Analysis of Algorithms

CS 477/677

Sorting – Part A
Instructor: George Bebis

(Chapter 2)
 The Sorting Problem

• Input:

– A sequence of n numbers a1, a2, . . . , an

• Output:

– A permutation (reordering) a1’, a2’, . . . , an’ of the input

sequence such that a1’ ≤ a2’ ≤ · · · ≤ an’

2
Structure of data

3
 Why Study Sorting Algorithms?
• There are a variety of situations that we can
encounter
– Do we have randomly ordered keys?
– Are all keys distinct?
– How large is the set of keys to be ordered?
– Need guaranteed performance?

• Various algorithms are better suited to some of

these situations

4
 Some Definitions
• Internal Sort
– The data to be sorted is all stored in the computer’s
main memory.
• External Sort
– Some of the data to be sorted might be stored in
some external, slower, device.
• In Place Sort
– The amount of extra space required to sort the data is
constant with the input size.

5
 Stability
• A STABLE sort preserves relative order of records with
equal keys
Sorted on first key:

Sort file on second key:

Records with key value

3 are not in order on
first key!!

6
 Insertion Sort
• Idea: like sorting a hand of playing cards
– Start with an empty left hand and the cards facing
down on the table.
– Remove one card at a time from the table, and insert
it into the correct position in the left hand
• compare it with each of the cards already in the hand, from
right to left
– The cards held in the left hand are sorted
• these cards were originally the top cards of the pile on the
table

7
Insertion Sort

To insert 12, we need to

make room for it by moving
first 36 and then 24.

8
Insertion Sort

9
Insertion Sort

10
 Insertion Sort

input array

5 2 4 6 1 3

at each iteration, the array is divided in two sub-arrays:

left sub-array right sub-array

sorted unsorted

11
Insertion Sort

12
 INSERTION-SORT
Alg.: INSERTION-SORT(A) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

for j ← 2 to n a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6 a7 a8

do key ← A[ j ] key
Insert A[ j ] into the sorted sequence A[1 . . j -1]
i←j-1
while i > 0 and A[i] > key
do A[i + 1] ← A[i]
i←i–1
A[i + 1] ← key
• Insertion sort – sorts the elements in place
13
 Loop Invariant for Insertion Sort

Alg.: INSERTION-SORT(A)
for j ← 2 to n
do key ← A[ j ]
Insert A[ j ] into the sorted sequence A[1 . . j -1]

i←j-1
while i > 0 and A[i] > key
do A[i + 1] ← A[i]
i←i–1
A[i + 1] ← key

Invariant: at the start of the for loop the elements in A[1 . . j-1]
are in sorted order
14
 Proving Loop Invariants
• Proving loop invariants works like induction
• Initialization (base case):
– It is true prior to the first iteration of the loop
• Maintenance (inductive step):
– If it is true before an iteration of the loop, it remains true before
the next iteration
• Termination:
– When the loop terminates, the invariant gives us a useful
property that helps show that the algorithm is correct
– Stop the induction when the loop terminates

15
 Loop Invariant for Insertion Sort
• Initialization:
– Just before the first iteration, j = 2:
the subarray A[1 . . j-1] = A[1],
(the element originally in A[1]) – is
sorted

16
 Loop Invariant for Insertion Sort
• Maintenance:
– the while inner loop moves A[j -1], A[j -2], A[j -3],
and so on, by one position to the right until the proper
position for key (which has the value that started out in
A[j]) is found
– At that point, the value of key is placed into this
position.

17
 Loop Invariant for Insertion Sort
• Termination:
– The outer for loop ends when j = n + 1  j-1 = n
– Replace n with j-1 in the loop invariant:
• the subarray A[1 . . n] consists of the elements originally in
A[1 . . n], but in sorted order
j-1 j

• The entire array is sorted!

Invariant: at the start of the for loop the elements in A[1 . . j-1]
are in sorted order
18
 Analysis of Insertion Sort
INSERTION-SORT(A) cost times
for j ← 2 to n c1 n
do key ← A[ j ] c2 n-1
Insert A[ j ] into the sorted sequence A[1 . . j -1] 0 n-1
i←j-1 c4 n-1

n
while i > 0 and A[i] > key c5 j 2 j
t
c6 
n
do A[i + 1] ← A[i] j 2
(t j  1)
c7 
n
i←i–1 j 2
(t j  1)
A[i + 1] ← key c8 n-1
tj: # of times the while statement is executed at iteration j

T (n)  c1n  c2 (n  1)  c4 (n  1)  c5  t j  c6  t j  1  c7  t j  1  c8 (n  1)
n n n

j 2 j 2 j 2
19
 Best Case Analysis
• The array is already sorted “while i > 0 and A[i] > key”
– A[i] ≤ key upon the first time the while loop test is run
(when i = j -1)

– tj = 1

• T(n) = c1n + c2(n -1) + c4(n -1) + c5(n -1) + c8(n-1)

= (c1 + c2 + c4 + c5 + c8)n + (c2 + c4 + c5 + c8)

