+
William Stallings
Computer Organization
and Architecture
9th Edition
+
Chapter 4
Cache Memory
Key Characteristics of Computer
Memory Systems
Table 4.1 Key Characteristics of Computer Memory Systems
+
Characteristics of Memory
Systems
Location
Refers to whether memory is internal and external to the computer
Internal memory is often equated with main memory
Processor requires its own local memory, in the form of registers
Cache is another form of internal memory
External memory consists of peripheral storage devices that are
accessible to the processor via I/O controllers
Capacity
Memory is typically expressed in terms of bytes
Unit of transfer
For internal memory the unit of transfer is equal to the number of
electrical lines into and out of the memory module
Method of Accessing Units of Data
Sequential Direct Random
Associative
access access access
Each addressable A word is retrieved
Memory is organized into
Involves a shared read- location in memory has a based on a portion of its
units of data called
write mechanism unique, physically wired- contents rather than its
records
in addressing mechanism address
Each location has its own
The time to access a
Individual blocks or addressing mechanism
Access must be made in given location is
records have a unique and retrieval time is
a specific linear independent of the
address based on constant independent of
sequence sequence of prior
physical location location or prior access
accesses and is constant
patterns
Any location can be
Cache memories may
selected at random and
Access time is variable Access time is variable employ associative
directly addressed and
access
accessed
Main memory and some
cache systems are
random access
Capacity and Performance:
The two most important characteristics of
memory
Three performance parameters are used:
Memory cycle time
Access time (latency) Transfer rate
•Access time plus any additional
•For random-access memory it is the time required before second •The rate at which data can be
time it takes to perform a read or access can commence transferred into or out of a memory
write operation •Additional time may be required unit
•For non-random-access memory it for transients to die out on signal •For random-access memory it is
is the time it takes to position the lines or to regenerate data if they equal to 1/(cycle time)
read-write mechanism at the are read destructively
desired location •Concerned with the system bus,
not the processor
+ Memory
The most common forms are:
Semiconductor memory
Magnetic surface memory
Optical
Magneto-optical
Several physical characteristics of data storage are important:
Volatile memory
Information decays naturally or is lost when electrical power is switched off
Nonvolatile memory
Once recorded, information remains without deterioration until deliberately changed
No electrical power is needed to retain information
Magnetic-surface memories
Are nonvolatile
Semiconductor memory
May be either volatile or nonvolatile
Nonerasable memory
Cannot be altered, except by destroying the storage unit
Semiconductor memory of this type is known as read-only memory (ROM)
For random-access memory the organization is a key design issue
Organization refers to the physical arrangement of bits to form words
+
Memory Hierarchy
Design constraints on a computer’s memory can be summed
up by three questions:
How much, how fast, how expensive
There is a trade-off among capacity, access time, and cost
Faster access time, greater cost per bit
Greater capacity, smaller cost per bit
Greater capacity, slower access time
The way out of the memory dilemma is not to rely on a single
memory component or technology, but to employ a memory
hierarchy
+ Memory Hierarchy - Diagram
Cache and Main Memory
Cache/Main Memory Structure
Cache Read
Operation
+
Typical Cache Organization
Elements of Cache Design
Table 4.2 Elements of Cache Design
+
Cache Addresses
Virtual Memory
Virtual memory
Facility that allows programs to address memory from a logical
point of view, without regard to the amount of main memory
physically available
When used, the address fields of machine instructions contain
virtual addresses
For reads to and writes from main memory, a hardware memory
management unit (MMU) translates each virtual address into a
physical address in main memory
+
Logical
and
Physical
Caches
Table 4.3
Cache
Sizes of
Some
Processors
a Two values
separated by a
slash refer to
instruction and
data caches.
b Both caches are
instruction only; no
data caches.
