Case Study - Gearbox Failure
Case Study - Gearbox Failure
Case Study - Gearbox Failure
18
Before Balancing 8
7
After Balancing
16
6
14
12 5
10 4 M
8 3
6
2
4
1
2
0 0
0 5000 10000 15000 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000
f [cp m] f [cp m]
0.34
0.32
RPM : 1500 (25.00Hz)
0.30 2 M(x) : 539.63 cp m (0.36 Ord e rs)
M(y) : 0.235 g
0.28
D(x) : 12951.00 cp m (8.63 Ord e rs)
0.26 D(y) : 0.022 g
0.24 M
0.22
0.20
4
0.18
3
0.16
0.14
10
0.12
9
0.10 13
0.08 7
6
11 16 19
0.06 14 17 20
12
0.04 2223
15 21 D
0.02 8 18
5
0.00
0 5000 10000 15000 20000
f [cp m]
2.0
M
1.5 D
1.0
0.5
0.0
-0.5
-1.0
-1.5
R PM : 1500 (25.00H z)
M(x) : 5437.50 ms
-2.0 M(y ) : 1.614 g
D (x) : 5548.83 ms
D (y ) : 1.342 g
-2.5
5200 5300 5400 5500 5600 5700 5800 5900
t [ms ]
18
0.35
16
0.30
14
12 0.25
10 0.20
8
0.15
6
0.10
4
0.05
2
0 0.00
0 20000 40000 0 20000 40000
f [cp m] f [cp m]
INTERNATIONAL MACHINE VIBRATION ANALYSIS CONFERENCE | DUBAI, UAE 2017 Slide 13
Conclusion: