the European
Union Renewable Energy Directive II was drafted because Western authorities
claim that the palm oil industry leaves a high carbon footprint, contributing
significantly towards climate change, and is therefore unsustainable in the long
run.
• Local authorities, however, rebut that the palm oil industry is no more harmful to
the environment as compared to other oil crops, and that this directive is nothing
more than a ploy to cripple the economy of palm oil-producing countries, while at
the same time boosting the demand for their own crops.
• Regardless of the basis of the claims from either party, it is undeniable that the
palm oil industry has been responsible for a significant volume of deforestation in
Malaysia alone.
• Significant and immediate action has to be taken in order to convince the wider
world to accept palm oil as the better alternative in all aspects, and thus reverse
the decision by the European Union. Failing that, the palm oil industry looks to be
bleak for the foreseeable future.

You might also like