Mapping Function
Because there are fewer cache lines than main memory
blocks, an algorithm is needed for mapping main memory
blocks into cache lines
Three techniques can be used:
Direct Associative Set Associative
• The simplest technique • Permits each main • A compromise that
• Maps each block of main memory block to be exhibits the strengths of
memory into only one loaded into any line of the both the direct and
possible cache line cache associative approaches
while reducing their
• The cache control logic disadvantages
interprets a memory
address simply as a Tag
and a Word field
• To determine whether a
block is in the cache, the
cache control logic must
simultaneously examine
every line’s Tag for a
match
+
Direct
Mapping
Direct Mapping Cache Organization
+
Direct
Mapping
Example
+
Direct Mapping Summary
Address length = (s + w) bits
Number of addressable units = 2s+w words or bytes
Block size = line size = 2w words or bytes
Number of blocks in main memory = 2s+ w/2w = 2s
Number of lines in cache = m = 2r
Size of tag = (s – r) bits
+
Victim Cache
Originally proposed as an approach to reduce the conflict
misses of direct mapped caches without affecting its fast
access time
Fully associative cache
Typical size is 4 to 16 cache lines
Residing between direct mapped L1 cache and the next level
of memory
Fully Associative Cache Organization
+
Associative
Mapping
Example
+
Associative Mapping Summary
Address length = (s + w) bits
Number of addressable units = 2s+w words or bytes
Block size = line size = 2w words or bytes
Number of blocks in main memory = 2s+ w/2w = 2s
Number of lines in cache = undetermined
Size of tag = s bits
+
Set Associative Mapping
Compromise that exhibits the strengths of both the direct and
associative approaches while reducing their disadvantages
Cache consists of a number of sets
Each set contains a number of lines
A given block maps to any line in a given set
e.g. 2 lines per set
2 way associative mapping
A given block can be in one of 2 lines in only one set
+
Mapping From
Main Memory
to Cache:
k-Way
Set Associative
k-Way
Set
Associative
Cache
Organization
+
Set Associative Mapping Summary
Address length = (s + w) bits
Number of addressable units = 2s+w words or bytes
Block size = line size = 2w words or bytes
Number of blocks in main memory = 2s+w/2w=2s
Number of lines in set = k
Number of sets = v = 2d
Number of lines in cache = m=kv = k * 2d
Size of cache = k * 2d+w words or bytes
Size of tag = (s – d) bits
+
Varying Associativity Over Cache Size
+
Replacement Algorithms
Once the cache has been filled, when a new block is brought
into the cache, one of the existing blocks must be replaced
For direct mapping there is only one possible line for any
particular block and no choice is possible
For the associative and set-associative techniques a
replacement algorithm is needed
To achieve high speed, an algorithm must be implemented in
hardware
+
The four most common
replacement algorithms are:
Least recently used (LRU)
Most effective
Replace that block in the set that has been in the cache longest with
no reference to it
Because of its simplicity of implementation, LRU is the most popular
replacement algorithm
First-in-first-out (FIFO)
Replace that block in the set that has been in the cache longest
Easily implemented as a round-robin or circular buffer technique
Least frequently used (LFU)
Replace that block in the set that has experienced the fewest
references
Could be implemented by associating a counter with each line
Write Policy
When a block that is resident in
There are two problems to
the cache is to be replaced
contend with:
there are two cases to consider:
If the old block in the cache has not been
altered then it may be overwritten with a More than one device may have access to
new block without first writing out the old main memory
block
If at least one write operation has been A more complex problem occurs when
performed on a word in that line of the multiple processors are attached to the
cache then main memory must be same bus and each processor has its own
updated by writing the line of cache out local cache - if a word is altered in one
to the block of memory before bringing cache it could conceivably invalidate a
in the new block word in other caches
+
Write Through
and Write Back
Write through
Simplest technique
All write operations are made to main memory as well as to the cache
The main disadvantage of this technique is that it generates substantial
memory traffic and may create a bottleneck
Write back
Minimizes memory writes
Updates are made only in the cache
Portions of main memory are invalid and hence accesses by I/O
modules can be allowed only through the cache
This makes for complex circuitry and a potential bottleneck
Line Size
When a block of Two specific effects
data is retrieved come into play:
and placed in the • Larger blocks reduce the
cache not only the As the block size number of blocks that fit into
desired word but increases more a cache
also some number useful data are • As a block becomes larger
each additional word is
of adjacent words brought into the farther from the requested
are retrieved cache word
As the block size The hit ratio will
increases the hit begin to decrease
ratio will at first as the block
increase because becomes bigger
of the principle of and the probability
locality of using the newly
fetched
information
becomes less than
the probability of
reusing the
information that
has to be replaced
+
Multilevel Caches
As logic density has increased it has become possible to have a cache
on the same chip as the processor
The on-chip cache reduces the processor’s external bus activity and
speeds up execution time and increases overall system performance
When the requested instruction or data is found in the on-chip cache, the bus
access is eliminated
On-chip cache accesses will complete appreciably faster than would even
zero-wait state bus cycles
During this period the bus is free to support other transfers
Two-level cache:
Internal cache designated as level 1 (L1)
External cache designated as level 2 (L2)
Potential savings due to the use of an L2 cache depends on the hit rates
in both the L1 and L2 caches
The use of multilevel caches complicates all of the design issues related
to caches, including size, replacement algorithm, and write policy
Hit Ratio (L1 & L2)
For 8 Kbyte and 16 Kbyte L1
+
Unified Versus Split Caches
Has become common to split cache:
One dedicated to instructions
One dedicated to data
Both exist at the same level, typically as two L1 caches
Advantages of unified cache:
Higher hit rate
Balances load of instruction and data fetches automatically
Only one cache needs to be designed and implemented
Trend is toward split caches at the L1 and unified caches for
higher levels
Advantages of split cache:
Eliminates cache contention between instruction fetch/decode unit
and execution unit
Important in pipelining
Pentium
4
Cache
Table 4.4 Intel Cache Evolution
Pentium 4 Block Diagram
Pentium 4 Cache Operating Modes
Note: CD = 0; NW = 1 is an invalid combination.
Table 4.5 Pentium 4 Cache Operating Modes
ARM Cache Features
Table 4.6 ARM Cache Features
ARM Cache and Write Buffer Organization
+ Summary Cache
Memory
Chapter 4
Elements of cache design
Characteristics of Memory
Cache addresses
Systems
Cache size
Location
Mapping function
Capacity
Replacement algorithms
Unit of transfer
Write policy
Memory Hierarchy Line size
How much? Number of caches
How fast?
Pentium 4 cache organization
How expensive?
Cache memory principles ARM cache organization