= an + b = (n)
T (n)  c1n  c2 (n  1)  c4 (n  1)  c5  t j  c6  t j  1  c7  t j  1  c8 (n  1)
n n n

j 2 j 2 j 2
20
 Worst Case Analysis
• The array is in reverse sorted order“while i > 0 and A[i] > key”
– Always A[i] > key in while loop test
– Have to compare key with all elements to the left of the j-th
position  compare with j-1 elements  tj = j
n
n(n  1) n
n(n  1) n
n(n  1)
using 
j 1
j
2
  j 
j 2 2
 1   ( j 1) 
j 2 2
we have:

 n(n  1)  n( n  1) n(n  1)
T (n )  c1n  c2 (n  1)  c4 (n  1)  c5   1  c6  c7  c8 (n  1)
 2  2 2

 an 2  bn  c a quadratic function of n

• T(n) = (n2) order of growth in n2

T (n)  c1n  c2 (n  1)  c4 (n  1)  c5  t j  c6  t j  1  c7  t j  1  c8 (n  1)
n n n

j 2 j 2 j 2 21
 Comparisons and Exchanges in
Insertion Sort
INSERTION-SORT(A) cost times
for j ← 2 to n c1 n
do key ← A[ j ] c2 n-1
Insert A[ j ] into the sorted sequence A[1 . . j -1] 0 n-1
i←j-1  n2/2 comparisons c4 n-1
c5 
n
while i > 0 and A[i] > key j 2 j
t

c6 
n
do A[i + 1] ← A[i] j 2
(t j  1)

 n2/2 exchanges c7 
n
i←i–1 j 2
(t j  1)

A[i + 1] ← key c8 n-1

22
 Insertion Sort - Summary
• Advantages
– Good running time for “almost sorted” arrays (n)
• Disadvantages
– (n2) running time in worst and average case
–  n2/2 comparisons and exchanges

23
 Bubble Sort (Ex. 2-2, page 38)
• Idea:
– Repeatedly pass through the array
– Swaps adjacent elements that are out of order

i
1 2 3 n

8 4 6 9 2 3 1
j

• Easier to implement, but slower than Insertion

sort

24
 Example
8 4 6 9 2 3 1 1 8 4 6 9 2 3
i=1 j i=2 j

8 4 6 9 2 1 3 1 2 8 4 6 9 3
i=1 j i=3 j

8 4 6 9 1 2 3 1 2 3 8 4 6 9
i=1 j i=4 j

8 4 6 1 9 2 3 1 2 3 4 8 6 9
i=1 j i=5 j

8 4 1 6 9 2 3 1 2 3 4 6 8 9
i=1 j i=6 j

8 1 4 6 9 2 3 1 2 3 4 6 8 9
i=1 j i=7
j
1 8 4 6 9 2 3
25
i=1 j
 Bubble Sort
Alg.: BUBBLESORT(A)
for i  1 to length[A]
do for j  length[A] downto i + 1
do if A[j] < A[j -1]
then exchange A[j]  A[j-1]
i
8 4 6 9 2 3 1
i=1 j

26
 Bubble-Sort Running Time
Alg.: BUBBLESORT(A)
for i  1 to length[A] c1
do for j  length[A] downto i + 1 c2
Comparisons:  n2/2 do if A[j] < A[j -1] c3
Exchanges:  n2/2
then exchange A[j]  A[j-1] c4
n

 (n  i )
n n
T(n) = c1(n+1) + c2  (n  i  1)  c3  (n  i )  c4
i 1 i 1 i 1
n

= (n) + (c2 + c2 + c4)  (n  i )

i 1
n n n
n( n  1) n 2
n
where  (n  i)  n   i  n 
2
 
i 1 i 1 i 1 2 2 2
Thus,T(n) = (n2)
27
Selection Sort (Ex. 2.2-2, page 27)
• Idea:
– Find the smallest element in the array
– Exchange it with the element in the first position
– Find the second smallest element and exchange it with
the element in the second position
– Continue until the array is sorted
• Disadvantage:
– Running time depends only slightly on the amount of
order in the file

28
 Example
8 4 6 9 2 3 1 1 2 3 4 9 6 8

1 4 6 9 2 3 8 1 2 3 4 6 9 8

1 2 6 9 4 3 8 1 2 3 4 6 8 9

1 2 3 9 4 6 8 1 2 3 4 6 8 9

29
 Selection Sort
Alg.: SELECTION-SORT(A)
n ← length[A] 8 4 6 9 2 3 1

for j ← 1 to n - 1
do smallest ← j
for i ← j + 1 to n
do if A[i] < A[smallest]
then smallest ← i
exchange A[j] ↔ A[smallest]

30
 Analysis of Selection Sort
Alg.: SELECTION-SORT(A) cost times
n ← length[A] c1 1
for j ← 1 to n - 1 c2 n
do smallest ← j c3 n-1
n2/2 for i ← j + 1 to n c4 nj11 (n  j  1)
comparisons
do if A[i] < A[smallest] c5 
n 1
j 1
(n  j )
n
exchanges then smallest ← i c6 
n 1
j 1
(n  j )

exchange A[j] ↔ A[smallest] c7 n-1

n 1 n 1 n 1
T (n)  c1  c2 n  c3 (n  1)  c4  (n  j  1)  c5   n  j   c6   n  j   c7 (n  1)  (n 2 ) 31
j 1 j 1 j 2