In Engineering, Applied Science and Technology: International Conference On Frontiers
In Engineering, Applied Science and Technology: International Conference On Frontiers
In Engineering, Applied Science and Technology: International Conference On Frontiers
• The element deflects until such time that the strain energy of the element is developed sufficiently to
balance the kinetic energy produced by the blast load.
• A structural element subjected to a blast loading exhibits a higher strength than a similar element
subjected to a static loading.
• Increase in strength for both the concrete and reinforcement is attributed to the rapid rates of Strain
that occur in dynamically loaded members.
• These dynamic strengths are used to calculate the element's dynamic resistance to the applied blast
load.
PROBLEM DISCRIPTION
Load Details:
An interior roof beam was assumed on
which a over head blast load of charge
131.5 kg is subjected
Figure 1 shows the pressure and time curve
of the blast load.
Positive peek pressure - 18 Psi (124.1
KN/m2)
Negative peek pressure - 2 Psi (13.8
KN/m2)
Design Details:
Concrete and steel exhibits higher strength in dynamic loading so yield strength of the material were
increased by use of a dynamic increase factor. So according to UFC3 340 02 Table 4-1 dynamic increase
factors were found-
Steel- Concrete-
Bending - 1.17 Compression - 1.19
Direct Shear - 1.1 Direct Shear - 1.1
Diagonal Tension - 1
Fe 415 and M80 grade of steel and concrete was assumed for design. Following material properties
were assigned to concrete and steel elements in modelling of reinforced concrete beam.
14
12
10
Stress (MPa)
0
0
0.122
0.471
0.584
1.17
1.64
2.1
2.57
2.92
3.27
3.5
3.8
4.2
4.55
5.13
5.37
5.84
Time (ms)
Equivalent Stress Shear Stress
Equivalent Elastic Strain, Maximum Shear Strain and Internal Energy
CONCLUSION
After the analysis and detail study of the results of the beam following points were concluded-
The designed beam have much capability to resist the blast load. High strength concrete used in
this beam imparts greater compressive strength against the blast loading and tensile strength
made the resistance over the erosion of the concrete.
From the results it was also seen that the concrete resist most of the load and absorb much
energy coming from the blast load, very least amount of energy or load was transferred to the
reinforcement of the beam.
High performance concrete also made the beam section safe in shear but minimum area of steel
for stirrups were provided for long term stability, fatigue and creep behaviour of the beam.
REFERENCES
[1]B.M. Luccioni, R.D. Ambrosini, R.F. Danesi, Analysis of building collapse under blast loads.
[2]Na-Hyun Yi, Jang-Ho Jay Kim, Tong-Seok, Yun-Gu Cho, Jang Hwa Lee, Blast resistance characteristics of ultra-high
strength concrete and reactive powder concrete.
[3]T. Ngo, P. Mendis, A. Gupta & J. Ramsay, Blast loading and blast effects on structures.
[4]Osman Shallan, Atef Eraky, Tharwat Sakr, Shimaa Emad, Response of building structures to blast effects.
[5]Unified facility criteria (UFC3 340 02),”Structure to resist the effect of accidental explosion.”
[6]Yanchao Shi, Hong Hao, Zhong-Xian Li, Numerical simulation to study the blast wave interaction with structure column.
[7]Ulrika Nystrom, Kent Gylltoft, Numerical studies of the combined effects of blast and fragment loading.
[8]Sarah De Carufel, Frederic Dagenais, Christian Melancon and Hassan Aoude, Effect of Design Parameters on the Blast
Response of Ultra High Performance Concrete Column.
[9]Jun Lia, Hong Haob, Chengqing Wu, Numerical study of precast segmental column under blast loads.
[10]Conrad Kyei, Abass Braimah, Effects of transverse reinforcement spacing on the response of reinforced concrete columns
subjected to blast loading.