The document discusses results from an experimental study on reinforced concrete beams. It examines the behavior of beams reinforced with 100% GFRP bars, 100% steel bars, and a hybrid of steel and GFRP bars. Load-deflection curves and crack patterns are presented for each group. It was found that beams with 100% GFRP reinforcement failed in crushing, while those with 100% steel bars failed in shear. Hybrid beams exhibited crushing failure at higher loads than beams with GFRP stirrups. Data on load at first crack and ultimate load is also presented.
The document discusses results from an experimental study on reinforced concrete beams. It examines the behavior of beams reinforced with 100% GFRP bars, 100% steel bars, and a hybrid of steel and GFRP bars. Load-deflection curves and crack patterns are presented for each group. It was found that beams with 100% GFRP reinforcement failed in crushing, while those with 100% steel bars failed in shear. Hybrid beams exhibited crushing failure at higher loads than beams with GFRP stirrups. Data on load at first crack and ultimate load is also presented.
The document discusses results from an experimental study on reinforced concrete beams. It examines the behavior of beams reinforced with 100% GFRP bars, 100% steel bars, and a hybrid of steel and GFRP bars. Load-deflection curves and crack patterns are presented for each group. It was found that beams with 100% GFRP reinforcement failed in crushing, while those with 100% steel bars failed in shear. Hybrid beams exhibited crushing failure at higher loads than beams with GFRP stirrups. Data on load at first crack and ultimate load is also presented.
The document discusses results from an experimental study on reinforced concrete beams. It examines the behavior of beams reinforced with 100% GFRP bars, 100% steel bars, and a hybrid of steel and GFRP bars. Load-deflection curves and crack patterns are presented for each group. It was found that beams with 100% GFRP reinforcement failed in crushing, while those with 100% steel bars failed in shear. Hybrid beams exhibited crushing failure at higher loads than beams with GFRP stirrups. Data on load at first crack and ultimate load is also presented.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 19
GFRP Bars
Dr R N KRISHNA Ph.D (Civil Engineering)
Reinforcement Caging
Dr R N KRISHNA Ph.D (Civil Engineering)
Reinforcement detailling:
Dr R N KRISHNA Ph.D (Civil Engineering)
Dr R N KRISHNA Ph.D (Civil Engineering) Loading pattern
Dr R N KRISHNA Ph.D (Civil Engineering)
Crack Pattern Observed in 100% Steel and GFRP Rebar
Dr R N KRISHNA Ph.D (Civil Engineering)
Load versus Deflection Curve for 100% GFRP and Steel reinforced beam
Dr R N KRISHNA Ph.D (Civil Engineering)
Load versus Deflection Curve for 100% steel and Hybrid beam
Dr R N KRISHNA Ph.D (Civil Engineering)
Load versus Deflection Curve for 100% steel and Hybrid beam (with GFRP as Stirrups)
Dr R N KRISHNA Ph.D (Civil Engineering)
Deflection along length of beam at 175KN
Dr R N KRISHNA Ph.D (Civil Engineering)
S.NO SPECIMEN LOAD AT WHICH ULTIMATE LOAD IN TYPE OF FAILURE INITIAL CRACK OCCURS (KN) IN (KN) 1. G1 BEAM 72.5 212.5 CRUSHING FAILURE
2. G2 BEAM 79.3 223.5 CRUSHING FAILURE
3. S1 BEAM 121.5 195.7 SHEAR FAILURE
4. S2 BEAM 118.8 181.7 SHEAR FAILURE
5. S3 BEAM 116.3 188.7 SHEAR FAILURE
6. H1 BEAM 47.8 208.3 CRUSHING FAILURE
7. H2 BEAM 63.8 177.4 CRUSHING FAILURE
8. H3 BEAM 48.5 166.7 CRUSHING FAILURE
9. H4 BEAM 72.8 177.9 SHEAR FAILURE
10 THEORITICAL ------- 158.68 -------
VALUE
Dr R N KRISHNA Ph.D (Civil Engineering)
Two Point loading test
Dr R N KRISHNA Ph.D (Civil Engineering)
Dr R N KRISHNA Ph.D (Civil Engineering) Dr R N KRISHNA Ph.D (Civil Engineering) Dr R N KRISHNA Ph.D (Civil Engineering) Dr R N KRISHNA Ph.D (Civil Engineering) Dr R N KRISHNA Ph.D (Civil Engineering) Dr R N KRISHNA Ph.D (Civil Engineering) Dr R N KRISHNA Ph.D (Civil Engineering)